sparklysecrets - Wolverhampton Outcall

[blueflame]

External Link/Members Only

So I posted a reverse booking, two weeks in advance, stating clearly what I was after on the purple pages and got several bids. As has been said before the one bid that stood out was from sparkly sparkles. She replied well and sounded interested in meeting up – unlike others who write little if anything. She caught my interest. Although younger than I normally go for I thought I would give it a go. So after some sporadic email replies I accepted the bid. Again I clearly stated what I had in mind (nothing wild, just wanted to get away from vanilla punts) and she eventually replied saying that she was fine with everything. I genuinely thought this would go well as her profile states that she does like the fetish side of life. So I thought I would give her a go.

A few days before the meet I emailed her to make sure we were still on for the meet and to again check she was ok with DFK, CIM, Swallow, toys etc. I also asked she wear a ‘revealing dress’ (her words on her profile) with hold ups and heels. She replied saying that all was ok except swallowing. I accepted this, as it was on her profile, and agreed to meet.
On the day I arrived at the hotel and emailed her my room number. She arrived and knocked on the door… so far so good. This is where the punt went south.

I hung her jacket up whilst she counted the cash in front of me. I offered her a glass of wine and we sat and chatted for a while. I immediately noticed that her ‘dress’ was far from revealing. She also said that she couldn’t get any hold ups and her heels were a far from sexy as you could get.
After a while chatting she stood up, stripped off and told me to lie on the bed for a ‘massage’. Wanting to go with the flow I did this and spent the next few minutes lying there with that ‘another crap punt is coming’ feeling. Wanting to give her a chance I put up with her poor massage technique. I then turned on my front and continued. Wanting to move things along I tried to kiss her but found that DFK was certainly not on the cards. I moved down and tried oral on her. She said she liked it but I didn’t believe her. She then went for oral on me but with such a poor technique I put on a bag and put myself inside her ‘til I popped.
We chatted some more as I was keen to try and rescue this punt. No chance.
I popped a second time and she went for a shower.
We chatted a little more and I discovered that her personal life is the stuff of nightmares… now the pieces were coming together.
I offered her some advice which took us was over our allotted booking time but she genuinely didn’t seem to mind.

This is a troubled girl who is certainly NOT the typical escort type.
Would I see her again… absolutely NOT. Her poor comms gave me an uneasy feeling but I ignored this as my ‘little brain’ took over. She has the ‘girl next door’ look but she is as far from sexy as I have ever seen. One previous review said that she was quiet and not overtly sexual... how true this is.

Comms 2/10
Looks 5/10
Body 9/10
Overall 1/10


Maybe we just didn’t click, but I have to say this was one of the worst ever punts I have had in ten years.
If you want a pure vanilla punt with a young inexperienced woman then she might be for you, just not for me.

[kryn]

Known barebacker too

[DarkFreddie]

I think you will find she had somebody post inaccurate services and her photo's. She does not do bareback. She has good reviews and I would not see a known escort for bareback sex! This girl has Durex condoms and takes care of her health. Maybe go and see her before making your mind up on the basis of what people post.

[Beamer]

I think you will find she had somebody post inaccurate services and her photo's. She does not do bareback. She has good reviews and I would not see a known escort for bareback sex! This girl has Durex condoms and takes care of her health. Maybe go and see her before making your mind up on the basis of what people post.

Hello Ivy 

[David50]

Known barebacker too

Is there any proof that she does ?

[blueflame]

I didn't get the impression she was a barebacker at all... in fact at one point she pulled away as she thought the bag had fallen off. It hadn't.

[Belgarion]

Known barebacker too

Known by who?

[blueflame]

Having read a review and post, I know for sure... DarkFreddie= sparklysecrets = Ivy

It's a shame people think they need to do things like this. My review is an honest one. I have no axe to grind or point to make. I made the choice to see her and it turned our to be my bad judgement. We didn't click and overall was a poor punt in my opinion.

