Sandy luscious - Great Portland Str

[tergil]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

I saw some good reviews of this lady so I went to see her. I was excited for the meeting because of the pictures and the description of her looks and service but it was disappointing for me.

It was easy to organise on the day, the was in an apartment near Great Portland street, no problems finding it or getting in.

She met me wearing some sexy underwear. Her profile says she is 25 and that is wrong, I would say around 10 years older. Unlike others I did not find her face all that attractive, older and harsher looking than I expected. She has badly bleached hair and very obvious blonde hair extensions, look bad. She seems friendly enough though, and her tits look great so I paid her 160 for an hour, since other reviews are good.

I had a shower and came to the room and she immediately took all her clothes off and wanted to get going. I prefer to start with FK and get rid of the clothes later. DFK was good enough. Touching her skin I notice that it does not feel very soft, like a lot of tanning has damaged it. She does not have much fat but her skin is not tight either so not a good feel. And her tits are big and fake but don't feel nice.

Then we go for OWO which is deep and aggressive and I ask her to slow down but she keeps going. We fuck with condom and she makes lots of pornstar noises, over the top. Once I come she does a massage and talks and talks. Round 2 is more of the same.

I did not enjoy the experience, I did not fancy her, there was no intimacy, she did not care what I want.

Neutral/negative 


Hidden Image/Members Only

[The Man With No Name]

Am considering booking her myself while she's up here in Glasgow this week, as I mainly punt for the types of girls and experiences I can't get on civvy street.

Each to their own obviously, but might I be right in saying you were possibly looking for more of a sensual GFE, despite booking what is clearly very much a sex-doll/PSE type of girl and service?

It's been stated several times before she's nearer her mid-thirties and has obviously has a very fake barbie/bimbo appearance. Meanwhile, although you probably need to be fired-up and in the mood for it yourself, the type of over-the-top dirty experience she offers is also very well documented in both her profile and reviews, so I kinda find it hard to understand what else you were expecting. I accept she was having a bad-hair day, and that her skin might not be as youthful as it once was. But you do seem to be a bit overly-picky with regard to most of your particular complaints, in relation to the type of girl you booked. Especially when a little bit of assertiveness on your part, in addition to your 160 quid, might've gone a long way in getting you more of what you wanted. Either way, "intimacy" ain't exactly what you book a girl like this for - and I'd argue a neutral would've been a fairer rating, given everything you've said and the expectations I think you should've had.

Furthermore, if you didn't overly like the look of what opened the door and you already had your reservations, why didn't you half the booking and save yourself 70 quid - or walk altogether? Ain't like you don't have another hundred plan-B options in the dead-centre of London, unlike up here in the wilds.

Sorry if I seem overly-harsh on your review, as I obviously haven't seen the girl myself yet and you can only report on your own impression. It's simply the case though, that in relation to my expectations of this type of girl, this type of service, and the other reviews I've read of her - with regard to what I'd be wanting from her - most of what you've written actually reads pretty positively to me.

Also, was there any reason for attaching the particular photo of her that you did? How closely would you say her body resembles it in reality?

[Othello1276]

I saw Sandy a few weeks ago and gave her a neutral review more for the fact that the service felt rushed and she took DFK and anal off the table. (my pierced tongue and apparently too big) As far as her body, I'd say the pics don't do it justice. If you are looking for that pornstar look, she hits all the notes. Her are way bigger in person than the pics show. She is definitely in her mid 30's. I can understand if she's not everyone's cup of joe, but reading other's reviews, you should be get a sense of who you are seeing and act accordingly.

[tergil]

Sorry if I seem overly-harsh on your review, as I obviously haven't seen the girl myself yet and you can only report on your own impression. It's simply the case though, that in relation to my expectations of this type of girl, this type of service, and the other reviews I've read of her - with regard to what I'd be wanting from her - most of what you've written actually reads pretty positively to me.

Also, was there any reason for attaching the particular photo of her that you did? How closely would you say her body resembles it in reality?

That is okay your comments are not harsh. Not much anyway. My review rating is how I felt when I left and it could've been neutral as I said. The picture is just the first one in her gallery.

[The Man With No Name]

I saw Sandy a few weeks ago and gave her a neutral review more for the fact that the service felt rushed and she took DFK and anal off the table. (my pierced tongue and apparently too big) As far as her body, I'd say the pics don't do it justice. If you are looking for that pornstar look, she hits all the notes. Her are way bigger in person than the pics show. She is definitely in her mid 30's. I can understand if she's not everyone's cup of joe, but reading other's reviews, you should be get a sense of who you are seeing and act accordingly.

Aye, I clocked your review and thought it was pretty fair and balanced for the disappointment over DFK and anal.

If you don't mind me asking (just to judge my own chances of getting some bum-fun), are you also hung as you'd presume Terry Crews to be?

Also, fancy sending that Brazilian with the awesome arse of muscle up this way? We've plenty of Latina trannies around these parts just now for some reason, so whether she actually is, or just pumped full of 'roids I'm sure she'll fit in very well.

In any case, the two of them in the one day is very good-going. You must've been shattered. 

That is okay your comments are not harsh. Not much anyway. My review rating is how I felt when I left and it could've been neutral as I said. The picture is just the first one in her gallery.

I know it is. I was wondering how much of a true reflection you consider it to be, given it's by far her most natural-looking shot.

[tergil]

It is pretty accurate although there could have been a small amount of airbrush

[The Man With No Name]

It is pretty accurate although there could have been a small amount of airbrush

Top titty!