Amazing Victoria No1 - not so amazing after all (Leeds central)

[DespicablemeGru]

After repeated attempts to get a meet with one of Leeds finest, I was thrilled when I got a booking for 2pm today. Arranged via AW email and confirmed by text, I set off in good time arriving into central Leeds before 1pm.

I tried ringing and texting to no avail. I sent further emails on A W with same outcome.

Pissed off by no contact by 14:15 I made alternative arrangements but not before firing off an email to express my disappointment by her silence.

I then see that had read my email of anger at 15:57 but still couldn't be arse to apologise, or even furnish me with some bullshit excuse

[amazing_victoria_no1]

Yeah, I coukd have handle this better. Didn't realise who you were, until I checked my previously blocked contacts and you were on that. Hope plan B worked out well, Im sure you won't contact me again
Just to reiterate, I could have handle this better.

[JackTheStripper]

Sad to see when I have only read good things about this girl up until now.

[Gas Man 40s]

Must be on her blocked contacts for a reason? .. should have just replied saying she was cancelling the booking

[blueduck]

If you were blocked, she would presumably think the appointment cancelled as you couldn’t confirm on the day?

[navydude]

So had you ever made a booking with her before O/P ?

[Luke B]

A fair rating. It's inexcusable for WG's not to at least have the common decency to contact you if their plans change.

[DespicablemeGru]

Don't understand why I am on her blocked contacts list!!

Only ever contacted her by email on AW, and more often than not I was told fully booked up, which is understandable given her popularity.

I have never said anything offensive, or abusive in any communications, and she accepted my booking without any argument.

I think she has me confused with someone else !!!!

At least she accepts she didn't handle things very well

Plan B was delightful

[amazing_victoria_no1]

Your were definitly on my block list, as I didn't recieve your text replies.
It could be for any manner of reasons, but your phone number was on my block list

[wristjob]

A fair rating. It's inexcusable for WG's not to at least have the common decency to contact you if their plans change.

Try reading it again til you understand.

Must be on her blocked contacts for a reason? .. should have just replied saying she was cancelling the booking

Maybe, but fair to say if she blocked him in the past she didn't want to see him anyway.

This scenario (booking via AW, can't get a reply via phone cos you are blocked) has happened a couple of times now. Dunno what the answer is.

[mrfishyfoo]

Try reading it again til you understand.


Maybe, but fair to say if she blocked him in the past she didn't want to see him anyway.

This scenario (booking via AW, can't get a reply via phone cos you are blocked) has happened a couple of times now. Dunno what the answer is.

My phone is set to receive delivery reports for texts. No delivery report = blocked. 

[navydude]

W/G should have let him know he was an undesirable.
I can't see a solution to this kind of thing. I get a postcode at least before I set off 

[hornypunter]

I have sympathy with both parties.  One it must be frustrating not knowing that or why you are  blocked. As for Victoria getting a negative review in an indirect way as no service actually took place could damage a lady's reputation. However Victoria has such a stable of positive reviews I am sure it will not have done her any harm. 79 positive is some going.
.

[mrfishyfoo]

W/G should have let him know he was an undesirable.
I can't see a solution to this kind of thing. I get a postcode at least before I set off

Talking to the lass is a good start.

Getting a reply to a text that confirms "all is good" is another one.

A confirmed AWank booking request another.

My MO is simple............I always ring a lass if I don't get a reply to my "are we still on" text. If this goes unanswered I'll send another text expressing my irritation at the situation and if that isn't responded to in a timely manner, after I've got the delivery report, I will not set off. This applies to newbies and lasses that I am returning to.

In this case AV accepted the booking so her fucked up admin has earnt her a well deserved red card.

[mrfishyfoo]

I have sympathy with both parties.  One it must be frustrating not knowing that or why you are  blocked. As for Victoria getting a negative review in an indirect way as no service actually took place could damage a lady's reputation. However Victoria has such a stable of positive reviews I am sure it will not have done her any harm. 79 positive is some going.
.

