Tina Sexy- a month ago - South Kensington

[sexistentialist]

External Link/Members Only

Wasn't too enthused to write this review and I had planned on leaving a very positive review about Naomi Lust, who I'd met a few weeks back, but have seen that she has now left Adult Work so not sure it will be productive. Not sure if she will return either, since it was a part time thing. But if she does, 'treat her well' as they say, as she is very genuine and sexy.

Anyway, figured I'd add to the stats of Tina since I saw she'd received a neutral.
For me it was somewhere between neutral and positive.

Old Tina likes to playfully punch me, she likes it more than I like receiving it.
Old Tina likes you to not stick it in too far as she is quite tight and small below. But after a while I needed to stick it in to my enjoyment.
Old Tina will try hard to make you cum and give a good hand job. Her blow job is pretty good and the sex, as I say, could be better but when you go slow she warms up and lets you take more chances.
Old Tina is a little older in the flesh than her photos show. Which means, in Asian years, her real age is probably 10 years extra
But old Tina has a superb body. And she has a good humor.
Yes I'm sure it's fake but it looks good and she is tight all over. She is the kinda woman that would make for a great 3rd choice option on a late night, maybe for half an hour. I booked an hour and it was casual. But her damn fan was broke and the room was boiling. She was very attentive, drying me off when I got sweaty and giving me some nice kisses and sucking as I cooled down. 

Let be said then, that these 4 positives she's racked up are a fairly generous positive. Perhaps it's a positive because she is close to the full package and shows enthusiasm. If you go in with a positive attitude too and treat it like a luxury massage parlor scenario, then you won't be disappointed.

[Sinz]

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[LLPunting]

...
Let be said then, that these 4 positives she's racked up are a fairly generous positive....

Thanks for the review 

However judging the other +ve reviews as being generous is not your call to make.  You can only speak to your experience in your meet.

Also where do you get off judging them when you admit to adding your "barely" +ve because you saw she got a Neutral?  Did you just admit to White Knighting this lady?
As ambivalent as you try to sound all the comments are positive about her performance, looks and how to get extra mileage.
The only fence you're on is the one in her lady garden around her vegetable patch.

[magnetico]

Location / price ?

[sexistentialist]

Thanks for the review 

However judging the other +ve reviews as being generous is not your call to make.  You can only speak to your experience in your meet.

Also where do you get off judging them when you admit to adding your "barely" +ve because you saw she got a Neutral?  Did you just admit to White Knighting this lady?
As ambivalent as you try to sound all the comments are positive about her performance, looks and how to get extra mileage.
The only fence you're on is the one in her lady garden around her vegetable patch.

This is why I'm hesitant to write reviews, cos there's always some spikey keyboard warrior who feels a need to throw insults on here.

Firstly 'white knighting' is not equated with choosing to judge a review as positive because the broad was nice to me and did well on all other accounts, even though the penetrative sex as I stated in the review was not great and limiting in terms of allowing deep penetration. Perhaps I should have expanded more on that, my bad, but I thought I had made it evident enough. Going by your reviews a woman is lucky to get a Neutral; don't wanna white knight the girl afterall!!!

Secondly, it does matter what other reviewers say and I think it is perfectly fine to question their reviews. Having met women based on reviews here and been disappointed, or surprised, it's fair to say there is a great degree of subjectivity. I'm fully aware that my own subjectivity isn't any more reliable and I don't claim it to be (though I have been using Adult Work for 10 years, so I have some experience) I think we can allow a degree of banter here in throwing doubt at others.

[sexistentialist]

Location / price ?

sorry, thought of adding this after and then assumed it was already covered info. It was in that infamous hotel in South Kensington. Actually, you know there's a back door I found which is left open for the bins which leads to the stairs, worth checking out  for anyone that frequents it and doesn't like walking past the reception.

[puntingpumping1920]

This is why I'm hesitant to write reviews, cos there's always some spikey keyboard warrior who feels a need to throw insults on here.

Firstly 'white knighting' is not equated with choosing to judge a review as positive because the broad was nice to me and did well on all other accounts, even though the penetrative sex as I stated in the review was not great and limiting in terms of allowing deep penetration. Perhaps I should have expanded more on that, my bad, but I thought I had made it evident enough. Going by your reviews a woman is lucky to get a Neutral; don't wanna white knight the girl afterall!!!

Secondly, it does matter what other reviewers say and I think it is perfectly fine to question their reviews. Having met women based on reviews here and been disappointed, or surprised, it's fair to say there is a great degree of subjectivity. I'm fully aware that my own subjectivity isn't any more reliable and I don't claim it to be (though I have been using Adult Work for 10 years, so I have some experience) I think we can allow a degree of banter here in throwing doubt at others.

 
You should block him like I did.
 
LLP does like to post his snobby/ elitist post every so often

[LLPunting]

This is why I'm hesitant to write reviews, cos there's always some spikey keyboard warrior who feels a need to throw insults on here.

Firstly 'white knighting' is not equated with choosing to judge a review as positive because the broad was nice to me, even though the sex as I stated in the review was not great and limiting in terms of allowing deep penetration. Perhaps I should have expanded more on that, my bad, but I thought I had made it evident enough. Going by your reviews a woman is lucky to get a Neutral; don't wanna white knight the girl do I!!?

Secondly, it does matter what other reviewers say and I think it is perfectly fine to question their reviews. Having met women based on reviews here and been disappointed, or surprised, it's fair to say there is a great degree of subjectivity. I'm fully aware that my own subjectivity isn't any more reliable and I don't claim it to be (though I have been using Adult Work for 10 years, so I have some experience) I think we can allow a degree of banter here in throwing doubt at others.

Didn't actually insult you, just questioned your judgement (and motive), like you did the other reviewers.  Not pleasant is it if you're on the level?

Your perception of your experience is indeed totally subjective, it's why your review should contain sufficient objective description so others can make some judgement about the desirability of the SP and her services, not just be left to wonder what you mean by "good", "amazing", "worthless", etc.
Not all SPs are consistent so there is scope for YMMV between punters so unless you can prove that their objective experience was worse than their subjective perception of it all you're doing is shovelling shit which means you're trolling.
Banter is fine but blundering about accusing people of lying isn't banter.
Perhaps stick to imparting the facts of your ongoing punting adventures with the weight of your 10 years wisdom would be smarter.  You could also share the substantiated insights you've gleaned from those years of purple site peeping.

[sexistentialist]

Didn't actually insult you, just questioned your judgement (and motive), like you did the other reviewers.  Not pleasant is it if you're on the level?

Your perception of your experience is indeed totally subjective, it's why your review should contain sufficient objective description so others can make some judgement about the desirability of the SP and her services, not just be left to wonder what you mean by "good", "amazing", "worthless", etc.
Not all SPs are consistent so there is scope for YMMV between punters so unless you can prove that their objective experience was worse than their subjective perception of it all you're doing is shovelling shit which means you're trolling.
Banter is fine but blundering about accusing people of lying isn't banter.
Perhaps stick to imparting the facts of your ongoing punting adventures with the weight of your 10 years wisdom would be smarter.  You could also share the substantiated insights you've gleaned from those years of purple site peeping.

'didn't actually insult me', just questioned my motive and judgement... how isn't that insulting? Not to mention this bullshit follow up. Every sentence you write leaves a stench of condescending and attacking narkyness. Read most posts on here and people make claims of an SP being over rated or not as attractive as others have stated etc. Please also find where I say people are lying. I didn't. I just said her 4 positive reviews seemed generous. I can only apologise that I didn't take into account people like you who take offence over something which to everyone else is obviously framed with my own subjective tongue in cheek authoritative statement.
I could debate with all day on the semantics and metaphysics of objective reality and the overlapping boundaries of subjective experience and get nowhere. Especially when discussing paid for sex, which effectively carries very little objective opportunities to write down, although I'd add I didn't even use  ' "good", "amazing", "worthless", etc..' so dunno why you're making that claim too now. But that's not even the point. The point is you aren't my moderator.

[LLPunting]

'didn't actually insult me', just questioned my motive and judgement... how isn't that insulting? Not to mention this bullshit follow up. Every sentence you write leaves a stench of condescending and attacking narkyness. Read most posts on here and people make claims of an SP being over rated or not as attractive as others have stated etc. Please also find where I say people are lying. I didn't. I just said her 4 positive reviews seemed generous. I can only apologise that I didn't take into account people like you who take offence over something which to everyone else is obviously framed with my own subjective tongue in cheek authoritative statement.
I could debate with all day on the semantics and metaphysics of objective reality and the overlapping boundaries of subjective experience and get nowhere. Especially when discussing paid for sex, which effectively carries very little objective opportunities to write down, although I'd add I didn't even use  ' "good", "amazing", "worthless", etc..' so dunno why you're making that claim too now. But that's not even the point. The point is you aren't my moderator.

Indeed, you may have meant your dismissiveness to be much lighter in tone than I interpreted it, but that's exactly the problem of the written word without sufficient qualification.
You take offence or insult at one sentence and I at another.  I asked you a question which you could have dispassionately answered and clarified your position but you took it as an insult.  I was taking you to task on your statement, "Let be said then, that these 4 positives she's racked up are a fairly generous positive", there's no "seems" or "perhaps" there.

My bad, I should have said "what one means by "good"..."

I'm certainly not your moderator, I was making you aware that your comments were inflammatory even if you didn't mean it that way.

You read all my reviews and came up with that conclusion about my method?  Perhaps you should read them again.

Keep posting and by all means block me, PP has and yet he still pops up to express his love.  Do read his back catalog, it's most entertaining if you're after an aneurysm.

[LLPunting]

 
You should block him like I did.
 
LLP does like to post his snobby/ elitist post every so often

"every so often"?  You're going soft PP, surely you mean "always"?

You'll be agreeing with me next 

[puntingpumping1920]

Every sentence you write leaves a stench of condescending and attacking narkyness.

 
You summed him up perfectly 
   
Punter with a superiority complex, but only meets bottom of the gutter prostitutes   

[LLPunting]

 
You summed him up perfectly 
   
Punter with a superiority complex, but only meets bottom of the gutter prostitutes   

The superiority complex is just in your mind, but not unexpected.

And you equate cost of punt with quality of experience, still such a neophyte.

Totally agree