Using AW private gallery photos in UKP reviews

[Rochelle]

You seem to have an issue with people replying to your posts, you can spout shit on your profile without being called out on it. where as here your bullshit gets called out 

What bullshit have you called out exactly?

[James999]

What bullshit have you called out exactly?

Not just me, others have called you out, as far back as posted above going back to 2017 with Marm 

[TailSeeker]

I've not made any veiled threats. I've just said I'll delete my PG galleries, others may not, but I will if it's viewed as okay to post those pics here. I don't run my profile off the credits (I don't send anything to operate my profile), and it's such a low income that I can do without if it'll be spread about.

I can get passing in private messages. But posting on a public forum without good reason I don't get. I mean it's essentially the difference between sharing pics/bids of a hookup with mates, and then uploading them to places like pornhub. One is something people can forgive. The latter few would. I suspect any punter here would feel similarly at pics/bids they'd supplied for WGs eyes only.

So a bit of treat people how you'd like to be treated.

[SlamBoy]

Most pics of me pre 18 are firmly under my control in a locked fb. People could spread them. I know there are some pics of me at 13 to 15 somewhere on the web. Also pics of me legal circulating. Didn't consent to it. But exes do what they want.

I don't know if admin has a strict rule, but it seems to be implied as most users won't upload. I think it's a sort of an unspoken agreement. Private trading I can understand, but public sharing is crossing a whole other boundary.

If someone uploaded my private gallery pics, I would report to admin. And then wipe any trace of them from AW. Just because those are pics I want kept to a limited audience. If UKP decides they're fair game. Well then I'll be deleting them all. As I don't want them posted up to absolutely everyone.

Public pics I'm fine existing after I quit, the private pics I want to disappear. Same with vids.

(1) You only have one pic in your private gallery anyway.

(2) Why apply the same 'I want them to disappear' rationale to pics in your 'Private Gallery' (which punters must pay for) and video stills in your 'Movies' (which punters must pay for) - yet the stills of those movies are accessible without a paywall (see attached, for example) so are without question in 'public'?

(3) I've noticed you are using a pseudonym. Why is that? Why are you not using your WG name which is Red_Kitten? Is it because when 'Tail Seeker' is searched for on AW you cannot find it (it doesn't exist) and no review results for 'Tail Seeker' exist on this forum, but if you look for Red_Kitten on this forum, there are negative experiences detailed that punters have had with you? e.g.:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=173011.msg1837132#msg1837132 (About you being a time waster)

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=151808.msg1656542#msg1656542 (Also about you being a time waster)

You should report yourself to Admin for using a pseudonym. UKP Rules state very clearly:

"All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'."

You are disrespecting the board and its members by quite possibly breaking the UKPunting Rules.

 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[TailSeeker]

(1) You only have one pic in your private gallery anyway.

(2) Why apply the same 'I want them to disappear' rationale to pics in your 'Private Gallery' (which punters must pay for) and video stills in your 'Movies' (which punters must pay for) - yet the stills of those movies are accessible without a paywall (see attached, for example) so are without question in 'public'?

(3) I've noticed you are using a pseudonym. Why is that? Why are you not using your WG name which is Red_Kitten? Is it because when 'Tail Seeker' is searched for on AW you cannot find it (it doesn't exist) and no review results for 'Tail Seeker' exist on this forum, but if you look for Red_Kitten on this forum, there are negative experiences detailed that punters have had with you? e.g.:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=173011.msg1837132#msg1837132 (About you being a time waster)

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=151808.msg1656542#msg1656542 (Also about you being a time waster)

You should report yourself to Admin for using a pseudonym. UKP Rules state very clearly:

"All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'."

You are disrespecting the board and its members by quite possibly breaking the UKPunting Rules.

 

1) I have no PG pics at all. I deleted them all following this thread. So claiming I have any is a lie. Before I had more than 30. Now zero.

2) yes I have screen shots on vids and I'm also considering removing my vids following this thread as well. I will kindly ask you to remove the pics but doubt you will as you seem to have a personal vendetta against me as can be seen in other threads. But that's fine.

