AdultWork or Parlours

[Highpeakguy]

Hi there, I'm not a regular punter these days but have a question after reading all the posts on here.
Do punters tend to usevAW these days or still visit parlours ? All reports on here seem to be AW orienated.
Thanks 

[strokeyjoe]

Hi there, I'm not a regular punter these days but have a question after reading all the posts on here.
Do punters tend to usevAW these days or still visit parlours ? All reports on here seem to be AW orienated.
Thanks 

Most do seem to use AW, and you probably will find that most reviews on here reflect that, but there are parlour users around, like myself. Just aren't that many good parlours around these days!

Joe

[Mr long sausage]

If parlours showed pictures of the girls (accurately) id never look at AW again.

[strokeyjoe]

If parlours showed pictures of the girls (accurately) id never look at AW again.

Absolutely agree, a lot of risk, looks and quality wise, in going to a parlour. You only have to walk back out the door you just walked in through though. Also pretty hit and miss with AW girls, if reviews here are anything to go by. Less time, effort and money wasted with parlours though

Joe

[goldwing1]

A lot of the adverts for parlours can be very misleading.
Girls will have a list of services that they provide, but it`s only when you are halfway through that you find out it`s a tenner for this, tenner for that etc, so it could easily work out cheaper just going on AW .

I prefer AW, just a huge variety, plus I think that on average, the girls are more likely to give a better service for fear of shit feedback. 

[NigelF]

for fear of shit feedback.

Not from you though.

[Blackpool Rock]

Not from you though.

PMSL 

[goldwing1]

Not from you though.

Exactly - can`t agree with you more - thanks for bringing it to my attention.
I`ll have to book some shit one`s in the future .

[Blackpool Rock]

Exactly - can`t agree with you more - thanks for bringing it to my attention.
I`ll have to book some shit one`s in the future .

Perhaps that's actually not a bad idea / suggestion (i'm being serious), what one punter thinks is a negative is a positive for someone else and vice versa, ultimately we all have a different baseline and expectations as to what we want and what is good / bad etc.
How about booking this girl who is great looking but seems to get consistently bad reviews for her service and attitude then see how you find her and review, at least you will get to shag a good looking girl. 
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

[pauleyleigh]

I prefer parlours especially after all efeedback i read on here about girls giving punters the runaround.... i don't have time for that nonsense

Around 6-8 years ago manchester had the best parlour scene... nowadays decent parlours are hard to come by....

It was great when to could walk into Sandy's get a guaranteed punt with a hot girl

I go to less parlours now, i suppose im saving money, I've looked at AW but not took the plung yet

[Asa1967]

I personally prefer parlours for the reason of u can walk into a parlour and can have a choice of at least 4/5 girls and there is usually at least 1 decent 1 in there, if u don’t like what u see u can turn round and walk out.
I did us AW a couple of times and one was not the same girl as on her AW profile but too late I was already in the hotel room and was to polite to walk, next thing I was handed the money over and the punt was shit, extra for this and extra for that even though she had told me it was a all inclusive service.

[marlboro20]

Exactly - can`t agree with you more - thanks for bringing it to my attention.
I`ll have to book some shit one`s in the future .

Here we go again... smart arse responses from John Major and BR.
OP... it's different strokes for different blokes... either/or is fine. Good point with parlours you'll have a choice of a few different girls... down side is the clocks ticking. Bury's got a couple of decent parlours.

[Rimtastic]

I used to be a regular parlour visitor, but got a bit fed up of the knock on the door, whereas an escort visit is a bit more relaxed.

I think parlours still generally offer cheaper punting once you find a girl you click with, but parlours generally seem to have gone down hill as everyone can access Adultwork etc these days, though I do feel that prices on AW are going up a bit too quickly for my liking.

I only punt two or three times a years these days, but have an open mind on whether I visit a parlour or an escort.

My last punt was back in Feb, in a parlour, with a lady I really clicked with, though her extras were a bit on the high side.

She left the parlour soon after, and although she escorts now at £150 an hour plus extras she is far too expensive for me to consider.

[cueball]

Here we go again... smart arse responses from John Major and BR.
OP... it's different strokes for different blokes... either/or is fine. Good point with parlours you'll have a choice of a few different girls... down side is the clocks ticking. Bury's got a couple of decent parlours.

here we go again.... The idiots champion rides in  ....

fags mantra.... The enemy of my enemy is my friend

[Blackpool Rock]

Here we go again... smart arse responses from John Major and BR.
OP... it's different strokes for different blokes... either/or is fine. Good point with parlours you'll have a choice of a few different girls... down side is the clocks ticking. Bury's got a couple of decent parlours.

Nothing smart arse about my response, if you care to note the below quote from my response it's basically the same as your "different strokes for different blokes" comment 

My quote was -
"what one punter thinks is a negative is a positive for someone else and vice versa, ultimately we all have a different baseline and expectations as to what we want and what is good / bad etc"

[Treehouse]

Been punting since late ninties.
Until recenty always used parlours as the choice and convienance was there. While prices havnt moved up quality has moved down as a couple of parlours could pass for oap homes now.

