Paris0122 (Gilf) - Hungerford /Swindon

[Donel75]

External Link/Members Only

Bit of an illusive lady, been on my hitlist for some time due to her odd work hours/days. Couldn't see any other reviews of her here so...

Comms

About a month's worth of AW mail and sms tennis. "Paris" rarely entertains incalls and works limited days making the logistics of a meet harder (usually wouldn't bother). Once arranged comms were good.

Pricing

In and out calls price at 90 for the half, 140 for the hour. All in.

Location

Outcall at an empty house I have access to.

Lady

Describes herself at early 40's, size 8-10, 5ft3inches and busty. Everything but the age correct here. Could be 15 years older than stated. I'd put her pushing 60. British

Personality

Nice lady,  chatty, polite, but of a laugh. Bit dirty like.

Services sought

Sex, RO, OWO, DFK

The meet

Arranged to meet 11am the day before. Confirmed the details (including my preference of under garments) earlier that day at 9am. Paris eventually turned up 30 minutes after the agree time.

Dressed Conservative but elegant, sunglasses and all. It was only after I let her in and she removed her glasses that I was struck by her her age however, this was only momentairily as my eyes drifted lower to her enormous, natural bust. Some light chit chat Before sorting the paperwork (1 hour agreed at 140).

 Paris asked why I liked. Before we were straight into some dfk. This was following be a great deal of mutual groping before any remaining clothing was disgarded and I moved on to the RO course (Paris was clean shaven and receptive) a good ten minutes of this before she beckoned me for some more dfk'ing. At this point she grabbed the old chap and started rubbing it around her bits it's at this point I wasn't sure if she wanted to take me bareback (nothing wa  said, but it felt like it was going that way). I prompted for the condom to which she reached into her bag. On with the condom and into her I dove. Deep mish for a good time, before a change of position was suggested. Before switch some ow which was... Shite. I'm glad I had the hat one. Defo excessive use of teeth going on (It almost numbed me). Her on top at this point. Really joy here as she ji rated with what seemed like real enthusiasm. Great view of those huge jugs. Flipped into doggy for the finale before flipping her over for a decent hosing down. 

More polite chit chat thereafter. Suspect I could have had another go however I was spend.

Conclusion
Nice lady, sexy if you're into the older lady. She's perhaps the maximum age I'd go with.  Decent body for that age however. Obviously enjoys her work. From What I understand she doesn't get through hundreds of punters and doesn't work ever day (probably a reflection on price). She is expensive,  if it was 100 for the hour I'd probably see her again without any doubt. At 140 I probably gamble on something different or new that wasn't as much hassle to arrange.

[sexgn00037]

Is she facially attractive?

[Donel75]

Maybe once upon a time.  She's not awful, just a bit on the old side.

[jake367]

Ditto

I had a v v similar experience to OP.

[markymarkfb]

Thanks for the feedback, did she contact you via whatssapp did she look like the pictures on there or much older?

[Donel75]

Thanks for the feedback, did she contact you via whatssapp did she look like the pictures on there or much older?

No, just texts. Didn't ask for a picture.  She said she was in her 40s which she's not.  She's well into her 50s for sure.  Wasn't that wrinkled. Think she mentioned she was a grandmother (which did put me off a little, this was post the deed however).

Body wise, the few snaps you see on AW are pretty represenative.

[dancr7]

Can anyone dm me her number if possible

[Jaysonloha1]

Possible I can get that number too

[markymarkfb]

With respect you should get it yourself, would you like it if she passed your number around

[Jaysonloha1]

I hear you lad but I don't have a adult work account so I can't get it

[Lewis]

I hear you lad but I don't have a adult work account so I can't get it

Well it's hardly rocket science to get one is it?

[Your_dark_knight]

A few month old thread I know, just adding pictures of the lady for others to see.

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Uoti2]

Thanks for yet another well-written and informative review, Donel75. I particularly like the way your reviews stick almost entirely to describing the appearance, attitude and actions of the WG, rather than being more about you than her.

Good luck with what appears to be your ongoing quest to see every WG in or near Swindon! 

[Loiner1]

Are you allowed to post pictures of the lady in question if she hasn't given you permission? She doesn't show face pictures on her AW profile. A bit dodgy that and illegal I believe. Perhaps you should delete them or she may sue.

[Cupid Stuntz]

Are you allowed to post pictures of the lady in question if she hasn't given you permission? She doesn't show face pictures on her AW profile. A bit dodgy that and illegal I believe. Perhaps you should delete them or she may sue.

Think it does go against site rules even though photos aren't mentioned here I would imagine they come under personal details? Reported the post for admin to decide.

