Girlfriend Kim - Shepherds Bush

[Sensation1984]

External Link/Members Only

I saw the Sp in April 2019

[Comms]
Called in the afternoon to see if she was available in the evening. I was sent the postcode and was asked to sent a confirmation text an hour before my appointment.

[Location]
About 4 minutes walk from Shepperd's Bush tube station in block of flats

[Looks]
Must be using pictures at least 10 years old
claims to be 30yrs old no chance! closer to 40yrs old
The Sp is a smoker the smell of cigarettes is not good.
Face 4/10
Body 5/10
Breast 5/10

[Price] £100 1hr

[The meet]
The Sp has extras as mentioned in her profile
£60 Massage and BJ
£100 BJ Fk Protected sex

[Fk] Claims in the profile that "Fk is essential to her" The service she provided was pathetic nothing more than pecks to my lips
[Bj] is the only thing the Sp can do right sucks like a pro one of the best around and is the reason I gave a neutral rating
[Sex] Kept fidgeting when I tried to penetrate kept complaining she can't take a pounding she had problems getting my dick inside her.


For £100 there are better looking Sp"s out there I won't be returning as she is not attractive her service apart from the Bj felt robotic.

[last_days_of_logan]

Thanks for the review

i considered seeing her but i will leave it now

also this is a hardcore negative... not a neutral

why did you stay if face and body were not to your liking?

[Sensation1984]

I stayed as I was not thinking with my head
The reason I gave a neutral is because she sucks dick good
If you want just a good Bj it is worth seeing her for £60

[last_days_of_logan]

I stayed as I was not thinking with my head
The reason I gave a neutral is because she sucks dick good
If you want just a good Bj it is worth seeing her for £60

its a negative my punting brother

sucked dick good

vs

bad face
bad body
lieing about age
using dated pics
does not kiss even though profile says she is amazing and it is important to her
fidgeting during sex making it shit

super negative

[Sensation1984]

When you put it like that it looks like a negative
I will try not to be as nice with the rating in future

[last_days_of_logan]

When you put it like that it looks like a negative
I will try not to be as nice with the rating in future

just request that someone changes this rating to a negative

[Sensation1984]

Hi Admin
Can you please change to a Negative?

[Fuzzyduck]

Hi Admin
Can you please change to a Negative?

I'm not admin but I've changed the rating for you. However, something to bear in mind for the future is that "your review, your rating" is a important principle for the posting reviews. Whilst I tend to agree with Logan's opinion, you were swayed and changed your mind pretty quickly. I'm not saying it was a wrong decision to change your mind but perhaps wait a bit longer and take on board a few more opinions.

Thanks for the review. I've contemplated seeing Kim in the past, but off the hotlist now.

[last_days_of_logan]

I'm not admin but I've changed the rating for you. However, something to bear in mind for the future is that "your review, your rating" is a important principle for the posting reviews. Whilst I tend to agree with Logan's opinion, you were swayed and changed your mind pretty quickly. I'm not saying it was a wrong decision to change your mind but perhaps wait a bit longer and take on board a few more opinions.

Thanks for the review. I've contemplated seeing Kim in the past, but off the hotlist now.

you are completely right Fuzzyduck... his review and his rating

i just felt that him being new and thinking this is a neutral might

a) keep him on track to ranking other reviews in the same manner - which personally i dont think helps
b) give this SP a false impression of being decent to neutral on most occasions. when this review i think shows she can be quite bad (especially considering his negative points)

feel free to switch it back to neutral, though i think this would be an easy negative for me personally and on top line stats viewing it puts her in a much better light than she deserves (personally feel she should lose money cause of it and maybe up her game to recover some reputaion. que 3 or 4 positive reviews now from her disciples), you never know maybe her covered oral is out of this world LOL

[Fuzzyduck]

you are completely right Fuzzyduck... his review and his rating

i just felt that him being new and thinking this is a neutral might

a) keep him on track to ranking other reviews in the same manner - which personally i dont think helps
b) give this SP a false impression of being decent to neutral on most occasions. when this review i think shows she can be quite bad (especially considering his negative points)

feel free to switch it back to neutral, though i think this would be an easy negative for me personally and on top line stats viewing it puts her in a much better light than she deserves (personally feel she should lose money cause of it and maybe up her game to recover some reputaion. que 3 or 4 positive reviews now from her disciples), you never know maybe her covered oral is out of this world LOL

No, it's OP's call on whether he'd want to change it back to neutral but, if I were him, I'd stick with where it is. Otherwise he starts looking flaky.

FWIW I agree with you on all your points, though OP's been a member for coming up to 2 years so presumably has some idea how things work. I just thought he jumped the gun a bit to change it.

[The_Don]

This W/G had a number of profiles over the years and often moves around.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Price: £70 per hour

Just an update (New profile) External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I seen her in passing, when I was punting in Uxbridge, last month

Hidden Image/Members Only

Ki$$ing wasn't on offer when I punted her.

[stryker13]

Thank you for sharing the warning - I did think she was too good to be true.