SEXYSHAZA83 - Paisley

[Paulc127]

External Link/Members Only

This was plan c for today after sexy Sophie wasn’t available and chloebrad wasn’t answering anyway on with the review Had a look at her profile and wasn’t paying 80 quid for the half hour so decided to go to for the 30 pound blowjob comma were all done by text she is based in a housing area in paisley not far from paisley town centre a 5/10 minute walk got the address as it’s a flat there was the usual hiding behind the door this is where I thought aw fuck she close the door and it’s a smallish woman would probably say late thirty’s early fourties No the best looking best has a decent wee arse on her she asked it I wanted owo or ow as she says this I notice her voice is very slow and she has about 2 teeth I still have the cash in my hand at this point so I’m in 2 minds as I was wanted at least a wee bit of action so I just tell her I’m a bit delicate just now so will a handjob do she agrees to a handjob but doesn’t look too happy starts as floppy as fuck felt her arse got me a bit stiff not full on though asked to finger her and the answer was no unless I pay the extra money for a quickie so she’s on her knees giving me the worst wank ever no even hard I asked her to get her tits out she says yes if it is gonna get me to spunk quicker to be fair she has wee perky ones that are no bad so I eventually tell her I’m ready to spunk she says do it over her tits I dropped 3 big loads over them a bit went on her chin and she was raging about it no shower no wipes or fukall offerd she just pulled her bra and t shirt back on coverd in spunk jeans up and out the door I go as I’m walking out she pipes up with next time come for half an hour and pay me 80 quid then dropped her hand down her jeans and says you can fuck this well no thank you as Kyle falconer says I get a lot of folk will say why go for it but I hand a hangover horn and just wanted a bit of action and with paisley having about 3 decent wgs then this was the last option I wouldn’t return as she clearly has some substance issue that’s why she wasn’t getting her dirty mouth near my sauasge negative for me

[Poopster]

Grim.

[seeker]

 
Always amazes me 
What guys are willing to stick thier dicks in 
And paying for it 
Thanks for the review (laugh )
Can't see many owning up to going and seeing this particular wg.

[Boinky]

You went to see that and expected anything other than a negative experience?

I'm sure she had bareback listed on her profile before as well.

Your reviews are really hard to read, maybe try some punctuation. It's just a wall of uncapitalised, unbroken text.

[DoctorSalchicha]

In the middle picture (school uniform) you can have a better glance to her, she's ugly as fuck. Man, next time go home, and have a wank while watching porn instead.

[Happyjose]

Saw the first pic and thought the test card girl has fallen on hard times

[Astarter]

You say you would not go back as she has clearly has had some substances issues. I'm amazed it took you to have to go and meet her to figure that out. Clear as day first glance of any of her pictures that becomes pretty obvious to me at least.

[brothelcreeper]

Bad luck pal but agreed with others and you obviously knew it urself when you got there it wasn't gny be the best punt. But fair play, if I lived over that way I'd see her too and probs go for the quickie hand relief; I mean she did ask you to cum on her tits so there's a spark right there. I have unusual tastes at times re women but, yes, if she was in the Lothians I could see the "attraction".

[J_H]

This profile just screams 'junkie skank' to me.

[J_H]

Fuck me! Previous feedback says 'Disgusting house, disgusting woman! Wiping her pussy with a baby wipe before wanting to do anything, sounded like a junkie and looked like one, walked out!!!!!!'

What more do you need to see?!

[youngatheart]

I agree with the comments above.

But a serious thanks for the review.

A negative review is as good a source of information as a positive one.

[Uncle Buck]

Always amazes me 
What guys are willing to stick thier dicks in 
And paying for it 
Thanks for the review (laugh )
Can't see many owning up to going and seeing this particular wg.

+1

I can’t imagine owning up to pumping this on civvie Street never mind paying.

Different folks for different strokes

UB

[Jock D]

It's already been said, but come on...the pics tell you all you need to know

[Happyjose]

Anyone recall her previous profile?

Would be useful to link it

[J_H]

It was a variation on 'Shazza'; definitely a barebacker.

[buddiemarvelous]

Get yourself to a doctor asap and stop pumping manky junkie skanks.

I dont know what disgusts me more, this or the tranny smackhead from Linwood

[auldie63]

tranny smackhead from Linwood

Do tell?

[Boinky]

One of his previous reviews was for Tinkerbell .who, like SexyShaza, is facially challenged and apparently leaves drug paraphernalia lying about. Some of her pictures make her look like a tranny, the ones that don't make her look like an oompah-loompah skanky ned.


Basically, Paul has extremely questionable taste.

[J_H]

Basically, Paul has extremely questionable taste.

As evidenced by his 50% failure rate … but it's still better than his punctuation!

Apparently Tinkerbell is a 'wee hidden gem'.

[Astarter]

Amazing what the male human species is capable of wanting to bonk. Seems there's a market out there for almost anything regardless of looks, drug issues or health risks. The mind boggles.

[brothelcreeper]

Think of it in terms of you're non punting life .Sometimes you just want to shag a chav or a fatty, no? 

[Astarter]

Think of it in terms of you're non punting life .Sometimes you just want to shag a chav or a fatty, no? 

Using the wg the op posted about as my reference point to your question, no never in any way or form at all whatsoever!

[J_H]

Still, to be fair to the OP, the Negative review is useful - a warning.

[Astarter]

Still, to be fair to the OP, the Negative review is useful - a warning.

Nothing wrong with op and his review. He just happens to have a very different outlook on who is suitable to punt with than I do.

[J_H]

+1

[S.X. MacHine]

Pure comedic genius, albeit unpunctuated.
As an East Coast punter who has joined in the general condemnation of the general quality of WGs in what is laughingly known as 'The Kingdom', I offer an apology. Paisley can offer SEXYSHAZA, a WG who can plumb depths unknown to Fife prostitution.
But, as they say, horses for courses; she obviously floats someone's boat.

[TommyMoundfrigger]

Still, to be fair to the OP, the Negative review is useful - a warning.

I agree.
Thank you OP for your review.
The comments that followed, although justified, may only stop others from posting negative reviews.

[Poopster]

I agree.
Thank you OP for your review.
The comments that followed, although justified, may only stop others from posting negative reviews.

Yep. 
The review is of the girl, not the punter.  If we keep turning reviews into an excuse to knock the OP, people will stop posting negatives for fear of being the next target of such a merry slating.  I've said it before, but negatives are, in many ways, more useful to us punters than positive reviews.

So can we leave the guy alone? 

[brothelcreeper]

Using the wg the op posted about as my reference point to your question, no never in any way or form at all whatsoever!

Hahaha I understand

[Jock D]

Yep. 
The review is of the girl, not the punter.  If we keep turning reviews into an excuse to knock the OP, people will stop posting negatives for fear of being the next target of such a merry slating.  I've said it before, but negatives are, in many ways, more useful to us punters than positive reviews.

So can we leave the guy alone?

+1

[Happyjose]

I agree.
Thank you OP for your review.
The comments that followed, although justified, may only stop others from posting negative reviews.

I agree. If the review(er) seems genuine, we should appreciate the contribution, and in the first instance nudge them in the right direction

[fedor]

Grim.

First reply nails it ^^^!