Author Topic: SexyYoungMilf2016. Eastleigh (Read 3929 times)

sadolddeejay · « **on:** October 01, 2018, 11:13:51 pm »

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I saw her a few weeks ago for an hour.

Location is a quiet residential area (so quite discreet) near Fair Oak in an upstairs flat. Lots of free parking on local roads. I parked at a discreet distance and walked there.

Pictures are accurate - lovely slim girl, good skin, good friendly, genuine relaxed attitude. She has a decent pair for a slim girl. If she ever puts on a few pounds in weight she will wear it well and her boobs will be, I think, sensational, and she will still have a great figure. All the Adultwork reviews are accurate. Facially she is pretty, though her mouth is not her best feature. I did not detect tobacco on her breath (and I do not actually usually mind a hint of that), but her teeth are a little dingy and not white. She would definitely benefit from a tooth whitening session at her dentist.

As for the meet itself, it started with kissing followed my missionary, followed by some 69. Nice gentle bj technique which I like as I am prone to premature ejaculation. I was rather put off by her pussy tasting a bit pissy and acidic like she had been for a pee recently and not cleaned herself up properly, so I avoided that area. I finished off by straddling her chest and coming in her mouth. Would I go back? Not sure - maybe just for a blowjob only as I would not want to be put off by lack of hygiene in that area.

nigel4498 · « **Reply #1 on:** October 01, 2018, 11:54:59 pm »

Thanks for reviewing

She's had a few profiles on AW over the years.
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only
as Princess Devil there was talk that she bare backed with guys she met on Fab Swingers

DrConners · « **Reply #2 on:** October 02, 2018, 10:21:40 am »

Quote from: sadolddeejay on October 01, 2018, 11:13:51 pm

I was rather put off by her pussy tasting a bit pissy and acidic like she had been for a pee recently and not cleaned herself up properly, so I avoided that area. I finished off by straddling her chest and coming in her mouth. Would I go back? Not sure - maybe just for a blowjob only as I would not want to be put off by lack of hygiene in that area.

Fucking hell DJ your generous rating this experience as positive !! If a WG can't be arsed to ensure her hygiene is good before she meets a punter ...........

Your review - your rating.

Thanks for writing it up but as Nigel says above - Always pays to do your research here first

king tarzan · « **Reply #3 on:** October 02, 2018, 03:53:08 pm »

Quote from: sadolddeejay on October 01, 2018, 11:13:51 pm

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

I saw her a few weeks ago for an hour.

Location is a quiet residential area (so quite discreet) near Fair Oak in an upstairs flat. Lots of free parking on local roads. I parked at a discreet distance and walked there.

Pictures are accurate - lovely slim girl, good skin, good friendly, genuine relaxed attitude. She has a decent pair for a slim girl. If she ever puts on a few pounds in weight she will wear it well and her boobs will be, I think, sensational, and she will still have a great figure. All the Adultwork reviews are accurate. Facially she is pretty, though her mouth is not her best feature. I did not detect tobacco on her breath (and I do not actually usually mind a hint of that), but her teeth are a little dingy and not white. She would definitely benefit from a tooth whitening session at her dentist.

As for the meet itself, it started with kissing followed my missionary, followed by some 69. Nice gentle bj technique which I like as I am prone to premature ejaculation. I was rather put off by her pussy tasting a bit pissy and acidic like she had been for a pee recently and not cleaned herself up properly, so I avoided that area. I finished off by straddling her chest and coming in her mouth. Would I go back? Not sure - maybe just for a blowjob only as I would not want to be put off by lack of hygiene in that area.

bad dental hygiene very off putting... yukzz

Zimbaman · « **Reply #4 on:** October 02, 2018, 07:25:30 pm »

Did I read a different review? This was definitely a positive

sadolddeejay · « **Reply #5 on:** August 30, 2019, 10:08:14 am »

Quote from: DrConners on October 02, 2018, 10:21:40 am

Fucking hell DJ your generous rating this experience as positive !! If a WG can't be arsed to ensure her hygiene is good before she meets a punter ...........

Your review - your rating.

