cindy-sins Emsworth

[Dropperpost]

External Link/Members Only
Incall £130/hour
Logistics
All emails and texts answered promptly. Sent postcode on the day and house number given when I had text I had arrived at the street.
Location
House in quiet street in nice area, daytime visit but would feel safe walking down that street at night. Didn't spot any nosey neighbours. Rang the bell but she was already by the door so let in straight away.
Looks
Cindy doesn't have a face pic on her profile so I wasn't sure what to expect. Once inside I more than happy to find she is (IMO) good looking, dark hair I would guess late 30's, 5ft tall. Her profile says size 8 which could be true, maybe a 10 but I'm not expert. She has great little body and fantastic breasts and a long decorative tattoo down her spine which i quite liked. She had just washed her hair and smelt nice and fresh.
Services
As soon as I was inside she gave me a big hug and kiss before leading me upstairs. She was in a black top and leather mini skirt and as requested she was wearing stockings and it was a fantastic sight watching her walk upstairs. In the bedroom there some more kissing DFK this time before we sorted out the paperwork. Back to DFK and undressing each other.
 Once naked she dropped to her knees for OWO before moving to the bed to continue. Plenty of sucking and eye contact, not deepthroat but took plenty of my cock in her mouth. She then moved onto to her back for RO, she has a lovely pussy with a little landing srip of hair.
After plenty of licking and fingering  it was on with the condom and fucking with her legs over my shoulders, CG and doggy. Before going back to WOO.
I thought I was going to pop straight away but it turned out the complete opposite despite Cindy's best efforts. After a quick drinks break we carried on with oral and wanking, put on a fresh condom and some more doggy. Still couldn't cum.
 I was prepared to give up as I had had a great time anyway and the problem was obviously in my head but Cindy made it her mission to make me cum and after more wanking and oral she got me to the point of no return,
I warned her is was about to cum as in our email exchange she told me CIM was at her discretion depending on cleanliness which is fair. I must have passed the test because she clamped her mouth around my cock and swalloed the lot ( and it felt like ALOT) without spilling a drop.
 Buy that time my hour was already up but there was no rush to get me out of the door so I got dressed and had another quick kiss before leaving.
Would I return? Absolutely
This is my first review so let me know if I've missed anything. I've tried not to be too fluffy which is harder than it sounds when you've enjoyed yourself so much.

[Zimbaman]

Good first review and welcome to the forum 

[DrConners]

Good first review and welcome to the forum 

Well ............... I see he's still pretty new here and I don't want to discourage the OP from further posts & reviews (not that I could or would) but this very positive review wouldn't encourage me to try to book this miniature whore again - Tramp stamps & all.

If he's telling the truth maybe she has upped her game on the comms front as opposed to the rude arrogant responses I got sent.

I'm glad she took the time to wash her hair  & gave you a spermy kiss on the way out 

Like Zimba says - Welcome to UKP - Look forward to further contributions from you if you get time 

[aronteo]

Like DrConners, I, too, didn't have a great experience with her (to say the least), so won't book her again. If she upped her game, good for her.

Welcome to the Forum and thanks for the review. 

[Zimbaman]

Am I missing something? Where are the negatives for Cindy? 

[Dropperpost]

I'm pleased to say she gargled before the goodbye kiss
I'll try and be a bit less positive next time

[aronteo]

Am I missing something? Where are the negatives for Cindy? 

I didn't put up a review, but basically this is what happened to me: after making the booking, I was given a postcode, and the instruction to call her for the house number once there. So I did, without never receiving any response.
The day after she came back to me by text with some B excuse that her mobile went out of battery and she didn't have the charger......, yeah right.......was bumped for a regular after driving all the way there....., very nice........

[Huawei]

Am I missing something? Where are the negatives for Cindy? 

This is what puzzles me - I've been thinking about seeing her, everything looks good : services, location etc., so I do my due diligence on here, and she has 5 positives and no negatives. Yet when she's mentioned or reviewed, more than once, there are some negative comments (and that's putting it mildly inn some cases!).

Am I doing something wrong with my research 

Thanks

[timsussex]

While she is clearly not a 20 year old stunner I don't recall many negative comments from those that have seen her.

Several of us (me included) have had problems arranging a meet; not serious in my case so she is still on my list.

[sailor3]

Well ............... I see he's still pretty new here and I don't want to discourage the OP from further posts & reviews (not that I could or would) but this very positive review wouldn't encourage me to try to book this miniature whore again - Tramp stamps & all.

