FFM Threesome with the Sisters- Ashton

[samneil15]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Ok so I have read a little(or a lot) about these 2 and everything was telling me to stay well clear apart from a good review from Goldwing. I ended up thinking with the wrong head and booked a 30 minute session for £100 all in. I hedged my bets and booked Claire for a massage directly after just in case I needed to relax.

Comms- They were all done via text- Very scatty which immediately annoyed me.

Location-Arrived bang on time and the location was the opposite street to Claire so happy days. The girls texted me to say we'll call you in a few minutes with the door number. This turned into a 10 minute wait outside which again was frustrating, but I was consoled with the fact I had a back up. Finally called and directed to the house. Not sure what Goldwing was on about with location, it is a dump. Shown straight up to the bedroom, where there was a double bed and women's clothes, makeup, sprays all kinds of shit everywhere. Didn't even have a clean spot to put my clothes.

The meet- Firstly, I made sure they had shower facilities as I'm sure they didn't in a previous review. Was told yes so then on arrival jumped into the shower- No pressure, crappy shower- Baby stuff everywhere in the bathroom and the bedroom next to us. Still I thought fuck it, I wanted to tick off a BJ rimjob combo.

Into the room and firstly to describe the girls. Kendall, the younger sister is hot. Really pretty imo, much better than the veri pic as her eyes are gorgeous with good complexion. Her ass was to die for. One of the biggest, firmest asses I have ever seen on a white girl. Tulisa on the other hand is a big girl. And I mean big, tall with some serious size. Facially did nothing for me.

Now I had a decent 20 mins or so, nice BJ technique from both girls but the rimjob attempt from Tulisa was awful. Both girls were giving the "porn film" talk which just annoyed me and I felt rushed as though they wanted me in and out asap. Tulisa mentioned on a few occasions that she is not well which put me off. I asked both girls to bend over with the intention of giving some RO. However, neither girl smelled fresh at all. They clearly do not use the shower in the house (i could tell) and used wet wipes to wipe after our session 

I could have forgiven everything else as I enjoyed kissing Kendall while the other sucked me off. But I like nothing more than lapping up a sweet, fresh young pussy and ass on a sexy girl. Kendalls ass and pussy looked amazing. Clean shave and pretty, but again the smell was there so I didn't want to bury my face in her or anywhere near her sister. She was hairy and her pussy was, let's say, well used 

I ended up finishing in Kendalls mouth, wasn't offered another shower and didn't want to in all honesty as Claire's was round the corner and I knew her facilities are always immaculate. Both girls used wet wipes and began talking about what they were doing for lunch 

They really don't have a clue how to entertain a gentleman during a meet, at least not for me. It's clear they do it for the money, which is fine, but have some fucking work ethic women!!!!

All in all, I left thinking no way would I see either of them again. I can't stand WG's who do not shower in between punts and unfortunately, this is the majority of this "type". Chavvy girls. I want a woman who can teach me a thing or two if I am spending my hard earned money. However, Kendall is really cute, and I felt like we could have some fun together, if she is fresh out of the shower 

Wasn't sure whether to leave this as a neutral or neg, but just for the fact that they were sweaty and smelly, it's a neg. I did end up at Claire's for over 2 hours with a 30 minute edging session after so not all bad. She helped me quickly forget that experience. Waste of £100.

[ISTS2005]

Grim pal, thanks for sharing.

[Availableinlarge]

Who or what is Claire’s or should I know that?

[Doc Holliday]

Who or what is Claire’s or should I know that?

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=239119.msg2456464#msg2456464

[Titi]

Grim pal, thanks for sharing.

Grim indeed.

Her ass was to die for. One of the biggest, firmest asses I have ever seen on a white gir

Her AW pics doesn’t give much away, OP can you describe a bit more. I think Kool Keef called her a Whooty.

[Kool Keef]

Her AW pics doesn’t give much away, OP can you describe a bit more. I think Kool Keef called her a Whooty.

