TS Peaches

[Stones69]

Hi, anyone got any information on this TS please, External Link/Members Only have searched but to no avail. Cheers

[jandyr]

I might be wrong, but she looks a little bit like someone who went by the name TS Sinead.

She had a terrible rep on the old HA reviews site.

[Stones69]

Thanks, only thing I found was a great verification pic. Any more info would be greatly appreciated. Might have to toftt

[Hugeadmirer]

Pretty sure this is Sinead. She was known to frequently change her name to try and escape her consistent terrible reviews.

She does indeed look stunning and I’ve been very tempted in the past but fortunately the bad feedback dissuaded me

[Stones69]

Thanks chaps, will stay well clear.

[djf1968]

Hi. I am an old HA member who joined here not too long ago after the escort review forum there was shut down. I havent been physically active for a little while, hence why I have not posted any reviews on here as yet. However, having been on HA for a few years, I can confirm 100% that the pics are those of TS Sinead, who did indeed have many bad reviews and was consistently changing her name to avoid losing business.


'The Science Guy' (this is how I was known on HA for anyone i chatted to on there who might read this)

P.S.I am now over my recent back problems and plan to go and see SexyTrans in Liverpool on Wednesday. Havent seen her for over 2 years and will be happy to post a review afterwards

External Link/Members Only

[Stones69]

What a wonderfully opportune set of circumstances that have allowed you to post such a great bit of news. I'm glad your back is better. However, if I was cynical I might also suggest this sounds like an advertorial. Nice try though.

[djf1968]

i was waiting for the 1st cynic to pop up, and well done its you. i dont really give a toss if you believe or dont believe, i will post a review anyway now that i am back in action, but i am sure there will be plenty of others who will also shout 'fake'.

i posted regularly on HA as djf1968 (I think over 100 posts before they closed the forum down) and reviewed a few TS up to around late 2017 until due to back spasms i struggled to be able to 'perform' so to speak. i never actually reviewed SexyTrans on there but if you wanted to see my previous reviews of her on Adultwork (she is listed as SexyTrans2019) dated Dec 2016 (field report) and Sept 2017, you will also see she has 93 positive reviews so hardly needs my help by advertising her. having seen her multiple times in 2016/17 i spoke to her about HA and other forums but she didnt strike me as being interested so i dont think she needs to pretend to be a punter either, but you keep believing what you want to believe.

THE SCIENCE GUY 

 

[NigelF]

i was waiting for the 1st cynic to pop up, and well done its you. i dont really give a toss if you believe or dont believe, i will post a review anyway now that i am back in action, but i am sure there will be plenty of others who will also shout 'fake'.

i posted regularly on HA as djf1968 (I think over 100 posts before they closed the forum down) and reviewed a few TS up to around late 2017 until due to back spasms i struggled to be able to 'perform' so to speak. i never actually reviewed SexyTrans on there but if you wanted to see my previous reviews of her on Adultwork (she is listed as SexyTrans2019) dated Dec 2016 (field report) and Sept 2017, you will also see she has 93 positive reviews so hardly needs my help by advertising her. having seen her multiple times in 2016/17 i spoke to her about HA and other forums but she didnt strike me as being interested so i dont think she needs to pretend to be a punter either, but you keep believing what you want to believe.

THE SCIENCE GUY 

External Link/Members Only

I hope your review on here is much more accurate and balanced than the field report you left. Here's a handy guide to writing reviews that are genuinely helpful (the summary is all you really need to know):
External Link/Members Only

I presume "she" doesn't have any tits and isn't on any hormones, so isn't really a TS, more of a TV?

[cueball]

i was waiting for the 1st cynic to pop up, and well done its you. i dont really give a toss if you believe or dont believe,

What do you expect?

If you're as forum savvy as you say you are it should come as no surprise your validity is called into question.

There's no need for a snotty answer, it just makes you look a twat.

Trust is built not given willy nilly.

[djf1968]

I apologise if my response came across as snotty, was not the intention, although I didnt appreciate the personal comments in response to my back, as that has been painful for a while and only recently have I been able to even think of getting back into action. Yes i did expect some cynicism regards my post, as  i had seen others on here receive that with their first post and of course saw plenty of that on HA forum too.

In hindsight, i probably shouldnt have added the comments about me going to see SexyTrans2019 in my first post as really I was just trying to be helpful in confirming that the pics were indeed of the notorious Sinead. It was almost just an afterthought really and while I appreciate I may still get some cynical comments when I post my review, I would like to contribute to the forum.

NigelF - Appreciate the guide, I must admit I was pretty new to the whole review thing when I wrote those and I have seen many use the structured review that you have sent me, so I will adhere to that approach in future. In answer to your question, yes more a TV than a TS as no breasts.

