Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: Top Rated Escorts in the North West  (Read 2879 times)

Offline NigelF

I've posted about this numerous times but never actually made a thread about it. I've created a list of escorts who advertise on AdultWork who have 3+ (4 or more) positive reviews on here and are either based in the North West or tour here fairly often :
External Link/Members Only

Note that the default order of the table is random (technically it's just the order I happened to add them in). To sort the results in the table, e.g. by number of positive reviews, click the "Rating" column (one click sorts it in ascending order and clicking again will show the descending order). Note that this only seems to work on computers though, on my phone it doesn't work.

At the top it says the prices and info are accurate as June/July 2018 which is when I started the page but (assuming you've not sorted the table in any order) the entries added from "Miss Skyedupree" were added a lot more recently (in the last month or so or even last day or so). As such, those should be fine but the info for the previous entries may be out of date (although I have corrected some of them).

The idea was taken from other regions. Click on the various regions on this page to see the lists for other regions:
External Link/Members Only

For our region's list, I've refrained from including the WG's phone number's because I'm not sure how up to date they're likely to be although actually I think it might well be taken from AW directly so it's probably OK, nonetheless, I've opted to add some general notes and UKE links instead as contact details should be on the WG's profile anyway. I've also included the half hour rate as well as the hour rate because even though you can only sort the results by the hour rate, at least it's easy to see at a glance what their half hour rate is.

I've tried to include as many well reviewed escorts as possible but I'm sure there's still a good number missing. While the criteria is more than 3 positive reviews, I've refrained from including those with a fairly low number of positives (4-6) but also lots of negatives and neutrals (even though there are some who do have quite a few). I've also refrained from including those who've only toured the North West once or twice, however WGs such as Skylah Rhodes are probably not a particularly helpful addition considering she only visits very occasionally however I think it's good to have a non local at the top so the other WGs have something to aim for (although I'm sure they don't actually care and Skylah's neutral and negative record is nothing to be proud of).

Nonetheless, those aren't "rules" and it's not "my" list so people should feel free to change things as they wish. The only recommendation I'd strongly make is to ensure that each row doesn't exceed it's current width (e.g. don't try to add too much in the location or comments sections) as I think it looks much neater. I also don't think it's a good idea to include anyone with less than 4 positives on here because it would make the table to big, if anything the criteria should be 5 or more. Or we could start separate tables for separate cities but I personally don't think there's much point.

Anyway, if you think there's someone missing I strongly recommend you try to add them yourself. If you're not already a site editor then PM admin for permission. As for how to edit the page, it's a lot simpler than you might think, even for a technophobic old man such as myself. You can have a read of this:
External Link/Members Only

To add something to the table, it's very easy (or at least very easy to learn quickly), just click on edit (near the top right), scroll to the bottom, copy & paste the last entry (the last row) and then swap out the details for the new WG you want to add.

It's probably not very clear just from reading that but it'll be clearer once you see it and even if you make a mistake, it's very easy to either identify (by previewing your change) or to just undo. Feel free to ask if you have any questions.

If you don't want to do it yourself then you can post the girl's AW link in this thread and I'll add her to the list at some point myself. 
« Last Edit: January 14, 2019, 12:06:17 am by NigelF »

Offline westeros

 :hi: quite an in depth list Nigel. Thank you for putting in all the hard work. One thing i do notice though and this probably applies to most of the WG on AW not just in your list, is that the prices are slowly creeping up higher and higher.

Not everyone has that kind of liquid funds available to enjoy our sport as much as we like to.

Rather than seeing a lot more, we may have to be extremely picky with who gets our money in future :drinks:


Offline Steve McQueen

Many thanks Nigel, extremely useful J

Offline Bustydusty

Thanks Nigel I noticed from recent meetings that the prices of the poles here have gone up although I think pleasuredome is still £100 p/h

Offline bolster3

Thanks Nigel - really helpful.

Dai Llama

  • Guest
Fantastic effort; much appreciated.  :hi:

Offline rizzy00

Brilliant Nigel, much appreciated. Dont think my wallet does though lol

Offline Bustydusty

:hi: quite an in depth list Nigel. Thank you for putting in all the hard work. One thing i do notice though and this probably applies to most of the WG on AW not just in your list, is that the prices are slowly creeping up higher and higher.