[Belgarion]

Ivy/Sparkly Secrets just wrote a fake review in response to this negative.

A truly stupid thing to do

[David50]

Ivy/Sparkly Secrets just wrote a fake review in response to this negative.

A truly stupid thing to do

Especially when she had 5 positives to only 1 negative

[kryn]

Known by who?

Me

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Aurelian999]

Known barebacker too

Since when?? Nothing on her other reviews, and the 3 times I've seen her she's been very clear that it's covered play only...?

[Aurelian999]

Me

Hidden Image/Members Only

So did you ask her for BB and she replied as she did? Because to me, this say she doesnt do it.... without other messages to say 'I allow BB but no cum inside' this is subjective - and, as I said, on the three times I've seen her she's been quite clear - no bag, no play...

I'm not whiteknighting, but we need to be clear on this before setting hares running.

[Hemlock47]

Me

Hidden Image/Members Only

Am I missing something? Did you ask her for bareback?

[Aurelian999]

author=Hemlock47
Am I missing something? Did you ask her for bareback?

Thats what I'm taking from this and got told no... so...?

[Kev40ish]

Thats what I'm taking from this and got told no... so...?

I suppose the context of this is just as important as the one message.
Was it a Reverse Booking for BB?
What was the rest of the messages prior to this?

[Hemlock47]

I suppose the context of this is just as important as the one message.
Was it a Reverse Booking for BB?
What was the rest of the messages prior to this?

Definitely needs to post the other messages for context

[kryn]

Yes it was for a BB reverse booking.  I have no quarms about admitting that.  It's my body.

I used to do it after a 3 month check.

Like I said in previous posts around 30 girls in the west Midlands agreed to this.

I'm just making you aware because there's a lot of anti bb on here plus I don't do it anymore.

[Punterperson1971]

Yes it was for a BB reverse booking.  I have no quarms about admitting that.  It's my body.

I used to do it after a 3 month check.

Like I said in previous posts around 30 girls in the west Midlands agreed to this.

I'm just making you aware because there's a lot of anti bb on here plus I don't do it anymore.

So will you review any girls you’ve seen regardless wether you’ve bb them just so we can avoid them or get ourselves checked out and you’ve been a member since 2012 so why no reviews???

[kryn]

So will you review any girls you’ve seen regardless wether you’ve bb them just so we can avoid them or get ourselves checked out and you’ve been a member since 2012 so why no reviews???

I can't do that as they are all under the counter.  Best way to do it is to ask them if they will do bb before you see them.  But then that runs the risk of them blocking you if they don't.  It's a difficult one

[Hemlock47]

I can't do that as they are all under the counter.  Best way to do it is to ask them if they will do bb before you see them.  But then that runs the risk of them blocking you if they don't.  It's a difficult one

So your selective in which girls you choose to accuse of being a BB. Strange.

[Punterperson1971]

So your selective in which girls you choose to accuse of being a BB. Strange.

I Agree,this one is a strange one 🤔🤔

[Hemlock47]

I Agree,this one is a strange one 🤔🤔

I smell mischief 

[Kev40ish]

So your selective in which girls you choose to accuse of being a BB. Strange.

Yes I agree, do you only out the girls who have upset you in some way?
Or gave a grudge against?
Won’t see you?
There must’ve some criteria that you use to decide!!!

[Punterperson1971]

I smell mischief 

Me too bullshit maybe??
He’s still online maybe thinking what to do or say next.

[kryn]

There's no mischief at all.

I'm just stating a fact.  And raising awareness that there's more of this going on then you think.  A lot more

[Hemlock47]

Yes I agree, do you only out the girls who have upset you in some way?
Or gave a grudge against?
Won’t see you?
There must’ve some criteria that you use to decide!!!

Could be any of the above😂
His pointless contributions over the years also suggest attention seeking.

[Kev40ish]

There's no mischief at all.

I'm just stating a fact.  And raising awareness that there's more of this going on then you think.  A lot more

Yes but why do you out only some of the 30 odd UTC girls?
What makes them special that they don’t remain UTC?

