Gorgeous Kacey - Elite, Newcastle

[ajcam8]

Date of meeting: Friday 20th July 2018
Type of meeting: 1 hour incall (extended to 2 hours)
Location: Easy to find (after a small misunderstanding), clean and tidy, great long mirror!
Time of meeting: 11pm
Agency: Elite Escorts Newcastle
URL: External Link/Members Only

This is my first review on this forum and it’s a well deserved one.  This lass is simply heavenly.  Stunningly beautiful, smashing chat, sexy as hell and a naughty little minx all at the same time.

Kacey looked smashing on her photos and I asked the agency to confirm if they were in fact genuine and they said they were. On reflection, I think they said, “she looks the same” which I suppose isn’t technically lying but it turns out that the photos on the site are not in fact Kacey (or at the time of writing they aren’t) but that really didn’t matter - this lovely creature is way better looking than the photos on the site!!

Standing a petite 4ft 11” with tied up brunette hair she looked great in a simple pencil skirt, blouse and leather jacket. She had a striking pair of aqua heels on (which stayed on all night) too.  She is busty with enhanced boobs I’d hazard a guess at 32DD but let me tell you, these are the best fake boobs I have seen. They look great and feel almost real - plus no problems letting you play with them. She has a cracking, pert, shapely bum that is a delight to watch and her legs are perfectly toned and shaped.  Honestly, one of the prettiest packages I’ve come across. Kacey has lovely light brown eyes that twinkle with kindness and also hold a naughty edge. One of her features I enjoyed most though was the cutest set of dimples when she smiles.

I really enjoyed the fact that, like a lot of other escorts, she didn’t just sit me down and lay out the rules or remind me I was there for that specific reason or list services offered and not. It felt much more natural than that and more like taking a cute girl home for the first time. It was seriously hot to watch her undress and the anticipation built beautifully. I never once felt rushed and we spent nearly an hour together just exploring each other and building the chemistry even more. She commented on enjoying giving oral and it was indeed a pleasure to receive. Those eyes and dimples at work again. We actually moved the long mirror in the room so that I could enjoy the view of her cute little butt wagging away. We moved onto the main event and it did not disappoint. Kacey felt incredible. Her skin was smooth and toned. She does have a few scars on her body. The most noticeable being a scar on her chest, kinda between her breasts, from an old operation but whilst this was noticeable it didn’t make her the slightest bit less attractive to me.  She has a few tattoos but they are small and discreet. I noticed one in particular because it’s an important name to her but it also happens to be my first two names - quite an incredible coincidence.

I was incredibly sad when time came to part.  I genuinely wanted to stay longer - even just to chat as I was having such a great time getting to know her.  Plus did I mention she is super hot and looks great naked. This girl has everything you need to fall in love with her - looks, personality, professionalism, sex appeal, honesty and ability.  I have to admit, I’m fairly smitten. I tried to book Kacey again a couple of nights later but she was sadly not available. Totally gutted!

I needed to write this review because Kacey 100% deserves to be very busy and successful but at the same time I hope no one sees it because then I can keep this absolute gem all to myself.  If by chance Kacey you get to read this then please know you have a huge fan here, thank you and I hope to see you again soon.  Feel free to message me on here to keep in touch. Now I have found you I don’t want to lose you! Lol!

Take care x AJ x


Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

[johnny34]

Only thing missing is 'treat her well', review reads like touting & agency still using fake pics.

[Kev3773]

He/she revived an old thread to 'balance' a negative review. Must think we were born yesterday   

[daviemac]

Nothing dodgy about this at all is there ??? Do they really think we're that stupid.   

I would rather give up punting than use this shower, dodgiest agency in the north in my opinion, fake photos. fake everything.     

[Andy_707]

lovely light brown eyes that twinkle with kindness 

[ajcam8]

Genuine post everyone.

I’m a fairly new punter and granted, the agency were fairly useless and the fake photos thing pisses me off a lot, but Kacey was a delight and totally saved them on this occasion. Just my opinion of course. I’d still highly recommend Kacey, despite the agency, and will book her again without hesitation when in the area next. Make fun of the review and my language if you want - seems like a petty thing to do.

