Roxy-Bristol

[BogBog1]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

As mentioned, I saw Roxy last Friday. Great comms by text, 30 mins for £60, everything included except anal (which I didn't go for on this occasion). Roxy works from a flat 5 mins walk from Temple Meads, so dead easy to get to. I got the impression that the flat is her place, rather than a "working flat" - either way, I didn't hear any other voices while I was there.

My preference is for petite girls, so I was pleasantly surprised when Roxy opened the door and she is smaller (shorter and slimmer) than her profile pics suggest. Her profile says she's a size 8 - I reckon she's a 6, tanned, toned, and incredibly smooth skin - overall she's got the body of a 20-year old. Roxy is English (which, again, I don't often go for due to a few really bad experiences) and friendly, so no language/communication problems or awkwardness at all. Age-wise she's mid-late 30s I would say - her photos aren't photoshopped at all so no nasty surprises there. I was put at ease by all this immediately, which always helps.

After freshening up, Roxy came into the bedroom wearing a black one-piece lacy number, which quickly came off to reveal matching black underwear and stockings/suspenders. Lots of proper french kissing, with tongues, from the start and throughout the punt, which is just how I like it. We moved onto the bed and as little Zakk was hard already, she started giving me a decent handjob while I finger-fucked her with one then two fingers (she was fine with this - another plus!)

Then she moved down and started with her apparently famous blowjobs (uncovered) - and I can see where she gets her reputation from! A great mixture of deep throat, use of tongue, licking my balls and the shaft as well as the head.... awesome, and after not very long I was close to popping so asked her to slow down. After a few minutes' kissing and "exploring each others' bodies" (ugh, that sounded like it came straight out of a Mills & Boon novel, sorry!), it was on with the mac and we fucked in cowgirl. I was intending on switching to another position but she sight of her seeming to get into it (acting or otherwise, it convinced me) made me unable to hold back for too long.

I'm a one-pop guy these days, so given we were 20 minutes into a 30-minute punt, there was no way I was going to fit in any further action - however, she didn't seem to be in any rush to get me out of the door, and we had a good chat about various things while I was getting dressed. As I left I said I'd be visiting her again, and even though this is something I often say to WGs (god knows why, too polite for my own good I am), on this occasion I genuinely meant it.

Overall - a great punt with a slim, toned and enthusiastic English MILF, and a thumbs up from me.

[Roth]

The Roxy BJ is to die for.  One of the best IMHO.

[house music dave]

Agreed lads:)

[Roth]

She should give coaching lessons to other WGs in the art of the BJ! And no I am NOT touting!  All I will say is that if you are thinking of trying her out then do.  She does not disappoint.

[Mr Kent (Not AW)]

Good report, I met Roxy about 10 years ago now on a skank council estate near Brislington, a young lad eyed me up at the entrance, she looked very scrawny, like a druggy, cot in the room with kids toys etc......you get the picture. Never went back after that. The reports I read now are of a totally different girl, glad she has improved so much over the years. 

[Roth]

Good report, I met Roxy about 10 years ago now on a skank council estate near Brislington, a young lad eyed me up at the entrance, she looked very scrawny, like a druggy, cot in the room with kids toys etc......you get the picture. Never went back after that. The reports I read now are of a totally different girl, glad she has improved so much over the years.

Yes Mr Kent, a totally different WG now.   Her personal WG website still has some old photos including cot in room.  There are a bit off putting but if you look above these she has improved a lot.  Defo NO cot in room in her current flat.  She is definitely not a druggy.  Pretty well balanced, pleasant and very very sexy when I saw her recently.

[Mr Kent (Not AW)]

Perhaps I should re visit Roth........it has been 10 years after all!

[Roth]

Perhaps I should re visit Roth........it has been 10 years after all!

I try not to return too often to the same WG but in this case I am certainly going again as I know I will not be disappointed.  But that's just me.

[hockogrockle]

I also remember a Roxy from a few years ago with photos that made her look a bit like a druggie (a very sexy druggie, mind you- and that's not something I thought I would ever write). I have a vague recollection of a cot in the photos, too. But I thought this Roxy was in a rough area of Hartcliffe I'll rephrase that: she was in a pretty typical area of Hartcliffe. That, more than anything was the reason I never saw her. I had visions of the wheels on my car having gone AWOL by the time I got back to it. Is this the same girl, and have I somehow got the original address wrong?