4) one punter I turned away and owned up to it, and in the thread was corroborated that I have restrictions on my in call. I'm not giving into why I turned him away as I'm not getting into a he said she said thing. Or any claims that I did or didn't act reasonably.

The other claim is not in my aggregate for good reason, the punter never booked with me, merely contacted me. He also
then threatened me with negative reviews on UKP and linked me the thread saying he'd do more if I didn't see him. As admin and others have good heads on their shoulders they didn't count it as a review, and as I told him, I'm not comfortable seeing him. Doubly so for sending me a removed review threatening me with further negative feedback. I'm likely not able to back this up as I suspect he's deleted his AW account since, so the emails will be gone.

3) everyone knows who I am. As stated by you knowing who I am (and seeking out pics of me). I just use a fun username, pics the same and I frequently state my name on AW here. I even use the same pic. Admin has never had an issue yet. If he does, I'll work with him to change the name to my working name. I simply don't use my working name to reduce claims of touting. But pretty much everyone knows I'm kitten. Claims I'm pretending otherwise aren't true.

If you want to claim otherwise. Well then you'd need to come up with a strange excuse on how you found stills of my vids.

[tesla]

(3) I've noticed you are using a pseudonym. Why is that? Why are you not using your WG name which is Red_Kitten?


"All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'."

You are disrespecting the board and its members by quite possibly breaking the UKPunting Rules.

To be fair she has identified herself, it was in a previous post
the rules do not state she has to use the same user name on here as on AW, only to identify herself,  as I interpret them

[Rochelle]

To be fair she has identified herself, it was in a previous post
the rules do not state she has to use the same user name on here as on AW, only to identify herself,  as I interpret them

That is correct, and I have personally clarified that with Admin as I have different usernames across all the sites.

[Home Alone]

3) everyone knows who I am. As stated by you knowing who I am (and seeking out pics of me). I just use a fun username, pics the same and I frequently state my name on AW here. I even use the same pic. Admin has never had an issue yet. If he does, I'll work with him to change the name to my working name. I simply don't use my working name to reduce claims of touting. But pretty much everyone knows I'm kitten. Claims I'm pretending otherwise aren't true.

Don't be so fucking arrogant, lady.

As one who doesn't punt in London, I hadn't a clue - nor any interest in - what your 'professional' name is. And trying to use the claim that "everyone knows who I am", is unbelievably arrogant. I assumed that Tailseeker was the - weird - working name of the prostitute who spewed out boringly long posts which I usually skip over.

But if Admin has a rule that prostitutes who want to post on here should do so under their working name, then what is so special about you that you should be exempt from that rule? And don't use that poncey 'political-style' language that you'll "work with Admin" to change [your] name on here; just bloody get it done.

[Kev40ish]

You should report yourself to Admin for using a pseudonym. UKP Rules state very clearly:

"All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'."

Although I do agree with you on transparency on WG identities.

I will say you seem to have an unhealthy obsession with TailSeeker.
You constantly have to find ways to try to challenge her. I think you need to take a break from trolling every post she makes.
How many times have you reported her now?

I cannot speak for Admin, but if I was him I’d be getting bored with your constant reports of her, none of which so far have been taken seriously.

I am sure Admin is aware of her real name and would have taken action if he deemed it necessary.

[James999]

The Pro$$ies are trying to take over, they did it when the site first started 

[smiths]

1) I have no PG pics at all. I deleted them all following this thread. So claiming I have any is a lie. Before I had more than 30. Now zero.

2) yes I have screen shots on vids and I'm also considering removing my vids following this thread as well. I will kindly ask you to remove the pics but doubt you will as you seem to have a personal vendetta against me as can be seen in other threads. But that's fine.

4) one punter I turned away and owned up to it, and in the thread was corroborated that I have restrictions on my in call. I'm not giving into why I turned him away as I'm not getting into a he said she said thing. Or any claims that I did or didn't act reasonably.