For me, genuinely good experience with a stunning girl. 

[waynekerr600]

Dodgy as fuck.

Is this the chest sitter agency?

[daviemac]

Genuine post everyone.

I’m a fairly new punter and granted, the agency were fairly useless and the fake photos thing pisses me off a lot, but Kacey was a delight and totally saved them on this occasion. Just my opinion of course. I’d still highly recommend Kacey, despite the agency, and will book her again without hesitation when in the area next. Make fun of the review and my language if you want - seems like a petty thing to do.

For me, genuinely good experience with a stunning girl. 

What a load of absolute bollocks, dodgy review for a dodgy agency, keep up the good work though, bumping negatives back to the top and showing just how dodgy this lot are.

Dodgy as fuck.

Is this the chest sitter agency?

Personally I actively avoid any agency with 'Elite' in their name just in case. With the reputation associated with that name, if I owned it, I'd be changing it pronto.

[ajcam8]

“Dodgy”?

How is this review dodgy?  Simply a guy like you giving his opinion.  Is it because you suspect I’m working on behalf of the agency?  If so then that’s just not true.

Take your point about ‘Elite’ name though. Nothing Elite about this agency at present. Kacey was the only classy part about it all.

Review is about the lady not the agency, which is absolutely dodgy.

[Kev3773]

“Dodgy”?

How is this review dodgy?  Simply a guy like you giving his opinion.  Is it because you suspect I’m working on behalf of the agency?  If so then that’s just not true.

Take your point about ‘Elite’ name though. Nothing Elite about this agency at present. Kacey was the only classy part about it all.

Review is about the lady not the agency, which is absolutely dodgy.

It's "dodgy" because you registered yesterday to try and discredit a legitimate review then put a gushingly embarrassing review up to 'verify' your actions. Seen it so many times before. You will drift off into Neverland and the Agency and all those involved with it will still have a rubbish name.
Hope that helps. 

[ajcam8]

Really? 

When I registered is irrelevant. My opinion is no less valid. As I said, it’s my first review and I only came across this site and other review just now.

My review was ‘gushing’. I had a great time and it was a positive review. I’m not embarrassed. 

It maybe the case that nothing changes as a result but that was never the intention. I’ll happily drift away to Neverland and stay young forever!

 

[Kev3773]

Really? 

When I registered is irrelevant. My opinion is no less valid. As I said, it’s my first review and I only came across this site and other review just now.

My review was ‘gushing’. I had a great time and it was a positive review. I’m not embarrassed. 

It maybe the case that nothing changes as a result but that was never the intention. I’ll happily drift away to Neverland and stay young forever!

Really 

[datwabbit]

Regardless of which agency it is, the style of this review is like one of those awful aw field reports. Actually puts me off. If I saw twinkling eyes, I'd think she was stoned. The responses to the review show any increased business from here is reduced by an overly fluffy review.

[Kev3773]

I find it incredible that he/she even posted the fake pictures in the "review" 

[datwabbit]

I find it incredible that he/she even posted the fake pictures in the "review" 

Just picked up on that.

So I should book with the agency and ask for the bird not in the pictures? 

[thekidah01]

Really? 

When I registered is irrelevant. My opinion is no less valid. As I said, it’s my first review and I only came across this site and other review just now.

My review was ‘gushing’. I had a great time and it was a positive review. I’m not embarrassed. 

It maybe the case that nothing changes as a result but that was never the intention. I’ll happily drift away to Neverland and stay young forever!

If your new to punting and only just became a member here how do you know about elite being dodgy as fuck? 
What a load of garbage your review is imho. I see a ban coming your way for being a white knight numpty. Time will tell.

[Mixedracegeordie]

I posted on another thread that i had seen Jemma and got ripped to pieces 

I just dont know why elite wont use actual photos for all girls. In my case i punted first then read the negative stuff about the afency itself, but in my case experience was good from start to finish.

