Finsbury Park - Sky Desire - Fat + UGLY slag

[FBIAgent]

Untrue reviews on UKP increasingly I think. This is another time where I've walked.

Link: External Link/Members Only

Much fatter and uglier than pics suggest.

[mrhappypants]

 If you think a review is a tout it is worth putting a comment to this effect on the review as well.  That way you signal other punters both through the aggregate and on the tout.

I have not see her.  From a quick read, Josepct2345’s review looks like a tout to me.   It’s useful to note the characteristic give always (I can spot at least three) and also check out his review record - see how he has published to look credible. Learn to spot the signs and you’ll less likely be fooled again.

Finally, if you are going to look credible in making accusation of touting you need to give plenty of detail. It is your word against his; you could merely be a disgruntled colleague or pimp.  Your review needs more detail that allows a potential visitor to test its veracity. 

Well done for walking, and for reviewing. 

[blackjack1]

Sorry to hear that ...was about to call her earlier this week, but English Annabelle (review pending) text back literally as I put in sky's number...bullet doged apparently 

[tantraman]

Thanks for the further intel, OP ... I'm still interested in Sky, as I've yet to tick off a Kiwi, but I might now suspend her on my HL until more info is forthcoming.

[Josepct2345]

Haha fuck off!

I think OP is being very harsh, or perhaps caught her at a bad moment.....
My review was honest and genuine.

Each to their own. 

[Josepct2345]

I will also add, the fact that you felt the need to say “slag” on the description signals some degree of anger and bitterness from the OP. Maybe there was a disagreement? Perhaps he himself was turned away and feels the need to vent on here?

This stood out to me because one of the highlights of the experience was her overall warm and friendly attitude.

If you turned up to find someone, totally different, very unattractive etc to what you expected (and trust me I have experienced this) you would leave disappointed perhaps but would you then go away and refer to them as a “slag”? That would make me think there is more to the story......

I would also definitely disagree with OP on his account of her appearance. Seems fishy

[LLPunting]

Untrue reviews on UKP increasingly I think. This is another time where I've walked.

Link: External Link/Members Only

Much fatter and uglier than pics suggest.

That's quite a statement to make without evidence.  How many other recent walks haven't you reviewed?
Which reviews are you calling BS?

[EnglishRebecca121]

why exactly did u walk? she states 5ft1 size 14 on her profile so you knew she wasnt a slim girl

[mrhappypants]

Untrue reviews on UKP increasingly I think.

That's quite a statement to make without evidence.  How many other recent walks haven't you reviewed?
Which reviews are you calling BS?

Up close (ie when you have actually visited the SP) touts are easy to spot, but difficult to prove.   The problem with listing details of SP’s who are giving freebies or even paying for tout reviews is that it encourages the trade.   A number of SP’s pay for AW ratings.  I believe this is happening increasingly here as well - see my recent review of Madam Storm as one example.

[puntingpumping1920]

why exactly did u walk? she states 5ft1 size 14 on her profile so you knew she wasnt a slim girl

 
+1
 
Her pictures advertised are at angles that don’t show a full view of her body, but she doesn't hide the fact she is a big girl.

[last_days_of_logan]

the question remains though

is she actually a PAWG? despite her size

[Josepct2345]

Up close (ie when you have actually visited the SP) touts are easy to spot, but difficult to prove.   The problem with listing details of SP’s who are giving freebies or even paying for tout reviews is that it encourages the trade.   A number of SP’s pay for AW ratings.  I believe this is happening increasingly here as well - see my recent review of Madam Storm as one example.

Well you were wrong about my review Sherlock 

[claretandblue]

how is this a review?

[Moneyd]

To be fair.

The profile states she is a size 14 and pictures show she is fat so I’m not sure why this would be a surprise.

[mrhappypants]

Well you were wrong about my review Sherlock 

Yes obviously because, as we all know, touts put their hands in the air and mutter "its a fair cop gov" when they have been rumbled.

[Josepct2345]

Yes obviously because, as we all know, touts put their hands in the air and mutter "its a fair cop gov" when they have been rumbled.

I don’t know about touts on here to be honest, not the longest or most active member I will admit.

But I would say the vague, unneccesarily insulting review here should raise more doubts than my genuine review from a few weeks back.

[DylanPerry]

how is this a review?

"

But I would say the vague, unneccesarily insulting review here should raise more doubts than my genuine review from a few weeks back.

"
It's always interesting to see what people to decide to jump against.


OP also gives the irrelevant insult of "ugly". No face pics on profile...how can one judge or expect something based off the pics?
My, and the general interpretation of "ugly", relates to facial aesthetics.