Yeah i thought her arse was great. Big, round & white hence whooty. She told me she regularly squats.
Her sister's arse is also big but not as firm as Kady's.

[goldwing1]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Ok so I have read a little(or a lot) about these 2 and everything was telling me to stay well clear apart from a good review from Goldwing. I ended up thinking with the wrong head and booked a 30 minute session for £100 all in. I hedged my bets and booked Claire for a massage directly after just in case I needed to relax.

Comms- They were all done via text- Very scatty which immediately annoyed me.

Location-Arrived bang on time and the location was the opposite street to Claire so happy days. The girls texted me to say we'll call you in a few minutes with the door number. This turned into a 10 minute wait outside which again was frustrating, but I was consoled with the fact I had a back up. Finally called and directed to the house. Not sure what Goldwing was on about with location, it is a dump. Shown straight up to the bedroom, where there was a double bed and women's clothes, makeup, sprays all kinds of shit everywhere. Didn't even have a clean spot to put my clothes.

The meet- Firstly, I made sure they had shower facilities as I'm sure they didn't in a previous review. Was told yes so then on arrival jumped into the shower- No pressure, crappy shower- Baby stuff everywhere in the bathroom and the bedroom next to us. Still I thought fuck it, I wanted to tick off a BJ rimjob combo.

Into the room and firstly to describe the girls. Kendall, the younger sister is hot. Really pretty imo, much better than the veri pic as her eyes are gorgeous with good complexion. Her ass was to die for. One of the biggest, firmest asses I have ever seen on a white girl. Tulisa on the other hand is a big girl. And I mean big, tall with some serious size. Facially did nothing for me.

Now I had a decent 20 mins or so, nice BJ technique from both girls but the rimjob attempt from Tulisa was awful. Both girls were giving the "porn film" talk which just annoyed me and I felt rushed as though they wanted me in and out asap. Tulisa mentioned on a few occasions that she is not well which put me off. I asked both girls to bend over with the intention of giving some RO. However, neither girl smelled fresh at all. They clearly do not use the shower in the house (i could tell) and used wet wipes to wipe after our session 

I could have forgiven everything else as I enjoyed kissing Kendall while the other sucked me off. But I like nothing more than lapping up a sweet, fresh young pussy and ass on a sexy girl. Kendalls ass and pussy looked amazing. Clean shave and pretty, but again the smell was there so I didn't want to bury my face in her or anywhere near her sister. She was hairy and her pussy was, let's say, well used 

I ended up finishing in Kendalls mouth, wasn't offered another shower and didn't want to in all honesty as Claire's was round the corner and I knew her facilities are always immaculate. Both girls used wet wipes and began talking about what they were doing for lunch 

They really don't have a clue how to entertain a gentleman during a meet, at least not for me. It's clear they do it for the money, which is fine, but have some fucking work ethic women!!!!

All in all, I left thinking no way would I see either of them again. I can't stand WG's who do not shower in between punts and unfortunately, this is the majority of this "type". Chavvy girls. I want a woman who can teach me a thing or two if I am spending my hard earned money. However, Kendall is really cute, and I felt like we could have some fun together, if she is fresh out of the shower 

Wasn't sure whether to leave this as a neutral or neg, but just for the fact that they were sweaty and smelly, it's a neg. I did end up at Claire's for over 2 hours with a 30 minute edging session after so not all bad. She helped me quickly forget that experience. Waste of £100.

I saw Miss bouncy butt /  aka tulisa ages ago , threesome with her bloke, good session.
When I saw her profile with her sister big batty gurl aka kady of manchester, I had a go, thought it was tops, proper filthy session.

Individually, they have only positives on here and AW, maybe they were having a bad day, but if they were, they should still provide a good service so if you had a shit time, it`s only right that you say so.

As for the accommodation, was it in the middle of a row of terraced houses or was it facing a sports centre?
I`ve been in both, may have been slightly untidy but not a shit tip.

[Titi]

Yeah i thought her arse was great. Big, round & white hence whooty. She told me she regularly squats.

