Author Topic: Gorgeous Ester Warren St NW1  (Read 4835 times)


29 review(s) for Gorgeous_Ester (19 positive, 5 neutral, 5 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline freeze44

Link to profile External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Comm- All good by phone/text and kept in touch well before and when entering place so all good. As working in the center of town was helpful to know the place was a short walk from the station so could sort travel plans.

Location- About 10 min north of Warren St station in a council block and easy found place off the main road. Buzzer entrance and guided up as floors are split so a little confusing but not too difficult to find. Reasonably discreet and door opened quickly and felt ok and safe enough. Flat is clean and tidy and shower offered and used before and after. Room was fine for the purpose and quite a large flat and couldn't hear or notice anyone else there. Good shower, clean towel and neutral body wash to use etc so all fine.

Wg- Profile pics seem accurate and thought she was pretty with a cracking slim nicely proportioned body. Small face and features and I thought she was good looking in natural way with little make up on. She had a gown on when opened the door and nice bra and pants on which she took off when I entered the room. Size 6 seems right, small but good for body shape tits, clean shaven, nice pert round looking ass, legs etc and was well pleased. Face and body would go for 7 out of 10. Very smiley and welcoming wg and she was open to my suggestions so happy to give the £80 for 30 min.

Services- Massage to back then front and around the business area and plenty of HE and owo which was hot and she goes at it and was enjoying playing with her body, then 69 and tasted good and finished after sex in various (covered) and doggy was the end point, then collapsed in a sweaty heap well satisfied. She is keen to please and happy to be directed and v good english. Enough interaction and few light kisses and moans and no fake dirty talk but she might do that if asked reckon

Summary- All round positive for me as think the profile is pretty accurate. age probably a few years more though and would guess 24 about right. Really liked her slim but curvy body,  about 5'4 tall and pretty face. Would say she is keen to please and likes to be lead and told what looking for and things moved along well an she had me well up for it. Chat was good and she is friendly although not a very confident wg or assertive type and would say she would suit if your happy to lead things etc. Plenty of wipes to help clean up after and no clock watching or rush or phone checking going on.

Overall, I enjoyed my time and as and when back in the area would try and return as think be more to come from her and if a pretty, slim slightly submissive type suits then she might work for you.
 
« Last Edit: November 29, 2018, 05:33:39 pm by freeze44 »


Offline Gynaemyte

Interesting, thank you.
Would you say that Sinz's bottom LH photo was accurate?
I ask because of doubts about her chin.

Offline freeze44

Interesting, thank you.
Would you say that Sinz's bottom LH photo was accurate?
I ask because of doubts about her chin.

Yes the pics look accurate to me. I read others reviews and tbh was expecting a very different type of look when read the chin comments and expecting a squirrel look!

To me she has a normal womans face, small features and is pretty and opposite to a mans face if know what I mean. Not a knock out model look but be happy to take her out in public.

Offline Gynaemyte


Offline slimdude1

Did she DFK?

Was it like a GFE?

Offline LanghamLodge

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 44
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
Did she DFK?

Was it like a GFE?


No DFK, for me at least. Smiley, friendly and compliant girl but I wouldn't exactly call it GFE because the intimacy is rather detached.
However, I did see her again last month to try her out her arse, and she took a good pounding in doggy style. Came in her arse (covered, of course). I bring this up, just in case any A Level fans out there.
Banned reason: No response to question about no reviews.
Banned by: 90125

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1

No DFK, for me at least. Smiley, friendly and compliant girl but I wouldn't exactly call it GFE because the intimacy is rather detached.
However, I did see her again last month to try her out her arse, and she took a good pounding in doggy style. Came in her arse (covered, of course). I bring this up, just in case any A Level fans out there.

In a punt to me personally

Dfk is the WORLD CUP
owo is the la Copa America/Euros
And the rest is champions League

TROPHIES
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline tergil

You say she is in a council block. Did it feel safe to you?

Offline king tarzan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 15,165
  • Likes: 8
  •  
  • Reviews: 1
You say she is in a council block. Did it feel safe to you?

Council estates use COMMON SENSE.....
always try to stick to affluent areas to punt...

I want to lick mango not have my throat introduced to a knife!!
Banned reason: Misogynist who gets free bookings from agencies for pos reviews.
Banned by: daviemac

Offline LanghamLodge

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 44
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 4
You say she is in a council block. Did it feel safe to you?

The two times were during the day and there was zero problems. Maybe at night the droogs are out and about.
Banned reason: No response to question about no reviews.
Banned by: 90125