I would have been tempted to see kacey goven her age and stats which sound right from this and AnthG's review. However i've read AnthG's rwviews in the past and generally aligned with what i've found. So if he says she's rubbish then chances are she probably is. Saved me money this time by the sounds of it 

[ajcam8]

Okay well, everyone can think what they want. Only giving my opinion as a normal gent and if you don’t like it then that’s fine.

My review is mine to leave and if I want to make it overly fluffy and compliment a very lovely and professional escort then I am entitled to do so. Believe me if I have a bad experience then I will happily leave a scathing review!! Furthermore, if you all think it’s too fluffy or gushy then fair enough you can certainly exercise your right to challenge me. Fact is, I thought the agency was reliable, found out they aren’t and are using fake images but luckily the lady I booked was stunning and I really enjoyed my time with her. If anything else, this review is meant for her.

I’ll admit that I was annoyed by the other review because I didn’t feel it was fair and wanted to ‘balance’ the negativity by simply saying that perhaps things were not as bad as were being made out, in my opinion. The intent was that I wanted to let anyone considering booking Kacey know that they should not necessarily be put off by that one negative review. Was I being a ‘white knight’...perhaps, I do like to try and see the good in people so when I feel they are unfairly treated and I am in a position to help then I should. It’s a difference of opinion ultimately and that’s cool. I’d happily do it again for this particular lady as I thought she was exceptional.  Don’t feel I should be banned for airing my thoughts on a subjective forum.

Regarding the images, I did post the images on this review that are currently in use on the Elite website. I thought this was the done thing as have seen the same in a few other reviews. I personally hate it when fake photos are used and had I any real photos then I’d have loved to use those instead. Obviously this isn’t Kacey’s fault but rather the agency. In my experience it seems that very few agencies use actual photos of their ladies anyway.

I’ll happily continue booking Kacey and despite the comments otherwise, this review will always be positive from my perspective. 

[waynekerr600]

In my experience it seems that very few agencies use actual photos of their ladies anyway.

I'd be most interested to hear more.

[Aji81]

There is no way this is a genuine review. It’s absolutely risible. Just look at the language being used; it’s either an infatuated fanboy/white knight with literary delusions or (more likely) a woman touting for herself/her agency. Either way it should be stricken from the record.

There was a more concise positive review left on the agency website as well, I’m sure by the OP as well...whoever he or she maybe.

‘Jul 25, 2018 by Alex James on Kacey

Simply Perfect!
I’ve seen a few ladies in my time but I spent two hours with Kacey last night and had to leave her a review. Don’t worry guys and girls this lady looks nothing like the photos...she’s much much more beautiful!! A body that begs to be pulled in close, the deepest dimples and ‘get lost in me’ eyes!! Chatting was lovely and enjoyed getting to know Kacey a bit. We share a name in common which was a funny coincidence and I was sad to leave at the end of our time. Would definitely like to see her again. A petite, busty, energetic package with everything a guy needs to fall in love! Sexy as hell and treated me to a night I’ll remember for a long time. Hope to she Kacey again sometime soon.’

[Kev3773]

Okay well, everyone can think what they want. Only giving my opinion as a normal gent and if you don’t like it then that’s fine.

My review is mine to leave and if I want to make it overly fluffy and compliment a very lovely and professional escort then I am entitled to do so. Believe me if I have a bad experience then I will happily leave a scathing review!! Furthermore, if you all think it’s too fluffy or gushy then fair enough you can certainly exercise your right to challenge me. Fact is, I thought the agency was reliable, found out they aren’t and are using fake images but luckily the lady I booked was stunning and I really enjoyed my time with her. If anything else, this review is meant for her.

I’ll admit that I was annoyed by the other review because I didn’t feel it was fair and wanted to ‘balance’ the negativity by simply saying that perhaps things were not as bad as were being made out, in my opinion. The intent was that I wanted to let anyone considering booking Kacey know that they should not necessarily be put off by that one negative review. Was I being a ‘white knight’...perhaps, I do like to try and see the good in people so when I feel they are unfairly treated and I am in a position to help then I should. It’s a difference of opinion ultimately and that’s cool. I’d happily do it again for this particular lady as I thought she was exceptional.  Don’t feel I should be banned for airing my thoughts on a subjective forum.

