Author Topic: Warning!! If you hear or see the name BritneyBitch! Run away like the plague. (Read 5348 times)

sr13 · « **on:** August 15, 2018, 07:32:39 pm »

There’s a from AW, she’s from Rochdale and her name is Britneybitch17. She’s got a few bad reviews but judging from her pictures she looked like a stunner. So I drive to her place and she opened the door and led me to a room. And for the record she looked nothing like the her shadow in the pictures(much worse) and I guarantee you it is her. Anyhow we got the awkward bit out and she kept telling me to book longer, she wasn’t nice to look at and seeing my money was gone, didn’t get hard from the start and when I eventually did, she said we couldn’t use the bed. She claimed I wasn’t hard and kicked me out. I can say this is by far the worst punt I’ve ever had I’m my life and save yourself from the disappointment I went through.

STAR-LORD · « **Reply #1 on:** August 15, 2018, 07:37:19 pm »

External Link/Members Only

scutty brown · « **Reply #2 on:** August 15, 2018, 08:15:55 pm »

looks fucking rough in the photos
Normal for Rochdale I guess............

Hurley · « **Reply #3 on:** August 15, 2018, 09:51:55 pm »

Reading her feedback which is admittedly not always the best indication it’s plainly obvious she needs to be avoided

PussyLover789 · « **Reply #4 on:** August 15, 2018, 10:09:32 pm »

Ok, so this woman has some bad feedback on AW (and im not defending her) but lets not forget that this is SR13s first post since this time last year, he must have known she was one to avoid but he still went for it, is this a fake review?? i think so

scutty brown · « **Reply #5 on:** August 15, 2018, 10:14:20 pm »

Quote from: PussyLover789 on August 15, 2018, 10:09:32 pm

Ok, so this woman has some bad feedback on AW (and im not defending her) but lets not forget that this is SR13s first post since this time last year, he must have known she was one to avoid but he still went for it, is this a fake review?? i think so

Agreed, especially given he describes her photos as "a stunner".
She's no stunner: she looks like s street junkie

PussyLover789 · « **Reply #6 on:** August 15, 2018, 10:57:20 pm »

Looks like she has 2 AW profiles External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

PussyLover789 · « **Reply #7 on:** August 15, 2018, 10:58:39 pm »

Quote from: scutty brown on August 15, 2018, 10:14:20 pm

She's no stunner: she looks like s street junkie

She certainly does

Northerndave666 · « **Reply #8 on:** August 15, 2018, 11:30:32 pm »

I'm sure this one used to be based down in Wythenshawe last year? And sure there was something about a 'boyfriend' arriving back and confronting punters. Same pic used on her old profile

chrishornx · « **Reply #9 on:** August 16, 2018, 08:05:58 am »

Quote from: PussyLover789 on August 15, 2018, 10:09:32 pm

Ok, so this woman has some bad feedback on AW (and im not defending her) but lets not forget that this is SR13s first post since this time last year, he must have known she was one to avoid but he still went for it, is this a fake review?? i think so

it is actually his first and only post

and he hasn't come back on to add to his original comments. could well be fake

Taggart · « **Reply #10 on:** August 16, 2018, 10:27:21 am »

Quote from: sr13 on August 15, 2018, 07:32:39 pm

..... but judging from her pictures.....

How can you judge? They are fecking postage stamp size....

BP · « **Reply #11 on:** August 16, 2018, 03:19:29 pm »

Quote from: Taggart on August 16, 2018, 10:27:21 am

How can you judge? They are fecking postage stamp size....

They might be on your phone but on desktop you can see all the junkiness in her

Hidden Image/Members Only

thedizzle · « **Reply #12 on:** August 16, 2018, 04:15:04 pm »

I'll be honest I like that picture of her. I do love a chav.

Won't be risking it now though and also very silly of her to have a child's photo still in the picture!

kammyaccountant · « **Reply #13 on:** August 16, 2018, 10:14:18 pm »

I was unfortunate enough to see her over a year ago, I got her details from vivastreet I think. It was by far the worst booking I have ever made, she wasn't clean, her place was a dump, she increased her price once I had paid her the agreed amount. I couldn't get her details up so didn't do a review on her.
I tried but couldn't get myself to perform, she was aggressive and whilst I was getting ready to leave she told me it was my fault and I best not give me bad reviews on any sites. I wish I did a review on her at that time.

BP · « **Reply #14 on:** August 17, 2018, 12:19:08 am »

Quote from: kammyaccountant on August 16, 2018, 10:14:18 pm

I wish I did a review on her at that time.

Yeah you might have saved the OP (and some others) some dosh

If you struggle with links (and I know this can be an issue for some on mobiles etc) then its still worth a review. If an advert exists someone will be happy to place the link for you. There are some supersleuths on here. Meant more as general advice for anyone struggling - not specifically aimed at you.
Thanks OP for the review.

DylzzCee · « **Reply #15 on:** August 23, 2018, 11:53:37 pm »

Saw the review and then saw Rochdale, now it all makes sense

rustpoacher · « **Reply #16 on:** August 24, 2018, 12:06:33 am »

Quote from: BP on August 16, 2018, 03:19:29 pm

They might be on your phone but on desktop you can see all the junkiness in her

Hidden Image/Members Only

How do you spot the junkiness?
She doesn't look too skinny or marked?

widow · « **Reply #17 on:** August 24, 2018, 05:08:59 am »

She is a known scammer a lot have had a guy boy friend hanging around tried with a mate luckily did not hand cash over so left even with b/f tryimg threaten him says he was willing to deck him to get out of there she has 2 or 3 different ads on adultwork This is one

Avoid at all costs

External Link/Members Only

Cash drawers · « **Reply #18 on:** August 24, 2018, 06:38:37 am »

I was going to comment basically as thedizzle before i see his post, any w.g. that has her kid in her profile pic has to be very unprofessional at least! I would avoid just on that ground.