Girlfriend_Victoria - Polish, Sep 2018, Photos are an absolute joke

[pepsicolaboy]

Current Profile
Girlfriend_Victoria (current aw name)
External Link/Members Only
Mob: currently not showing
Member Since: 12/06/2018

Date of punt
Sep 2018, daytime.

Venue
London, block of flats within an estate at her usual location I think it was Old Street as per other reviews. (apologies can’t remember now)

Amount Paid
£100.00
Her pricing has now changed, from memory that was either 1 hour service or it was £80.00 + £20 for OWO.
I would never normally pay that much for an unknown but was desperate on the day

Cost of any extras?
See above

Session

I really wanted to post this sooner but life takes over.

Sadly this was one of my worst Polish punts and im normally quite good at avoiding the bad ones. At the time of the visit (or just before) there was hardly any intel on UKP on her so I took a chance and was also swayed by the aw feedback – thank fully I am more hardened now.

Spoke to her on the phone to book, which was in fact the female handler/Sergei.

Sergei messed me about and I was waiting ages outside the block and the girl turned up while I was waiting and went into the block. I could see she was heavily made up.

Looks 2.5/10

She doesn’t look like her photos and is caked in tonnes of make up and is very off putting.
She has a massive scar on her tummy as well.

Her tits where like fried eggs and worse for wear.

Basically her she is very scrawny and emaciated and has zero tone on her body, like an older woman, she might even have a condition of some sort that makes this happen.


Service 2.5/10

It was 6-7 months ago and I remember being so depressed AFTER her clothes came off, as she looked nothing like the pics and Wasn’t attracted to her. Don’t remember her changing positions much if at all and to be honest didn’t really want to touch her body.

There was also a smell there and this could been the cheaper condoms she was using or her. I basically wanted to get in and out as quick as I could

Atmosphere turned when I questioned the profile pics.


Personality 4/10

She did get horny after I was slamming away and did take a pounding.

After the session, I did question her about them using these heavily shopped photos and the benefits of ‘real’ photos and she got very defensive and the atmosphere turned sour.


Location 6/10

Block of flats a walk from the station. Parking would be a problem in the day time I think and also the fact Sergei kept me waiting gives the location another minus point


Value 3/10

Rubbish, as I forked out the higher amount thinking she would be like her photos


Overall 3/10

At best, if there is no other option, she should be a £40 pump and dump. Avoid this one.


Closing comments

Completely ignore her profile pics, this is nothing like her in real life & the body is completely saggy and way too thin.

Considering how good a service Polish generally provided, still worth being cautious with any SP IMO you havent seen (or has low to zero reviews on here) and also remember to walk if they not up to scratch, on this occasion I didn’t. 

AW feedback is an absolute joke, not one negative on looking today. Either there is lots of fake reviews, or the guys who review have zero standards and are just pleased to be getting their end away, 


Profile as of today:

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[peter purves]

 

[pepsicolaboy]

I know and im normally quite good at avoiding rubbish Poles. Mrs Segei kept we waiting so long I think I would have pumped and dumped the pillows in there...definitely should have walked but the tits and body situation only came to light fully after the money had been handed over and the clothes off.

[PatMacGroin]

There's some suggestion of the stomach scar on some of her profile pics. In some she's trying to mask it with her hand (like the 3rd image on your OP). The scar runs top to bottom?

Actually looks like a kind of pretty face on that 1st main profile pic, I assume it's heavily soft focus photo shopped. Also looks too skinny for my tastes in several shots. Sorry it didn't work out for you, and thanks for the warning.

(P.s. excuse the poor quality screen shot. The tool I use has been playing up recently.)

Hidden Image/Members Only

[pepsicolaboy]

There's some suggestion of the stomach scar on some of her profile pics. In some she's trying to mask it with her hand (like the 3rd image on your OP). The scar runs top to bottom?

Actually looks like a kind of pretty face on that 1st main profile pic, I assume it's heavily soft focus photo shopped. Also looks too skinny for my tastes in several shots. Sorry it didn't work out for you, and thanks for the warning.

(P.s. excuse the poor quality screen shot. The tool I use has been playing up recently.)

Thanks for your thoughts.

Ive re downloaded it for you.

