Mary69 - Ashford

[KeepCalm]

External Link/Members Only

Comms: Quick responses to arrange.

Location: Local hotel. Pissed about with giving room number.

Looks: Darker looking version of profile pic. Looked better in person than pics to me. Slim with massive fake tits. 9/10.

Meet: Went safe with 15 mins for £50. Covered blowjob was good, went touch her tits and she did dramatic reaction as if hurt her which was a joke. She did seem get into it and let me play with them. Asked her suck me off in front of mirror, said no "only 15mins" - so asked her jump on top, not sure if bad English or attitude but moaned "thought you only want blowjob" Great sight but little movement.

Summary: Probably would again. Felt argument needed to get good service.

[James999]

Describes herself as Latin, profile confirms Romanian 

[KeepCalm]

Yeah she ain't Latin. She probably whited up her profile pic, but looks better in person, olive skin or whatever it is.

[James999]

olive skin or whatever it is.

Dirt?

[KeepCalm]

No mate wasn't dirt, just skin colour.

[Raven]

Thanks for the review OP 

She Looks great, but I get the feeling the longer the meet, the more battle it is to get good service. 

[stevesimmons101]

Cheers for the review, won't waste my money here. I wonder if the other Roms in the area are staying in the same place (Ceraselle xx) although she's bb so avoid anyway

[MrMatrix]

Thanks for the review OP. now 3 neutrals and 1 neg. You'd hope a good looking girl llike this would be the real deal, but no. And yet with thse looks and body I guess punters will still see her. What we forget is that its always performance over looks. If the performance is shite then looks are irrelavent and we walk away pissed off.
Better luck next time OP. 

[Bornslippy]

One of my worst punts with this one (reviewed earlier in year). Shame as she is a lovely looking little thing. Shit attitude and shit services (lack of).

[massageseeker1977]

Thanks for the review OP. now 3 neutrals and 1 neg. You'd hope a good looking girl llike this would be the real deal, but no. And yet with thse looks and body I guess punters will still see her. What we forget is that its always performance over looks. If the performance is shite then looks are irrelavent and we walk away pissed off.
Better luck next time OP. 

Quite agree and personally I have always formed the opinion that neutral reviews are people who actually mean negative but are being too polite to say so, like it is the British way of not complaining in the restaurant at the time.......

[MisterP]

Thanks for the review OP. now 3 neutrals and 1 neg. You'd hope a good looking girl llike this would be the real deal, but no. And yet with thse looks and body I guess punters will still see her. What we forget is that its always performance over looks. If the performance is shite then looks are irrelavent and we walk away pissed off.
Better luck next time OP. 

Last year I saw one of the ladies she works with, who was maybe about mid thirties and definitely not as good looking as Mary.  But I specifically chose her for the above reason and hoping the performance would make up for the fact she wasn't as pretty as her colleague and I was right.  She was great and I'm disappointed that she no longer appears to be within the group.
I did actually see Mary as I walked out and thought I'd made the wrong decision and should have gone for the prettier one if 'their' service was like that.  Was going to book her the next day but they had gone.