Not everyone has that kind of liquid funds available to enjoy our sport as much as we like to.

Rather than seeing a lot more, we may have to be extremely picky with who gets our money in future :drinks:

Getting pissed off with these increases tbh - 3 out of only 14 in my hl have just increased their rates added to the poles I used to see for £60 :dash:

Offline Dreamweaver1

Superb Nige, but I bet there will still be some lazy sods asking for the information even though it's there.

Offline mace-window

I've posted about this numerous times but never actually made a thread about it. I've created a list of escorts who advertise on AdultWork who have 3+ (4 or more) positive reviews on here and are either based in the North West or tour here fairly often :
External Link/Members Only

Note that the default order of the table is random (technically it's just the order I happened to add them in). To sort the results in the table, e.g. by number of positive reviews, click the "Rating" column (one click sorts it in ascending order and clicking again will show the descending order). Note that this only seems to work on computers though, on my phone it doesn't work.

At the top it says the prices and info are accurate as June/July 2018 which is when I started the page but (assuming you've not sorted the table in any order) the entries added from "Miss Skyedupree" were added a lot more recently (in the last month or so or even last day or so). As such, those should be fine but the info for the previous entries may be out of date (although I have corrected some of them).

The idea was taken from other regions. Click on the various regions on this page to see the lists for other regions:
External Link/Members Only

For our region's list, I've refrained from including the WG's phone number's because I'm not sure how up to date they're likely to be although actually I think it might well be taken from AW directly so it's probably OK, nonetheless, I've opted to add some general notes and UKE links instead as contact details should be on the WG's profile anyway. I've also included the half hour rate as well as the hour rate because even though you can only sort the results by the hour rate, at least it's easy to see at a glance what their half hour rate is.

I've tried to include as many well reviewed escorts as possible but I'm sure there's still a good number missing. While the criteria is more than 3 positive reviews, I've refrained from including those with a fairly low number of positives (4-6) but also lots of negatives and neutrals (even though there are some who do have quite a few). I've also refrained from including those who've only toured the North West once or twice, however WGs such as Skylah Rhodes are probably not a particularly helpful addition considering she only visits very occasionally however I think it's good to have a non local at the top so the other WGs have something to aim for (although I'm sure they don't actually care and Skylah's neutral and negative record is nothing to be proud of).

Nonetheless, those aren't "rules" and it's not "my" list so people should feel free to change things as they wish. The only recommendation I'd strongly make is to ensure that each row doesn't exceed it's current width (e.g. don't try to add too much in the location or comments sections) as I think it looks much neater. I also don't think it's a good idea to include anyone with less than 4 positives on here because it would make the table to big, if anything the criteria should be 5 or more. Or we could start separate tables for separate cities but I personally don't think there's much point.

Anyway, if you think there's someone missing I strongly recommend you try to add them yourself. If you're not already a site editor then PM admin for permission. As for how to edit the page, it's a lot simpler than you might think, even for a technophobic old man such as myself. You can have a read of this:
External Link/Members Only

To add something to the table, it's very easy (or at least very easy to learn quickly), just click on edit (near the top right), scroll to the bottom, copy & paste the last entry (the last row) and then swap out the details for the new WG you want to add.

It's probably not very clear just from reading that but it'll be clearer once you see it and even if you make a mistake, it's very easy to either identify (by previewing your change) or to just undo. Feel free to ask if you have any questions.

If you don't want to do it yourself then you can post the girl's AW link in this thread and I'll add her to the list at some point myself.

Great idea Nigel.