Why ?? I'll be amazed if she even knows why he was blocked in the first place. 

Getting blocked is par for the course and an inevitable consequence of their twisted pro$$ie logic.  I've lost count of how many have blocked me.

The reasons they have for blocking a punter can range from what time of the month it is to him be a rude and arragant cunt. It's a part of this game that we all play.

To expect a pro$$ie to share with the person they've just blocked the reason why they've blocked him is naivety of the highest order IMHO. 

[hornypunter]

Why ?? I'll be amazed if she even knows why he was blocked in the first place. 

Getting blocked is par for the course and an inevitable consequence of their twisted pro$$ie logic.  I've lost count of how many have blocked me.

The reasons they have for blocking a punter can range from what time of the month it is to him be a rude and arragant cunt. It's a part of this game that we all play.

To expect a pro$$ie to share with the person they've just blocked the reason why they've blocked him is naivety of the highest order IMHO. 

I know. I just said it can be frustrating if you think you have done nothing wrong. As you say the ladies will bit not know the reasons for blocking as there are so many even indirect ones such as previous ladies visited. The best way in this game is to move on to the next punt after a bad experience until your next positive experience. Do not dwell on the negatives just learn by your experience. At least the OP had not spent a load of money and had a shit punt. Years ago and similar thing happened to me at a parlour in Leeds where a lady refused to see me. Pissed me off at the time as I did not understand why. But thought bollocks and went elsewhere to empty my sack. Felt her loss my gain she could have had that money.

[mrfishyfoo]

I know. I just said it can be frustrating if you think you have done nothing wrong. As you say the ladies will bit not know the reasons for blocking as there are so many even indirect ones such as previous ladies visited. The best way in this game is to move on to the next punt after a bad experience until your next positive experience. Do not dwell on the negatives just learn by your experience. At least the OP had not spent a load of money and had a shit punt. Years ago and similar thing happened to me at a parlour in Leeds where a lady refused to see me. Pissed me off at the time as I did not understand why. But thought bollocks and went elsewhere to empty my sack. Felt her loss my gain she could have had that money.

EXACTLY !!! 

[PussyLover789]

NavyDude & Luke B, when are you guys going to have a punt then?? you seem to have alot to say but no reviews?? 

[vw]

W/G should have let him know he was an undesirable.

How do you know that's what she thinks?

Are you a mid reader?     

[navydude]

How do you know that's what she thinks?



Are you a mid reader?     

If she's blocked him he is hardly a desirable sort in her opinion.

yes I am don't eat that extra pie VW. 

[vw]

If she's blocked him he is hardly a desirable sort in her opinion.

yes I am don't eat that extra pie VW. 

She doesn't even know why He was blocked, but you do.   Thats shocking IMO.

[wristjob]

W/G should have let him know he was an undesirable.
I can't see a solution to this kind of thing. I get a postcode at least before I set off

How is this confusing?

He made a booking on AW, she didn't link his AW ID to his phone no so didn't know his number was blocked so how could she have done anything different until the time of the booking?

Once she found out it seems she just felt the ignore him route would be easiest, and she paid for that.

I don't want to come across as being a WK but one thing that bugs me is how he made the booking on AW. All I really use AW for is to ask for their number. AVN1 is well reviewed but generally I won't book with anyone I don't talk to and if I get "texting is so much sexier dahling" I usually ditch them. It just seems bizarre that anybody would have made (or taken) a booking without knowing the other person's number and at least exchanged texts before.

[amazing_victoria_no1]

There was no aw booking request. He asked if I am free at 2pm and left me his number in the email to which I replied by text "2pm is fine" awaiting reply to provide him with my address details and question for booking request. No reply recieved and as everyone know, I am busy so I don't turn to be online all the time. Another text sent just after 1pm to which I had no reply. I didn't check my emails, there is a fault, for which I am to blame.
Checked his number and it seems he is on my block list.
I block people for arranging a booking and not turning up or requesting services which are not listed on my profile which will put me into risk. As everyone know, I only recently removed my phone number from my profile, he might have arranged in the past, by phone and not turn up, which will automatically put him into block list.
Misunderstanding led to this review and I know, I am not without fault here.

