^ Samantha ^ @ Gatwick

[personofinterest]

Neutal, as I think a bait and switch, but a good attitude.

Samantha I do not think is depicted in the pictures. Samantha is around 40-45, with a number of tatoos. Light brown shoulder length hair. Still quite a nice personality but not facially attractive to me. Very good OWO (plenty of attention around my balls) and sex.


All comms was via text. Until a final call to give the room number (hidden caller ID).

Not a keeper for me.


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[MrMatrix]

Neutal, as I think a bait and switch, but a good attitude.

Samantha I do not think is depicted in the pictures. Samantha is around 40-45, with a number of tatoos. Light brown shoulder length hair. Still quite a nice personality but not facially attractive to me. Very good OWO (plenty of attention around my balls) and sex.


All comms was via text. Until a final call to give the room number (hidden caller ID).

Not a keeper for me.


External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Well profile says shes 29. so 40-45 would be a bit of a shock. No other review has mentioned age that I could see so this is useful.
How much for the hour did you pay.
Was she a good fuck, Did she do CIM as its on her likes list?
Was there much in the way of FK.
And her figure- what size is she? Over weight or not? One review said shes "is a petite busty size 8-10" is this the case.
Sorry to hear it was disappointing - profile certainly doesnt reflect what you say. 

[loopy]

Jesus. 40-45?!

[MrMatrix]

Jesus. 40-45?!

Hi Loopy havent heard from you in a while.
There are 2 other threads which are positive and refect the profile we see and that shes about 29.

However HappyDays (he walked) in one off these threads says shes over 40. PoInterest says over 40-45. Something isn't right here.
Are we looking at B&S now taking place. Either way I will now be visiting her. Shame profile looked good. Bloody out ragious that theres such an age diffence.

[Fuzzyduck]

B&S and mahoosive porky pies regarding age, and you didn't fancy her? A generous neutral IMO.

[emirates52]

Does sound odd - girl I saw was no way that old, slim waist no tum and definitely brunette. The group seem to get very good reviews usually so not sure what is going on.

[emirates52]

plus girls in this group never give you their number so not sure how texting was possible - r u sure you've got the right profile?

[MrMatrix]

plus girls in this group never give you their number so not sure how texting was possible - r u sure you've got the right profile?

OP did say hidden caller ID.
This group are normally pretty good and reliable. However after Megan and this - well thats 2 girls whose physical appearance doesn't match their profiles now. Louise puts a lot of effort into her girls and I can only assume perhaps shes not met them.
This issue with Samantha is pretty strange and I can only assume the original Samantha has stopped escorting and moved her profile on or some such thing.Got no idea really........
Not that it matters now as I wont be meeting her.

[personofinterest]

Hi, to answer the above questions.

Comms - Sorry was via AW email until a hidden ID call when on location with the room number.
How much for the hour did you pay - £130 for an hour.
Was she a good fuck, Did she do CIM as its on her likes list? - dare I say it, not memorable and I did not ask for CIM.
Was there much in the way of FK. - Honestly, do not recall.
And her figure- what size is she? Over weight or not? One review said shes "is a petite busty size 8-10" is this the case. - size 10 not petitte. I guess 9-ish stones, average body size and dimensions for her height. Busty yes.