Author Topic: Camilla - Tantric Pleasure Holborn  (Read 4934 times)

Offline hyunther

External Link/Members Only


Location
Flat in Holborn. Is round the corner from a pub and there are often people outside so is not overly discreet, but as we get into winter less chance of anyone being outside.

Looks
Camilla Very petit and attractive with long black hair. Petit body, but an amazing pair of tits. Worth the money just to play with them.
Overall 9/10

Cost
£120 for 1 hour

Services
I have been to Tantric Pleasure a few times and is my go to place if I want a guaranteed service which is safe and comfortable. I have seen a few of the girls here and Camilla is probably the most attractive - in my opinion. The service can sometimes be a bit mechanical though rather than sensual.

She does all you would expect from this kind of massage. Reasonably good teasing while on your front then turn over for the luxurious hand job at the end. There have been a million reviews of massage on here and they all pretty much follow the same process. Carmen does it well. She is happy for you to touch her all over, but no fingering. She uses her fabulous tits well and puts them in your face and lets you suck and play with them as much as you want. As I said, it can feel a little functional though - She has a routine and goes through it. At no point does she make you think that she is fully involved. She is there to provide you a service and that's it. But she does do that service very well.

Recommended?
Yes - as you are guaranteed a good service with a pretty girl and she will make you cum and feel good about it.

Note
Others have mentioned that Tantric Pleasure has a habit of eeking the hour out with showers before and after the session. This is true. You are only ever actually being massaged for probably a maximum of 45 minutes. This does piss me off, but I do go back !!!

I have also seen others at Tantric Pleasure and will post separate mini-reviews of them in a bit.


 

« Last Edit: October 31, 2018, 09:29:43 am by hyunther »

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,375
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Can you please confirm if the girls are the ones in the photos?  They all look suspiciously like web rips for possible lookalikes.

Offline hyunther

No I don’t think they are. But they give a reasonable likeness.

Don’t rely on the photos though!

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,375
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
No I don’t think they are. But they give a reasonable likeness.

Don’t rely on the photos though!

Thanks so it's a B&S shop

Offline hyunther

Wouldn’t quite put it like that. You will always get the same girl. Some of the pics might be accurate but is difficult to tell. The fact that’s it’s difficult suggests that they are either real or a good likeness

But you can make your own mind up if you want to bother with it.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,375
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Wouldn’t quite put it like that. You will always get the same girl. Some of the pics might be accurate but is difficult to tell. The fact that’s it’s difficult suggests that they are either real or a good likeness

But you can make your own mind up if you want to bother with it.

IF they're not of the girls then it's a bait and switch.

You first said you didn't think they were real and were a reasonable likeness, now you're saying the opposite.
Why the flip flop?

This is the same as the lamentably diminished Inverness Terrace crew.

It's reassuring that you get the same girl each time for any given name but you're paying top dollar for a limited action massage.  There are plenty of AW/VS girls on offer for the same or less and are WYSIWYG bundles of fun, a good few of which will do a decent (FBSM) massage and edging.

Offline maybe

Hi, what services did you get exactly? Thanks!

Offline cookiemunchster

Hyunther.. You appear to have written three almost identical postings for different girls at Tantric Pleasures within a few hours of each other. 


Did you see the girls all recently as some form of mop up activity at the provider?

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
« Last Edit: November 01, 2018, 02:47:00 pm by mrhappypants »

Offline hyunther

Yes this was a bit of a mop up of recent visits over the past few months.

I don’t get time to come on here often and post reviews so did them in a batch!

Offline hyunther


This is the same as the lamentably diminished Inverness Ter
It's reassuring that you get the same girl each time for any given name but you're paying top dollar for a limited action massage.  There are plenty of AW/VS girls on offer for the same or less and are WYSIWYG bundles of fun, a good few of which will do a decent (FBSM) massage and edging.

Then by all means go and see them - I don’t care. I’m not sure I understand why you are chastising me for my opinion.

Offline LLPunting

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 17,375
  • Likes: 184
  •  
  • Reviews: 360
Then by all means go and see them - I don’t care. I’m not sure I understand why you are chastising me for my opinion.

I'm not advocating IT crew, I wouldn't as they're past their heyday, hence my comment.

I wasn't chastising you, I was challenging your recommendation of a value punt.

Your review is laced with subjective terms and omitted any objective description of the SP.  You gave a decent description of her performance but then you also qualified it by describing a professionally distant engagement.

Re: your apparent change of opinion about the pictures being genuine.  Was it just a loose use of words but with same first opinion or do you now believe they are more likely genuine because there are uniquely identifying features in them?

Offline hyunther

I'm not advocating IT crew, I wouldn't as they're past their heyday, hence my comment.

I wasn't chastising you, I was challenging your recommendation of a value punt.

Your review is laced with subjective terms and omitted any objective description of the SP.  You gave a decent description of her performance but then you also qualified it by describing a professionally distant engagement.

Re: your apparent change of opinion about the pictures being genuine.  Was it just a loose use of words but with same first opinion or do you now believe they are more likely genuine because there are uniquely identifying features in them?

Surely all reviews are subjective. Your opinion of what looks good is completely different to mine (and that is what makes the world great).

Regarding the pictures- I don’t know if they are real or not. Some might be , some might not. The photo of Camilla I would say is her, whereas I’m not so sure on the ones of Carmen or Nancy. I can’t say there are unique features and without seeing the faces it is almost impossible to tell for sure.
Maybe I didn’t think fully enough about my exact choice of words before posting. I’ll make sure I do if I review again.