[Hemlock47]

There's no mischief at all.

I'm just stating a fact.  And raising awareness that there's more of this going on then you think.  A lot more

You haven’t stated any facts that people aren’t already aware of. If you have solid evidence of WG who bare back you should post the details. Other wise anything you contribute is pointless and irrelevant.

[Aurelian999]

There's no mischief at all.

I'm just stating a fact.  And raising awareness that there's more of this going on then you think.  A lot more

Given Ivy's reaction to this subject when discussed (no, I dont do BB, but we discussed it in the subject of WG's who do) I call bullshit, combined with the fact her message even says 'I dont do cum inside' says to me you're a fucking Walt.

[normski]

Personally, I’m staying well clear of this lady....’I don’t do cum inside’ is not the same as saying ‘I don’t do bareback’!!

[Punterperson1971]

Personally, I’m staying well clear of this lady....’I don’t do cum inside’ is not the same as saying ‘I don’t do bareback’!!

Me too.

[Aurelian999]

Me too.

And this is how reputations are destroyed.... IMHO unfairly in this case, though I dare say I'll get flamed for 'white knighting' or suchllike.

[normski]

And this is how reputations are destroyed.... IMHO unfairly in this case, though I dare say I'll get flamed for 'white knighting' or suchllike.

Read kryn’s reposts, most are linked to WGs offering BB. Plus, he’s openly admitted to seeing WGs who offer BB.

If someone asked you ‘do you bareback WGs’. Which of the following do you reply back with
a) I don’t cum inside them
b) I don’t bareback

The two are miles apart.

[Aurelian999]

Read kryn’s reposts, most are linked to WGs offering BB. Plus, he’s openly admitted to seeing WGs who offer BB.

If someone asked you ‘do you bareback WGs’. Which of the following do you reply back with
a) I don’t cum inside them
b) I don’t bareback

The two are miles apart.

On balance, I'd hope you were wrong...but. damn, another decent one off the block. Ce'st La Vie - Move on!

[j_181]

There's no mischief at all.

Then can you post the whole message thread so we can see what you actually asked her?

[kryn]

Then can you post the whole message thread so we can see what you actually asked her?

Yes.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[kryn]

My point here is there's a load of people on this forum going mental over bb all the time.

I can't be alone here with getting these girls to agree to bb vaginal and anal.

Most of the profiles state you'll be blocked if you ask and they still do it.  And this is all over the country.

I think it's safe to say more than half of escorts will bareback on the quiet. 

[Belgarion]

My point here is there's a load of people on this forum going mental over bb all the time.

I can't be alone here with getting these girls to agree to bb vaginal and anal.

Most of the profiles state you'll be blocked if you ask and they still do it.  And this is all over the country.

I think it's safe to say more than half of escorts will bareback on the quiet.

Which is up to you. For our safety it would be good to know the ones that offer it under the table. A few reviews would help

[Punterperson1971]

My point here is there's a load of people on this forum going mental over bb all the time.

I can't be alone here with getting these girls to agree to bb vaginal and anal.

Most of the profiles state you'll be blocked if you ask and they still do it.  And this is all over the country.

I think it's safe to say more than half of escorts will bareback on the quiet.

With clients or in their private life??as I don’t believe they all would do it with clients if they had the chance.

[Hemlock47]

I think it's safe to say more than half of escorts will bareback on the quiet.

More of your well researched “facts”   

[Aurelian999]

So, either you’re lying or she is. Given I’ve seen her a few times and have no reason to not believe her, and you’re coming across as a fucking Walt, I’ll go with her.

Hidden Image/Members Only

[shyboy1]

So, either you’re lying or she is. Given I’ve seen her a few times and have no reason to not believe her, and you’re coming across as a fucking Walt, I’ll go with her.