 

[cpw_19]

Ok so I have read a little(or a lot) about these 2 and everything was telling me to stay well clear apart from a good review from Goldwing.

Not to cast aspersions on a member with 38 reviews, but yours is the only neg for either girl.

I'd also say that the mentioning of "Claire's" gaff three times (and singing its praises so much) comes off a bit tout-like.

[Rack Admirer]

Why does "Kady" keep changing her name?

[goldwing1]

Why does "Kady" keep changing her name?

And tulisa.
At one point, she had one profile but with details of 2 other girls in it, availability, prices etc, it was so confusing

[Musttryit]

great review samneil. When you ended up at Claires did you have to ask for the extra Edging ?
Only been to see Sophia recently. Does Claire still insist on keeping her kit on? Do you have to bbok the 2 hours?

[Bustydusty]

Not to cast aspersions on a member with 38 reviews, but yours is the only neg for either girl.

I'd also say that the mentioning of "Claire's" gaff three times (and singing its praises so much) comes off a bit tout-like.

Sounds like casting aspersions to me 

[samneil15]

great review samneil. When you ended up at Claires did you have to ask for the extra Edging ?
Only been to see Sophia recently. Does Claire still insist on keeping her kit on? Do you have to bbok the 2 hours?

No, it's just what she does. The HE always lasts around 30 mins with me and that's after a 90 minute massage. I have only ever booked an hour with her.

She will NOT take her kit off. Hope that helps.

[samneil15]

Sounds like casting aspersions to me 

+1

I will say this regarding aspersions. I had a booking with Claire after the FFM so this was stated in the review. With regards to me being the only negative, such is life. I have been doing this a while now and know most of the Manchester "scene". Once you have experienced the "top performers", Aimy, Alana, Chelsea Brooke, even the likes of Zoe of Manchester, then you become accustomed to a certain level of punt and a certain level of hygiene.

Most men, like me, can tell when girls do not shower between punts and unfortunately, this is probably the majority. Especially parlour girls and ex parlour girls like Tulisa and her sis. Both advertise at the Georgian which, let's be honest, is not the classiest joint in the world.

No real offence taken to your "aspersions" just accept the fact that a lot of guys won't mind the lack of hygeine, or may not even notice if they are not an OCD clean freak like me. 

Hope that clarifies things, in the end, you get what you pay for. This was a budget punt from low budget WG's.

[samneil15]

Why does "Kady" keep changing her name?

To try and get away from any bad press!!!! Just how Safina from Indigo Nile changed her name to Samira as soon as the neg went up on here.

These girls think they are clever, but they aren't the brightest sparks in the country 

[Titi]

Not to cast aspersions on a member with 38 reviews, but yours is the only neg for either girl.

I'd also say that the mentioning of "Claire's" gaff three times (and singing its praises so much) comes off a bit tout-like.

It’s the OP’s experience and his right to review how he feels.

[Access]

OP’s experience, OP’s review. Hygiene is an absolute MUST for me. No excuse for stinks.

[cpw_19]

It’s the OP’s experience and his right to review how he feels.

OP’s experience, OP’s review. Hygiene is an absolute MUST for me. No excuse for stinks.

I will say this regarding aspersions. I had a booking with Claire after the FFM so this was stated in the review. With regards to me being the only negative, such is life.

To clarify, I'm not questioning OP's right to review how he pleases based on his own experience. That's his prerogative.

What I was more intending to point out (via the choice of quoted text in my first post) was the mismatch between OP's statement that the only good thing he'd read on the sisters was one of Goldwing's reviews, and his review being the only Negative up to that point out of 5+ reviews for each girl. I think that's a perfectly valid (if slightly cynical) observation. I accept I could have expressed it better though.

In the end, you get what you pay for. This was a budget punt from low budget WG's.

Definitely true at the cheap end of the scale! Although there is certainly a happy medium too, in terms of price vs quality of service.

[T13]

Sounds good this Claire. Did you meet Sofia?

