Jasmine Ryder - Manchester

[flame1666]

Sorry guys wanted this punt to be great but came away feeling well disappointed.
Punt was about a week ago near Piccadilly Station. Comms are sporadic even on her working days. (Tues,Wed).
Jasmine is indeed fit (IMO), friendly and chatty with a great tan and tiny ass. There's nothing wrong with her boobs with great suckable nipples.

However, as with previous reviews she's over subscribed herself and her performance lacks enthusiasm with no real desire to please. She's more of a "I'm too tired" GFE.

I'll have to take some of the blame because once I sense a girl isn't up for it neither am I.

Went through the motions, RO (clean- considering), 69, Doggy, Mish, Cowgirl. I even requested a CIM but she pretended not to hear and wanked me off regardless.

Showered, got off and booked another punt with a proper WG.

[Goldfinch]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[yorkieyorkie]

Her comms are shite so I removed her from my HL

[flame1666]

Cheers for link Goldfinch, I'll get the hang of the reviewing soon!

Comms were indeed shite.

[OakTree]

it was starting to become apparent she was cramming them in in her previous reviews. For that sort of eye watering money it’s pretty piss poor to be literally too fucked to care.

[Goldfinch]

Cheers for link Goldfinch, I'll get the hang of the reviewing soon!

 

[Availableinlarge]

However, as with previous reviews she's over subscribed herself and her performance lacks enthusiasm with no real desire to please. She's more of a "I'm too tired" GFE.

Her first punt is at 5.30 am!

[goldwing1]

Unlucky there, all positives from other punters on here and AW.
As for cim ( at discretion ) I tell them it`s a must or the deal is off.
At discretion to me is another way of saying no.

[flame1666]

Her first punt was 5.30am but her last the night before was 1.00am!!

I do think I got the Siesta Shift. I made the mistake of lying down with her when I should of kept moving.

I live and learn.

[freeze44]

Thanks for the review and better luck next time.

Seems a pattern here...hidden gem who gets discovered and then gets busy and then service goes down hill...suppose the test will come in a few weeks when the rush has died down and normal service might return but going to piss a load of in the mean time!! 

Maybe she planning to move on soon?? 

[Boates]

She was at top of my list but, as mentioned above, there's a pattern emerging so she's been crossed off.

Apparently she's having a boob job in June so possibly getting as many punters in as she can now to pay for it.

[lewisjones23]

Thanks for the review and better luck next time.

Seems a pattern here...hidden gem who gets discovered and then gets busy and then service goes down hill...suppose the test will come in a few weeks when the rush has died down and normal service might return but going to piss a load of in the mean time!! 

Maybe she planning to move on soon?? 

she wasnt a hidden gem - was on the agency scene for ages as Gracie at Elite

[iceCaptain]

So close to booking this one today... Thanks for the info

[yorkieyorkie]

Well she’s retiring tomorrow.

[delta69]

I was gonna book for tomorrow but this review has put me off. I'm not gonna waste £150 for  a shite service

[lewisjones23]

Well she’s retiring tomorrow.

standard shite they come out with to drum up business when things slow down

[yorkieyorkie]

standard shite they come out with to drum up business when things slow down

Yeah I’ve seen it far too often

[Eggybread]

Yeah, she’s going on holiday. She told me she was going to get a boob job but used the money for a holiday instead. I need to catch up on a number of reviews so will post my review of my meet with her soon.

[Juanfortheroad]

 I saw her yesterday and had a great time. She couldn't have been any more willing to please.
I'm sure we've all caught a girl on an off day seems you were unlucky.
I'd have no hesitation in seeing her again if I got the chance.

[OakTree]

I saw her yesterday and had a great time. She couldn't have been any more willing to please.
I'm sure we've all caught a girl on an off day seems you were unlucky.
I'd have no hesitation in seeing her again if I got the chance.

Luck good or bad had nothing to do with it. Here's the reason why.

Her first punt was 5.30am but her last the night before was 1.00am!!

Just because you had a great time and would happily see her again doesn't mean everybody else does. Your post is an attempt to undermine the OP's review.

[Juanfortheroad]

Luck good or bad had nothing to do with it. Here's the reason why.

Just because you had a great time and would happily see her again doesn't mean everybody else does. Your post is an attempt to undermine the OP's review.

No my post is a comment on my experience with the girl, surely that’s the point of these posts to share experiences of the girls for other people benefits.
Nothing to do with undermining anything
Everyone has their own experience and opinion about girls and I was lucky to have a good experience the OP wasn’t so lucky

[freeze44]

No my post is a comment on my experience with the girl, surely that’s the point of these posts to share experiences of the girls for other people benefits.
Nothing to do with undermining anything
Everyone has their own experience and opinion about girls and I was lucky to have a good experience the OP wasn’t so lucky

The point is that your review is enough and no need to comment on this review.

