Author Topic: Ivory-Diva - High Street Kensignton  (Read 1846 times)

Offline brutsol52

I think i am going to lean more conservative on my reviews when in a grey area so while she was not bad, i did feel unsatisfied at the time spent after i left given the price.


Link:https://www.divaescort.com/girls/brunette-paddington-ivory


Price: 300 1 hour

Date: Early 2019

Comms: You message, confirm, get address and go.

Location: High street kensignton, on a residential road- nice area.


Appearance: less attractive in person to me, not as fit/gym fit as she looks in her pictures but a pretty girl. She gives of the girl next door vibe. But i would go with a 7.5 or so. Nothing exceptional, has an ass, tits are fine.

Services: Here is where the grey area for me starts. She was in to it, she provided OWO which was good, not great, she did take a pounding in all the regular positions, and im pretty sure she came during doggy. She started the punt with a striptease dance to some music, and while it was fine, im more of a hands on person in punts so i feel like the first 5 mins were wasted but it wasn't a big deal. She is definitely early 20s. I did not think she was particularly tight, but i think the whole meet was a downer because she just was not as hot as i had hoped. Great English, so she can talk your ear off if that is your thing. ended up having to finish myself off with some fondling and dirty talk going on. Her owo avoided everything but the shaft.

Unless her look is your thing, i felt as though if i am going to spend this amount of money then i need to get something that is not readily available already to me, and meets my expectations. Lena, who i just reviewed, with far worse English was much more better even though i spent more because she met my standards of being a truly stunning girl. Ivory is just too average and her skills were not shit but they were not great either.

To each their own, save your money imo.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2019, 09:29:43 am by brutsol52 »


Offline stuart.

Thanks for review. Sorry punt didn't turn out great for the money you spent.  :(

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Paying £300 for someone you didn't really physically like
🌕 For you!!


Your own fault, should of walked....

Wear boxer shorts instead of silky panties!!

100% prime example of punter wearing a nappy because he is too scared to walk....


Man up for fucks sake.. respect your time and money...


If it was me I would 100% walked.....
Reason not physically attractive enough to warrant £300 price tag..


In the past I've told women your to old, ( was in 50's)I want to see someone younger, I've told women your over charging, I've argued with maids/pimps about the nonsense they masquerade as a top brothel in town..

Walking is second nature to me all boils down to many years of experience.
« Last Edit: April 19, 2019, 01:35:46 pm by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline The Film Director

I think i am going to lean more conservative on my reviews when in a grey area so while she was not bad, i did feel unsatisfied at the time spent after i left given the price.


Wise words - for £300/hr I'd need to be walking on a air as I left.....

Offline hw189

IIRC:

She has been around for several years (possibly up to 10);
She is one of the last ladies I saw through these EE agencies (HC, I believe) and one of the reasons I gave up meeting any other escort from these London EE agencies;
My assessment of her back then was neutral, bordering negative. And that was at more reasonable £200 per hour rate back then. I was shocked to see her hourly rate jump up to £300 per hour only several months after my visit.

BTW she is a Rom, she even told me that herself during my meet (a typical Rom too, at that time).

Offline BanksRobin

Paying £300 for someone you didn't really physically like
🌕 For you!!


Your own fault, should of walked....

Wear boxer shorts instead of silky panties!!

100% prime example of punter wearing a nappy because he is too scared to walk....


Man up for fucks sake.. respect your time and money...


If it was me I would 100% walked.....
Reason not physically attractive enough to warrant £300 price tag..


In the past I've told women your to old, ( was in 50's)I want to see someone younger, I've told women your over charging, I've argued with maids/pimps about the nonsense they masquerade as a top brothel in town..

Walking is second nature to me all boils down to many years of experience.

Well aren't you just a bundle of laughs  :lol: :lol:

Offline brutsol52

Paying £300 for someone you didn't really physically like
🌕 For you!!


Your own fault, should of walked....

Wear boxer shorts instead of silky panties!!

100% prime example of punter wearing a nappy because he is too scared to walk....


Man up for fucks sake.. respect your time and money...


If it was me I would 100% walked.....
Reason not physically attractive enough to warrant £300 price tag..


In the past I've told women your to old, ( was in 50's)I want to see someone younger, I've told women your over charging, I've argued with maids/pimps about the nonsense they masquerade as a top brothel in town..

Walking is second nature to me all boils down to many years of experience.

Panties? boxers? Perhaps i misconveyed my thoughts here, i had no desire to walk, and being put back in that position, i just wouldnt do it, for the following reasons. This has nothing to do with cowardice or something, it was an experience that i had to have in order to know that it wasnt great. I didnt say she was a 6. You seem to overreact a lot.

I am not quite sure i conveyed my thoughts, she was not UNattractive, she just wasnt a 9, and i did like her when i booked her and she looked fine when i saw her. Furthermore, i have seen other women, less attractive than her and had a better time for a similar price point. Ultimately, the feeling i had was in hindsight and after the punt, hence why i would not go again. I also specify that given some of the people i have seen here being linked as "super honeys", that she may very well tick other people's boxes, but not mine.

You seem to do this a lot to people, you are not some beacon of punting etiquette and purveyor of punting morality. The review is honest, and i described a feeling as being one lacking euphoria hence the negative.

For what it is worth, i have seen your reviews on multiple women classes as super honeys that i do not find that attractive in their photoshopped pictures, but i did not, and will not, start lambasting your subjective stance on attractiveness.

It is an honest review- services were fine but i want more for that price point- services were not mind blowing, and if they were her looks wouldn't matter as much.

As for my money and time, it is precisely that- MINE. I dont judge yours or others use of their own funds, and i had no intention of walking as it wasn't like she was a bait and switch, which i am sure one of your recent reviews ( laila i think) seemed very close to being yet you had a good service and championed for her- which is fine.

As for your actions calling out pimps, insulting woman you didn't think were meeting your standards, fair enough- Even in hindsight, i wouldnt have belittled her for no reason, she wasnt rude, she was quite bubbly but we didnt click, and it was what it was. And no, i am not advocating for putting WG;s on some pedestal, they are providing a service, you are well within your rights to complain but this was a review and i have no desire to end an encounter with a decent looking woman, who was welcoming and nice by stating " hey KT thinks we should all be giant cunts, so let me state that you were shit".



Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Your money
Your choice
Your whining


Thank you


As for Laila it was bait and switch and I did request for review to be changed to negative..
I thought it was her in pictures and then come to conclusion 100% not her apart from 1 showing her from the back..
« Last Edit: April 19, 2019, 03:00:28 pm by king tarzan »
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline tomato sauce and waffles

Thanks for the review, brutsol52.

I'm think this WG used to be £150 an hour once.

Offline massagepuntingfan

Paying £300 for someone you didn't really physically like
🌕 For you!!


Your own fault, should of walked....

Wear boxer shorts instead of silky panties!!

100% prime example of punter wearing a nappy because he is too scared to walk....


Man up for fucks sake.. respect your time and money...



Are there any site rules against abusing other members? My interpretation is the OP was posting a review with a view to help inform, ego motivated insults do nothing except make the poster look childish and potentially discourage the OP and others from posting reviews.

Offline brutsol52

Thanks for the review, brutsol52.

I'm think this WG used to be £150 an hour once.

 :drinks:


Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
Are there any site rules against abusing other members? My interpretation is the OP was posting a review with a view to help inform, ego motivated insults do nothing except make the poster look childish and potentially discourage the OP and others from posting reviews.

When punters where nappies whores keep making money they don't deserve...
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac