Standard Review Format What Do Punters Think

[vorian]

Having looked at many,  many reviews one thing does seems apparent. A massive variety of formats exist on this forum, some long, some short and lots of different types of information offered.

Now I'm no IT expert but would it be better to have some sort of standard format that we could all use. With Tick boxes for somethings but room to write ad verbatim comments as well. We don't want to make it so complicated that it put people of doing reviews but a more formal approach might help future punters make a more informed decision about a WG and the service she provides.

 

[smiths]

Having looked at many,  many reviews one thing does seems apparent. A massive variety of formats exist on this forum, some long, some short and lots of different types of information offered.

Now I'm no IT expert but would it be better to have some sort of standard format that we could all use. With Tick boxes for somethings but room to write ad verbatim comments as well. We don't want to make it so complicated that it put people of doing reviews but a more formal approach might help future punters make a more informed decision about a WG and the service she provides.

 

This is for Adam to decide, he recently changed the format so i assume he is happy with it, i certainly am, particularly to be able to post on them which isnt available on Pnet making them interactive.

[Bangers and Gash]

Every punter is different, as is every punt and prostitute. People on UKP should be allowed to express themselves how they wish (within reason). This aint pro$$ienet.

[AnthG]

Personally speaking I wouldn't mind a suggested format that people can use to follow by if they want to.

But after writing reviews on %%% and Adultwork I wouldn't want a forum enforced format as they are a pain to create and usually consist of clicking submit and "you have not filled out all criteria go back and do it again" and then you hunt for what's wrong and then you see whats causing it and you react, but I don't want to put something in that box. Or I have said all I can for it.

[Silver Birch]

Every punter is different, as is every punt and prostitute. People on UKP should be allowed to express themselves how they wish (within reason). This aint pro$$ienet.

I agree. We don't need to be filling in forms.

[The President]

Been discussed before and although I agree it should contain 'basic' min criteria flexibilty is liked by majority I think, depends on punt type I suppose

IMO the review should/could include not I have complied everytime
Link of WG and her name
Amount paid for how long
Booked Punt, arranged or short notice
Communication type and whether good/average or poor
Services undertaken and if clock watcher
Location/Incall/outcall and if RB bidder
Review
Return and score out of 10
Any poor services or refusal to listed or agreed likes

[vorian]

Been discussed before and although I agree it should contain 'basic' min criteria flexibilty is liked by majority I think, depends on punt type I suppose

IMO the review should/could include not I have complied everytime
Link of WG and her name
Amount paid for how long
Booked Punt, arranged or short notice
Communication type and whether good/average or poor
Services undertaken and if clock watcher
Location/Incall/outcall and if RB bidder
Review
Return and score out of 10
Any poor services or refusal to listed or agreed likes

That seems like a very reasonable idea, so set format would be dislikedl but rough guidelines about the sort of content that would be helpful for other punters in a review.

[Silver Birch]

I rarely do a field report on AW because I cannot be arsed to fill out comments in each box.... err, what's the next question.... ummm, what shall I write etc etc.

I probably wouldn't be arsed to do it here either.

Let the punters write what they want, and let others question it, either on the thread or PM, if they want more info.

Doesn't need changing IMO.

[potato]

Tick boxes are  too black and white unless you are going to have a comments section against every item in which case you might as well write a review.  A sticky with a check-list would be useful so everyone could ensure that they cover all the pertinent points. Not sure about disclosing the rate from a RB though - that's a personal arrangement between the client and pro$$ie at that time. It is useful to know whether the booking was the result from an RB as she may respond to others on here and we will know that the bid can be taken seriously.

I am really only interested in whether the girl was on time, didn't clock watch, her age and stats looked right, she looked liked her pics, was friendly, spoke english (even the english ones!) and of course was friendly.  The rest is subjective and may vary depending on the client - including the enjoys list to a certain extent.

[James999]

Pointless idea, there was enough debate about the tick box of positive / negative let alone adding more boxes, if you want your own form or format then develop and use one, freedom is far better, otherwise you will get twats ticking th eform and then adding "what does on beteween me and a lady stays between us" and all that bollocks 

[smiths]

Pointless idea, there was enough debate about the tick box of positive / negative let alone adding more boxes, if you want your own form or format then develop and use one, freedom is far better, otherwise you will get twats ticking th eform and then adding "what does on beteween me and a lady stays between us" and all that bollocks 

Spot on, the present set-up is perfecty adequate in my view.

[NIK]

Spot on, the present set-up is perfecty adequate in my view.

Totally agree.

[vorian]

Pointless idea, there was enough debate about the tick box of positive / negative let alone adding more boxes, if you want your own form or format then develop and use one, freedom is far better, otherwise you will get twats ticking th eform and then adding "what does on beteween me and a lady stays between us" and all that bollocks 

Excellent point James. Also I for one would be more than happy to furnish other punters with more detail if they posted a question on a review.

[Stiltskin]

I'd like to see a standard format for reports. Nothing too onerous, just a standard title and a report template with a few section headings (rather than a form).

We're pretty much there already with the report titles, <girls name> of/at <Location/Establishment> being the most used format. For me the report template would need just 3 section headings - Location, Looks and Service.

[Daffodil]

There are pros and cons to both solutions.

I like the freestyle method we currently have, as allows some originality, but I think we would all agree a link prompt would be a good idea.

Change isn't always a bad thing, even if the current system is ok.

[dandaley]

There are pros and cons to both solutions.

I like the freestyle method we currently have, as allows some originality, but I think we would all agree a link prompt would be a good idea.

Change isn't always a bad thing, even if the current system is ok.

i agree as its easy to miss out the basic things we as punters would like to know so I am for it 

[rpg]

I always like to know the level of English a foreign girl has.

[Jimmyredcab]

I always like to know the level of English a foreign girl has.

I agree but some punters don't seem to care as long as the price is low, I have enough problems in Thailand with the language.   

[rpg]

I agree but some punters don't seem to care as long as the price is low, I have enough problems in Thailand with the language.   

It's something that is very seldom mentioned in positive reviews. The girl could be the best fuck in town but I need to know they have a good grasp of English.

[Jimmyredcab]

It's something that is very seldom mentioned in positive reviews. The girl could be the best fuck in town but I need to know they have a good grasp of English.

I have seen positive reviews where the girl refused to kiss, some punters are very easily pleased.

[rpg]

Indeed

[vorian]

If a WG's is honest on her profile and states she does not kiss. Then it is up to the punter to decide if they want to book or not a personal informed choice. As long as all the services she offered were enthusiastically performed then if the punter was happy I can understand why he would give her a good review.

It would put me off if a WG states she does not kiss on her profile but plenty more out there for me to choose from.

However if she states she will kiss then refuses that is unacceptable, dishonest and should be a reason for a bad review irrespective of how good she looks or how nice she was. By false advertising she is providing poor customer service as should be reviewed as such.

[Jimmyredcab]

If a WG's is honest on her profile and states she does not kiss. Then it is up to the punter to decide if they want to book or not a personal informed choice. As long as all the services she offered were enthusiastically performed then if the punter was happy I can understand why he would give her a good review.

It would put me off if a WG states she does not kiss on her profile but plenty more out there for me to choose from.

You make punting sound very simple.
I have some bad news for you, prostitutes tell lies, some will claim to offer all services and provide very little. 

[vorian]

Of course Jimmy you are right WG's do lie and the majority of them give a poor service and poor value for money. If they claim to do something and then they do not come through, they are providing a poor service and should be reviewed and outed accordingly. Although that does not help the punter, who has been fucked over at the time. The next punter may not book because of the review and in reality that next punter could be anyone of us.

I don't think punting is simple it's a minefield and no matter how many reviews you read or how much homework/research you do there will be times when one is caught out. That does not mean we should not try and mitigate the risk as best we can by using the tools we have available to us.

However if a WG is honest and said no I do not kiss and a punter still books on that basis, then if he gives a good review I do not believe that punter should be castigated because the majority think kissing is a basic service that should be provided. If a WG only does HR and a punter knows this beforehand and reviews it as the best HR he has ever had then it should still be a good review. After all the next punter may be only looking for HR.

The type of services on offer should not be judged merely if the service was offered and to what level of quality it was provided to.
 

[Bangers and Gash]

I have seen positive reviews where the girl refused to kiss, some punters are very easily pleased.

Or the positive feedback given for cancellations. Apparently the comms were superb.   

[vorian]

I would say the fluffy idiots got what they deserve but they make it harder for all punters as they empower the WG's who provide poor service.

[James999]

Dorian, no offence and all that shit,  but you don't half come across as a fluffy in some of your posts   

[vorian]

No offence taken at all James, I value your opinion in an open forum. I would be interested to seek your thoughts as to why you believe I am fluffy and would be delighted to respond to any points you wish to raise.

[rpg]

Hey Dorian, at the risk of sounding fluffy and all that I think you're one of the most sensible new members in a while.

[Urban_G]

I'm not so sure about a checklist, but as previously suggested, certain criteria should be added as standard and a 'neutral' option in the present system wouldn't be a bad thing imo.

[rockharders]

Every punter is different, as is every punt and prostitute. People on UKP should be allowed to express themselves how they wish (within reason). This aint pro$$ienet.

I second that. I don't want reviewing to end up like some kind of bureaucratic box ticking exercise. I probably wouldn't bother if it was like filling out a tax return.

[myothernameis]

In field reports I like to know what exactly went on, as there is a good chance I may book the escort

So when I see, what happened between me and the escort, wont be entered int, it puts me of

But if I read,....As I got in the door, she was straight on me, we entered the bedroom, she pushed me onto the bed, and unbuckled my trousers, and began to suck me of, this is the kind of review I like

[Biggripper]

I've not left many reviews , actually I think only 1-2 but regularly check before booking anything and love the 'free format'. No prompts etc, just how we feel it went and I think a true reflection. No word limit etc
Total freedom to write what you like how you like... Open and to the point! I hope we are here for similar reasons ... To have safer more reliable punts so why restrict freedom of so each with tick boxes and formats etc... Just my 2ps

[jimbobwood]

I think the review section is fine. I have my own template, which is easy to adjust. I don't think we need a neutral option. Just write neutral in capitals in the subject title. Concerning neutral reviews: If the prossie offers the services but you didn't fancy her or you didn't click do a positive. If she offers services, but she cut your time short, fucked about on her phone, wasn't totally clean and so on, do a negative.

[iPad3]

My veiw is to keep things easy so we can mould our own to a certain extent however a few standard details at the top would work well IMO as it would allow a quick scan to indicate if the girl is worth bothering with without he need to spend 10 minutes reading the details of a long review if she's not going to for the bill.

I do agree though that finding this balance for all is a tricky one!

[iPad3]

Oops last line should be fit the bill (damn iphone auto compete!!)

[Dipper]

Yes I know zero as yet but i do think some kind of general template would be great.

This is what's held me back so far, being unsure of the layout.

[Jas1975]

I, and others, have asked questions when Reviews have left out certain information.  I think the current system seems to work quite well overall.

[daviemac]

Yes I know zero as yet but i do think some kind of general template would be great.

This is what's held me back so far, being unsure of the layout.

The site has worked perfectly well in the 3 1/2 years since the last post on this thread.

Try reading -

 External Link/Members Only

Tells you all you need to know. 

[Steely Dan]

Tells you all you need to know. 

In particular note point 3.6.  There are templates there if you want them.

Personally I don't use a template but I use the words Looks Location Logistics and Experience to make sure I have included enough.

[Dipper]

Thanks all.

Well I've popped my cherry now.