I get you'r quite new to this so take the advice as it's seen a bad form to do what you did by adding undermining comments to a negative review. It's why reviews are so important and those looking to find a punt can look and compare reviews and make their own minds up.

[manfox]

What Juan did happens often even by established posters.

No big deal IMO, people can make their own minds up.

[Availableinlarge]

What Juan did happens often even by established posters.
No big deal IMO, people can make their own minds up.

I agree, this 'take the advice' language will only deter open and reasonable contributions - surely the guy can add his own comment as to HIS experience, it's not like he was having a go at the OP.
Just my thoughts.

[Availableinlarge]

AFWIW, my experience of Jasmine was very different to his! 

[freeze44]

I agree, this 'take the advice' language will only deter open and reasonable contributions - surely the guy can add his own comment as to HIS experience, it's not like he was having a go at the OP.
Just my thoughts.

Why would it deter someone to take advice?? Man up ffs!

The issue as I see it is that if someone posts a negative and then a number come along and post under it that their experience was different and better, it can look as white knighting and trying to 'save' their darling who has been given a negative.

Why feel the need to post on someones review that you had a different experience  Just post your own review.

[Moby Dick]

Why would it deter someone to take advice?? Man up ffs!

The issue as I see it is that if someone posts a negative and then a number come along and post under it that their experience was different and better, it can look as white knighting and trying to 'save' their darling who has been given a negative.

Why feel the need to post on someones review that you had a different experience  Just post your own review.

+1
Looks like WK to me.

[robsmith149]

So from some of the comments on here suggest that if someone posts a neg review and someone else says they had a good time with her that is white knighting, yet if someone posts about a bad time with a wg on a positive review that is perfectly fine.

Couldn't give a fuck either way to be honest and really don't know why it bothers certain people so much.

[EUGENE TACKLEBERRY]

So from some of the comments on here suggest that if someone posts a neg review and someone else says they had a good time with her that is white knighting, yet if someone posts about a bad time with a wg on a positive review that is perfectly fine.

Couldn't give a fuck either way to be honest and really don't know why it bothers certain people so much.

I get the logic of it being considered wrong or white knighting if u comment positively on a neg review, everyones time with the lady in question is different And we are all different HOWEVER I left a positive review recently and a guy came on to complain about her, his time with her and how she almost made him pack in punting, this then drew out other Negative  comments/haters yet nobody (including me) said BOO, bearing in mind this guy already did his negative review. I found it odd that this was deamed ok to do, its exactly the same logic but in reverse, its jumped on if you say + on a neg review but it seems ok to neg coment on someone else's positive review?????? If one is wrong so is the other, it undermined my POV that id had a good time/my review is worthless......therefore if one is considered  WK'ing then the other is a vendetta type comment and imo both are wrong but only one gets shot down???

I wasnt overly impressed at the time but didn't comment as couldn't be arsed with the drama, i also didnt comment on his review saying "oh ive seen her b4 and she's always been great with me" blah blah blah  as i knew what would be said!

On a Jasmine note, shame she's packing it in, I would have liked to have seen her, oh well

[ArchBacon]

So from some of the comments on here suggest that if someone posts a neg review and someone else says they had a good time with her that is white knighting, yet if someone posts about a bad time with a wg on a positive review that is perfectly fine.

Couldn't give a fuck either way to be honest and really don't know why it bothers certain people so much.

Whatever the opposite of white knighting is (black knighting?) is just as annoying but never gets commented on, why could that be....

[freeze44]

I get the logic of it being considered wrong or white knighting if u comment positively on a neg review, everyones time with the lady in question is different And we are all different HOWEVER I left a positive review recently and a guy came on to complain about her, his time with her and how she almost made him pack in punting, this then drew out other Negative  comments/haters yet nobody (including me) said BOO, bearing in mind this guy already did his negative review. I found it odd that this was deamed ok to do, its exactly the same logic but in reverse, its jumped on if you say + on a neg review but it seems ok to neg coment on someone else's positive review?????? If one is wrong so is the other, it undermined my POV that id had a good time/my review is worthless......therefore if one is considered  WK'ing then the other is a vendetta type comment and imo both are wrong but only one gets shot down???

I wasnt overly impressed at the time but didn't comment as couldn't be arsed with the drama, i also didnt comment on his review saying "oh ive seen her b4 and she's always been great with me" blah blah blah  as i knew what would be said!

On a Jasmine note, shame she's packing it in, I would have liked to have seen her, oh well

Agree it's fucked up the other way round and again think the question is why do it? As you say could be a vendetta or whatever and should be taken to task as it's the review that counts and the person writing it that matters.