[bluefinger]

There was no aw booking request. He asked if I am free at 2pm and left me his number in the email to which I replied by text "2pm is fine" awaiting reply to provide him with my address details and question for booking request. No reply recieved and as everyone know, I am busy so I don't turn to be online all the time. Another text sent just after 1pm to which I had no reply. I didn't check my emails, there is a fault, for which I am to blame.

I'm no phone expert and it depends on the phone you use but most of them won't let you send a text to someone on the block list? 

[Romeo Sensini]

I'm no phone expert and it depends on the phone you use but most of them won't let you send a text to someone on the block list? 

That needed an emoji for a smoking gun 

[Sonny Crockett]

The negative is justified. The WG is just plain rude.

[Al1245]

I've seen AV in the past and she is not rude. She's a lovely lady. What I believe has happened is she had sent the text but cos he's on her block list the SMS never got delivered. Only after she sent a few texts she realized that he was on the block list and hence she did not want to see him.

Explains why he is on the block list when he is the only guy to leave her a negative review 

[Sonny Crockett]

I've seen AV in the past and she is not rude. She's a lovely lady. What I believe has happened is she had sent the text but cos he's on her block list the SMS never got delivered. Only after she sent a few texts she realized that he was on the block list and hence she did not want to see him.

Explains why he is on the block list when he is the only guy to leave her a negative review 

She is rude for not having the courtesy to tell him that the booking they agreed to was not on, therefore wasting his time. Therefore the negative is justified.

[vw]

I've seen AV in the past and she is not rude. She's a lovely lady. What I believe has happened is she had sent the text but cos he's on her block list the SMS never got delivered. Only after she sent a few texts she realized that he was on the block list and hence she did not want to see him.

Explains why he is on the block list when he is the only guy to leave her a negative review 

Hidden Image/Members Only

Maybe others are scared of her fan club?

[Justanotheruser]

She is rude for not having the courtesy to tell him that the booking they agreed to was not on, therefore wasting his time. Therefore the negative is justified.

I see you've retained your cheery disposition after the years of being banned then.

[muffin]

Good point sir... no smoke without fire... maybe a blacklist amnesty is required!!

[vw]

I see you've retained your cheery disposition after the years of being banned then.

His mantra thread was hilarious.


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=92894.msg1125143#msg1125143

[yorkieyorkie]

A justified negative irrespective of how popular AV is.

[marlboro20]

For fucks sake... mole hill - shit storm - out of- making a... Re-arrange.

[stevedave]

His mantra thread was hilarious.


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=92894.msg1125143#msg1125143

I miss all the!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

On every sentence!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

[sheffielder]

How is this confusing?

He made a booking on AW, she didn't link his AW ID to his phone no so didn't know his number was blocked so how could she have done anything different until the time of the booking?

Once she found out it seems she just felt the ignore him route would be easiest, and she paid for that.

I don't want to come across as being a WK but one thing that bugs me is how he made the booking on AW. All I really use AW for is to ask for their number. AVN1 is well reviewed but generally I won't book with anyone I don't talk to and if I get "texting is so much sexier dahling" I usually ditch them. It just seems bizarre that anybody would have made (or taken) a booking without knowing the other person's number and at least exchanged texts before.

Why does it bug you if he made a booking via adultwork?

On the odd occasion I have booked via Aw. It sends the SP your contact number when they accept the booking.

[sheffielder]

Just read that he didnt book via the booking system only via email.

Av can block and not see who ever she likes. Her black listing him may or may not be justified. That's between her and him.