If he's telling the truth maybe she has upped her game on the comms front as opposed to the rude arrogant responses I got sent.

I'm glad she took the time to wash her hair  & gave you a spermy kiss on the way out 

Like Zimba says - Welcome to UKP - Look forward to further contributions from you if you get time 

Dropperpost, thanks of the review. I don't know how you felt about Conners comments, but I find them patronising. Don't worry, most of us are here simply to pass on info and to learn from each other's experience. He seems to think he is some sort of authority on the validity of other peoples' reviews. We were all "pretty new here" at some point and your contribution re your experience is appreciated.

[Fuzzyduck]

Dropperpost, thanks of the review. I don't know how you felt about Conners comments, but I find them patronising. Don't worry, most of us are here simply to pass on info and to learn from each other's experience. He seems to think he is some sort of authority on the validity of other peoples' reviews. We were all "pretty new here" at some point and your contribution re your experience is appreciated.

I'm sure he'll speak for himself but the way I read it was that DrC doesn't 100% believe OP since the review doesn't tally against the other info he has (knowledge, direct experience of the girl and experience of how people operate on UKP). He was wary and called it out. Nowt wrong with that. In fact, it's important people do that. Without scrutiny, the reviews all become fluffy and touting/advertising becomes mainstream.

Anyone who believes a first review (positive or negative) from a newbie at face value is naive. Anyone who believes that all UKP member behave honestly with the best intentions is also naive.

FWIW, I thought it was a good first review (thanks OP), albeit quite fluffy. That said, any very positive review from a member with no punting credentials raises a flag with me. Furthermore, I thought the negative feedback from other members was more valuable. Shame no-one has put these into a review.

[Zimbaman]

I'm sure he'll speak for himself but the way I read it was that DrC doesn't 100% believe OP since the review doesn't tally against the other info he has (knowledge, direct experience of the girl and experience of how people operate on UKP). He was wary and called it out. Nowt wrong with that. In fact, it's important people do that. Without scrutiny, the reviews all become fluffy and touting/advertising becomes mainstream.

Anyone who believes a first review (positive or negative) from a newbie at face value is naive. Anyone who believes that all UKP member behave honestly with the best intentions is also naive.

FWIW, I thought it was a good first review (thanks OP), albeit quite fluffy. That said, any very positive review from a member with no punting credentials raises a flag with me. Furthermore, I thought the negative feedback from other members was more valuable. Shame no-one has put these into a review.

+1  DrC can speak for himself, but there are clearly negative aspects to Cindy that I hadn’t been aware of. Balance is important and newer members need a bit of a thick skin. I found the review useful (and not overly fluffy), clearly this is subjective though.

[Derrick101]

I didn't put up a review, but basically this is what happened to me: after making the booking, I was given a postcode, and the instruction to call her for the house number once there. So I did, without never receiving any response.
The day after she came back to me by text with some B excuse that her mobile went out of battery and she didn't have the charger......, yeah right.......was bumped for a regular after driving all the way there....., very nice........

Maybe a review would have added a negative to balance things up a bit ??

It seems that its only her comms let her down at times. Otherwise, her services, if you get to see her, are reported as good.

[glamourtog]

Sorry, but I too don't think this is genuine.  Too much selling for my liking.  Hair washed, lead me upstairs, email exchange about CIM etc......not written by a bloke.
Sounds like bullshit to me.

[James999]

I would guess late 30's,

Well the profile says 37 so more likely late 40's, some of the pictures would indicate even older 

[Zimbaman]

Sorry, but I too don't think this is genuine.  Too much selling for my liking.  Hair washed, lead me upstairs, email exchange about CIM etc......not written by a bloke.
Sounds like bullshit to me.

You gave chocolate Breanna a positive. I’ll take your views with a pinch of salt 

[DrConners]

Dropperpost, thanks of the review. I don't know how you felt about Conners comments, but I find them patronising. Don't worry, most of us are here simply to pass on info and to learn from each other's experience. He seems to think he is some sort of authority on the validity of other peoples' reviews. We were all "pretty new here" at some point and your contribution re your experience is appreciated.

You found my comments patronising or you found them patronising on her behalf ?

Listen sailor, you've seen her and had a good time - frequently it would seem :

Over the last year or so I have visited this little horndog a number of times. She has been reviewed here before, and this review largely confirms what has already been written.

