Pisses me off this. everyone slagging everyone off.
Ok, the original review might have been a bit fluffy, but it`s the OP`s first one. my first review was along the same lines and everyone had a pop instead of giving advice on how to write one.
Treat new members like this and they just won`t bother writing reviews, they won`t even post anything, they`ll just "leech " off the site and that`s in no - one`s interest.
Going off his last active date, probably just thought we are just a bunch of cunts and hasn`t bothered since.
The review is shit and contains pretty much no helpful details that a punter would want to know. He is clearly beyond help because he's too thick to understand what makes a even just a slightly helpful review. All he needs to do is think about what he would like to know before seeing a girl but he's either too stupid to do that or is so easily pleased, it doesn't matter. If he doesn't bother reviewing again, he's no loss to the site. The same applies to you actually because even though your reviews have definitely improved they're still amongst the very least helpful on here, although of course still better than AW feedback/field reports (which you used to just copy & paste for your first 20 odd reviews). Also, you're bullshitting when you say you didn't get any advice on how to write a good review, you did (note for people who want to check that, his first review was moved to the discussion section by admin because it was so rubbish).
Why accuse her of writing the review, is there any proof of this, if so, why hasn`t she been banned by admin ?
If you are going to make accusations, you`ve got to be able to back them up, or shut up.
She`s got excellent reviews on here and 139 positives on AW so in my opinion there`s no need to make up a false review.
If I was going to book her, I know that at least she`s a safe bet rather than a TOFTT.
I'm shocked that you're so stupid as to think anyone could have "proof" on an anonymous forum where no one has access to any personal/technical/computing data regarding any other members (except admin). If it wasn't reported to admin (and often these things aren't, even when accusations are made) then admin is unlikely to have become aware of it and so wouldn't have investigated (because he's so busy). Maybe it was reported though and as I've said, I doubt it was her.
Her positives on AW are almost meaningless and while she does have numerous good reviews on here she doesn't have absolutely loads. While you may think there's no need to make up a false review (and actually I usually agree with that school thought in most cases myself), there are numerous examples of WGs on here who've had plenty of positive reviews (including more than this WG) but still decided to write a fake one (especially if they had no recent reviews on here even if overall they have many). To be fair, many examples are also after a girl has received a negative (even though most of their reviews are positive) but there are some examples of girls who only have positives (including more than this WG) but have still made one up.
Personally I think one of the big clues that she didn't write this review is that if even if she did wanted to make something up, she wouldn't have written it like the OP did because I don't think she's anywhere near that stupid! So on reflection, I think she might have been a little upset but only because some people (a small minority, especially given the number of views this topic has) thought she might be thick enough to have posted this "review".
I'm not trying to have a go at them though because in many cases, some WG's are rather dumb and as I've said, there have been plenty of instances of WGs making up reviews in the past. However, I do think generally speaking some people are bit too quick to jump to the somewhat cynical conclusion that it's the WG. People should try to understand that there are many dumb and deluded fluffy punters out there (see AW feedback and field reports as well as other "punting forums" or just the many banned members from this site etc) and I think there were a few classic trademark signs of this review being written by a useless fluffy punter.
TITS look great and that is all I can add to this discussion 
God I love TITS
They're fake but I think they have a nice natural look to them and in terms of feel, they're shockingly realistic/soft to the touch. Personally I think she's had one of the best boob jobs I've ever seen (and obviously I've seen quite a few). Oh, god now I'm turning into a fluffy (although am also being objective). Interestingly, I do have a review of a girl with another great boob job coming up soon too.
I’m certain she didn’t write this but as a review it’s totally rubbish. You say if you was going to book her you’d know she was a safe bet. That’s because others have written objective detailed reviews. If this review was the only one to go by I’d bet you’d have second thoughts. It’s purely a self gratifying over indulgent announcement of his feelings for her. It was obviously written for her to read.
There is absolutely no information here of any use other than he’s totally enamoured with her.
+1
Ok, his review is a bit bobbins, so was my first one, but I would book her even if there were no reviews on here.
Why haven't you already seen her then?
Loads of times i`ve met someone with none or only a few reviews on here but have loads on AW like she has, so at least it gives you a bit of an indication, and there`s probably loads guys on here who have TOFTT.
A few times I`ve punted a newbie with no reviews on AW, sometimes you take your chances.
Have a look at this one External Link/Members Only
4 reviews on here ( including mine )734 on AW, would have thought she`d have a hell of a lot more on here.
I do agree. Indeed, the thing that "pisses me off" is how some/many girls have clearly seen loads of punters but have no or very few reviews on here. It slightly annoys me that, relatively speaking, a minority of WGs get a such a large share of the reviews on here. Of course, it is very understandable (as people like to see those who've been well reviewed on here) and even if a girl has loads of reviews, another one from a new perspective and confirming she's still good is always helpful. However, sometimes I do get frustrated with lack of breadth of reviews on here (a recent example is this girl who has 51 AW feedback, the vast majority of which are for escorting:
External Link/Members Only). Having said that I'm not exactly a TOFTT machine myself. Also, I should probably post more reviews myself in general, especially parlour girls (who are also very under-reviewed on here despite clearly being seen by many punters and indeed members here).