Thanks for writing it up but as Nigel says above - Always pays to do your research here first

Yeah, on reflection maybe should have been a neutral, but to be clear, her flanjy firanjy was not fishy or malodourous, just a little pissy, and although that was a bit offputting, everything else - body, face (mostly), friendly attitude and behaviour were so good that it pushed it to a positive.

Derrick101 · « **Reply #6 on:** August 30, 2019, 10:16:14 am »

Quote from: sadolddeejay on August 30, 2019, 10:08:14 am

Yeah, on reflection maybe should have been a neutral, but to be clear, her flanjy firanjy was not fishy or malodourous, just a little pissy, and although that was a bit offputting, everything else - body, face (mostly), friendly attitude and behaviour were so good that it pushed it to a positive.

Changed for you

Huawei · « **Reply #7 on:** August 31, 2019, 09:30:27 am »

Quote from: Derrick101 on August 30, 2019, 10:16:14 am

Changed for you

Does this need re- indexing, still shows 1 pos and 1 neg at the top? Not sure how these things work

DrConners · « **Reply #8 on:** August 31, 2019, 09:52:40 am »

Quote from: sadolddeejay on October 01, 2018, 11:13:51 pm

She has a decent pair for a slim girl. If she ever puts on a few pounds in weight she will wear it well and her boobs will be, I think, sensational, and she will still have a great figure.

I've seen this WG sadold, her tit's are never going to be 'sensational' ever again unless she has a boob job. I enquired after Bonkers review ( https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=238460.0 ) and he confirmed they look like the pic I've posted off her profile - She has a body wrecked by childbirth - her tit's are 'dejected' to say the least. Is your spectacle persription up to date ?

Quote

All the Adultwork reviews are accurate.

Quote

I was rather put off by her pussy tasting a bit pissy and acidic like she had been for a pee recently and not cleaned herself up properly, so I avoided that area. I finished off by straddling her chest and coming in her mouth. Would I go back? Not sure - maybe just for a blowjob only as I would not want to be put off by lack of hygiene in that area.

I already said 'your review, your rating' but the fact you have left this as a positive is a joke.

You have focused on what you consider the positives of the meet - That's great. IMO the negatives were pretty shocking.

Bear in mind other UKP members considering a visit to this prostitute, she works from her own home (it is clean)- All her & her bf/partner/husbands personal shit are on show. She obviously has at least one kid. If you get a booking with her she sends 'hubby' out to the park/shops with the kid(s) whilst you bang her.

Leaving out details like this in a review makes me reconsider your contributions SODJ.

I saw her once & never wanted to revisit.

Hidden Image/Members Only

DrConners · « **Reply #9 on:** August 31, 2019, 09:57:06 am »

Quote from: Huawei on August 31, 2019, 09:30:27 am

Does this need re- indexing, still shows 1 pos and 1 neg at the top? Not sure how these things work

Search on here using the index numbers in these old AW profiles - Tells you everything you need to know I think.

External Link/Members Only

External Link/Members Only

DrConners · « **Reply #10 on:** August 31, 2019, 10:37:12 am »

Quote from: sadolddeejay on August 30, 2019, 10:08:14 am

Yeah, on reflection maybe should have been a neutral, but to be clear, her flanjy firanjy was not fishy or malodourous, just a little pissy, and although that was a bit offputting, everything else - body, face (mostly), friendly attitude and behaviour were so good that it pushed it to a positive.

Quote from: Derrick101 on August 30, 2019, 10:16:14 am

Changed for you

Be careful with your helper status D, he didn't ask for it to be changed (although I agree with you, it's neutral more like fucking negative IMO) - you either never read his post to the end or misunderstod it.

Re-read it, see what I mean ?

Sparta Prada · « **Reply #11 on:** August 31, 2019, 10:38:58 am »

Quote from: DrConners on August 31, 2019, 10:37:12 am

Be careful with your helper status D, he didn't ask for it to be changed (although I agree with you, it's neutral more like fucking negative IMO) - you either never read his post to the end or misunderstod it.

Reread it - see what I mean ?

I must admit I thought Derrick was a bit quick off the mark to change the review when the OP declared it was enough for him to chalk it up as a positive.

