Cum Fuck My Arse - Waterloo. Amazing dirty fuck

[hyunther]

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only


Location
Flat near Waterloo station, close to London Eye

Looks
Pictures are accurate, but Lilly is a little older than the pcis suggest. But she has a fit body for an older lady. Would put her in her 40's.
Overall 8/10

Cost
£150 for 1 hour - all in. No extras

Services
Lilly has been reviewed on here before, but if you are after a no holds barred sex session where pretty much anything goes then Lilly is for you. If you are after a softly softly GFE experience then look elsewhere.

I had asked Lilly to answer the door naked and start seducing me straight away. She did this expertly and within a couple of minutes of me entering the flat we were both naked and in full flow.

As I said, Lilly is pretty much up for anything - DFK, OWO DT, Hard fingering (bordering on fisting), she squirts pretty much on demand (and a lot of it), she wants you to bite her nipples, rimming and hard anal - and when I say hard I mean balls deep pounding her arse. Sex in pretty much any position you desire. Round 1 here finished with her lying on the bed with her head hanging over the edge, her teabagging and rimming me and me shooting into her mouth and face. She didn't swallow, but wasn't in a rush to get up and spit.

Had round 2 and pretty much went at it again doing whatever I could manage. Just about produced a second pop. Be she was very keen to make sure I did.

Would point out that I have seen Lilly a couple of times before so we know each other. A first visit may not be as full on.

It has been reported on here that she talks a lot - and she does. It is hard to get a word in edgeways and this may put some people off. Others have mentioned that she may have been drunk. I obviously don't know the specifics of those visits but I personally doubt she would have been. She just talks a lot and her accent gives the impression of slurryness (if that's a word)! That's just my opinion though.


Recommended?
For my money she is amazing value. She is not the hottest looking girl, but she is a lot hotter than many of the munters out there. If you go to a prossie for sex you don't get at home then boy she delivers on every count and then some. I don't know if I have ever fucked someone so hard and dirty. If you go for a sensual GFE experience (which is what some people want and is perfectly fine), then she is not for you.

[LLPunting]

Thanks for review 

How recent was this encounter?

[hyunther]

A couple of weeks ago

[LLPunting]

A couple of weeks ago

 

[Sinz]

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members Only

[nigel4498]

Looks like Gatehouse was unlucky then 

[bonapati]

Looks
Pictures are accurate, but Lilly is a little ...
Overall 8/10

Are you kidding 8/10? I don't agree pictures are accurate
I went to see her based on comments saying she looked like Asa Akira which she did in a way just no way as pretty.

Recommended?
For my money she is amazing value. She is not the hottest looking girl, but she is a lot hotter than many of the munters out there. If you go to a prossie for sex you don't get at home then boy she delivers on every count and then some.

I'm not sure about the "amazing" VFM especially that you did not prevail yourself to the service advertising in her nickname.

I'd say most WG's provide a service most don't of us get at home/with partners etc (that's why we are here) but hers is in no way an exception or 8th wonder of the world.

Overall, a well balanced review. It seems like you are celebrating your 5 year membership with a line of reviews, 4 tantric ones yesterday plus this one 8 in total that's a ration of less the one a year but please keep them coming. It's always good to give back to a community that gives you all for nothing.

Lastly, your review comes so close after a negative review and comments thereafter
Is this a rescue review for a long time regular of yours?
Didn't mean to sound like Columbo

[Waterhouse]

Lastly, your review comes so close after a negative review and comments thereafter
Is this a rescue review for a long time regular of yours?

Precisely what I was thinking.

[LLPunting]

BP, Yondu,
You're not suggesting that we're seeing a man about (on) a horse are you?

[Waterhouse]

BP, Yondu,
You're not suggesting that we're seeing a man about (on) a horse are you?

Probably just my over analysing nature. 

"Everyone thinks I'm paranoid."   

[hyunther]

To answer a point - yes I have been a member for 5 years but I’m not here every day. I’ve been a member of amazon for many years but doesn’t mean I’m on their site all the time.

I posted a few reviews as I came back to the site recently and thought I would add some value. So I added a few reviews in a batch.

Regarding am I posting in response to another negative review - the answer is no. If someone feels it is then feel free to remove it and I will make sure that if there is a negative review for someone then I’ll not post a positive.

All reviews are people’s opinions- if others choose to believe them or not then that is up to them.

