Author Topic: Chloe e - Tower Hill - English bird - Waste of space  (Read 2364 times)


10 review(s) for chloe e (6 positive, 2 neutral, 2 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

Comms : Booked over text, lunch time punt, quick responses.

Location : Few mins walk from Tower Hill station. Well known hotel chain.

Price : £70 for 30 mins
 
Services : FK, OWO and protected sex in various positions

The WG : Early 30s, typical English bird, asked "You alright" every couple of seconds like a freaking parrot. Not attractive facially had a double chin possibly triple. Disgusting looking tits with very prominent surgical scars running down nipples to under the boobs. The nipples almost looked like they were stuck on. Size 10, beer belly, clean shaved pussy but wasn't fresh. Ass looked alright in doggy.

The Punt: Was dressed in black lingerie, sorted paperworks out. Started off with FK, which was not passionate at all. She offered to OWO, mediocre sucking skills, very mechanical with no effort put into it, definitely cannot DT. Sucked for a while, maintained no eye contact. Does not do facial (not look I would on that triple chin), does not do CIM, hairy arsehole (don't even think about rimming or playing with it).

Rubbered up and she got on top in CG again no eye contact, the only conversation from her side was "You alright". Then switched to mish again very mechanical and no passion. The look for the disgusting surgical scars on her tits was off putting, so requested to switch to doggy. She cannot take a decent pounding. Kept stopping me every time I tried going deep in any position. The view of her arse was decent and since her tits and face were hidden in this position. I managed to pop.

Looked like she had sleepy eyes, wouldn't be surprised if she was on drugs.

Noticed that she has popped up now in Heathrow area.

Advice to WG If you are not interested in offering the services listed with basic enthusiasm, then its probably time to hang your knickers and call it quits.

Visit again : No- Why would I, when there are better WGs for the same price.


Offline Waterhouse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,372
  • Likes: 70
  •  
  • Reviews: 23
Everything about this sounds bloody awful.  Condolences fella... hope you get to finish the year on a high note.

Offline magnetico

typical English bird, asked "You alright" every couple of seconds like a freaking parrot.
I totally know the kind of girl you're talking about  :dash:

Offline peter purves

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 14,865
  • Likes: 7
  •  
  • Reviews: 25
Banned reason: Can't / won't take advice.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Belgarion

I totally know the kind of girl you're talking about  :dash:

Remember seeing her a few years ago and the "You alright" was so annoying.

Punther had said she had great tits but there was nothing great about them. Made me rethink a lot of his recommendations.

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Everything about this sounds bloody awful.  Condolences fella... hope you get to finish the year on a high note.

Met one of the regulars to set the records straight. But itching to try a new WG.

Offline Waterhouse

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 4,372
  • Likes: 70
  •  
  • Reviews: 23
Met one of the regulars to set the records straight. But itching to try a new WG.
:thumbsup: :cool:

Offline Meursault

Thank OP.
Was on my list, so you saved me.
 :drinks:

Offline Xtro

Sorry to hear about your shit punt.

What does Chloe and her 48 positives on AW have in common?  Neither are worth a wank!

holland

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

Offline Bangers and Gash

If nothing else, she consistent.  :hi:


punther

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Remember seeing her a few years ago and the "You alright" was so annoying.

Punther had said she had great tits but there was nothing great about them. Made me rethink a lot of his recommendations.

she did previously have great tits imo..something has happened to them since the previous times ive seen her....

i saw her most recently a couple months ago and if i were to review her again it would echo sinz word for word

re my recommendations (imo) they dont really deviate from the opinions other punters have who (i am aware of) have seen a wg based on my reviews

that being said best to do what you think is best  for your wallet, if you think a punters descriptions/ relayed experiences may not be sound best to avoid the WG completely until you get more info on the WG

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Previous profiles:
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Thanks for linking the old profiles.

I was wondering how could she possibly have no Negative reviews, makes sense now.

She will most likely switch profiles in light of this review.

« Last Edit: December 29, 2018, 09:12:05 am by Sinz »

Offline Sinz

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 10,543
  • Likes: 13
  •  
  • Reviews: 59
Forgot to mention she has a tongue piercing, sad part is she doesn't really know how to best use it while sucking.

Her version of ball sucking is kissing and licking balls.

Offline BootsnBunches

Those pics are years old. I saw a couple of years ago and she didn't live up to the pics then. Her service was basic to say the least.

Offline Belgarion

Forgot to mention she has a tongue piercing, sad part is she doesn't really know how to best use it while sucking.

Her version of ball sucking is kissing and licking balls.

Remember that too. A truly mediocre meet