DrConners · « **Reply #12 on:** August 31, 2019, 10:53:12 am »

Quote from: Sparta Prada on August 31, 2019, 10:38:58 am

I must admit I thought Derrick was a bit quick off the mark to change the review when the OP declared it was enough for him to chalk it up as a positive.

Quite, I'm sure the OP will log in again in the near future - it's his call.

Given the amount of fluffy reviews he's contributed recently I'm sure he'll want it changed back

Hantsolo · « **Reply #13 on:** August 31, 2019, 12:56:55 pm »

Pretty sure she’s still on fabswingers. Search for couples in SO postcode...

Derrick101 · « **Reply #14 on:** August 31, 2019, 02:42:23 pm »

Quote from: DrConners on August 31, 2019, 10:53:12 am

Quite, I'm sure the OP will log in again in the near future - it's his call.

Given the amount of fluffy reviews he's contributed recently I'm sure he'll want it changed back

I might have been a bit quick off the mark

Lets see what OP says when he logs back on. It can always be changed back.

Derrick101 · « **Reply #15 on:** August 31, 2019, 02:43:49 pm »

Quote from: Hantsolo on August 31, 2019, 12:56:55 pm

Pretty sure she’s still on fabswingers. Search for couples in SO postcode...

Other reviews and posts about her 'History' have noted a fabswingers account and bareback GB's. Best avoided methinks

sadolddeejay · « **Reply #16 on:** August 31, 2019, 03:51:45 pm »

Quote from: Derrick101 on August 31, 2019, 02:42:23 pm

I might have been a bit quick off the mark Lets see what OP says when he logs back on. It can always be changed back.

Yeah, leave it neutral.

Others, with regards my reviews, gissabreak, I'm new to the review game, but at least I'm trying instead of lurking, which is how I started. I'm trying to give back. All opinions are subjective - and will vary. Fluffy? Yeah, I'm not a hard case. (Not saying others are - or am I fluffy saying that?)

sadolddeejay · « **Reply #17 on:** August 31, 2019, 06:31:58 pm »

Quote from: DrConners on August 31, 2019, 09:52:40 am

I've seen this WG sadold, her tit's are never going to be 'sensational' ever again unless she has a boob job. I enquired after Bonkers review ( https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=238460.0 ) and he confirmed they look like the pic I've posted off her profile - She has a body wrecked by childbirth - her tit's are 'dejected' to say the least. Is your spectacle persription up to date ?

I already said 'your review, your rating' but the fact you have left this as a positive is a joke.

You have focused on what you consider the positives of the meet - That's great. IMO the negatives were pretty shocking.

Bear in mind other UKP members considering a visit to this prostitute, she works from her own home (it is clean)- All her & her bf/partner/husbands personal shit are on show. She obviously has at least one kid. If you get a booking with her she sends 'hubby' out to the park/shops with the kid(s) whilst you bang her.

Leaving out details like this in a review makes me reconsider your contributions SODJ.

I saw her once & never wanted to revisit.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Yeah, as a relative newbie to reviewing, I s'pose I should have put in about all the sci fi collectibles. I guess I didn't consider it relevant to what occurred in the bedroom. The fact that it is her home is relevant and I should have mentioned it. I had no evidence of her sending a partner on walkies so could not comment on that. I saw no evidence of a child.

My subjective opinion of her boobs is that they would fill out if she put on weight. She is extremely slim. I guess we'll never know.

Derrick101 · « **Reply #18 on:** August 31, 2019, 07:56:09 pm »

Don't be put off DJ, your contributions so far have been worthwhile ( If a little fluffy

) It is a steep learning curve

Hantsman · « **Reply #19 on:** September 06, 2019, 08:55:08 pm »

Here are her fab profiles. (All veris must be on show. Not wanting anyone with loads though)

External Link/Members Only
External Link/Members Only

I want Candy · « **Reply #20 on:** September 07, 2019, 05:06:50 pm »

Thanks for this thread.
Always found her comms let me down in the 11th hour and after reading this its enough not to bother. I'll treat myself elsewhere.

Member Benefits

Author Topic: SexyYoungMilf2016. Eastleigh (Read 3929 times)