Cindy claims to be late 30's and I would judge that to be about right. She is short, curvy, has a decent natural bust, and is to my eye pretty with a naughty smile and a twinkle in her eye. I wouldn't describe her as gym toned, but she has very sexy curves in the right places. The AW photos are of her.

Physical attributes aside, it's her enthusiasm that makes her such a great punt. She has good oral skills, will gobble your balls, slide her tongue up and down your shaft all the while french polishing your bell end using loads of spit, before suddenly sucking you all in. She hoovers up your load and last time I was there, she gave a spunky smile before swallowing it all down. She will snog your face off from the moment you come in to when you leave. I must have fucked her in every position possible. Whichever way, its a great view, she loves it all and can take a really good pounding. After popping, if you are up for it she will definitely have a go at getting another load out of you if there's time left, and she has never rushed me out the door.

Heartily recommended.

Now we've established what a colossal fan boy you are (little horndog - FFS!!    ) why don't you wind your neck in when it comes to ther members contributing their personal experiences of her shit comms ? Not just me, Bonetti, timsussex, aronteo, andyw1969 ect - You have taken it upon yourself to defend her honour when you really don't need too.

It would seem if you do manage to 'fit into her busy' schedule you'll have a good time - bully for you.

I tried several times to book her & either had no response to messages or rude & arrogant responses to polite texts - whats the problem with sharing what happened to me with other members ?

She's a prostitute that gargles your cum every now & again - not your sister. She's aware of UKP so unless she asked you to defend her honour I would politely remind you we are both on the same team. 

Or was it the spermy kiss comment that got your piss boiling ? 

[DrConners]

This is what puzzles me - I've been thinking about seeing her, everything looks good : services, location etc., so I do my due diligence on here, and she has 5 positives and no negatives. Yet when she's mentioned or reviewed, more than once, there are some negative comments (and that's putting it mildly inn some cases!).

Am I doing something wrong with my research 

Nope I just think if she's available & your schedules sync you'll be okay - Has a preference for return visitors it would seem 

[DrConners]

While she is clearly not a 20 year old stunner I don't recall many negative comments from those that have seen her.

Several of us (me included) have had problems arranging a meet; not serious in my case so she is still on my list.

That's fair enough tim - I must be overly sensitive 

Hope you get around to finally meeting her - I'm out though 

[Dropperpost]

TBF my first draft was even fluffier
I don't know if it made a difference but as it was my first punt  I first emailed her a week before the meet to give me a chance of going elsewhere if she didn't answer. It was also a lunchtime meet so maybe I was first of the day or just got lucky.
Thanks for all the comments, I'll try and take the advice on board. Hopefully I'll have time for another punt next month, if so I'll try to tone down the fluffyness.

[timsussex]

That's fair enough tim - I must be overly sensitive 

Hope you get around to finally meeting her - I'm out though 

It was more poor comms than a real letdown i.e. I hadn't travelled to meet her it was just that having e mailed earlier in the week about a day she didn't answer on the day so I moved to plan B

Always have a plan B   

[sailor3]

You found my comments patronising or you found them patronising on her behalf ?

Listen sailor, you've seen her and had a good time - frequently it would seem :

Now we've established what a colossal fan boy you are (little horndog - FFS!!    ) why don't you wind your neck in when it comes to ther members contributing their personal experiences of her shit comms ? Not just me, Bonetti, timsussex, aronteo, andyw1969 ect - You have taken it upon yourself to defend her honour when you really don't need too.

It would seem if you do manage to 'fit into her busy' schedule you'll have a good time - bully for you.

I tried several times to book her & either had no response to messages or rude & arrogant responses to polite texts - whats the problem with sharing what happened to me with other members ?

She's a prostitute that gargles your cum every now & again - not your sister. She's aware of UKP so unless she asked you to defend her honour I would politely remind you we are both on the same team. 

Or was it the spermy kiss comment that got your piss boiling ? 

Conners, read my comment again. I'm not commenting on your experience re poor comms. Neither am I defending her! Where do you see that? I am commenting on your patronising appraisal of a review just because its a newbie and he had a different experience to your own. Wind your own neck in big boy.

[DrConners]

I am commenting on your patronising appraisal of a review just because its a newbie and he had a different experience to your own. Wind your own neck in big boy.

Except your not - That's just your excuse. The OP had no issues with my comments & it's his review - You however did.

Conners, read my comment again. I'm not commenting on your experience re poor comms. Neither am I defending her! Where do you see that?

