Ava Austen - Chiswick

[DragonAgeInquisition]

External Link/Members Only

Cost: £200
Duration: 30mins
Location: Chiswick

The venue was great, a 4 star hotel very discreet and short walk to the elevators after walking through the doors. As mentioned before i dread hotel meets but this was very easy.

Ava opened the door and was looked absolutely great, quick shower and a brief chat Ava began with OWO (this remained fairly sloppy throughout and Ava allowed some light facefucking). This happened in two positions, me lying on the bed with Ava between my legs, and me standing. Ava managed to get me very hard and after about 15mins of oral we moved into doggie.

Doggie in standing aswell as missionary, I also kissed and sucked Ava's breast in between (maybe I'm a tits man     

More Oral and Ball sucking before I ejaculated mostly on Ava's tongue/mouth area. My ejaculation usually has trajectory but this time it didn't maybe i needed longer to work up for it... that's the only negative as I do prefer a good facial.

For my first 30min this was perfect, I will definitely consider more in the future.

 

[g284]

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[claretandblue]

ridiculously over priced because she is,and I use this term loosely, a "pornstar", shes barely a 6 out of 10 job!

[Warm-Hands]

200 pounds for 30 minutes? Are you serious?

[Sh5278]

So did you book on the day or did you have to pay for a deposit as stated in her “escorting” tab?

[LLPunting]

200 for 30 mins of a decidedly lacklustre encounter with a very ordinary looking lass.

You could've gotten more from blowing 100 in a local boozer and seeing what you went home with.

DAI, perhaps you're better off going back to slaying digi-drags...  Load up DA2 and you'll get better action from some of the adult mods.

[DragonAgeInquisition]

200 for 30 mins of a decidedly lacklustre encounter with a very ordinary looking lass.

You could've gotten more from blowing 100 in a local boozer and seeing what you went home with.

DAI, perhaps you're better off going back to slaying digi-drags...  Load up DA2 and you'll get better action from some of the adult mods.

The closest i have got to the game is seeing it on an advert. £200 for one man is £20 to another. Why must the scholars on the website judge. I do not understand why price must be mentioned when it is clearly outlined in the indexed AW profile...anyhow... perhaps i have not made myself clear enough when replying to other posts.

Final 2 punts until next June this month.

[Peterbry]

I would be interested to know if you had to pay a deposit for this booking, as per her AW profile? When I went to book her a while ago she requested a 50% deposit to ensure I wasn't wasting her time, and wanted it paid via bank transfer. I declined. Did you pay a deposit?

[DragonAgeInquisition]

I would be interested to know if you had to pay a deposit for this booking, as per her AW profile? When I went to book her a while ago she requested a 50% deposit to ensure I wasn't wasting her time, and wanted it paid via bank transfer. I declined. Did you pay a deposit?

Yes, it stops timewasters. I must admit I am skeptical of this and if it was any girl i.e not an established pornstar I would not entertain.

[claretandblue]

The closest i have got to the game is seeing it on an advert. £200 for one man is £20 to another. Why must the scholars on the website judge. I do not understand why price must be mentioned when it is clearly outlined in the indexed AW profile...anyhow... perhaps i have not made myself clear enough when replying to other posts.

Final 2 punts until next June this month.

why must we judge? this is a forum where we discuss prostitutes,clearly the merits of their pricing is part of that? 

[PatMacGroin]

The closest i have got to the game is seeing it on an advert. £200 for one man is £20 to another. Why must the scholars on the website judge. I do not understand why price must be mentioned when it is clearly outlined in the indexed AW profile...anyhow... perhaps i have not made myself clear enough when replying to other posts.

Final 2 punts until next June this month.

I've heard similar sentiments on this site and other forums. When I hear it, any respect for that voice disappears.

If you will pay more than something is worth, just because you have easy access to money you are clearly an imbecile. I doubt that wealth came through any real effort of your own, which is why you lack the understanding of it's value. No doubt it will be equally as incomprehensible to you when those funds disappear as easily as they came.

[DragonAgeInquisition]

I've heard similar sentiments on this site and other forums. When I hear it, any respect for that voice disappears.