Regarding the images, I did post the images on this review that are currently in use on the Elite website. I thought this was the done thing as have seen the same in a few other reviews. I personally hate it when fake photos are used and had I any real photos then I’d have loved to use those instead. Obviously this isn’t Kacey’s fault but rather the agency. In my experience it seems that very few agencies use actual photos of their ladies anyway.

I’ll happily continue booking Kacey and despite the comments otherwise, this review will always be positive from my perspective. 

Could you please clarify how you come to this conclusion ?
Imo the main agencies in this area have had the majority of there girls reviewed on here with very few mentioning that bait & switch has happened. That appears to mainly happen with 'Elite' agencies or other new ones that pop up and leave just as quick.Look forward to your revelations.

[ajcam8]

There is no way this is a genuine review. It’s absolutely risible. Just look at the language being used; it’s either an infatuated fanboy/white knight with literary delusions or (more likely) a woman touting for herself/her agency. Either way it should be stricken from the record.

There was a more concise positive review left on the agency website as well, I’m sure by the OP as well...whoever he or she maybe.

‘Jul 25, 2018 by Alex James on Kacey

Simply Perfect!
I’ve seen a few ladies in my time but I spent two hours with Kacey last night and had to leave her a review. Don’t worry guys and girls this lady looks nothing like the photos...she’s much much more beautiful!! A body that begs to be pulled in close, the deepest dimples and ‘get lost in me’ eyes!! Chatting was lovely and enjoyed getting to know Kacey a bit. We share a name in common which was a funny coincidence and I was sad to leave at the end of our time. Would definitely like to see her again. A petite, busty, energetic package with everything a guy needs to fall in love! Sexy as hell and treated me to a night I’ll remember for a long time. Hope to she Kacey again sometime soon.’

If everyone would please read the thread where I have clearly stated that I am not the agency rep or the lady concerned that would be great and save me from having to repeat myself. Genuine client, genuine review! End of story.

Firstly, yup that’s my review on the website. As I say, quite happy to stand by my comments and recommendation.

Secondly, why should my review be stricken from the record? Regardless of how it’s written or the language used it makes it no less valid than a scathing, negative review. The fact is I had a great experience and happy to say that. If you feel it’s overly gushy and are suspicious of it then you can look for other reviews to balance out mine. Just like any review platform.

Am I an infatuated fanboy? Most definitely. I’ve made that clear in my review. Stunning lass. Great evening. Would love to see her again. Once more - I’m not Kacey herself or a rep of the agency. Please let’s move past that notion.

Do I have literary delusions? Not really but I like to try and use language that is a little more tasteful when describing events of such an evening. I’m not publishing any books any time soon so you’re safe. Also, it’s my first review so thanks for the kind welcome and the constructive critique guys, I’ll be looking forward to leaving my next one!

[ajcam8]

Experience of ‘bait and switch’ that I have come across have been evident with different agencies, independents and directorys all over the country. I’ve met with a small number of escorts relative to you guys I am sure but in Nottingham, Birmingham, London, East Anglia and here in the North East, I have booked a lady only to find out that they are not even close to the person I was expecting. That’s not even just heavy photoshopping but a totally different person. It’s not on and certainly in this case Elite were guilty of that. Luckily, Kacey turned out to be one of the sexiest, charming girls I’ve spent time with. Hence I thought it warranted a good show of support.

[datwabbit]

This is a most bizzare review.

It's fluffy but it describes the escort he saw and his experience.

However it also mentions b&s - something that usually warrants a negative but because he enjoyed it, it gets a positive.

Total head spinner.

  

[daviemac]

Experience of ‘bait and switch’ that I have come across have been evident with different agencies, independents and directorys all over the country. I’ve met with a small number of escorts relative to you guys I am sure but in Nottingham, Birmingham, London, East Anglia and here in the North East, I have booked a lady only to find out that they are not even close to the person I was expecting. That’s not even just heavy photoshopping but a totally different person. It’s not on and certainly in this case Elite were guilty of that. Luckily, Kacey turned out to be one of the sexiest, charming girls I’ve spent time with. Hence I thought it warranted a good show of support.