Then your in denial    Re-read it yourself :

Dropperpost, thanks of the review. I don't know how you felt about Conners comments, but I find them patronising. Don't worry, most of us are here simply to pass on info and to learn from each other's experience. He seems to think he is some sort of authority on the validity of other peoples' reviews. We were all "pretty new here" at some point and your contribution re your experience is appreciated.

You singled me out purely based on the fact I've commented about her shit comms before ? You've seen her several times & always enjoyed her company - I'm happy for you - I'm also afraid I have to advise you you seem to have developed a fluffy affection for her.

You ignored my previous comments on your review but couldn't help yourself here - I doubt she'll give you a discount for white knighting her but feel free to keep rushing to this whores defence - Sorry horndog/warthog 

[cyberstrider]

Well well, you made it upstairs huh? I only made it to the sofa as my juices were running high.
Cindy lives in Portsmouth but works from a rented house near Emsworth. Problems occur when the owner doesn't go to work and she cannot work. I can vouch for her performance, especially her encouraging whispers; I'm wet, I wanna cum when you cum.
I prefer to stay away from Emsworth, as it's on my doorstep. Otherwise I'd be inside her again.

[sailor3]

Except your not - That's just your excuse. The OP had no issues with my comments & it's his review - You however did.

Then your in denial    Re-read it yourself :

You singled me out purely based on the fact I've commented about her shit comms before ? You've seen her several times & always enjoyed her company - I'm happy for you - I'm also afraid I have to advise you you seem to have developed a fluffy affection for her.

You ignored my previous comments on your review but couldn't help yourself here - I doubt she'll give you a discount for white knighting her but feel free to keep rushing to this whores defence - Sorry horndog/warthog 

Whatever... I don't think anyone has cause to label me a white knight, but if you say so - I really couldn't care, especially coming from someone who writes "I couldn't concentrate for the rest of the day & felt a little cunt-struck".

I have "singled you out" for one reason only. It is perfectly reasonable to question the verity of a review when it is justified. However, your approach amply illustrated here is to cast aspersions upon reviewers a) because they are new, and b) because their experience has been different from yours. Thus the first comments a newbie sees in response to a perfectly reasonable review of his experience is a rather disparaging one questioning his motives. This is not conducive to getting either newbies nor lurkers to contribute, and we should be encouraging them to do so. Sure rip into those who are touting, but not everyone is! I would urge you to show a little more respect for their contributions.

Hopefully you will reflect on this. For my part I could have used more moderate language and more clearly explained my grouse with you. Thank you for your contributions, I'm sure you appreciate not having your motives questioned each time you write a positive review. Feel free to have the last word, I have said my piece.

[DrConners]

Whatever... I don't think anyone has cause to label me a white knight, but if you say so - I really couldn't care, especially coming from someone who writes "I couldn't concentrate for the rest of the day & felt a little cunt-struck".

A transparent & flimsy attempt at deflection if ever I read one  I'd hardly been a member here for 5 minutes when I wrote that plus you missed off "That hasn't happened for a long time" which kinda balances out the comment. Cheap shot but when your desperate I guess 

I have "singled you out" for one reason only. It is perfectly reasonable to question the verity of a review when it is justified. However, your approach amply illustrated here is to cast aspersions upon reviewers a) because they are new, and b) because their experience has been different from yours. Thus the first comments a newbie sees in response to a perfectly reasonable review of his experience is a rather disparaging one questioning his motives. This is not conducive to getting either newbies nor lurkers to contribute, and we should be encouraging them to do so. Sure rip into those who are touting, but not everyone is! I would urge you to show a little more respect for their contributions.

Rubbish, you singled me out because I called your "horndog/warthog" a "miniature whore - tramp stamps & all" & you lost the plot. This backtracking only reinforces your white knight status IMO. Sword waving is tedious & unproductive, given the chance I wouldn't change my terminology but I think it's a shame we've ended up butting heads.

You've got to see her several times with obvious positive experiences - I have not - Fair play to you.

The OP logged in last night & has expressed no issues with my comments - Your the one charging in.

Think about poor aronteo - stitched up on the doorstep - I do & I'm glad he shared - Makes me put my thoughts in perspective about articulating my opinions on this one.

Hopefully you will reflect on this. For my part I could have used more moderate language and more clearly explained my grouse with you. Thank you for your contributions, I'm sure you appreciate not having your motives questioned each time you write a positive review. Feel free to have the last word, I have said my piece.

How touching - playing the martyr.    Just put me on "ignore" buddy