[Roth]

I also remember a Roxy from a few years ago with photos that made her look a bit like a druggie (a very sexy druggie, mind you- and that's not something I thought I would ever write). I have a vague recollection of a cot in the photos, too. But I thought this Roxy was in a rough area of Hartcliffe I'll rephrase that: she was in a pretty typical area of Hartcliffe. That, more than anything was the reason I never saw her. I had visions of the wheels on my car having gone AWOL by the time I got back to it. Is this the same girl, and have I somehow got the original address wrong?

No I think she has just moved onwards and upwards courtesy of us punters who have enjoyed her company. All positive IMHO.  Nothing wrong with that.

[HS4000Kestral]

saw Roxy back end of last year - she had two flats to work from I think.

anyway very decent punt - although her legs were a bit bigger than the rest of her frame.

did everything asked for though.

[Curious6705]

I saw Roxy in 2009. After years reading glowing PN reviews and thinking she looked thin as a rake and not my type, I finally decided to give her a try.

She was working from a battered looking block of flats at the end of a bleak cul de sac on a sink estate in Hartcliffe. She opened the door in bra and briefs looking, to be honest, dull eyed, dissipated, and amazingly enough, overweight. The flat smelled bad and IMO was in dire need of redecoration and a good clean. She showed me to a bedroom which looked out over the parking square at the end of the cul de sac and I paid for an hour which we had agreed over the phone. She then disappeared for 10 minutes so we had a 50 minute punt. The bedroom featured a double bed and a clearly visible clock. Also a laptop displaying her website on a pouffe stool at the end of the bed - she had a moan about PNet when she eventually reappeared - Ms Harman was in her full pomp at the time.

We went through the motions - she made clear that it was a one-cum-punt. To be honest I was glad when the hour - I mean 50 minutes - were up and I could return to a cleaner and better smelling world. Not a good experience for me, and one I will never repeat.

I'm glad others report better experiences, but never again for me.

[Lz-129]

I saw roxy last year! An absolutly fantastic blow job! I'd certainly see her again

[Mr Kent (Not AW)]

I saw her recently after a 10 year absence and after the meet I realised why I had left it 10 years to see her again............

[Blue Suede Goo]

I saw her recently after a 10 year absence and after the meet I realised why I had left it 10 years to see her again............

What was wrong?
All the talk about her quality blow job has me curious but I'm not sure about her appearance.

[Mr Kent (Not AW)]

Gaunt, skinny, looks a bit like a druggy, I'll go down on most girls...........would't Roxy. Yes she does give a good BJ, but you have to keep your eyes tightly shut, the whole picture for me was a put off. That said she was very pleasant, but I wasn't paying for that.

[Blue Suede Goo]

Gaunt, skinny, looks a bit like a druggy, I'll go down on most girls...........would't Roxy. Yes she does give a good BJ, but you have to keep your eyes tightly shut, the whole picture for me was a put off. That said she was very pleasant, but I wasn't paying for that.

Thanks Mr Kent.
I'll steer clear.

I'm in Bristol Saturday. Any recommendations?

[Alde]

Thanks Mr Kent.
I'll steer clear.

I'm in Bristol Saturday. Any recommendations?

You won't get Soph I doubt at this notice.  I have reviewed both these:

Olivia   External Link/Members Only

Good vanilla punt

Or

Cheeky Hands   External Link/Members Only

Good vanilla punt but can also by a bit more spicy/racy if you prefer!

[Mr Kent (Not AW)]

Agree with Alde on Anna (Cheeky Hands), seriously good punt !

[Blue Suede Goo]

Booked an hour with Cheeky Hands.
 

[Alde]

Booked an hour with Cheeky Hands.
 

You won't regret it BSG.  Looking forward to reading about it.

[Roth]

Roxy's not everyone's cuppa but I thought she was ok.

[Lz-129]

Roxy's not everyone's cuppa but I thought she was ok.

Me too! Excellent blow job too

[Roth]

Me too! Excellent blow job too

+1

 

[XTC2]

It's pretty funny we've got opinions of "overweight" and "skinny" here within just a few posts of each other

I've seen her a number of times and at the moment she's neither of those. She looks like her photos guys, check them out first and you'll have no surprises.

Me too! Excellent blow job too

+2 

[Curious6705]

It's pretty funny we've got opinions of "overweight" and "skinny" here within just a few posts of each other

I've seen her a number of times and at the moment she's neither of those. She looks like her photos guys, check them out first and you'll have no surprises.