Recently tried an incall from AW mainly because 60 -70 nowadays translates to less than 40 when I started.

Aw gitls tend to be less organised but better value.
However some rip off artists are oit there many of whom would not keep a job in a parlour

[ISTS2005]

To be fair - At least Goldwing does review, I'm sure I saw a negative or two from him recently too. I'd rather have his slightly rose-tinted reviews and Marlboros contributions, in comparison to the 'Posts 9 Reviews 0' or 'Post 7 Reviews 0' efforts of a few of the other so-called contributors. At least with GW reviews I get some of the information I need in making my own decisions as to whether to visit, they are valuable to me just like Cueballs, Nigels, BRs etc.

[cueball]

To be fair - At least Goldwing does review, I'm sure I saw a negative or two from him recently too. I'd rather have his slightly rose-tinted reviews and Marlboros contributions, in comparison to the 'Posts 9 Reviews 0' or 'Post 7 Reviews 0' efforts of a few of the other so-called contributors.

Interesting comment

With regards to goldwing, I honestly don't think he has an agenda or is particularly dodgy. He's just a daft bugger.... Can't say that about t'other one... Now that's another story

[ISTS2005]

With regards to goldwing, I honestly don't think he has an agenda or is particularly dodgy. He's just a daft bugger.... Can't say that about t'other one... Now that's another story

LOL Yeah I've noticed you and 'fags' bickering on 'ere! I seem to remember a comment about someone underselling themselves and should charge more and I think thats where all the shit-chucking started from?

[NigelF]

To be fair - At least Goldwing does review, I'm sure I saw a negative or two from him recently too. I'd rather have his slightly rose-tinted reviews and Marlboros contributions, in comparison to the 'Posts 9 Reviews 0' or 'Post 7 Reviews 0' efforts of a few of the other so-called contributors. At least with GW reviews I get some of the information I need in making my own decisions as to whether to visit, they are valuable to me just like Cueballs, Nigels, BRs etc.

I agree with a lot of what you've said but his reviews aren't just "slightly rose tinted". They're very rose tinted. Most of his reviews (although probably not recent ones) are still exact copy & paste jobs of his fluffy/"written for her benefit" Field Reports on AW (all of which always rated the girl 10/10 in every category - presumably because he's just happy to be in the presence of a woman). They also never contain anything critical about the girl's appearance (as if every girl he's seen has accurate pics, age, size and is really good looking etc) and almost never anything critical about any aspect of their service. Also his negatives are only for no shows/timewasters and even then, at least for his first one, he was initially reluctant to post it and had to be repeatedly asked to post it (by myself and others).

It basically comes down to whether you can trust someone who's had well over 100 punts (probably at least around 150 now) but never had a bad punt (except an extremely small number of no shows and neutrals - but no neutrals since joining):

I`ve been punting and going to swingers clubs for around 15 years now, and i`ve never really had a bad time, a few neutrals, I must have developed a bit of a gut instinct over the years

Yes, i`ve never had a really bad punt in 15 years, why would I come on here and tell lies?

I don`t list of the punts i`ve had, must be over a hundred though.

He can pretend it's because of his instinct or whatever (which is laughable because he thinks AW feedback is reliable) but obviously it's just because he's very easily pleased. As such, anyone who's just a little more discerning will find his reviews to be useless. Kind of like with positive feedback on AW, it's almost impossible to tell when it's just fluffy rubbish and when it's not. Fortunately on here we have other reviews so if the girl has any others on here you can rely on those a lot more (in the vast vast majority of cases).

[marlboro20]

So many assumptions John!

[NigelF]

So many assumptions John!

Not all - all the evidence in his reviews and what he's said. If you want even more evidence, read the reviews of other punters who've seen the girls he has and you'll see they're not as perfect as he always makes them out to be. To be clear I'm not just talking about subjective things, I'm talking objective aspects of appearance etc.

[goldwing1]

I agree with a lot of what you've said but his reviews aren't just "slightly rose tinted". They're very rose tinted. Most of his reviews (although probably not recent ones) are still exact copy & paste jobs of his fluffy/"written for her benefit" Field Reports on AW (all of which always rated the girl 10/10 in every category - presumably because he's just happy to be in the presence of a woman). They also never contain anything critical about the girl's appearance (as if every girl he's seen has accurate pics, age, size and is really good looking etc) and almost never anything critical about any aspect of their service. Also his negatives are only for no shows/timewasters and even then, at least for his first one, he was initially reluctant to post it and had to be repeatedly asked to post it (by myself and others).