Hidden Image/Members Only

+1
I’ve not met ivy but have tried to, just not got availability to match up.
Had good friendly coms and it’s been made clear all penetration is covered.
As already mentioned in this thread this is how reputations get shredded.
SB

[Hemlock47]

Yes.

Hidden Image/Members Only

So far you have produced a message asking for bareback sex and the service provider replying saying she doesn’t do “cum inside”.
That could be taken two ways.
1. She will bareback but you must pull out before cuming.
2. She doesn’t do bareback.

Do you have any actual evidence of her agreeing to fuck you bareback?

[kryn]

Do you want me to start a daily 'who's a barebacker' on here or will that cause congestion around the GUM clinic.

I don't care really if I tell on these lot.  I much prefer seeking arrangement these days anyway.

[Aurelian999]

Do you want me to start a daily 'who's a barebacker' on here or will that cause congestion around the GUM clinic.

I don't care really if I tell on these lot.  I much prefer seeking arrangement these days anyway.

You dont really care as you're a fucking tourist with a fetish for stalking WG's asking for bareback.

If anyone's a danger to punters it's you - Freak.

[Hemlock47]

Do you want me to start a daily 'who's a barebacker' on here or will that cause congestion around the GUM clinic.

I don't care really if I tell on these lot.  I much prefer seeking arrangement these days anyway.

Only asked you to back up your claims. Or simply don’t make them if you don’t give a fuck.
You just sound like a disgruntled bug chaser to me.

[Whirl Pool]

So far you have produced a message asking for bareback sex and the service provider replying saying she doesn’t do “cum inside”.
That could be taken two ways.
1. She will bareback but you must pull out before cuming.
2. She doesn’t do bareback.

Do you have any actual evidence of her agreeing to fuck you bareback?

I would read it as number 1, she does BB but you must pull out.

Kryn said:
“Just to clarify this is a unprotected sex booking as per the ad.
Are you ok with that as your profile states otherwise.”

Replies I’d expect if she didn’t offer BB at all:
“Sorry, I misread, I don’t offer BB”
“ABSOLUTELY NOT”
“Fuck off and never contact me again, you’re blocked”

Instead she replies:
“I don’t do Cum inside”

That doesn’t answer the question. I’ve seen a million and one Rom profiles where they offer BB but explicitly say they don’t offer Cum in pussy.

Her answer to me is really:
“[Yes, but] I don’t do Cum inside”

I would be intrigued to know if kryn mentioned in his RB that he had just been recently checked and how much he was offering, all WGs have a price.

[DAlpine1980]

I wonder if Kryn has received a bucket load of PMs about this asking who the others are....

Personally I don't think it makes much difference knowing the 'under the counter' wgs as you'll never know for sure if the escort you are seeing offers it on the side. You just have to be careful yourself.

I wonder if Ivy has seen a spike in business too 

[Hemlock47]

I would read it as number 1, she does BB but you must pull out.

Kryn said:
“Just to clarify this is a unprotected sex booking as per the ad.
Are you ok with that as your profile states otherwise.”

Replies I’d expect if she didn’t offer BB at all:
“Sorry, I misread, I don’t offer BB”
“ABSOLUTELY NOT”
“Fuck off and never contact me again, you’re blocked”

Instead she replies:
“I don’t do Cum inside”

That doesn’t answer the question. I’ve seen a million and one Rom profiles where they offer BB but explicitly say they don’t offer Cum in pussy.

Her answer to me is really:
“[Yes, but] I don’t do Cum inside”

I would be intrigued to know if kryn mentioned in his RB that he had just been recently checked and how much he was offering, all WGs have a price.

It’s very much open to interpretation. If kryn simply answered the question and provided solid evidence it would clear up any confusion. Instead he’s very defensive and misleading in his answers. Considering he’s a self confessed, habitual, bug chaser (obviously not sound in mind) I doubt the legitimacy of anything he says.
As for the reverse booking, it’s well know that a lot of SP respond to all RB without even reading them.
He’s obviously got the full communication history. So why is he reluctant to post it?