She gives her weight as 8 stone which is not really underweight.
Assuming all her "stats" are accurate, 8 stone definitely makes her underweight. She wouldn't be if she was an average height for a girl but she's not, she's 5ft 7", which basically means her 8 stone is spread out even more "thinly" than for shorter girls, hence she would look underweight (in the eyes of "most people") and certainly meet the medical criteria for being underweight, indeed close to severely underweight. You can input her stats here to check it out yourself:
External Link/Members OnlyYou might be inventing reports on here to make yourself look good and to boost your presumably low esteem.
Having seen this quoted above by others, I presume you actually said this as an intentionally/deliberately ludicrous riposte, as it's a "claim" which you believe is just as valid as the claims I made - i.e. you actually think both our claims to be rubbish.
However, my claim, in this instance about feedback and self esteem was based on at least one of your previous comments on here where you lamented the fact that you've given feedback numerous times only to receive none in return.
Also, it's a shit riposte/comeback because it has no obvious logical basis (I don't see the link between numerous reviews and "looking good"/self esteem), unlike my claim.
Having said all that, you either care about feedback for your own ego or you care about it in order to help you get future bookings (perhaps particularly Reverse Bookings), which is what your first post in this thread seemed to say however as I've already pointed out, thinking the latter when you already have plenty of feedback (which you do), is stupid. Perhaps you care about both.
Anyway, if you want me to go back to find that comment from you or if you want me to back up anything else I've said then, as I said in my last post, I'm very happy to do so.
Thanks for your help, I know her price are expensive, but if she 19yrs, I am willing to pay, I’m not bothered about CIM
Surly some one must have seen her from SA
Thanks, Nigel, I didn’t notice her measurements, hope she got her measurements Wrong,
When and where had she slag client, ( quote: backstreet creeps ) I can’t find it any where
It seems that she's removed the "backstreet creeps" comment, rather quickly too, she definitely did say it but it's not there any more. What she said was something along the lines of not meeting/wanting to be contacted by members who don't have feedback to prove they're legit as she doesn't see "backstreet creeps" who don't have any feedback/can't prove they're not "backstreet creeps".
I'm sure that wasn't exactly what she said but it's definitely very close. My main issue with it is that she's now seen at least a good few punters so it's concerning she still holds such a derogatory view of
all punters with no feedback or perhaps more accurately it's concerning that she'd even think to put that on her profile which is meant to be an advert (albeit one that tries to "filter" those who contact her). Given that she's now removed it, I don't have too much of an issue but only really on the basis that many girls probably hold that view and there may be some truth to it (as with all stereotypes but some more than others) but most girls are smart enough not to say it or if they do they only do it fairly anonymously (e.g. on SAAFE etc).
Anyway, I'd guess that her stats are actually fairly accurate and not deliberately inflated or reduced, especially since it's hard to say which she'd think is better (larger or smaller stats). However, she still may have made a mistake but given that she seemed to quickly change the wording of her profile - removing her "backstreet creeps" comment and explaining why her incalls are more expensive than outcalls - very soon after both of those things were mentioned in this thread (which almost certainly isn't a coincidence), I think it's unlikely her stats are a mistake as she'd have probably have noticed/changed them by now (unless of course they're deliberately misleading).
I think, given that her profile pic shows very little and you have no issue with her rates but are still somewhat hesitant, I'd strongly recommend buying her private gallery. It's only only a couple of quid (or free if you have some "freeviews") and you should be able to get a much better idea of what she looks like and if she's as thin as she seems. There's also apparently a couple of face pics in there too but they seem to be quite low res which suggests either the camera she used to take them is crap (which could well be the case with some front-facing phone cameras but not all that many theses days) or they're really old.
Hopefully those pics should also help show if she looks 19 or not. Generally though, of anything on a WG's profile, age is probably the most commonly lied about aspect and I personally very much doubt she's 19 however I don't particularly doubt that she looks young and she may well be able to pass for 19.
Also I hope I have not start a war between you and GW1, the two punters legends,
He randomly took this thread off topic by posting irrelevant rubbish and, perhaps unfortunately, I couldn't resist replying. It definitely wasn't started by you and nor is this anywhere near the first thread where we've had "debates".