+2 

But describing visits separated by five years - I made clear in my post that it was 2009 when I saw her. Mr K saw her again recently.

Incidentally I see her personal website still shows the same photos as in 2009 - and they were out of date then - as the WG I saw had put on weight compared to the photos.

[XTC2]

The AW pictures are far more recent, obviously, and don't show significant change in terms of weight. Besides, if you seriously thought she was overweight back then, I can only assume you must be really turned on by stick insects

[Curious6705]

The AW pictures are far more recent, obviously, and don't show significant change in terms of weight. Besides, if you seriously thought she was overweight back then, I can only assume you must be really turned on by stick insects

I see the AW profile includes photos from that personal website. Those photos must be 5 or 6 years old now - yet they are featured on her current profile - which is misleading and dishonest.

She was overweight - she admitted to me that she had put on a lot of weight - I was there - you were not - or were you? Do you have some personal connection to her?

[Curious6705]

In fact I just looked at both her AW profile and her personal website. There is a photo on both of her bending over and touching her toes. I won't post the image as it is explicit - but here are the links -

Personal website -

External Link/Members Only

AW Profile -

External Link/Members Only

The photo on her own website has the file name - Roxy-a-nov-07-d.jpg and the next image file is roxy-a-nov-07-e.jpg

Seems clear she is claiming those photos were taken November 2007 - and yet they are still described on her website as her "latest pictures"

And you claim that the photos on her AW profile are current - which they clearly are not as the images I have highlighted appear to be 7 years old.

It is not me that is talking nonsense here. 

[XTC2]

I'm not sure what your point is, but look at the first few pics on her AW gallery, they are recent. Yes, ones further down are older. That surprises you for some reason?

I've seen her off and on for several years, you can (very easily) see on PN I left a review for her back at the start of 2009 FYI. My original comment stands, thanks!

[Daffodil]

I'm not sure what your point is, but look at the first few pics on her AW gallery, they are recent. Yes, ones further down are older. That surprises you for some reason?

I've seen her off and on for several years, you can (very easily) see on PN I left a review for her back at the start of 2009 FYI. My original comment stands, thanks!

On her own website, in her "latest pictures" section, the newest is from May 2010  That's four years.

The pictures on her main AW profile page have been in use for several years at least, they never seem to change. As curious points out, she has lots of pictures that are even older.

I fail to see how you can argue, she is clearly using pretty old pictures 

[Curious6705]

I'm not sure what your point is, but look at the first few pics on her AW gallery, they are recent. Yes, ones further down are older. That surprises you for some reason?

I've seen her off and on for several years, you can (very easily) see on PN I left a review for her back at the start of 2009 FYI. My original comment stands, thanks!

I think the point is pretty clear - Daff had no problem understanding what I am saying.

In my comment detailing my punt I mentioned Harman and PNet - so when I punted with her it was the autumn of 2009 - and PNet had just begun its death spiral following Harman's criticism of them in Parliament at the end of September. Your punt was in January 2009. Three quarters of a year is plenty of time for someone to put on weight. There's even a PNet report in July 2009 which mentions how she'd put on weight compared to her photos.

[XTC2]

I thought the point was about weight, not how recent the photos were? The photos are an accurate representation of her weight, that was my point. There are some that are very recent, even if others are older. None of them show an enormous variation, do they?

Anyway this is starting to become something of a surreal argument, like someone holding up a picture of a fox and swearing blind that it's a dolphin. The pictures, regardless of age, show her weight accurately IMHO. If you believe from those that she's thin, fat or whatever that's your call, but claiming that someone who has to my knowledge never been larger than a size 8-10 since 2009 (and I was FYI seeing her regularly at that time) is "overweight" is a bit ridiculous.

[Curious6705]

I thought the point was about weight, not how recent the photos were? The photos are an accurate representation of her weight, that was my point. There are some that are very recent, even if others are older. None of them show an enormous variation, do they?

Anyway this is starting to become something of a surreal argument, like someone holding up a picture of a fox and swearing blind that it's a dolphin. The pictures, regardless of age, show her weight accurately IMHO. If you believe from those that she's thin, fat or whatever that's your call, but claiming that someone who has to my knowledge never been larger than a size 8-10 since 2009 (and I was FYI seeing her regularly at that time) is "overweight" is a bit ridiculous.