However I'm not sure we are getting the full storey here. I'm pretty sure you can't text numbers you have blocked. Either way it was really unprofessional to just ignore the situation.

Justified Negative which could have been avoided. I'm sure 1 negative  against all of the positives would not put two meny people off.

[wristjob]

Why does it bug you if he made a booking via adultwork?

Wondering if he did it that way cos he suspected his phone was blocked.

Av can block and not see who ever she likes. Her black listing him may or may not be justified. That's between her and him.

Can't argue with that.

However I'm not sure we are getting the full storey here. I'm pretty sure you can't text numbers you have blocked. Either way it was really unprofessional to just ignore the situation.

Justified Negative which could have been avoided. I'm sure 1 negative  against all of the positives would not put two meny people off.

Not a comment against you but that whole "justified" thing bugs me a bit. I think it needs explaining but I don't think a punter ever needs to justify their rating, it's how he felt about the situation.

[stevedave]

As Wristjob said, it's fair enough. AV fucked up. She's admitted it too.

I guess there is a reason why AV dropped a bollock (we may never fully know the reason for this), but the OP obviously had made a bad impression sometime ago.

Shit happens, move on I guess. Reason for the neg justified, fair play to the lass for her open and honest rebuttal (which still justifies the neg)

[sheffielder]

Not a comment against you but that whole "justified" thing bugs me a bit. I think it needs explaining but I don't think a punter ever needs to justify their rating, it's how he felt about the situation.

I'm not sure why the use of the word "justified" would need explaining.. I'm saying I agree with his negative.

[Romeo Sensini]

I'm not sure why the use of the word "justified" would need explaining.. I'm saying I agree with his negative.

I think wristjob is simply saying that a negative review should be explained, as should a positive or neutral. How the reviewer assesses the punt is up to him based on his experience and hence has fuck all to do with anyone else's opinion -  hence no justification needed.

[vw]

I see she has 2 white knight reviews.   

[Neptune]

I see she has 2 white knight reviews.   

Yawn!

[sheffielder]

I think wristjob is simply saying that a negative review should be explained, as should a positive or neutral. How the reviewer assesses the punt is up to him based on his experience and hence has fuck all to do with anyone else's opinion -  hence no justification needed.

At no point did I say he had to justify his rating. I am entitled to pass comment and was agreeing with the reviewer..

[Romeo Sensini]

At no point did I say he had to justify his rating. I am entitled to pass comment and was agreeing with the reviewer..

Did you read the bit where he said it wasn't a comment against you? Do you just enjoy being offended?

[sheffielder]

.

[sheffielder]

I'm not offended. He said something I said needed explaining which in my opinion needed no explanation.  What's has it got to do with you? You obviously enjoy trading tit for tat on a forum.

[wristjob]

I'm not offended. He said something I said needed explaining which in my opinion needed no explanation.  What's has it got to do with you? You obviously enjoy trading tit for tat on a forum.

Several people said it was a justified negative. I just don't think anybody ever needs to justify their ratings, good or bad.

I see she has 2 white knight reviews.   

I saw Victoria a couple of years back. The punt wasn't really to my liking but she was awesome, solid positive, but there were already 40+ reviews of her and I didn't feel I had anything to add that would help a punter to decide whether to see her or not so I didn't post a review. This review will do nothing whatsoever to harm her reputation. The review with AW84 adds something but I can't see why anybody would post a solo review that says the same as all the others.

[vw]

Several people said it was a justified negative. I just don't think anybody ever needs to justify their ratings, good or bad.


I saw Victoria a couple of years back. The punt wasn't really to my liking but she was awesome, solid positive, but there were already 40+ reviews of her and I didn't feel I had anything to add that would help a punter to decide whether to see her or not so I didn't post a review. This review will do nothing whatsoever to harm her reputation. The review with AW84 adds something but I can't see why anybody would post a solo review that says the same as all the others.

To get a extra kiss or cuddle on the next booking maybe.