If you will pay more than something is worth, just because you have easy access to money you are clearly an imbecile. I doubt that wealth came through any real effort of your own, which is why you lack the understanding of it's value. No doubt it will be equally as incomprehensible to you when those funds disappear as easily as they came.

"I doubt that wealth came through any real effort of your own" - False, it would be immoral to spend anyone else's money but my own with regards to this hobby. To make wild statements such as that is not called for especially if you do not know ones background. To argue over a hugely subjective aspects of the meeting is up for debate it seems.

Apologies for not knowing the etiquette with regards to the value for money. Personally if someone reviewed a 1hr meet @ £700 i would not slate them for doing so (I concede it is fine to state one's opinion on the pricing but attack the consumer decision is not, it was not my intention to be unbecoming in my previous comment)

I for one would not slate anyone's consumer decisions as I do not know if they earn £20K per annum or £20K per annual bonus  is all i am trying to say.

[DragonAgeInquisition]

ridiculously over priced because she is,and I use this term loosely, a "pornstar", shes barely a 6 out of 10 job!

Subjectivity seems to be a running theme, as it is by nature on every review site. I guess one man's 6 is another man's 10 would you not agree 

[salazar]

Is the review about the WG or the op? If it's the latter then maybe the forum should change to UKPUNTER and we can all have a go and telling people what to do with their money.

[shagbambi]

Hi OP. Thanks for reviewing.

The jibes about cost on this site are linked very much to a belief/idea, that the quality of sex is not linked to price - something that I broadly agree with.  With experience this becomes more and more evident.  Carry on punting and enjoying yourself. 

With regards to stating a price in the review its of interest to other punters to see if the girl is ramping up her prices or discounting them over time- both of which can mean different things - she's in demand or not in demand or she's simply taking the piss.

[Fuzzyduck]

Yes, it stops timewasters. I must admit I am skeptical of this and if it was any girl i.e not an established pornstar I would not entertain.

To be fair, I'd be willing to pay a deposit if it was only a tenner

[PatMacGroin]

"I doubt that wealth came through any real effort of your own" - False, it would be immoral to spend anyone else's money but my own with regards to this hobby. To make wild statements such as that is not called for especially if you do not know ones background. To argue over a hugely subjective aspects of the meeting is up for debate it seems.

Apologies for not knowing the etiquette with regards to the value for money. Personally if someone reviewed a 1hr meet @ £700 i would not slate them for doing so (I concede it is fine to state one's opinion on the pricing but attack the consumer decision is not, it was not my intention to be unbecoming in my previous comment)

I for one would not slate anyone's consumer decisions as I do not know if they earn £20K per annum or £20K per annual bonus  is all i am trying to say.

I wouldn't object to you saying "In my opinion she was worth £200 for 30 mins.", I would probably disagree but as I haven't seen this WG I would have little real basis for my opinion. Also, it's not my place to object to someone being willing to pay £700 per hour for a WG, or even €1,500 per hour for a bucket list porn star. If that's what they want, and that's what it costs, so be it.

What I object to is saying that basically, in your opinion, £200 = £20. It doesn't matter how much money one person has as an individual, there's a magnitude of 10 difference between those amounts. It's not a matter of opinion or perspective. To say otherwise is to suggest that the more money someone has, the less it is worth, which is simply absurd.

I shouldn't have qualified my previous comment with a personal criticism. It's just that I'd had a few drinks last night, and several of your posts to date have given me the impression that you are immature and boastful. Please do enjoy your 20k bonus and your 1.8k per annum punting budget. Dammit... I did it again.

[Fuzzyduck]

What I object to is saying that basically, in your opinion, £200 = £20. It doesn't matter how much money one person has as an individual, there's a magnitude of 10 difference between those amounts. It's not a matter of opinion or perspective. To say otherwise is to suggest that the more money someone has, the less it is worth, which is simply absurd.

Nicely put. I thought arrogant twat when I read how he effectively considered £200 was not much more than pocket change.

[threechilliman]

Nicely put. I thought arrogant twat when I read how he effectively considered £200 was not much more than pocket change.

To some guys 200 quid is loose change, believe me.

[kaj314]

Is the review about the WG or the op? If it's the latter then maybe the forum should change to UKPUNTER and we can all have a go and telling people what to do with their money.