It's important to make clear to any punter who might decide to book her that the photos on her profile were taken years ago. It's nonsense to claim a punter can rely on photos up to 7 years old or more.

For me she was a "negative" punt - for example time wasting (disappeared for first 10 minutes) and significantly heavier than her photos, which were misleading.

[inch]

So in other words the photos are both

- current and accurate
and
- not current and not accurate

Thanks guys, that's really helped us all.

[Curious6705]

So in other words the photos are both

- current and accurate
and
- not current and not accurate

Thanks guys, that's really helped us all.

Up to 7 years old so unreliable. HTH.

I believe differences of opinion are tolerated on UKP. For example if I wrote up my punt with this WG as a review it would be a negative for the reasons I've already given. Whereas ZakMorrison rates his punt as a positive.

Although strictly speaking that would not be a difference of opinion as such - it would be two separate reports of different punts with the same WG.

[XTC2]

Differences of opinion are fine. Claims that her photos were misleading is clearly bullshit, and there's plenty of comments in PN reviews to back that up.

Sorry for the confusion inch. It's because of obviously incorrect (let's be generous and say "skewed") information being posted that I replied in this thread. I'd advise you take a look at her recent photos (the first few in her gallery) and make up your own mind.

[Curious6705]

Differences of opinion are fine. Claims that her photos were misleading is clearly bullshit, and there's plenty of comments in PN reviews to back that up.

Sorry for the confusion inch. It's because of obviously incorrect (let's be generous and say "skewed") information being posted that I replied in this thread. I'd advise you take a look at her recent photos (the first few in her gallery) and make up your own mind.

No they are not - on the contrary your claims that the photos were up to date clearly are.

You knew very well they are not up to date because I see that in your report on PNet in January 2009 you say she has used your photos on her profile.

PN is a fluffies paradise - reports on there and the photos it appears you took were responsible for misleading me so I booked this WG - which was a mistake.

So you say you're a "regular" of this WG, you took photos which were used on her profile, and you won't hear a bad word said against her ... are you just her punter?

[XTC2]

Check my posts, I have never  claimed all her photos were up to date. I have stated that there are also recent photos in  her gallery. This is a point you seem to be wilfully ignoring - I wonder why? Moreover there is nothing I have written here or on PN that suggests I "won't hear a bad word said against her". I objected to a misleading description, nothing more.

So let's see, we have unsubstantiated accusations and claims that appear to conflict with the vast majority of other accounts (not to mention photographic proof). Ironically this started as a good natured observation that you must prefer skinny girls, but you seem determined to turn it into something more. So as long as we're throwing around baseless accusations, perhaps we should be asking what girls in the area you seem to post positively about, what your "link" with them might be, and if that might be the reason for your recent posts perhaps?

[Curious6705]

Check my posts, I have never  claimed all her photos were up to date. I have stated that there are also recent photos in  her gallery. This is a point you seem to be wilfully ignoring - I wonder why? Moreover there is nothing I have written here or on PN that suggests I "won't hear a bad word said against her". I objected to a misleading description, nothing more.

So let's see, we have unsubstantiated accusations and claims that appear to conflict with the vast majority of other accounts (not to mention photographic proof). Ironically this started as a good natured observation that you must prefer skinny girls, but you seem determined to turn it into something more. So as long as we're throwing around baseless accusations, perhaps we should be asking what girls in the area you seem to post positively about, what your "link" with them might be, and if that might be the reason for your recent posts perhaps?

So - which photos on her website are you responsible for.

Photos, some of which you took, and which have no doubt been through Photoshop, are not "proof". 

I have punted with many of the Bristol area WGs who are \ were well known but not recently. I returned to punting after a break in the summer of 2012 - by July 2012 I had decided the Bristol scene was crap since when I have punted almost exclusively in London - mainly at LMP.

So I don't seek to promote any Bristol WGs and haven't posted positively about any. And this is not PN - it's quite OK for a couple of punters, such as myself and another to have a negative opinion which is different from that of others. This is just as "substantiated" as any other on UKP and certainly much more than the fluffy nonsense often posted on PN.

[XTC2]

Oh I see, reports that disagree with yours are by fluffies. Photographs that show things are not as you've claimed must have been photoshopped. People that claim otherwise must have a "personal link" with the prozzie in question. Nice little straw man you've built there.

[Curious6705]

Oh I see, reports that disagree with yours are by fluffies. Photographs that show things are not as you've claimed must have been photoshopped. People that claim otherwise must have a "personal link" with the prozzie in question. Nice little straw man you've built there.

