Cara James/ Glasgow

[Clattypats]

External Link/Members Only 30mins - £80

Contacted Cara for advance booking via AW...Answered the same day, and was given phone number/Postcode...Comms all good...

Proceeded to flat on the day...Glasgow harbour...She requested that I phone when I got there, which I did...Couldn't quite work out the accent on the phone, but after initial call, she then sent me a text containing the buzzer number...

Chapped on the door, then she appeared from behind it...Dressed in Black leggings, and a sporty vest top...Nice looking girl...Blonde hair, quite tall and slim (profile accurate enough)...Age wise I would say early thirties, and with a Canadian accent, although said she was born in Scotland...

Paperwork oot the road, then I asked for a shower...Had one beforehand but prefer a before and after at the meet...Was told the shower wasn't working so just went for a freshen up...No shower in the bathroom at all, just a bath...I do believe they flats have 2 bathrooms, but who knows ...

Out the shower and stripped off...Her likewise...She has a nice figure...Very slim...Small, but nice tits, big nipples,  and a nice tanned body...Quite chatty, and easy to get on with...

Onto the bed for some FK and fingering...She then worked her way down for some OWO....Pretty good technique,Then onto 69...Missionary followed, with a couple of variations...Knees to her chest, then legs on shoulder...Moved onto doggy then prone bone...She done all these positions enthusiastically, with a wee bit of dirty talk during...Intended finishing with CIM which she had no problem with...Unfortunately it wasn't happening for me that day,  and I couldn't Cum...

Had a wee chat at the end up...She said she works part time...No rush, and easy to get on with...I certainly wouldn't rule out seeing her again further down the line...

[Dezeen1]

Sounds like a good one but an SP who can’t work out their pricing structure really annoys me!
30 mins for £80 yet 60 mins is £180!!!

[Rome66]

Maybe just prefers 30min and quotes to deter other requests ? 

[Uncle Buck]

Good review Clatty.

She does look like a stunner....

[The Man With No Name]

Perhaps it's a semi-regular problem in your case - owing more to the physical or mental state you're in at the time, regardless of the calibre of girl or how much you fancy her.

But half the appeal of punting is picking or revisiting a tried-and-tested good-looking performer, who I'm basically guaranteed will do enough to make me comfortably blow my load at least once, often all done and dusted in 15 min. To me, that's the biggest advantage of it over civvy shagging - where, depending on the social setup, there's often a lot of games involved with multiple potential candidates, forcing you to hedge your bets for a bit - before often compromising in terms of raw talent and less likely long-term goals, all in favour of actually getting a result that night. But a result that can often have you thundering away till the early hours with plenty of snap and crackle, but in the end, no pop - mainly because you'd rather be pumping something else you saw that night and fancied more.

The biggest benefit of punting is basically the presence of an unequivocal result. Some may argue it's a massive trade off, as it's directly costing you money. But to me, there's simply a distinct appeal to the certainty of turning up at a flat and giving a hot girl money to fuck as long as you can, before blowing your load inside her. So much so that I'm usually far more excited on my way to a punt, than on my way back from a night out with bird to shag in her own bed.

Therefore, given all of what I've said above - unless there was a very good reason otherwise - I certainly wouldn't be going back to pay a hooker again, when she didn't even turn me on enough to make me cum once in 30 min. As it completely defeats the point in going for a punt.

[Rome66]

As many will say its all subjective, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Regadless , and pertinent to my age , being rock hard and wanting to cum doesn't necessarily result in the desired result , my problem and not one I would use to degrade a review score.(unless her skills are lacking) In my personal opinion only . Other opinions are available   

[Clattypats]

Perhaps it's a semi-regular problem in your case - owing more to the physical or mental state you're in at the time, regardless of the calibre of girl or how much you fancy her.

But half the appeal of punting is picking or revisiting a tried-and-tested good-looking performer, who I'm basically guaranteed will do enough to make me comfortably blow my load at least once, often all done and dusted in 15 min. To me, that's the biggest advantage of it over civvy shagging - where, depending on the social setup, there's often a lot of games involved with multiple potential candidates, forcing you to hedge your bets for a bit - before often compromising in terms of raw talent and less likely long-term goals, all in favour of actually getting a result that night. But a result that can often have you thundering away till the early hours with plenty of snap and crackle, but in the end, no pop - mainly because you'd rather be pumping something else you saw that night and fancied more.

The biggest benefit of punting is basically the presence of an unequivocal result. Some may argue it's a massive trade off, as it's directly costing you money. But to me, there's simply a distinct appeal to the certainty of turning up at a flat and giving a hot girl money to fuck as long as you can, before blowing your load inside her. So much so that I'm usually far more excited on my way to a punt, than on my way back from a night out with bird to shag in her own bed.

Therefore, given all of what I've said above - unless there was a very good reason otherwise - I certainly wouldn't be going back to pay a hooker again, when she didn't even turn me on enough to make me cum once in 30 min. As it completely defeats the point in going for a punt.

At the end of the day, I can't legislate for not being able to Cum in a booking...I'm not going to give someone a rating under a Pos because I couldn't Cum, when I thought she provided a good enough service...

I've seen a couple of "Regs" for a while now and had plenty return visits...One, I've came in every booking, the other in about 80% of them...So to fault service or looks doesn't really add up in my book...

I will say though, if it's a first meet, and I don't Cum then it will lessen my chances of booking again...Would I rule it out, No...Hence my Pos for the review...I don't know what bookings I will Cum in, and which ones I won't...I wish I knew the answer, but maybe it's just the way I'm programmed...

[The Man With No Name]

As many will say its all subjective, and beauty is in the eye of the beholder. Regadless , and pertinent to my age , being rock hard and wanting to cum doesn't necessarily result in the desired result , my problem and not one I would use to degrade a review score.(unless her skills are lacking) In my personal opinion only . Other opinions are available   

At the end of the day, I can't legislate for not being able to Cum in a booking...I'm not going to give someone a rating under a Pos because I couldn't Cum, when I thought she provided a good enough service...

I've seen a couple of "Regs" for a while now and had plenty return visits...One, I've came in every booking, the other in about 80% of them...So to fault service or looks doesn't really add up in my book...

I will say though, if it's a first meet, and I don't Cum then it will lessen my chances of booking again...Would I rule it out, No...Hence my Pos for the review...I don't know what bookings I will Cum in, and which ones I won't...I wish I knew the answer, but maybe it's just the way I'm programmed...

Nor would I ever advocate giving a girl a negative or neutral simply because you couldn't cum - as long as her looks and service reflected her profile - no matter how pretty or ugly, how fat or thin, or how expansive or limited.

But my point is that as hot and attentive as this girl seems to have been, unlike your regulars - for whatever reason - she simply didn't it for you. Or at least not enough to make you spunk. As your contrasting, consistent performance with your regulars, and everything else you've said, would seem to suggest it's more down to a personal interpretation of attractiveness, as opposed to any physical or mental issue at play.

So while you were perfectly correct to positively review her - especially since fellow punters are far more interested in her objective qualities, and not really that they didn't seem to do enough for your particular ageing prostate on a subjective basis - I'm just surprised you stated there was a good chance you'd book her again and not try your money elsewhere, for the reasons I've stated above.

if it's a first meet, and I don't Cum then it will lessen my chances of booking again

Perhaps this, however, suggests you're moving more into line with my own thinking. Or that I possibly simply over-interpreted your intention to actually book her again. 

[seeker]

I think Clatty did the right thing, He had a good time
The wg did her bit and was enthusiastic with all services delivered  .
If a punter is unable to get ,wood, comes too quick or as in Clatty,s case was unable to .
You can't blame the sp imo.

[The Man With No Name]

I think Clatty did the right thing, He had a good time
The wg did her bit and was enthusiastic with all services delivered  .
If a punter is unable to get ,wood, comes too quick or as in Clatty,s case was unable to .
You can't blame the sp imo.

Exactly the point I was making - she deserved a positive review.

I just don't see why he'd consider going back. At least in the cold, objective light of day.

[seeker]

I just don't see why he'd consider going back. At least in the cold, objective light of day.

Because  Clatty  felt it was a positive punt ... up to him if he wants to go back , and I don't see why he shouldn't as the sp kept up her part of the deal .

[The Man With No Name]

Because  Clatty  felt it was a positive punt ... up to him if he wants to go back , and I don't see why he shouldn't as the sp kept up her part of the deal .