Bit worrying to see that a number don't seem bothered about posters trying undermining reviews...the integrity of reviews what makes this site so valuable and gives punters great information and for punters benefit not the wg's.

[OakTree]

There’s nothing wrong in writing a positive slant on a negative review but it’s how and what you say. If for example the poster had written "I saw her the other day and had an amazing time but reading this review it seems she might have consistency issues," No one would of batted an eyelid. Instead (and I Don’t think it was truly intentional white knighting) he made out it was just bad luck for the punter and made excuses for the WG, every WG has an off day. Then went on to say how he’d definitely see her again. That to me does look to undermine the review and defend the WG.

[robsmith149]

Whatever the opposite of white knighting is (black knighting?) is just as annoying but never gets commented on, why could that be....

It's all bollocks tbh, some people take this site way too seriously.

[manfox]

It's all bollocks tbh, some people take this site way too seriously.

This ^

[Moby Dick]

Nothing quite like a Whiteknight to divide opinion. 

Crack on for all I care.
Just puts the NEG to the top of the pile.
I am sure she will thank him.

[Juanfortheroad]

Firstly although I'm relatively new to this site, ive been around this industry on and off for 10 years and was definitely not White Knighting as you put it. I being new to this site and how it works thought that offering an opinion on a review was fair game, but now I can see a flaw in that system and would try to avoid doing so in the future, instead commenting about such things in the discussion section where it would be more appropriate.
As some others have pointed out however, it seems fair game for negative comments to be made on a positive review where they should also be directed to the discussion section leaving a review to be a review and not a debate about the SP in question.
Believe me I'm not offended or bothered by anyone "having a go" about my comments I'm not a snowflake who can't take some stick.
But if people want to complain about such things then it should work both ways.
I'll no doubt post another review in the not too distant future hopefully it will be taken as my opinion based on my personal experience.

[Availableinlarge]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=251125.0

[Availableinlarge]

Does the negative poster need to ‘take the advice’?

[Moby Dick]

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=251125.0

What does this have to do with JasmineRyder?

[Moby Dick]

Does the negative poster need to ‘take the advice’?

What advice?

[freeze44]

What advice?

Think this about what I said earlier re the posting a positive spin on a negative...clearly rattled this one's cage 

[robsmith149]

Does the negative poster need to ‘take the advice’?

No because negging a positive review is fine on here, haven't you learned that yet? just don't even think of putting a positive post on a neg review though as that really offends a few snowflakes.

[freeze44]

No because negging a positive review is fine on here, haven't you learned that yet? just don't even think of putting a positive post on a neg review though as that really offends a few snowflakes.

  aw are your feelings hurt cause not everyone agrees with ya??! Don't take things so seriously tough guy 

[robsmith149]

aw are your feelings hurt cause not everyone agrees with ya??! Don't take things so seriously tough guy 

Bore off snowflake.

[freeze44]

Bore off snowflake.

Na...sorry hard nut but you can't tell anyone here what to to do...try making a sensible point if it not to difficult to too worried some may not agree with ya and you get your knickers in a twist again! 

If you took the time to read the thread you might see am agreeing with the point but you melting in the heat big boy 

[Availableinlarge]

Just about every review on here has a comment which either supports or contradicts the OP.
Surely that’s normal for forums which are designed to offer an insight in to a particular subject (in this case, what’s its like to pay for sex with someone who is happy to receive money for doing so).

[goldwing1]

Just about every review on here has a comment which either supports or contradicts the OP.
Surely that’s normal for forums which are designed to offer an insight in to a particular subject (in this case, what’s its like to pay for sex with someone who is happy to receive money for doing so).

Try to ignore the politics and bullshit and read the reviews.
7 positives and 1 negative on here

[Lancastrian1]

Firstly although I'm relatively new to this site, ive been around this industry on and off for 10 years and was definitely not White Knighting as you put it. I being new to this site and how it works thought that offering an opinion on a review was fair game, but now I can see a flaw in that system and would try to avoid doing so in the future, instead commenting about such things in the discussion section where it would be more appropriate.
As some others have pointed out however, it seems fair game for negative comments to be made on a positive review where they should also be directed to the discussion section leaving a review to be a review and not a debate about the SP in question.
Believe me I'm not offended or bothered by anyone "having a go" about my comments I'm not a snowflake who can't take some stick.


But if people want to complain about such things then it should work both ways.
I'll no doubt post another review in the not too distant future hopefully it will be taken as my opinion based on my personal experience.

It’s a forum you entitled to your opinion. You weren’t rude in how you said it. Sometimes when someone posts a negative and then someone’s comments that they have had a positive can be helpful to punters.

[Gordon Bennett]

Good factual honest review - thanks!