Due to the length of time since the visit, I cant remember the orientation or placement of the scar, some of the other reports mentions it, so maybe worth checking out.

She was literally caked in makeup and it was really off putting. I would say she is not as good looking as the photoshopped photos 'imply' and they are implying that (combined with what looks like an amazing body). Your not getting what it says on the tin.


Hidden Image/Members Only

[Jerk Chicken]

OP thanks for the review. Reads like the classic punting horror story! Why didn't you walk mate jump on the mobi and find a plan B/C? or was it a question of the old dick messing with your brain?

[pepsicolaboy]

OP thanks for the review. Reads like the classic punting horror story! Why didn't you walk mate jump on the mobi and find a plan B/C? or was it a question of the old dick messing with your brain?

I built up to it, also Mrs Sergei kept me waiting ages ('im getting ready darling' when in fact the SP had not even arrived) which meant I was more in need of 'relief' and finally when she walked past me to go into the block, I think the buzz meant I was going to go in.

[Spurt]

Thanks for these reviews can ekliminate this one from my search for a Saturday punt.

[Peter49]

How the bloody hell did she get 56 positive feedbacks

[Heph]

How the bloody hell did she get 56 positive feedbacks

For any AW ratings in double-figures, I always divide any AW positive feedbacks by 10, and multiply any negatives by 20 to get what I feel is a more accurate sense of any given WG's positive to negative ratio. Quite apart from the many false positives, AW incentivises good over more balanced feedback because many WGs require that punters themselves have positive feedback before they will accept our bookings. And any negative feedback is usually automatically reciprocated, whether deserved or not, and so punters leaving negatives (assuming they aren't malicious) are more likely to be doing so on a principled basis, knowing that it will likely affect other WGs impression of them. Fortunately, you can  also give far greater weighting to the reviews and ratings here on UKP which have far less chance of being confected.

I actually respectfully dispute Pepsi's take in his review that this woman's picture are inaccurate or of no use. From my own fairly recent experience, they give you a fair impression of her looks: she is indeed slender, has an appealing shape and is really quite pretty. But what the photo's simply can't convey is that, as he does point out, she has scarcely any muscle definition at all - and yes, her boobs are of the water-sac variety. She can probably do something about the former (exercise), but not so much the latter. Her service is acceptable enough, if not exactly brimming with skill or the kind of enthusiasm that would be wise for any sensible professional to project.

[pepsicolaboy]

How the bloody hell did she get 56 positive feedbacks

From this point onwards I never trusted aw reviews again, far far far to many fakes.

For any AW ratings in double-figures, I always divide any AW positive feedbacks by 10, and multiply any negatives by 20 to get what I feel is a more accurate sense of any given WG's positive to negative ratio. Quite apart from the many false positives, AW incentivises good over more balanced feedback because many WGs require that punters themselves have positive feedback before they will accept our bookings. And any negative feedback is usually automatically reciprocated, whether deserved or not, and so punters leaving negatives (assuming they aren't malicious) are more likely to be doing so on a principled basis, knowing that it will likely affect other WGs impression of them. Fortunately, you can also give far greater weighting to the reviews and ratings here on UKP which have far less chance of being confected.

+1
Absolutely spot on with the AW ratings system, to many fake reviews and whatever ones remaining are from real gents, run the risk at being falsely glowing, so as not to incur their own negative feedback (which may then impact them booking someone else) - the aw system needs an overhaul, its proving pointless IMO.

I actually respectfully dispute Pepsi's take in his review that this woman's picture are inaccurate or of no use. From my own fairly recent experience, they give you a fair impression of her looks: she is indeed slender, has an appealing shape and is really quite pretty. But what the photo's simply can't convey is that, as he does point out, she has scarcely any muscle definition at all - and yes, her boobs are of the water-sac variety. She can probably do something about the former (exercise), but not so much the latter. Her service is acceptable enough, if not exactly brimming with skill or the kind of enthusiasm that would be wise for any sensible professional to project.

Thanks for your respectful disagreement.

I maintain that her profile pics are highly deceptive and while I don't directly blame her as doubtless she has a handler. While the service was not terrible, the overall pictoral deception was and her frosty response when I suggested she take more natural pictures, and the price levels, meant this was a strong negative.