Ahhhh...a rare voice of reason 

[LLPunting]

Is the review about the WG or the op? If it's the latter then maybe the forum should change to UKPUNTER and we can all have a go and telling people what to do with their money.

A review reveals something about both.

As always the community responds to both.

OP should've been aware that posting about this encounter in the way he did would stir up a response, especially with respect to VFM.  If he posted fully cognisant of this then it's provocativeness is borderline trollish.  If he did so naively then all the responses, however harsh, are also constructive guidance.

[Fuzzyduck]

To some guys 200 quid is loose change, believe me.

I know. I've met many. They tend to be arrogant twats. It's not just about how much money you have, it's your attitude towards it. The most minted guy I know is also one of the most humble. He worked hard for it and doesn't splash it around. Other guys with a tenth of his net worth are flash pricks who enjoy mocking poorer people.

[Yankee21]

I know. I've met many. They tend to be arrogant twats. It's not just about how much money you have, it's your attitude towards it. The most minted guy I know is also one of the most humble. He worked hard for it and doesn't splash it around. Other guys with a tenth of his net worth are flash pricks who enjoy mocking poorer people.

Good post.

[DragonAgeInquisition]

I wouldn't object to you saying "In my opinion she was worth £200 for 30 mins.", I would probably disagree but as I haven't seen this WG I would have little real basis for my opinion. Also, it's not my place to object to someone being willing to pay £700 per hour for a WG, or even €1,500 per hour for a bucket list porn star. If that's what they want, and that's what it costs, so be it.

What I object to is saying that basically, in your opinion, £200 = £20. It doesn't matter how much money one person has as an individual, there's a magnitude of 10 difference between those amounts. It's not a matter of opinion or perspective. To say otherwise is to suggest that the more money someone has, the less it is worth, which is simply absurd.

I shouldn't have qualified my previous comment with a personal criticism. It's just that I'd had a few drinks last night, and several of your posts to date have given me the impression that you are immature and boastful. Please do enjoy your 20k bonus and your 1.8k per annum punting budget. Dammit... I did it again.

Understood. I do wish to retract my comment which has caused much debate. It was arrogant, rude and offensive and not at all well thought out. Believe it or not to cause such offence was not what i intended 

In hindsight i should have politely rebutted, as a beginner i have got carried away and if you do the math, my budget has been mightily exceeded but adopting a top heavy staircase approach that will level itself out over x period of time. Yes £200 for 30 mins is ridiculous however a) it falls within budget b) it's someone I have always wanted to see! so apologies to all for sounding like a massive prick, the response was brash and hastily sent as i felt under attack.

Cost and the addictive element were actually factors keeping me from using the website for a very long time, so I would advise anyone thinking about it especially those with addictive personalities to be well disciplined and frugal as with any vice (drinking, smoking, gambling).

"Frugality is very attractive in a man" - Mark Corrigan  s06e02

Immature - possibly
Boastful - Not my intention, I do try to describe the meeting in as much detail as possible.

[Fuzzyduck]

Fair play, DragonAI. I look forward to the next instalment of your puntathon!
 

[DragonAgeInquisition]

A review reveals something about both.

As always the community responds to both.

OP should've been aware that posting about this encounter in the way he did would stir up a response, especially with respect to VFM.  If he posted fully cognisant of this then it's provocativeness is borderline trollish.  If he did so naively then all the responses, however harsh, are also constructive guidance.

Constructive guidance for sure. Although please note my following comments were reactive .

[PatMacGroin]

Fair enough DAI. 

Scanning through posts and threads on forums like UKP. It can be easy to read something into a comment which wasn't the intended message. Creating characters in the imagination to put faces to these disembodied voices.

Best of luck with your future punting endeavours, and hope you decide to continue sharing them with us. 

[LLPunting]

So nice to see everyone kiss and make up.

DAI you really should try the game, much better occupation for an addictive personality, so much cheaper and you can still get your cheap thrills.

[DragonAgeInquisition]

So nice to see everyone kiss and make up.

DAI you really should try the game, much better occupation for an addictive personality, so much cheaper and you can still get your cheap thrills.

Please refer to my previous comment. Discipline is required, nevertheless there is method to the madness (puntathon). Not sure how long this will last with an overseas secondment on the cards next year ...