Not really, since that the neg points as I see them exist in every punt
You're right that there are always limitations and almost always negative points to a punt (sometimes just very minor ones) but as far as I can see the neg points that you specifically mentioned in this review don't exist in every punt. I'm particularly referring to all the negative points mentioned below, I'm confident that there are a number of WGs out there who don't have any of these downsides:
The absolute must for me is to have my neck kissed. So the only thing I was missing on was neck kissing from her service so unlike most here, her services are a good match to me or so I thought. Now the punt is the most mechanical I had which was expected but I did not expect a full lack of touch so basically touch is minimal, her face does not get anywhere near you and anything that is slightly intimate is out of the question but to her credit she never promises otherwise. Usually in other punts it starts with a bit of of groping caressing cuddling but with Jess those things are unavailable and the punt starts with her instructing you to lie on the bed. She gets on the bed ( still looking very sexy and heels still on, tattos are a tasteful add which I liked even though not a fan of tats in general) and wipes my cock before putting condom on for oral. Now this left me a bit confused wondering why the wiping, I am circumcised, pay extra attention to cock in shower and took a shower 5 mins before seeing her (she lives very close) and on top of that did not request OWO it was OW never had a WG use wet wipes on me even those who do OWO. This, kind of makes you doubt yourself especially when you spend extra time taking care of your hygiene before the punt but I do understand her and not a big deal if it makes her feel better.
Started with doggy (it's either doggy or missionary no other choice)
Being someone who already enjoys few basic services with WGs I thought her service would be ideal for me but I underestimated the importance of some seduction, neck and body kissing, touch and little intimacy. Service is very mechanical and lacks the slightest of touch but that is expected and mentioned (or else it would have not been a positive).
On the way back was not fully satisfied or fulfilled, can't really pinpoint why. Could be the lack of touch but mostly I slightly felt like we didn't click even though we're the same age while other WG I've seen and clicked with there's an age difference. Not her fault though hence I felt that a neutral is harsh and a positive is well deserved, you just can't click with everyone not everyone is gonna like you and vice versa.
Would I visit again? If I am back in Manchester one day probably if in the right mood when I do not feel like I need some intimacy and just want to empty my load (but I am rarely in that mood) as she is hot imo, honest and genuine about services and does seem to want to please with what's available and if I would recommend her or not really depends on each individual and what floats their boat. Some give zero fucks about intimacy and certain services while others prefer things a bit more sensual.
As for who, well on that list of NW escorts, in terms of older MILFs, I'd particularly point you in the direction of Naughty Aimy, TheToriBliss and Pleasuredome.
As for younger WGs who should still have none of those negatives (although obviously that can't be guaranteed): xmanchesterfun, Eleanor Rose, Sienna Kink, Schoolgirl Kate, Luna__Rose (often tours Manc), Alana Amor.
There's more in my reviews too, recent examples being the positive review I linked in my previous post and these:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=235684.0 (touring Manc again this month)
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=233932.0Have a look through my reviews to find more. Obviously your mileage may vary and things are subjective so it's important to check you like their photos and profile yourself.
it is important to mention the positives and negatives regardless of the overall rating of the punt. It would be unfair to rate a review as negative or neutral due to personal preferences only. If the wg delivered as promised and had good attitude and was genuine In description, picture and services I see no reason to rate it other than positive.
I definitely agree although it is your review so you are perfectly entitled to rate how you see fit and in line with your own personal preferences.
True about that, but personally I know that I can be a bit picky and sensitive to people’s tiniest reactions in this area ( that’s a malfunction in me) and even if a wg fakes liking you or so you can easily spot the difference and what most would describe as clicked to me might not be hence why I said not her fault and I really do mean it.
Fair enough. I do still think you're more likely to "click" with the girls I've just mentioned more than any of the ones you've reviewed. Looking at your reviews I think Vivien had gone significantly down hill by the time you saw her, as evidenced by my 2nd review of her and some of the comments from others:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=235344.0And Molly Swedish probably was a bit too passive for you. I think with many of girls above they'll be able to take more of the lead and you can just go with flow however I do recommend working on being able to sometimes lead the punt or be assertive when necessary (e.g. verbally telling them what you want during the punt, not just during comms), after all you're the one paying.
Thanks for your recommendation Nige always super helpful and ready for the rescue!
Duos are not my thing, I can barely keep up with one girl in the room:p however I did see Lucy alone as well review to follow and similar to this one positive with a couple comments.
Fair enough. Your review of Lucy will be interesting to read especially since she has no solo reviews on here (assuming you saw Lucylou not Lucylovesit). You might also want to add your thoughts to this thread given the confusion in it:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=237210.0Won’t be commenting again as many seem rude and determined to bitch!
Aside from James, who are these "many" people?
I see the biggest troll on UKP has hijacked another thread...
It can be helpful for punters to see how the WG reacts (e.g. to gauge their attitude). What both "sides" come out with can also be rather entertaining.
As for McMuffin1 and the deleted comments (visible here for those who have access:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=238396). Adding comments like that to provide "balance" is very much white knighting (as you admit yourself). Instead, posting your own review would be much better and just as helpful as long as it's not over the top fluffy.