I acknowledge that while I may have been 'reasonably' well known on HA that is clearly not the case here, so as you say I hope that over time my opinions and reviews will gain some trust with all forum members.

The Science Guy

[NigelF]

I apologise if my response came across as snotty, was not the intention, although I didnt appreciate the personal comments in response to my back, as that has been painful for a while and only recently have I been able to even think of getting back into action. Yes i did expect some cynicism regards my post, as  i had seen others on here receive that with their first post and of course saw plenty of that on HA forum too.

In hindsight, i probably shouldnt have added the comments about me going to see SexyTrans2019 in my first post as really I was just trying to be helpful in confirming that the pics were indeed of the notorious Sinead. It was almost just an afterthought really and while I appreciate I may still get some cynical comments when I post my review, I would like to contribute to the forum.

NigelF - Appreciate the guide, I must admit I was pretty new to the whole review thing when I wrote those and I have seen many use the structured review that you have sent me, so I will adhere to that approach in future. In answer to your question, yes more a TV than a TS as no breasts.

I acknowledge that while I may have been 'reasonably' well known on HA that is clearly not the case here, so as you say I hope that over time my opinions and reviews will gain some trust with all forum members.

The Science Guy

Fair enough, cheers for the info and I look forward to your future contributions 

[18smiler82]

He was on my to do list whilst down this part of the world, even if not TS,  until i learnt gloryhole and swallow for the cost of a round of drinks. Pass on that one, guess it explains the headless pics.

[Stones69]

Fair play Science Guy, genuinely glad your back is better.

[Strummer]

Yes, the notorious Sinead/Stacy/Peaches/Teegan Flowers or whatever she is calling herself now.

Negatively reviewed extensively on HA, I was unfortunate to part with money to her before I found the now non functioning HA site.

£120, I was in and out in 20 minutes, all she wanted to do was get me to cum ASAP and show me the door.

Second worst punt I've ever had  - You don't want to hear about the worst!

[magpie252]

Second worst punt I've ever had  - You don't want to hear about the worst!

And judging by your contribution so far, we never will 

[winkywanky]

Yes, the notorious Sinead/Stacy/Peaches/Teegan Flowers or whatever she is calling herself now.

Negatively reviewed extensively on HA, I was unfortunate to part with money to her before I found the now non functioning HA site.

£120, I was in and out in 20 minutes, all she wanted to do was get me to cum ASAP and show me the door.

Second worst punt I've ever had  - You don't want to hear about the worst!

So in your FOUR YEARS on here, that's at least two punts you haven't bothered to review.

Perhaps if you had it might have saved someone wasting their money, no doubt just like you use reviews by others to inform yourself.

[Strummer]

So in your FOUR YEARS on here, that's at least two punts you haven't bothered to review.

Perhaps if you had it might have saved someone wasting their money, no doubt just like you use reviews by others to inform yourself.

I haven't punted for at least 4 years, so I have no new reviews to leave. I am not going to type out all my old meetings again.

Nearly all mine were with TS's and EVERY TS encounter I had was reviewed on HA.

The couple of RG's were before I joined this site too. I replied about Portia Wells, however, I have never been with her.

I updated my visit to Nicky's angel.eyes, even though I wasn't a member of this site when I saw her and also lovelylucy34e, even though I wasn't a member of this site when I had the misfortune to meet her.

If you were so interested in TS's, then perhaps you should have paid more attention to the TS review sites dedicated to them?

Wow, what an arsehole!

[chrishornx]

Winky Wanky is not the arsehole on this thread

[markey174]

Like Strummer, I don’t punt as much these days but used to do a lot of posting on HA. What I did was do on here was to provide a list with a brief description  and rating of all the girls I’d seen in those days that are still working now. It would be helpful if he could do the same. There must be lots of people on here who never saw or can’t remember a HA review of a current provider

[chrishornx]

. What I did was do on here .....

what does that mean?

[Chris1990mcr]

Personally saw her many years ago in hulme.
She was and is very fit and very good looking. I somehow managed a good experience but I think that was the exception rather than the norm.

Universally derided as terrible.  I really wouldn’t bother plus as far as I know she is utterly mental.

Avoid.

[spippex2]

Probably I bit off topic, but I was wondering if there is any (web) archive of those reviews from HA forum. Does anyone know whether it is possible to dig up and bring back to life that very valuable piece of information?

[winkywanky]

I haven't punted for at least 4 years, so I have no new reviews to leave. I am not going to type out all my old meetings again.

Nearly all mine were with TS's and EVERY TS encounter I had was reviewed on HA.