The other claim is not in my aggregate for good reason, the punter never booked with me, merely contacted me. He also
then threatened me with negative reviews on UKP and linked me the thread saying he'd do more if I didn't see him. As admin and others have good heads on their shoulders they didn't count it as a review, and as I told him, I'm not comfortable seeing him. Doubly so for sending me a removed review threatening me with further negative feedback. I'm likely not able to back this up as I suspect he's deleted his AW account since, so the emails will be gone.

3) everyone knows who I am. As stated by you knowing who I am (and seeking out pics of me). I just use a fun username, pics the same and I frequently state my name on AW here. I even use the same pic. Admin has never had an issue yet. If he does, I'll work with him to change the name to my working name. I simply don't use my working name to reduce claims of touting. But pretty much everyone knows I'm kitten. Claims I'm pretending otherwise aren't true.

If you want to claim otherwise. Well then you'd need to come up with a strange excuse on how you found stills of my vids.

"Everyone knows who I am", well I don't and I don't wish to know any more than the shit you have posted on this thread so far.

[James999]

everyone knows who I am.

Complete bullshit, like Smiths I wasn't aware. If you think everyone knows as you claim, you wouldn't need to hide your AW identity on here would you 

Pro$$ies are required to use their working names to avoid such confusion on this site, so what are you trying to hide, apart from your shit attitude 

[Happyjose]

What bullshit have you called out exactly?

Here's some fun facts:

Ignoring your posts on this thread, since the turn of the year, you have made 66 posts

42% would be classed as bad attitude towards punters on here (directed towards many different members)

42% would be classed as using the site as a chat platform

15% were you arguing with Tailseeker

Given the rules state:

- Service providers

* Service providers are allowed to be members, but there is no tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters.
* The site is not a chat platform between punters and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers.
* All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'.
* Service providers are recommended to join External Link/Members Only instead if they wish to advertise freely and / or chat with punters.

Would it be reasonable to say that you are abusing the privilege of membership on here?

.

[scutty brown]

FFS, she's not hiding anything
Google "tailseeker escort" and this is the first hit:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=173011.0

takes all of ten seconds to find

[James999]

Her nic on here is not the same as her working name, that's not in line with the rules, she's clearly trying to hide the link between her UKP profile and AW profile, if you search tailseaker on AW you get nothing. 

[scutty brown]

Her nic on here is not the same as her working name, that's not in line with the rules, she's clearly trying to hide the link between her UKP profile and AW profile, if you search tailseaker on AW you get nothing. 

This has been raised as an issue and reported with other girls many times before, and to the best of my  memory Admin has accepted the situation each time.
As I understand it, the girl has to simply make her working profile name known: she doesn't have to use it as her profile name on here.
In Rochelle's case, my recollection is that Admin actually allowed her to change her forum name away from her AW name due to unwanted attention from a stalker.

[Waterhouse]

(1) You only have one pic in your private gallery anyway.

(2) Why apply the same 'I want them to disappear' rationale to pics in your 'Private Gallery' (which punters must pay for) and video stills in your 'Movies' (which punters must pay for) - yet the stills of those movies are accessible without a paywall (see attached, for example) so are without question in 'public'?

(3) I've noticed you are using a pseudonym. Why is that? Why are you not using your WG name which is Red_Kitten? Is it because when 'Tail Seeker' is searched for on AW you cannot find it (it doesn't exist) and no review results for 'Tail Seeker' exist on this forum, but if you look for Red_Kitten on this forum, there are negative experiences detailed that punters have had with you? e.g.:

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=173011.msg1837132#msg1837132 (About you being a time waster)

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=151808.msg1656542#msg1656542 (Also about you being a time waster)

You should report yourself to Admin for using a pseudonym. UKP Rules state very clearly:

"All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'."

You are disrespecting the board and its members by quite possibly breaking the UKPunting Rules.

 

Really? Your assertion that I am pursuing her is demonstrably wrong. Why? Because I do not comment on anything she posts other than when she jumps on threads to spout incorrect and dangerous advice that potentially puts punters at risk. Go and check the record yourself. Why would that be? Because I care about her potentially putting punters in danger, and she (and seemingly you) does not.

Now proven to be bollocks.

