Most of the VS Oriental profiles use fake photos, or some generic body pic which could be anyone. So I can't really see the point of using hjosr photos when it's some Instagram model or random bird.
Although I'm sure you'll be along to tell me I'm wrong.
Sorry, my point above about photos was about profiles considered genuine before visiting. For the known/suspected (non-)Asian B&S operations if you decide to proceed with that knowledge then you should:
1) Get the girl's name when you meet
2) Take a good mental note of what she looks like so an identifying description can be given in review, particularly features visible when dressed.
3) Add "Expected B&S confirmed" to title
If you decide to stay for service then:
4) Review and rate girl's performance
5) Confirm if the WG can be consistently booked via the profile, ask her how to book her again if you like her.
B&S photos are sometimes re-used so no harm in attaching some/all of the better ones so we're all aware which images should set our alarm bells ringing.
I know the expectation and likelihood is that a B&S op will provide poor quality WGs but it's still worth building a profile of an operation's performance offering over time.
The Inverness Terrace crew and some of the long established places listed by AM never post actual pics but the girls you met were consistently bookable and some worth revisiting.
Automatic branding of a given URL or identifiable operation as "Negative" because it's "B&S" negates the usefulness of the performance rating reflecting the quality of the girls it has historically supplied. Brand offerings evolve over time whether KIAs, Alfa Romeos, Hoovers, reputed SPs, parlours who post fake pics, parlours who don't post any pics. Some you couldn't depend on became dependable and vice-versa. A history of genuine performance reflects that. A bigoted perpetual branding does not.