The couple of RG's were before I joined this site too. I replied about Portia Wells, however, I have never been with her.

I updated my visit to Nicky's angel.eyes, even though I wasn't a member of this site when I saw her and also lovelylucy34e, even though I wasn't a member of this site when I had the misfortune to meet her.

If you were so interested in TS's, then perhaps you should have paid more attention to the TS review sites dedicated to them?

Wow, what an arsehole!

Once again, when a longstanding member with no reviews, who has seen girls, is reasonably questioned over their lack of contribution, the immediate response is to lash out  .

And call me an arsehole  .

There seems to have been a spate of these over the last few days, and the result is always the same. They spit their dummy out, and please note, it's completely unjustified. Grovelling is not required, just a little reasoned explanation, WITHOUT all the teenage attitude. It's pathetic.

And this why they are likely to be immediately be labelled as A CUNT by existing members, until they subsequently prove otherwise  .

[Kool Keef]

+1 Winkywanky
What's he on here for anyway if he doesn't punt?

[winkywanky]

Dunno. It seems unlikely to me that a previously prolific punter with membership of (and supposedly, reviews on) the now defunct Hung Angels, would suddenly and inexplicably stop punting the precise moment they joined UKP.

But of course only he knows the truth of that, and his bad attitude to a reasonable question will lead others to draw their own conclusions on that.

[Strummer]

+1 Winkywanky
What's he on here for anyway if he doesn't punt?

I was told about this site by Portia Wells when I met her at the R3tro Club, so I joined.

I added comments about a couple of RG's that I had seen previously to joining but didn't bother with a review as there was already information on them, I just added my updates.

There were no reviews on TS's then as HA was the Transgender review site.

There is then a long gap without any activity, because, do you know why?...... I didn't visit the site or any RG Escorts.

I was talking to a very, very good TS friend about a month ago who told me she'd had a less than favourable review on here. I told her I wasn't aware UK Punting had TS reviews, but said I was a member and I'd have a look, hence the reason I came back on the site.

She told me what had happened and, I know there are two sides to every story but the punter got exactly what he paid for in my opinion.

Anyway, I thought if I could add a bit of info about some of the TS girls I know, and trust me, I know quite a few, or ones that I've met professionally, I would.

For instance, I read about 'A Decent Fist' ending up with a post-op. I knew she was a post-op, I've never been with her but I know her. Her name is Giovana, a real nasty piece of work. 5 or so years ago she used to have an apartment in Dale Street, Manchester by Piccadilly Gardens. She would plaster Birchplace with fake ads of gorgeous looking girls pretending them to be TS's. She'd have a couple of TS's at the apartment and when punters call she'd get them to the apartment and just bait and switch, leaving the poor girls to explain why they don't look like their advert.

She usually had girls that hadn't been in the country long, struggled to find places to work from, struggled to communicate and were scared. Some punters stayed, some walked and some caused problems.....which is why she doesn't see coloured men.

I wouldn't have been able to help A Decent Fist as I wouldn't have posted a review, but if he'd of asked for info prior going to see her I would have been able to give him the heads up.

Anyway, it seems that unless you are a friend of Mr W Wanker or a serial poster you aren't welcome on the site.

I bid you a good day gentlemen 

[winkywanky]

Anyway, it seems that unless you are a friend of Mr W Wanker or a serial poster you aren't welcome on the site.

That is utter tosh, and you know it. I'm by no means a 'bigwig' on here, and frankly no-one really is, we're all equal in punting terms. And that's the way it should be.

The comment from me (#16) which immediately followed your post was entirely reasonable, justified, and not nasty or abusive. Your reply to that was arsey, and you called me an arsehole. So quite frankly, you can fuck off until you show a reasonable attitude.

As soon as you do so you are indeed welcome.

[Tony4447]

Looks like a bolt on to me..............I mean the cock 

[chrishornx]

That is utter tosh, and you know it. I'm by no means a 'bigwig' on here, and frankly no-one really is, we're all equal in punting terms. And that's the way it should be.

The comment from me (#16) which immediately followed your post was entirely reasonable, justified, and not nasty or abusive. Your reply to that was arsey, and you called me an arsehole. So quite frankly, you can fuck off until you show a reasonable attitude.

As soon as you do so you are indeed welcome.

could not agree more, well said Winky. He was bang out of order being abusive and that attitude is not welcome on here

if he has a problem with that he is welcome to fuck off

[winkywanky]

Yes. Infact I do wish that everyone would just bloody well fuck off! 

[chrishornx]

Yes. Infact I do wish that everyone would just bloody well fuck off! 

charming