Online chrishornx

Superb post Nigel many thanks

whilst west lancs is a relative desert compared to the rich hunting ground software Manchester but he are still some that deserve mention even if the review account i snot a high a some of the mega busy Manchester stars


External Link/Members Only   Jessica Joy
External Link/Members Only   Lucypx

External Link/Members Only   lola x
External Link/Members Only   little miss mika

External Link/Members Only  Nova painted floozie
External Link/Members Only  English Emilyxxxxx

External Link/Members Only    Escort annabelle
External Link/Members Only   Codymilf


Offline NigelF

Superb post Nigel many thanks

whilst west lancs is a relative desert compared to the rich hunting ground software Manchester but he are still some that deserve mention even if the review account i snot a high a some of the mega busy Manchester stars


External Link/Members Only   Jessica Joy
External Link/Members Only   Lucypx

External Link/Members Only   lola x
External Link/Members Only   little miss mika

External Link/Members Only  Nova painted floozie
External Link/Members Only  English Emilyxxxxx

External Link/Members Only    Escort annabelle
External Link/Members Only   Codymilf

Nice one, cheers. Lola x was already on the list but I've now added Jessica Joy, English Emily, Escort Annabelle and Cody Milf. There's definitely some worthy additions there.

I've added LucyPx as well although I think she's a bit borderline since her most recent review (posted just last month) is a negative (albeit for a no show) and her other 5 reviews, while all positive, are all around 2 years old or more and 3 of them are from the same reviewer (you). Nonetheless, I think it's right to add her since the table is only a starting point for people, it obviously doesn't negate the need to actually read reviews etc.

I haven't added Little Miss Mika primarily because she only has 3 positives and the criteria is more than 3. She also has a negative (for a meet that did take place). Nonetheless, since you haven't reviewed her, if you were to give her a positive then she'd be eligible for inclusion and of course it'd be good to get your take on her.

I also haven't added Nova Painted Floozie as she only has 2 positives and also has 2 neutrals and 2 negatives (all for meets that took place) and indeed they've definitely been enough to put me off. As such, you might want to review her as well so people have more info.

The only recommendation I'd strongly make is to ensure that each row doesn't exceed it's current width (e.g. don't try to add too much in the location or comments sections) as I think it looks much neater.

Having said that, it depends on the size of the screen you're viewing it on anyway.
« Last Edit: January 15, 2019, 01:02:31 am by NigelF »

Treehouse

  • Guest

Offline Carpy

 :hi:

Literally take my hat off to you Nige.... well done for generating. Useful is a understatement.


Offline Blue Moon

That's excellent, Nigel. Thank you   :hi:    Bm

Online chrishornx

Nice one, cheers. Lola x was already on the list but I've now added Jessica Joy, English Emily, Escort Annabelle and Cody Milf. There's definitely some worthy additions there.

I've added LucyPx as well although I think she's a bit borderline since her most recent review (posted just last month) is a negative (albeit for a no show) and her other 5 reviews, while all positive, are all around 2 years old or more and 3 of them are from the same reviewer (you). Nonetheless, I think it's right to add her since the table is only a starting point for people, it obviously doesn't negate the need to actually read reviews etc.

I haven't added Little Miss Mika primarily because she only has 3 positives and the criteria is more than 3. She also has a negative (for a meet that did take place). Nonetheless, since you haven't reviewed her, if you were to give her a positive then she'd be eligible for inclusion and of course it'd be good to get your take on her.

I also haven't added Nova Painted Floozie as she only has 2 positives and also has 2 neutrals and 2 negatives (all for meets that took place) and indeed they've definitely been enough to put me off. As such, you might want to review her as well so people have more info.

Having said that, it depends on the size of the screen you're viewing it on anyway.

thanks...never seen Nova Painted Floozie so can't review.

Yes there were 3 LUCYPX reviews by me, sorry, I got enthusiastic and was happy to review any lady whenever I saw them before I got the notion that to do so was to risk being a 'White Knight' which was never the intention. Just seen someone else I have reviewed before but won't review again for the same reason 

not seen Little Miss Mika either I am just aware of her reviews as she is on my hotlist

Offline Winterspirit

Cheers for this Nigel, might help me make some new choices.

Offline Gordon Bennett

Great stuff! Thanks for time and effort. I have seen just one lady on that list...... Suppose that means there's lots and lots of choice and adventure out there still in store for me, well on paper there is anyway!

Offline Bustydusty

Great stuff! Thanks for time and effort. I have seen just one lady on that list...... Suppose that means there's lots and lots of choice and adventure out there still in store for me, well on paper there is anyway!

Make your 1000th post a memorable one
Go see naughty Amy or xxxangela! :thumbsup: