Sugar Babies
Shemales

Author Topic: How Many "Gold Standard WG's" Are There In The UK  (Read 12064 times)

vorian

  • Guest
How many "Gold Standard" WG's do we have in the UK. Now obviously the question is subjective and there will always be someone who disagrees.

Also Lets be honest not every prossie has been seen and reviewed by UKP members but it does seem a very few girls names keep coming up time and time again with top reviews and great comments from nearly all members, a  few of the one's I am thinking off of the top of my head. Madlin Moon, Michelle Independent and Platinum Cindy.

When I say "Gold Standard" I'm talking about not only looks (Subjective) but professionalism, effort and a dedication to providing great customer service at all times. Price of course needs to be perceived as VFM.

I think the UKP members on the whole would be educated and knowledgeable regarding what makes a "Gold Standard" so when these few names come up again and again it makes me think how many are there really in the UK.

10,20,30,40. When you look at how many prossies are working it seems like a very small percentage of top class "Gold Standard" girls.

Gordo987

  • Guest
I like the question but perhaps the most subjective one ever.  Who I think is the prettiest would not be the next punters ideal.

You said it yourself, so what's the point?  :crazy:

vorian

  • Guest
You said it yourself, so what's the point?  :crazy:

Far point Gordo but on this thread I am not just talking about who has the best looking pictures on AW but am talking about the whole WG package, mainly based around providing the points above such as effort, professionalism and customer service. These things cannot be picked up from looking at a picture but can be discussed based on memebers personal experience and reviews.  :hi:

Gordo987

  • Guest

Far point Gordo but on this thread I am not just talking about who has the best looking pictures on AW but am talking about the whole WG package, mainly based around providing the points above such as effort, professionalism and customer service. These things cannot be picked up from looking at a picture but can be discussed based on memebers personal experience and reviews.  :hi:

You said it again.  :wacko:

vorian

  • Guest

Offline smiths

How many "Gold Standard" WG's do we have in the UK. Now obviously the question is subjective and there will always be someone who disagrees.

Also Lets be honest not every prossie has been seen and reviewed by UKP members but it does seem a very few girls names keep coming up time and time again with top reviews and great comments from nearly all members, a  few of the one's I am thinking off of the top of my head. Madlin Moon, Michelle Independent and Platinum Cindy.

When I say "Gold Standard" I'm talking about not only looks (Subjective) but professionalism, effort and a dedication to providing great customer service at all times. Price of course needs to be perceived as VFM.

I think the UKP members on the whole would be educated and knowledgeable regarding what makes a "Gold Standard" so when these few names come up again and again it makes me think how many are there really in the UK.

10,20,30,40. When you look at how many prossies are working it seems like a very small percentage of top class "Gold Standard" girls.

Impossible to know the answer to this in my view. The WGs you name are what i call forum darlings, punted with by a number of forum punters so get a lot of exposure on here which they both deserve and no doubt is good for them getting other punters.

Also no doubt there are equally good WGs who dont get as reviewed and/or other feedback, some i imagine get no or very little feedback at all. I have often over the years punted with good WGs on A/W who had no reviews or feedback and still didnt months later as they worked off their phones.

vorian

  • Guest
Impossible to know the answer to this in my view. The WGs you name are what i call forum darlings, punted with by a number of forum punters so get a lot of exposure on here which they both deserve and no doubt is good for them getting other punters.

Also no doubt there are equally good WGs who dont get as reviewed and/or other feedback, some i imagine get no or very little feedback at all. I have often over the years punted with good WGs on A/W who had no reviews or feedback and still didnt months later as they worked off their phones.

That makes a lot of sense smiths shame UKP was not around might have helped punters to connect with them. After all a good punt is what we are all after i presume.

password02

  • Guest
I have 7-8 'Gold Standard' WG that I spend time with sometimes 30 mins - 1 hour or even +2 hours -

In between i see some new girls 2-3 per month and see if i can add these new girls onto my 'gold' list - however it is becoming harder and harder as there seems to be less of these 'Gold' standard girls around in London.


vorian

  • Guest
I have 7-8 'Gold Standard' WG that I spend time with sometimes 30 mins - 1 hour or even +2 hours -

In between i see some new girls 2-3 per month and see if i can add these new girls onto my 'gold' list - however it is becoming harder and harder as there seems to be less of these 'Gold' standard girls around in London.

London unsurprisingly does seem to have to most according to the reviews. Not surprising as London has more reviews than any other region. I'm going to make a stab and say 8 for London and maybe 2/3 for each of the other regions so perhaps 35-40 across the country. Of course that is total guess work based on imperfect information.

password02

  • Guest
I would say IMO tops is a max of 50 'Gold' Standard girls who have the complete package.

Again veru subjective with looks but beyond the beauty its attitude, professionalism, service, making the client feel great every time, never jaded or looking tired, always provides a top service - and 100% committed all the time...

DaveMugabe

  • Guest
In my 20+ years of punting, I can only remember one that I would class as gold standard.  It was a small agency, days before t'interweb had a flat in Simonside Terrace in Newcastle.  I was her third ever customer.  Her BJ was fantastic and I only managed last 5 seconds into a shag.

Never found her again (and probably wouldnt recognise her anyway). But she was great.

And I have seen Northern Kara who everyone seems to rave about.

Offline Jimmyredcab

On Adultwork ----------------------------- none.     :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
I would say IMO tops is a max of 50 'Gold' Standard girls who have the complete package.

Again veru subjective with looks but beyond the beauty its attitude, professionalism, service, making the client feel great every time, never jaded or looking tired, always provides a top service - and 100% committed all the time...

That is exactly what I'm talking about an excellent description.

vorian

  • Guest
On Adultwork ----------------------------- none.     :hi:

Interesting why would you say none on AW and if there is none are they anywhere else or in your opinion do they just not exist.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Interesting why would you say none on AW and if there is none are they anywhere else or in your opinion do they just not exist.

Simple answer, gold standard prostitutes would not need to sink to advertising on Adultwork.   :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
Simple answer, gold standard prostitutes would not need to sink to advertising on Adultwork.   :hi:

Thank you, where or how do they advertise then I'm assuming you don't mean through agencies or newspapers.  I'm afraid I'm a bit ignorant with advertising methods other than AW.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Thank you, where or how do they advertise then I'm assuming you don't mean through agencies or newspapers.  I'm afraid I'm a bit ignorant with advertising methods other than AW.

I have no knowledge of how top class pro$$ies get their clients, they would be out of my price range.

Could you imagine Silvio Berlusconi logging on to Adultwork for his next pro$$ie.     :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

vorian

  • Guest
I have no knowledge of how top class pro$$ies get their clients, they would be out of my price range.

Could you imagine Silvio Berlusconi logging on to Adultwork for his next pro$$ie.     :rolleyes: :rolleyes:

Very good  :D, I was not thinking of linking price to quality as such, as to me "Gold Standard" is not necessary related to "Top Class" or price but other factors which can be found at the more reasonable rates which the average (I know no such thing) punter pays. These prossies imho can and are seen and reviewed by UKP members and as such do advertise on AW. I also have no idea or interest in finding out where prossies who charge thousands of pounds per hour find their work.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Very good  :D, I was not thinking of linking price to quality as such, as to me "Gold Standard" is not necessary related to "Top Class" or price but other factors which can be found at the more reasonable rates which the average (I know no such thing) punter pays. These prossies imho can and are seen and reviewed by UKP members and as such do advertise on AW.

Some of our members are happy to shag anything with a pulse as long as the rate is low ------------ their definition of VFM is totally different to mine.    :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
Some of our members are happy to shag anything with a pulse as long as the rate is low ------------ their definition of VFM is totally different to mine.    :hi:

I feel sure you are quite right Jimmy, my apologies if you have been asked this question many times before but as a long standing and experienced member and punter,  I would be very interested to get your take on what your personal definition of VFM is. 

Offline smiths

Simple answer, gold standard prostitutes would not need to sink to advertising on Adultwork.   :hi:

I view gold standard WGs to be good WGs myself. A WG you and me rated highly, Alex of The Bunny Lounge advertises or did on A/W. And Seductive Scarlet who we both rated as well. So has Natasha who is or was a member on here, she also had her own site as some WGs do of course. She was a gold standard WG in my opinion as is Shanelle of St Albans and Alexandra Divine of St Albans to name a few in my experience of punting with them. :hi:

password02

  • Guest
Simple answer, gold standard prostitutes would not need to sink to advertising on Adultwork.   :hi:

I think you are totally incorrect with that statement JRC - All of my 'Gold Standard' WG's have come from AW - it may not suit everyone BUT it is the best site on the internet for looking and booking WG's .

I found Madlin Moon, Michelle Indi, Platinum Cindy, Jessy189, Sexy Dee, Hot Katalina, Hot Lara, Nicola

Offline smiths

Very good  :D, I was not thinking of linking price to quality as such, as to me "Gold Standard" is not necessary related to "Top Class" or price but other factors which can be found at the more reasonable rates which the average (I know no such thing) punter pays. These prossies imho can and are seen and reviewed by UKP members and as such do advertise on AW. I also have no idea or interest in finding out where prossies who charge thousands of pounds per hour find their work.

Gold Standard means a good or better WG to me, its got NOTHING to do with what price she or her pimp charges or where they advertise.

DaveMugabe

  • Guest
I have no knowledge of how top class pro$$ies get their clients, they would be out of my price range.

Could you imagine Silvio Berlusconi logging on to Adultwork for his next pro$$ie.     :rolleyes: :rolleyes:
Cost does not equal quality.  A very silly schoolboy error to make. :rolleyes: :rolleyes: :rolleyes:  Keep on with your fantasies though.

Silvio probably had pimps source the girls for him.

Karima El Mahroug is not my idea of Gold Standard, for a start, she is far too young, despite your insinuations, JRC. 


But then as many have pointed out, its very subjective and a matter of taste.

Offline smiths

I think you are totally incorrect with that statement JRC - All of my 'Gold Standard' WG's have come from AW - it may not suit everyone BUT it is the best site on the internet for looking and booking WG's .

I found Madlin Moon, Michelle Indi, Platinum Cindy, Jessy189, Sexy Dee, Hot Katalina, Hot Lara, Nicola

Add me to the Hot Katalina list, and i add GEN in the same premises as Jessy in Barnet, also a very good WG in my view, both on A/W. And certainly Michelle, Cindy, Madlin and Jessy that i have read reviews and feedback on on here have been rated highly by many punters.

vorian

  • Guest

But then as many have pointed out, its very subjective and a matter of taste.

Agreed which is why I was kind of thinking about the WG's with multiple reviews from different UKP respected members. That way at least some of the subjectivity, particularly based around looks as opposed to customer service, effort and professionalism should be flattened out and give a more balanced view.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Agreed which is why I was kind of thinking about the WG's with multiple reviews from different UKP respected members.

I respect quite a few members on here ---------------- but there are others who I would not want in the back of my cab.  :hi:

Offline jackdaw



When I say "Gold Standard" I'm talking about not only looks (Subjective) but professionalism, effort and a dedication to providing great customer service at all times. Price of course needs to be perceived as VFM.

I think the UKP members on the whole would be educated and knowledgeable regarding what makes a "Gold Standard" so when these few names come up again and again it makes me think how many are there really in the UK.

10,20,30,40. When you look at how many prossies are working it seems like a very small percentage of top class "Gold Standard" girls.

What would you include in professionalism?

If you just include performance once the meeting starts,I think there might be low hundreds of gold medal WG. But if you include stuff like arranging meeting, providing top class environment, etc... Then probably less than a hundred. And certainly less than a hundred in range I can afford.

vorian

  • Guest
I respect quite a few members on here ---------------- but there are others who I would not want in the back of my cab.  :hi:

Would you say there is any memeber in particular who's reviews you would trust Jimmy.

vorian

  • Guest
What would you include in professionalism?

If you just include performance once the meeting starts,I think there might be low hundreds of gold medal WG. But if you include stuff like arranging meeting, providing top class environment, etc... Then probably less than a hundred. And certainly less than a hundred in range I can afford.

Yes I'm kind of getting that 50 to 100 feeling now, which is scary compared to how many WG there are apparently working in the UK and how many punts take place every year. Thinking of how much money just UKP members fork out alone is just crazy.

Offline Jimmyredcab

A "gold standard" prostitute has to have more skills than just sucking cock. Suppose a CEO of a major company needs a girl to take to the Royal enclosure at Ascot, he will not resort to Adultwork.

Offline Jimmyredcab

Would you say there is any member in particular who's reviews you would trust Jimmy.

That would have to be NIK without a doubt, we have very similar tastes plus I have met him face to face on a number of occasions.    :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
A "gold standard" prostitute has to have more skills than just sucking cock. Suppose a CEO of a major company needs a girl to take to the Royal enclosure at Ascot, he will not resort to Adultwork.

See your point however I personally believe a very, very small number of AW WG's could fit in well to that environment the fact that I think they could, to me is an indication of their "Gold Standard"ness. Imho the number who could perhaps do this is very small and in percentage terms tiny. Which is why I asked the original question in this thread. Just how many do you think are that "Gold Standard".

Offline Jimmyredcab

Yes I'm kind of getting that 50 to 100 feeling now, which is scary compared to how many WG there are apparently working in the UK and how many punts take place every year. Thinking of how much money just UKP members fork out alone is just crazy.

True, but the vast majority of us are mere peasants (under £50K a year).

A pro footballer would earn that in a day.      :scare:

vorian

  • Guest
That would have to be NIK without a doubt, we have very similar tastes plus I have met him face to face on a number of occasions.    :hi:

Thank you so NIK, seems a very good choice, as you said you have very similar tastes to NIK, so would that mean that you wouldn't trust any review if the WG reviewed was not to your particular taste irrespective to who the reviewer was, makes sense to me but would seem to limit the usefulness of reviews to a degree.

Offline smiths

A "gold standard" prostitute has to have more skills than just sucking cock. Suppose a CEO of a major company needs a girl to take to the Royal enclosure at Ascot, he will not resort to Adultwork.

So Alex who then became Chelsea who you highly rated as a WG and who had a profile on A/W or Seductive Scarlet who you highly rated and recommended who also had an A/W profile, it was your recommedation that alerted me to her and why i booked her and then had a good punt leading to me giving her a positive FR at the time. So these 2 WGs werent gold standard when you punted with them then is that right? :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
True, but the vast majority of us are mere peasants (under £50K a year).

A pro footballer would earn that in a day.      :scare:

 My apologies I may have been unclear, I was talking in total the amount of money spent by UKP members not how much individual members spend. If every member say spent 2% of their income on prossies a year that figure  would still be enormous. How much the individual member earns is still proportional. So footballer or as you said a "Mere Peasant" (under £50K a year) would not matter.

Offline Jimmyredcab

So Alex who then became Chelsea who you highly rated as a WG and who had a profile on A/W or Seductive Scarlet who you highly rated and recommended who also had an A/W profile, it was your recommedation that alerted me to her and why i booked her and then had a good punt leading to me giving her a positive FR at the time. So these 2 WGs werent gold standard when you punted with them then is that right? :hi:

As much as I like Seductive Scarlet I am not sure she would be suitable for "escort duties" at Royal Ascot, Chelsea of Watford might just be able to pull it off.    :hi:

The sort of clients these "gold standard" pro$$ies see would not know the price of a pint of milk, let alone care.   :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
As much as I like Seductive Scarlet I am not sure she would be suitable for "escort duties" at Royal Ascot, Chelsea of Watford might just be able to pull it off.    :hi:

The sort of clients these "gold standard" pro$$ies see would not know the price of a pint of milk, let alone care.   :hi:

I see the point you make Jimmy, I was thinking more about the WG as opposed to who they are or how much the punter earns, that is not really important to me as such.

Offline smiths

As much as I like Seductive Scarlet I am not sure she would be suitable for "escort duties" at Royal Ascot, Chelsea of Watford might just be able to pull it off.    :hi:

The sort of clients these "gold standard" pro$$ies see would not know the price of a pint of milk, let alone care.   :hi:

So in your view Chelsea could be even though she has or had an A/W profile then.

Also i dont agree with your definition of a gold standard WG here, the OPs opening post in my understanding of it was about good WGs, not just those that charge a lot and punt with rich guys. :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
As much as I like Seductive Scarlet I am not sure she would be suitable for "escort duties" at Royal Ascot, Chelsea of Watford might just be able to pull it off.    :hi:

The sort of clients these "gold standard" pro$$ies see would not know the price of a pint of milk, let alone care.   :hi:

So you believe that Chelsea might be able to pull it off and thus by your personal standards could be considered "Gold Standard" interesting so one (Maybe so far) would that be across the whole UK or would it be fair to think if one exists then there might be more out there, who do indeed advertise on AW.

vorian

  • Guest
So in your view Chelsea could be even though she has or had an A/W profile then.

Also i dont agree with your definition of a gold standard WG here, the OPs opening post in my understanding of it was about good WGs, not just those that charge a lot and punt with rich guys. :hi:

It indeed was Smiths, I never even considered those "Elite" rich punter type WG to me they are not really relevant to me personally or most members on this forum.

Offline Jimmyredcab

So in your view Chelsea could be even though she has or had an A/W profile then.


There are exceptions to every rule ---------------- Chelsea is one pro$$ie out of how many ------- tens of thousands.  :unknown:

vorian

  • Guest
There are exceptions to every rule ---------------- Chelsea is one pro$$ie out of how many ------- tens of thousands.  :unknown:

Exactly that's the point I was making, of course everyone will have a different opinion, so your answer Jimmy is One. Thank you

Offline Jimmyredcab

It indeed was Smiths, I never even considered those "Elite" rich punter type WG to me they are not really relevant to me personally or most members on this forum.

But your original question was ----------

"How many "Gold Standard" WG's do we have in the UK."

The vast majority of those girls would be of no interest to most UKP members, including me, my absolute maximum would be £200 an hour ------------- no matter how attractive she was.

Offline smiths

There are exceptions to every rule ---------------- Chelsea is one pro$$ie out of how many ------- tens of thousands.  :unknown:

Indeed there are but you posted there were none on A/W, i see she is now called Chelsea Heart on her A/W profile. :hi:

Offline smiths

But your original question was ----------

"How many "Gold Standard" WG's do we have in the UK."

The vast majority of those girls would be of no interest to most UKP members, including me, my absolute maximum would be £200 an hour ------------- no matter how attractive she was.

But you are classing gold plated as expensive WGs who go to Ascot with rich punters which wasnt what Vorian was posting about in his OP and he has confirmed he wasnt in another post since. :dash:

You once told me when i paid £180 an hour to punt with Keira Pharrell that you would rather cut your arm off than pay that much. My absolute maximum is also £200 an hour. :hi:

vorian

  • Guest
But your original question was ----------

"How many "Gold Standard" WG's do we have in the UK."

The vast majority of those girls would be of no interest to most UKP members, including me, my absolute maximum would be £200 an hour ------------- no matter how attractive she was.

I never mentioned price at all apart from perceived VFM and attractiveness is subjective anyway. For me price and "Gold Standard" or good WG are only related in so far as how much the punter can pay. I think there are "Gold Standard" at any price but for argument sake £100 to £175 covers many of them and £200 at a push.

To be clear imho, higher prices do not equal a good "Gold Standard" WG.

I have never linked the question to these "Elite" types I have no interest in them and I agree with you most UKP members would probably feel the same.

"Gold Standard" does not mean expensive but good.

the pussy man

  • Guest
Vivienne from Sindy Dolls Elite in Chester is the only GOld Standard girl I know working at the moment.  I have seen her about 5 times now (over 1 year) and she never disappoints.  Great looking, great personality, and great in bed.  She is phenomenal.  She's very sensual and great at GFE.  Pretty sure she doesn't go for PSE

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

I have seen some more who were great at Sindy's too recently, but haven't seen them more than once so don;t know if it was a one of thing.  I tend to always be on the lookout for a new experience so it;s really unusual for me to go back to a girl more than a couple of times.

Offline smiths

I never mentioned price at all apart from perceived VFM and attractiveness is subjective anyway. For me price and "Gold Standard" or good WG are only related in so far as how much the punter can pay. I think there are "Gold Standard" at any price but for argument sake £100 to £175 covers many of them and £200 at a push.

To be clear imho, higher prices do not equal a good "Gold Standard" WG.

I have never linked the question to these "Elite" types I have no interest in them and I agree with you most UKP members would probably feel the same.

"Gold Standard" does not mean expensive but good.

Now thats what i call very clearly clarifying it. :D