[T13]

External Link/Members Only
Is that her mate

[NigelF]

Cheers for the review. You've confirmed my suspicions about "Tulisa" and the duo.

External Link/Members Only
Is that her mate

Yes. Here's another ad (same info):
External Link/Members Only

Ok so I have read a little(or a lot) about these 2 and everything was telling me to stay well clear apart from a good review from Goldwing.

You should read about reviewers like Goldwing too. He's an easily pleased fluffy so you should probably take his reviews with a big pinch of salt. There's lots of evidence for that in many of his posts and reviews. His 3 most recent positives are good examples, 2 of them were followed by damning negatives from more discerning and objective punters and in the other he thought that the WG looked better than her photos even though the photos she was using were stolen  :
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=242376.0

There are many other examples and if you read his reviews you'll see that he's almost never remotely criticised any WG's appearance or the fact that their photos have been misleading or flattering. Except for a few helpful negatives (all for no shows/radio silence), he's never written a single negative or even neutral review (i.e. he's rated every girl he's actually seen as a positive). Of the punts he had before he started reviewing he's said:

I`ve been punting and going to swingers clubs for around 15 years now, and i`ve never really had a bad time, a few neutrals, I must have developed a bit of a gut instinct over the years

Yes, i`ve never had a really bad punt in 15 years, why would I come on here and tell lies?

When asked about his total number of punts up to then (October 2017):

I don`t list of the punts i`ve had, must be over a hundred though.

If (but only if) you can relate to that kind of record then maybe he's worth listening to. However, at least he's improved since the days where he used to copy & paste his AW field reports as "reviews" (his first 20 or so reviews) and give every WG he saw a 10/10 in every category. Also, with his more recent reviews you can sometimes "read between the lines" e.g. when he doesn't give a glowing positive that's possibly a sign of what should be a neutral (what would be a neutral the eyes of most "normal" punters) and when he says some critical things about their service that's potentially a sign of a negative. However his reviews still leave a lot to be desired (as opposed to reviews which include all the relevant details but you just happen to disagree with the rating).

What I was more intending to point out (via the choice of quoted text in my first post) was the mismatch between OP's statement that the only good thing he'd read on the sisters was one of Goldwing's reviews, and his review being the only Negative up to that point out of 5+ reviews for each girl. I think that's a perfectly valid (if slightly cynical) observation. I accept I could have expressed it better though.

That's definitely true but they're not all ultra positive/glowing if you read them (e.g. my review of "Kady") and there are some other posts on here which would give cause for concern about them. As I've said, I had my suspicions about Tulisa and the duo although overall your point is definitely valid.

[goldwing1]

Cheers for the review. You've confirmed my suspicions about "Tulisa" and the duo.

Yes. Here's another ad (same info):
External Link/Members Only

You should read about reviewers like Goldwing too. He's an easily pleased fluffy so you should probably take his reviews with a big pinch of salt. There's lots of evidence for that in many of his posts and reviews. His 3 most recent positives are good examples, 2 of them were followed by damning negatives from more discerning and objective punters and in the other he thought that the WG looked better than her photos even though the photos she was using were stolen  :
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=242376.0

There are many other examples and if you read his reviews you'll see that he's almost never remotely criticised any WG's appearance or the fact that their photos have been misleading or flattering. Except for a few helpful negatives (all for no shows/radio silence), he's never written a single negative or even neutral review (i.e. he's rated every girl he's actually seen as a positive). Of the punts he had before he started reviewing he's said:When asked about his total number of punts up to then (October 2017):
If (but only if) you can relate to that kind of record then maybe he's worth listening to. However, at least he's improved since the days where he used to copy & paste his AW field reports as "reviews" (his first 20 or so reviews) and give every WG he saw a 10/10 in every category. Also, with his more recent reviews you can sometimes "read between the lines" e.g. when he doesn't give a glowing positive that's possibly a sign of what should be a neutral (what would be a neutral the eyes of most "normal" punters) and when he says some critical things about their service that's potentially a sign of a negative. However his reviews still leave a lot to be desired (as opposed to reviews which include all the relevant details but you just happen to disagree with the rating).