This is the North East board and we're discussing North East agencies, what happens in other areas is irrelevant to this thread. Can you name the N E agencies that have, in your experience, used fake or misleading photos.

I use agencies regularly and in my experience the photos are accurate and reading reviews inaccurate pictures are not a thing that's mentioned. The exception to this is the dodgy 'elite' or fly-by-night type that crop up every now and then.

[waynekerr600]

Experience of ‘bait and switch’ that I have come across have been evident with different agencies, independents and directorys all over the country. I’ve met with a small number of escorts relative to you guys I am sure but in Nottingham, Birmingham, London, East Anglia and here in the North East, I have booked a lady only to find out that they are not even close to the person I was expecting. That’s not even just heavy photoshopping but a totally different person. It’s not on and certainly in this case Elite were guilty of that. Luckily, Kacey turned out to be one of the sexiest, charming girls I’ve spent time with. Hence I thought it warranted a good show of support.

A bit vague.

Smoke and mirrors with a bit of muddy water just for luck.

You aren't improving on your new found reputation as a complete bullshitter.

Don't hold back do tell us the girls and agencies by name in the North East that are doing this.

Who knows if you are running an agency yourself this is a golden opportunity to have a dig at the opposition.

If you are a WG yourself you can similarly have a dig at the competition.

[toon972]

Never read so much rubbish in my life. Strange you have written the exact opposite of the negative review.

[Aji81]

Why should it be stricken from the record? I’ll admit, I’m not familiar with the technical rules around admissibility of reports but my understanding is that this is a punter-focused forum where reports should be as objective, impartial and factual as possible to allow other punters to make an informed decision on whether or not they want to see a particular lady.

As you’ve confessed to being an ‘infatuated fanboy’ I just can’t trust that this report is objective or factual in any way. Despite its length, descriptions of services are minimal contrasted with how often Kacey’s  ‘cute little butt’ or ‘cutest set of dimples’ is mentioned. If this was a used car dealership and you were trying to flog me a car I would have to leave because you were just coming on too strong.

‘Simply heavenly.  Stunningly beautiful, smashing chat,’

What? You mean in addition to the amazing eyes and dimples, she’s also a great conversationalist?Wow, what a find!

‘This girl has everything you need to fall in love with her. I needed to write this review because Kacey 100% deserves to be very busy and successful but at the same time I hope no one sees it because then I can keep this absolute gem all to myself.’

She’s so amazing and you’re so infatuated  and want to keep her to yourself so much that you:

1) Leave a fluffy review on the agency website
2) Join this forum and immediately post on a year old negative review of the same lady by an established reviewer disputing his appraisal of the lady
3) Post a gushing review of the same lady
4) Rebut at every opportunity any doubts expressed by other members over the veracity of the report

‘Luckily, Kacey turned out to be one of the sexiest, charming girls I’ve spent time with. Hence I thought it warranted a good show of support.’

This, to me, is the crux of it. I don’t mind if reports are a little fluffy or over the top as long as they are written honestly and in good faith. What you state here is basically an admission of your agenda in wanting to counteract Kacey’s historic negative review with a positive which is why I just can’t accept your review is written in good faith or for the benefit of other punters.

In fact, the main beneficiary of a review like this would be Kacey who, how should I put it, oh yes-‘100% deserves to be very busy and successful’.

[daviemac]

Why should it be stricken from the record? I’ll admit, I’m not familiar with the technical rules around admissibility of reports but my understanding is that this is a punter-focused forum where reports should be as objective, impartial and factual as possible to allow other punters to make an informed decision on whether or not they want to see a particular lady.

It's not up to you to decide what should or shouldn't be deleted, only Admin makes that decision.

It's up to you to read any review and make a decision based on your opinion of that review, if you think it's fluffy bollocks then treat it as such and give it zero value, like most are doing with this one.

Are you not capable of making your own decisions on the validity of reviews.   

[Aji81]

Like I said, I’m not au fait with the rules so apologies if I was advocating something which is against forum rules. I just wanted to give my take on the report but as you say I think most people have made their mind up, me included.

