posts in reviews keep getting took down !!

[nicentrim88]

I have posted 4 reviews now on ne board and they keep getting took down. They are not false at all. I am genuinely writing them. They aren't derogatory or any personal info etc. I cant understand why they keep getting took down. 

[OldAdmin]

Because this site is suffering a lot of touting of Diamonds.

[nicentrim88]

Yes but I am not touting for diamonds it just so happens that I have seen a lot of diamonds girls and been viewing this site alot, and I thought I had a lot to add. Yes I started by reviewing  3 diamonds girls of which 1 was BAD,  and they got took down. I would of wrote other reviews for other escorts  but I don't see the point if they're going to be took down.

[portable]

Got to be honest, it does seem a bit odd to say he's touting for Diamonds, considering he's given a negative review...

I'm glad the moderators crack down on the touts firmly and quickly, and given that his first three posts are reviews, it does seem odd, but I hope if this guy is legit, that it's worked out.  I mean if he can afford to see 3 girls in a short space of time and write honest reviews then surely that's a good thing for the users?

[kingkong]

Because this site is suffering a lot of touting of Diamonds.

I had noticed that myself. I think Gingergary is one or at the very least he/she is one/or more of the girls submitting reports. Just my opinion 

[AnthG]

I had noticed that myself. I think Gingergary is one or at the very least he/she is one/or more of the girls submitting reports. Just my opinion 

Don't take my saying this other than just wild speculation on my part but the posts in support of Grace aka Charlotte made me remember of this Ginger Gary which was shown to be Grace/Charlotte's alter ego

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=9590

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=14266.msg219708#msg219708

I doubt Grace/Charlotte would have the moxie to come back using the same name though so he must be genuine person called Gary.

[Spartacus123]

I'm thinking something sounds odd as well

[Toshiba]

Don't take my saying this other than just wild speculation on my part but the posts in support of Grace aka Charlotte made me remember of this Ginger Gary which was shown to be Grace/Charlotte's alter ego

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;u=9590

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=14266.msg219708#msg219708

I doubt Grace/Charlotte would have the moxie to come back using the same name though so he must be genuine person called Gary.

Who ever it is if hes genuine hes being a complete tool in my opinion, writes like a 16 year old boy with a massive ego and stuff

[Barry Shipton]

Have to agree with all the above. I'd give Nicetrim the benefit of the doubt for the moment although wading in with three reviews before you even post is unusual to say the least.

But in his Negative of Megan, who it seems everyone agrees is a bit of a minger and nothing like her pics, who comes in to defend her and says she's stunning - Gingerboy Gary.

If he's not a tout or one of the girls then he's just an annoying twat.

[DaveMugabe]

The negative reviews are part of a cunning plan:

1. It improves the creadibility of the poster to mods on this forum.
2. They are able to stab their fellow prossies that they dont like

Win-win for them eh!

[nicentrim88]

Got to be honest, it does seem a bit odd to say he's touting for Diamonds, considering he's given a negative review...

I'm glad the moderators crack down on the touts firmly and quickly, and given that his first three posts are reviews, it does seem odd, but I hope if this guy is legit, that it's worked out.  I mean if he can afford to see 3 girls in a short space of time and write honest reviews then surely that's a good thing for the users?

I have not seen 3 girls In a short space of time I have seen lots of girls over 4 years and recently started viewing ukp and thought I had something to add. It just happened to be that I chose to review diamonds girls first . Its up to yous if you believe them or not. I dont see how writing 3 reviews before any posts is odd. I just wanted to let other punters know some good info I had but the reviews were took down.

[nicentrim88]

The negative reviews are part of a cunning plan:

1. It improves the creadibility of the poster to mods on this forum.
2. They are able to stab their fellow prossies that they dont like

Win-win for them eh!

Couldn't be further from the truth.

[Toshiba]

Couldn't be further from the truth.

He wasnt on about you

[DaveMugabe]

Thanks Holycrosser

[nicentrim88]

Sorry didn't realise ginger gary had posted any negative reviews.