That's definitely true but they're not all ultra positive/glowing if you read them (e.g. my review of "Kady") and there are some other posts on here which would give cause for concern about them. As I've said, I had my suspicions about Tulisa and the duo although overall your point is definitely valid.

Are we reviewing the girls on her or reviewing the reviewers on their reviews about their reviews.

[T13]

Thanks deffo on my hl

[goldwing1]

 MISS BOUNCY BUTT is now called PREGNANT TULISA
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

[Moby Dick]

Thanks for the review Sam.
Can’t stand a trench stench.
Us Gentlemen have standards.

[unplayable]

They are both pregnant it seems.
My review was positive, 2 hot sisters (IMO banging bodies too).  Not an awesome experience but still, an experience for sure.

[Rack Admirer]

They are both pregnant it seems.

What makes you say that?

Women working when they're pregnant... it doesn't sit comfortably with me.

[unplayable]

FYI i didnt do reverse oral and no smell issues in my review and meet

[samneil15]

Another one to add as soon as I get the chance for Sub Savannah- Let's just say I will not be returning.

[Titi]

Another one to add as soon as I get the chance for Sub Savannah- Let's just say I will not be returning.

Not surprised there pal, I saw her once as part of a duo and she seemed ok. However tried to see her on a solo punt and she cancelled without saying.

[samneil15]

Sounds good this Claire. Did you meet Sofia?

I have seen both many times, but Claire is my go to for a massage with HE.

[samneil15]

Thanks for the review Sam.
Can’t stand a trench stench.
Us Gentlemen have standards.

So true mate, amazes me how many girls can't get the basics right.....

[samneil15]

Cheers for the review. You've confirmed my suspicions about "Tulisa" and the duo.

Nige you are a legend, thanks for the advise and yes I will do more "Due dilligence" prior to a meet next time. Had I seen a neg review from you, I wouldn't have bothered.

That's the problem when you have some extra cash to burn and a bucket list 

[Dickled]

Another one to add as soon as I get the chance for Sub Savannah- Let's just say I will not be returning.

Who is Savannah please?

[Goldfinch]

Who is Savannah please?

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[Dickled]

Another one to add as soon as I get the chance for Sub Savannah- Let's just say I will not be returning.

Thanks Finchy. I see that samneil has mentioned her but I was wondering how she'd entered the "sisters" debate?
PS. By the way, thanks samneil, you've saved me some money, I had intended seeing the two sisters together at some point, but no longer interested, especially if both are expecting.

[samneil15]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Can admin or someone help with this. I posted the review of English Sub Savannah yesterday. Saw it in the list of reviews with a few views and today it has disappeared??? No trace of it whatsoever and it was quite in depth. 

Let me know if I need to do another.

[CoolTiger]

Can admin or someone help with this. I posted the review of English Sub Savannah yesterday. Saw it in the list of reviews with a few views and today it has disappeared??? No trace of it whatsoever and it was quite in depth. 

Let me know if I need to do another.

Admin deleted your review as there were issues with some of the comments you made.

Next time try and be more objective in your reviews and look at it from a punter's perspective.

[samneil15]

Admin deleted your review as there were issues with some of the comments you made.

Next time try and be more objective in your reviews and look at it from a punter's perspective.

Thanks will do. Not sure how I can look at it from a punters perspective any more since I myself am a punter 

Review now up anyway- Not as detailed as the original but you get the idea.

[jaszyj87]

are they actual sisters or just girls saying they are?

[george r]

MISS BOUNCY BUTT is now called PREGNANT TULISA
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

 looking at her first pic she looks 6 months up the duff at least ?

[samneil15]

looking at her first pic she looks 6 months up the duff at least ?

External Link/Members Only

Fuck me only saw em the other week and I did not see that bump 

Probably because I paid most of my attention to Kendall.