I absolutely do. I will "let it rest" when she stops posting incorrect and potentially dangerous fake medical advice which, if followed, would put punters at risk.

Again, proven to be bollocks.

If you spent as much time punting as you do chasing me around on these boards and writing long diatribes about what standards of behaviour you think should apply to these boards, you might have more than THREE punts in FOUR YEARS. You're a tedious blowhard shit-stirrer who contributes nothing.

Talk about irony.


Despite what you say, you clearly have some sort grudge or vendetta with his SP as evidenced in your persistent trolling of her posts.  Maybe she wasted your time or refused to see you too?

[daviemac]

Her nic on here is not the same as her working name, that's not in line with the rules, she's clearly trying to hide the link between her UKP profile and AW profile, if you search tailseaker on AW you get nothing. 

It doesn't say it has to be, it just has to be revealed.   

- Service providers

* Service providers are allowed to be members, but there is no tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters.
* The site is not a chat platform between punters and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers.
* All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'.
* Service providers are recommended to join External Link/Members Only instead if they wish to advertise freely and / or chat with punters.

[scutty brown]

Now proven to be bollocks.

Again, proven to be bollocks.

Talk about irony.


Despite what you say, you clearly have some sort grudge or vendetta with his SP as evidenced in your persistent trolling of her posts.  Maybe she wasted your time or refused to see you too?

Agree totally
He's obsessed in a bad way
should be renamed as StalkerBoy

[James999]

This has been raised as an issue and reported with other girls many times before,

The simple solution is for pro$$ies to use the same MADE UP NAME they use on AW on here   

[daviemac]

The simple solution is for pro$$ies to use the same MADE UP NAME they use on AW on here   

Admin seems quite happy with the way it is, otherwise he would change it.   

[James999]

Admin seems quite happy with the way it is, otherwise he would change it.   

Admin changes & updates things constantly 

[scutty brown]

Admin changes & updates things constantly 

But he hasn't changed this. Do you want to tell him you think he's wrong?

[James999]

Yes he has, you obviously were not around in the early days of the site 

As for telling Admin what to do, you seem to be doing fine with your white knighting of Rochelle (whoever she is)   

[workinallweek]

Random thoughts

 If someone looks at a 'name' on here it may say    SERVICE PROVIDER  thats a clue
 If you want to know more about their services surely pm them  ?  just a thought

 If you dont like their posts ignore them  or is there an ability to block ?
 Is it really worth the punting time to waste it on endless (i know more than you )arguments?
 Dont get upset when someone wont see you .

 Even if you consider the service providers dirty stinking whores or worse maybe unless they have harmed you or yours in some way do they not deserve some human respect ? after all we are using their services .

   

[daviemac]

Yes he has, you obviously were not around in the early days of the site 

As for telling Admin what to do, you seem to be doing fine with your white knighting of Rochelle (whoever she is)   

November 2013 if you look, don't know if you count that as early enough.   

I'm not white knighting anybody, workinallweek has summed it up perfectly, any prossie posting on this thread is doing so within the rules that Admin has set. You are the one who's saying it should be this way and that way.

[James999]

November 2013 if you look, don't know if you count that as early enough.

I'm not white knighting anybody,

The comments were not to you, try and keep up 

[daviemac]

The comments were not to you, try and keep up 

 

[Rochelle]

Here's some fun facts:

Ignoring your posts on this thread, since the turn of the year, you have made 66 posts

42% would be classed as bad attitude towards punters on here (directed towards many different members)

42% would be classed as using the site as a chat platform

15% were you arguing with Tailseeker

Given the rules state:

- Service providers

* Service providers are allowed to be members, but there is no tolerance for touting, flirting, attention-seeking and negative attitude towards punters.
* The site is not a chat platform between punters and service providers, nor is it a support site for service providers.
* All service providers must reveal their working identities - no 'anonymous WGs'.
* Service providers are recommended to join External Link/Members Only instead if they wish to advertise freely and / or chat with punters.

Would it be reasonable to say that you are abusing the privilege of membership on here?

.

I would say no. If I was abusing the privilege I doubt I'd still be allowed here.