[hyunther]

Oh and in response to the point about not mentioning services in her name - I would have thought that “balls deep pounding her arse” would cover this 😀

[Waterhouse]

To answer a point - yes I have been a member for 5 years but I’m not here every day. I’ve been a member of amazon for many years but doesn’t mean I’m on their site all the time.

I posted a few reviews as I came back to the site recently and thought I would add some value. So I added a few reviews in a batch.

Regarding am I posting in response to another negative review - the answer is no. If someone feels it is then feel free to remove it and I will make sure that if there is a negative review for someone then I’ll not post a positive.

All reviews are people’s opinions- if others choose to believe them or not then that is up to them.

No one's questioning your opinion, OP... the reason this was brought into doubt was simply due to the fact that your positive review came just one day after CFMA received her first negative review.  It's an all to common 'damage limitation/rescue attempt' that is often seen here and often instigated or prompted by the SP herself.

[bonapati]

Oh and in response to the point about not mentioning services in her name - I would have thought that “balls deep pounding her arse” would cover this 😀

Lol. Good man!

[Gatehouse]

Gents, all noted and read.

For me it was a bag of spanners. I anticipated something good from a comb of AW profile and previous reviews.

I appreciate that its each to their own, but there werre a sufficient number of issues about it - aside from ‘personal preferance,” to justify it as such. Namely :

- Poor technique, given the previous reviews and the niche she proports to frequesnt, namely ‘pse’.

- Far too chatty which led to an instinctive view about being intoxicated/off her tits. Respectfully not able to judge with abs certaintity. But it was clead she didn’t just talk, she was compelled to do so.

Overall, not in line with the aggregate review and consensus for the service as portrayed here.

And that’s aside from the strictly personal view ; namely I didn’t fancy her.



I have  mnothing declare but my sanity........

[Gatehouse]

Ps typos excused, as in a cab

[Waterhouse]

Gents, all noted and read.

For me it was a bag of spanners. I anticipated something good from a comb of AW profile and previous reviews.

I appreciate that its each to their own, but there werre a sufficient number of issues about it - aside from ‘personal preferance,” to justify it as such. Namely :

- Poor technique, given the previous reviews and the niche she proports to frequesnt, namely ‘pse’.

- Far too chatty which led to an instinctive view about being intoxicated/off her tits. Respectfully not able to judge with abs certaintity. But it was clead she didn’t just talk, she was compelled to do so.

Overall, not in line with the aggregate review and consensus for the service as portrayed here.

And that’s aside from the strictly personal view ; namely I didn’t fancy her.



I have  mnothing declare but my sanity........

It's not usually the Red_Negs that are called into question, it's the potential false Positives that immediately follow a Negative review.

Not suggesting that is the case here though, was just initially a bit suspicious.  Truth to tell she would not be my cup of tea at all.
 

[Clooney]

I’ve seen her once and was impressed.

She is absolute filthy and up for near enough anything.

She DOES talk a lot, but I was on a three hour booking because at £350 she is excellent value for money, and I had blocked out a whole evening of filth and boy did I get it! She also overran by a bit too. Not a silly amount but there was no rushing me out of the door.

On the subject of drugs, I obviously can’t say for sure, but in conversation she was VERY anti drugs. Especially in a working setting. She told me about group situations that she was booked for and walked out of because there were drugs present.

She does love a drink though. That much IS true. She can put it away!

Bottom line, if you want absolute filth, squirting, balls deep anal and don’t mind a bit of chat, she has only Miss KDD who is better than her.

I’ve no vested interest. As I say, I’ve seen her once and will certainly see her again.

[Gatehouse]

Maybe some had a good time - that’s cool. We can’t always be consistent as either punters, or as sps.

I never said she was on drugs. But I’ve been around long enough to now when a bird starts rabbiting to that degree, its either ‘one or the other.’

It therefore was definitely in turn, one of them.

Either way and coupled with the service issues I highlighted, and my personal preference (which I accept, is by defintion, a personal thing) a duff meet.

[Clooney]

Maybe some had a good time - that’s cool. We can’t always be consistent as either punters, or as sps.

I never said she was on drugs. But I’ve been around long enough to now when a bird starts rabbiting to that degree, its either ‘one or the other.’

It therefore was definitely in turn, one of them.

Either way and coupled with the service issues I highlighted, and my personal preference (which I accept, is by defintion, a personal thing) a duff meet.

You’re entirely entitled to your opinion and voice your experiences. I’ve no issue with that and no vested interest in this SP.

I’d seriously doubt any drug use though. That’s my opinion.