No you don't see - reports by fluffies are fluffy. There are many of those on PN. I've looked at your 2 reports on there - I see she's the only WG you're reported on - and they are overwhelmingly positive. From your January 2009 report -

I've visited Roxy a number of times and thought I'd finally write a report. Quite simply, she never disappoints and is easily the best escort I have ever met.

... She also lets me take pictures, and has even put a few of them up on her site

she's also rather amazing value for money

And on and on in the same vein.

Please answer the question - which photos on her website are you responsible for?

[XTC2]

PN removes reports on girls that are no longer working, in fact I had a number of others. But sure, I've just checked and it looks like the only pic I've taken that's still on her site is called "roxy-a-jul-09-1.jpg" (I can't check AW at the moment). A pity as there were others that I preferred. Now perhaps you'll answer all of my questions above that you previously ignored? Such as how someone who is a size 8-10 could be considered 'overweight'. Or is it still your contention that all photos that might have shown that have been altered?

[Curious6705]

PN removes reports on girls that are no longer working, in fact I had a number of others. But sure, I've just checked and it looks like the only pic I've taken that's still on her site is called "roxy-a-jul-09-1.jpg" (I can't check AW at the moment). A pity as there were others that I preferred. Now perhaps you'll answer all of my questions above that you previously ignored? Such as how someone who is a size 8-10 could be considered 'overweight'. Or is it still your contention that all photos that might have shown that have been altered?

Please can you provide a link to that photo as I linked to images in post number 28 of this thread. I just clicked through all the photos on her web site gallery and I didn't see one captioned "roxy-a-jul-09-1.jpg"

When I saw her she presented as overweight - particularly around her backside - which IMO was saggy - a long way from the "pert bum" claimed on her website. I could provide more detail about that - possibly as a "negative" review - which I considered doing earlier - but as it was five years ago I've so far decided against it. Compared to her appearance when I saw her in person photos such as the one I linked to earlier were a joke.

As I said earlier, during the punt she volunteered the information that she'd put on a lot of weight recently.

[XTC2]

Nah sorry, if you can't be bothered to check a website or even answer a straight question I don't see why I should be doing you any favours. You can think she's fat, thin or a fucking antelope for all I care.

[Curious6705]

Nah sorry, if you can't be bothered to check a website or even answer a straight question I don't see why I should be doing you any favours. You can think she's fat, thin or a fucking antelope for all I care.

I answered the question. She was overweight when I saw her with my own eyes and compared to the person before me the photos on her website were a joke.

I checked the website - and to help explain I posted two links earlier in the thread. It's you who cannot be bothered.

You're a bit of a strange one IMO - you post glowing reports of one WG on PN - start an argument and then complain it's surreal - ignore answers to questions etc.

I see from another post on here you say you got some bother from the Police when you were with an "Escort". That's unusual IMO - I started punting 25 years ago and I've never experienced anything like that. Was Roxy the "Escort" you were with? 

[XTC2]

It was another girl, Steff (aka BristolBabe). The incident was mentioned on bristolscene.

No, you didn't answer the question, or many others in fact. But there's little point in continuing this, for whatever reason you seem to have some beef with her and I think I've gone quite far enough in  stating an obviously slim girl is in fact slim (hence the surreal comment). But you think whatever the hell you like mate.

[Curious6705]

It was another girl, Steff (aka BristolBabe). The incident was mentioned on bristolscene.

No, you didn't answer the question, or many others in fact. But there's little point in continuing this, for whatever reason you seem to have some beef with her and I think I've gone quite far enough in  stating an obviously slim girl is in fact slim (hence the surreal comment). But you think whatever the hell you like mate.

It's patently obvious I did answer the question. She'd put on weight. This is part of the human condition and happens quite a lot - usually when people eat more and exercise less. There is quite a lot of evidence - including  reports by members of UKP - that WGs often put on weight and don't immediately update the photos they use to attract punters.

[inch]

I've just taken a look through her gallery and I don't see any photos of a fat bird. Therefore:

a) she isn't fat

or

b) the photos are not up-to-date

She did appear to be gurning in several of them, however, which is MORE than enough to put me off.

[XTC2]

gurning

Jesus, you could have warned us what that meant before I did an image search! I can't say I notice any of that, but what the hell do I know, apparently both my memory (and photos) from 2009 are incorrect.