" Privacy of service providers

It is not allowed to post personal info of service providers, such as real names and personal social networking profiles. Phone numbers may be posted in full only if they are published in adverts / profiles. General description of incall locations is acceptable, but not specific house numbers or street names or postcodes. Linking porn work is allowed. Modelling work is also allowed depending on circumstance, e.g. face pics showing on both prostitution profile and modelling profile. News items may be posted depending on circumstances (e.g. criminality). Previous working names are never censored, regardless of reasons. Objections from service providers to any privacy-related info will need to be raised with Admin for consideration."

[Fuzzyduck]

Are you allowed to post pictures of the lady in question if she hasn't given you permission? She doesn't show face pictures on her AW profile. A bit dodgy that and illegal I believe. Perhaps you should delete them or she may sue.

You really think she would? I mean really? If they are private pics, all she has to do is ask Admin to delete them.

It's a fair point, though, regarding personal information. However, my understanding is that if they've ever been posted in the public domain (e.g. they used to be on her AW public profile), then it's fair game.

Perhaps YDK could confirm where they came from.

[markymarkfb]

Im with you Cupid Stuntz , out of order!

[Cupid Stuntz]

You really think she would? I mean really? If they are private pics, all she has to do is ask Admin to delete them.

It's a fair point, though, regarding personal information. However, my understanding is that if they've ever been posted in the public domain (e.g. they used to be on her AW public profile), then it's fair game.

Perhaps YDK could confirm where they came from.

I've never seen these on her AW profile.
None of her profile pics show her face.
One of these she sent to me in confidence so would imagine these have been PM'd, also confidentially to DK?

[Your_dark_knight]

Sorry for any confusion guys I remember these on her AW profile along time ago when I noticed the profile being super new, and I saved them from the AW profile, this is something I normally do and go back to the profile. I did crop out the AW part which is normally on the photos.

If this goes against any rules on here then I'm sorry so please delete accordingly, however I don't understand the difference between me uploading them and the difference between the verified picture thread (SW) which shows the girls verified picture and in most cases which are now set to private on their profiles?

[Fuzzyduck]

Sorry for any confusion guys I remember these on her AW profile along time ago when I noticed the profile being super new, and I saved them from the AW profile, this is something I normally do and go back to the profile. I did crop out the AW part which is normally on the photos.

If this goes against any rules on here then I'm sorry so please delete accordingly, however I don't understand the difference between me uploading them and the difference between the verified picture thread (SW) which shows the girls verified picture and in most cases which are now set to private on their profiles?

There isn't any. If they are veri pics or were on the public profile then they can be treated in the same way. If the veri pic threads were a problem from a data protection perspective, it would have been flagged up and dealt with before now (assumption). As CS mentioned, it's been flagged to admin, so he'll make the call.

What I don't know is, if they were put in the public domain before, what the protocol is if the SP asks for them to be removed.

[markymarkfb]

They are probably from her Facebook, its easy to search phone numbers on there

[houseboot]

They are probably from her Facebook, its easy to search phone numbers on there

"Probably"?

They either are or are not.

If you know that to be fact then please say so.

If not, then you shouldn't make an assumption/accusation.

[markymarkfb]

They are

[Fuzzyduck]

They are

Fair enough, though it doesn't mean they weren't on her AW public profile at some point. Admin hasn't removed them so draw your own conclusions from that.

If any white knights are still concerned about them still being here, then perhaps they should contact the SP so she can ask Admin herself.

[Your_dark_knight]

Thanks for the supportive comments houseboot and Fuzzyduck 

To any others, just to re-confirm I saw these pictures on her AW profile and saved them to my phone, I guess I was just viewing her profile at the right time.

Like I said this is something that I commonly do, purely due to B&S that I have had in the past.

[Fuzzyduck]

They are

I note you've put in a new post report stating these pictures have only appeared on social media. Do you categorically know this, i.e. YDK is mistaken? If so, how?

[markymarkfb]

Its not hard to find there face book profiles when they give you there personal number, Ie if they have posted on for sale pages ect on there with there number showing, i spoke to her via whatsapp and ask for pictures, she only sent pictures of her face hidden or covered, it was only when i searched her number on facebook i saw the photos that are posted on here, i have never seen her face on AW and never seen her post face pics on there

[Fuzzyduck]

Its not hard to find there face book profiles when they give you there personal number, Ie if they have posted on for sale pages ect on there with there number showing, i spoke to her via whatsapp and ask for pictures, she only sent pictures of her face hidden or covered, it was only when i searched her number on facebook i saw the photos that are posted on here, i have never seen her face on AW and never seen her post face pics on there

That sounds reasonable.

However, you haven't offered any proof that you categorically know that they were never on her AW public profile. All you have said is that these pics are on her FB. It is plausible she used the same pics on her early AW profile then changed her mind and removed them. I haven't a clue. YDK claims there were there. Do you have any proof that they weren't?