It basically comes down to whether you can trust someone who's had well over 100 punts (probably at least around 150 now) but never had a bad punt (except an extremely small number of no shows and neutrals - but no neutrals since joining):
He can pretend it's because of his instinct or whatever (which is laughable because he thinks AW feedback is reliable) but obviously it's just because he's very easily pleased. As such, anyone who's just a little more discerning will find his reviews to be useless. Kind of like with positive feedback on AW, it's almost impossible to tell when it's just fluffy rubbish and when it's not. Fortunately on here we have other reviews so if the girl has any others on here you can rely on those a lot more (in the vast vast majority of cases).

If you don`t like my reports, don`t read them.
I`m more concerned with having a good time ,  and doing a quick report, don`t want to be spending hours writing a report worthy of a Sunday Times investigative journalist.
As long as the main bases are covered, ease of booking, comms, her accommodation, profile and pictures accurate and does she offer what she states on the likes list, along with any good / bad points or comments that other punters should be aware of.

Should be more concerned about highlighting shit prossies rather than backbiting each other.

[Luissuarez777]

haha I've noticed a lot of these posts and up in arguments. Am I detecting sexual tension. Haha.back to the point anyone know if any parlour in or near Liverpool apart from the obvious ones. Like Christies.
I remember my first punt was a place in canal street in bootle not there no more. But it lasted about 3 minutes haha.

[NigelF]

I`m more concerned with having a good time

At least you're getting close to admitting that you don't actually care about their appearance.

and doing a quick report, don`t want to be spending hours writing a report worthy of a Sunday Times investigative journalist.

I never said you should and indeed I don't do that myself.

As long as the main bases are covered, ease of booking, comms, her accommodation, profile and pictures accurate and does she offer what she states on the likes list, along with any good / bad points or comments that other punters should be aware of.

I get the impression that you are genuinely dumb and deluded enough to think you actually do that but you clearly don't.  You think every girl you see has accurate pictures and almost never has any bad points (perhaps 2 or 3 at most, all with very minor "bad points" out of 34 positive reviews).

Should be more concerned about highlighting shit prossies rather than backbiting each other.

If you don't want to improve your useless reviews, that's your problem. Anyway, I agree we should highlight shit prossies so aside from 3 timewasters (at least one of which I and others had to repeatedly ask you for), which ones have you highlighted and why haven't you highlighted any more?

Anyway, to get back on topic:

Hi there, I'm not a regular punter these days but have a question after reading all the posts on here.
Do punters tend to usevAW these days or still visit parlours ? All reports on here seem to be AW orienated.
Thanks 

Not all reviews on here are for AW girls. Quite a few are for girls in thai (and similar) massage places and there are a few "normal" parlour girl reviews. The problem is that most people (myself included) barely review any of their parlour punts. It also doesn't help that they can't currently be indexed and searching for reviews is difficult due to variations in the spelling of review titles (particularly parlour names) and of course when girls change parlours or their names.

Nonetheless, overall there are many parlour girls who have been reviewed and it's probably more than you think (it always surprises me when I do a very thorough/multiple searches). A few easy examples are these 3 girls who all have an AW profile so their reviews can be indexed/linked using that, even though all their reviews are from parlour meets:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=14730
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=4515
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=18854

That's a total of 21 parlour reviews for just 3 girls and there's plenty of other examples out there (including girls who are even more popular).

My recommendation is to review as many girls as you can, including from parlours, as they're all definitely helpful. I myself prioritise girls on AW (although of course I still don't review all of them) but do make sure to review some of my parlour punts as well. Of course I always post any negatives as they're often the most helpful reviews and there's no reason not to post at least those.

[marlboro20]

worthy of a Sunday Times investigative journalist
Spot on Goldwing... John's got far too much time on his hands... maybe he's got a reseach assistant

[goldwing1]

worthy of a Sunday Times investigative journalist
Spot on Goldwing... John's got far too much time on his hands... maybe he's got a reseach assistant

I prefer fucking instead of writing

[marlboro20]

Sometimes a write-ups good... if it significantly adds to what's already been said (or not been said)

[goldwing1]

Sometimes a write-ups good... if it significantly adds to what's already been said (or not been said)

If I write a positive review and if some people don`t like it, well, it`s not my problem, it`s me that`s had a good time and I don`t have to justify it to anyone apart from myself.
Some people want you to go into great detail, like the colour of her eyes  and the coefficient of friction of her minge.

[marlboro20]

If I write a positive review and if some people don`t like it, well, it`s not my problem, it`s me that`s had a good time and I don`t have to justify it to anyone apart from myself.
Some people want you to go into great detail, like the colour of her eyes  and the coefficient of friction of her minge.

[/b]
Think I know who you might be referring to

[parker]

Depends what you are looking for really - it is that simple really

[bigboy]

Parlour for now just having the choice of the WGs i have seen a couple WGs on Adult Work but there is no back up just incase she is not what you expect unless you walk which be akward. Parlours you can judge your nect WG if there someone you fancy for the next time.