Of course it's his choice.

But as I highlighted earlier in the thread, the main point of punting for me is being guaranteed at least one easy, enjoyable pop - without the hassle and drawbacks of civvy street. If you read my post above in full, you'll get where I'm coming from.

So as good as she may be, she still couldn't make him cum for whatever reason. Thus, there's little point in paying to see her again and risk repeating this, given my reasoning. But again, if he wants to go to watch her paint her nails or take a shite, that's his privilege too.

[Clattypats]

Of course it's his choice.

But as I highlighted earlier in the thread, the main point of punting for me is being guaranteed at least one easy, enjoyable pop - without the hassle and drawbacks of civvy street. If you read my post above in full, you'll get where I'm coming from.

So as good as she may be, she still couldn't make him cum for whatever reason. Thus, there's little point in paying to see her again and risk repeating this, given my reasoning. But again, if he wants to go to watch her paint her nails or take a shite, that's his privilege too.

Right...I'll try and explain this as best I can, without turning it into too big a deal, which wasn't my intention...

I never said at anypoint I would most likely see her again, what I did say was, I wouldn't rule it out further down the line...There is a bit of a difference between the two IMO...There have been WGs where I have came in the first meet, booked them again, and not came in the second meet....There was one, maybe two where I haven't came in the first meet, but have done in the second one, so like I've said previously, I can't legislate for when I will or won't...

However what I will say, and as I've also stated...It may lessen the chances of me repeat visiting, if it doesn't happen for me in the first meet but wouldn't rule it out, depending.. i.e. If I feel it wasn't totally to do with the service provided, or how good looking I thought she was, then if any of the Reg(s) I see or any other WG I've seen and had no problem Cumming in the bookings with, weren't availible on a particular day I fancied a booking, then I would maybe look to her again...Doesn't mean I 100% would, but I would still possibly consider it an option...There are two others I recall having looked to book again where I haven't came in the first meet...But over the course of time since I last seen them, some of their services had changed (OWO to OW) so I didn't bother...

I don't know what factors play a part in this happening sometimes (and it is only sometimes), but an ageing prostate ain't one of them  ...I'm not for the Scrapheap yet!...

[Gdg4y69]

On yourself clatty....quite right.

Some of us quick draw merchants would swap you the problem anytime.

I'm in Brum next week for business and just finalising a session with Sabrina foxx who I've been chasing for a while now.....I can see my two shot load going in 15 mins with her....but as long as I enjoy it I'm no bothered!

[Happyjose]

On yourself clatty....quite right.

Some of us quick draw merchants would swap you the problem anytime.

I'm in Brum next week for business and just finalising a session with Sabrina foxx who I've been chasing for a while now.....I can see my two shot load going in 15 mins with her....but as long as I enjoy it I'm no bothered!

Just a quick word to the wise, and entirely up to you how you take it

but based upon past experience, it's generally not a good idea to flag up arrangements you've made with a prossie, as they may find out about your post, get spooked at the possibility of a review and drop your booking.

[Gdg4y69]

Jose

Thanks for heads up and appreciate that this will have happened to others in past.

I'm comfortable enough that I've not put day of week or time so non specific should put me in same bracket as the other 20 or so punters she may see next week.
 

[Happyjose]

Jose

Thanks for heads up and appreciate that this will have happened to others in past.

I'm comfortable enough that I've not put day of week or time so non specific should put me in same bracket as the other 20 or so punters she may see next week.
 

Good man

[Matrix]

Jose

Thanks for heads up and appreciate that this will have happened to others in past.

I'm comfortable enough that I've not put day of week or time so non specific should put me in same bracket as the other 20 or so punters she may see next week.
 

Most of whom, won't be sporting an "accent". 

[Gdg4y69]

Bejesus if she goes at the lengths to scope n find me out it's maybe better I cancel the booking.

The tie and tease just became a whole new level!!

Matrix I would only have accent if I was Scottish 

[DickDiver]

Bejesus if she goes at the lengths to scope n find me out it's maybe better I cancel the booking.

The tie and tease just became a whole new level!!

Matrix I would only have accent if I was Scottish 

It was a suggestion. Don't over think it.

Punting completely anonymously is smart, especially if you review. Broadcasting your bookings is the opposite.

Take the advice or leave it.