[daviemac]

Like I said, I’m not au fait with the rules so apologies if I was advocating something which is against forum rules. I just wanted to give my take on the report but as you say I think most people have made their mind up, me included.

First thing I did when I joined was to read the rules, would've thought you would have had time to do the same by now.

BTW there's a link at the bottom of every page, where it says 'site rules'.     

Edit

Have you forgotten what you see when you post a review ?

- Include a profile or website link. If no link is available, please include contact details (e.g. phone number).
- Include town / city in the subject.
- Reviews cannot be deleted once posted.

[toon972]

Like I said, I’m not au fait with the rules so apologies if I was advocating something which is against forum rules. I just wanted to give my take on the report but as you say I think most people have made their mind up, me included.

You never read the rules but did not take you long to find the negative review

[ajcam8]

There’s certainly no rules about reviews having to be objective. The very nature of this industry is subjective - what I find to be attractive may not be someone else’s cup of tea.  I don’t think all elements of a booking can be judged objectively. Some can, were the agency quick at responding, was the location clean and tidy, was the lady on time, how accurate was their profile etc. When it comes down to enjoyment and attraction then it is all subjective.

Also, this was always a review of the lady not the agency.  Trust me I do not like the way this particular agency use fake photos (this was true in my experience twice - once where it worked out and once where it didn’t) and I have been clear of that throughout. Also, to answer an earlier point about North East punting and examples of bait and switch/ fake photos I have found sites like vivastreet where a lot of independents operate are almost always fake - I’ve booked and sent home at least three or four girls that way. I’ve also called a lot more and asked them if they are actually the girl in the photo only to have the phone put down on me. Of course, independents may be seen differently as opposed to an agency who you would hope were more trustworthy. Also, Elite (the agency in question here) have done it to me twice even after I asked them to confirm genuine photos.

If you find my review fluffy and over the top then please just disregard it. If I had believed what the other review said then I’d have not even entertained a booking but the fact is I’d have missed out on what was, to me, and in the end a great evening with a lovely lady. I am sure that my review may lead others to book and I hope they have a great time too.

I can 100% promise though that this is not a sponsored or bullshit review in that it’s fake or anyone else other than the actual punter involved commenting.  You may not agree or chose to ignore it completely but that’s totally fine. Like other businesses and services that I use in my life, if I can help them by leaving a good review when I have truly had a good time then I’m happy to do so. This helps other people looking to use that business or service becuase they can see all the reviews and make up their own mind.  Now Kacey has one very negative review and one very positive review.  More will follow and overall a true overview will form and it all helps us and the service provider in the end.

[daviemac]

Also, to answer an earlier point about North East punting and examples of bait and switch/ fake photos I have found sites like vivastreet where a lot of independents operate are almost always fake

Vivastreet is renowned for 'bait and switch' there's loads of threads on the subject on here.

Can you answer the question asked regarding your posts quoted below, which North East agencies, in your experience, use fake photos and practice 'bait and switch', apart from the one mentioned in this thread.      This is the type of information that's valuable to other punters.

In my experience it seems that very few agencies use actual photos of their ladies anyway.

Experience of ‘bait and switch’ that I have come across have been evident with different agencies

[Kev3773]

Vivastreet is renowned for 'bait and switch' there's loads of threads on the subject on here.

Can you answer the question asked regarding your posts quoted below, which North East agencies, in your experience, use fake photos and practice 'bait and switch', apart from the one mentioned in this thread.      This is the type of information that's valuable to other punters.

He won't answer DM  because he can't, he will be vague as usual. He is treating Viva Street as an agency,  then mentions Elite again that everyone already knows are full of b,&s

[waynekerr600]

So when you said most agencies in the north east use fake photos that was utter bollocks and you meant Vivastreet.

Edit: just beat me there Alfie

[Kev3773]

So when you said most agencies in the north east use fake photos that was utter bollocks and you meant Vivastreet.

Correct 

[waynekerr600]

Correct 

If he chooses to try to manipulate the truth in this way I really can't believe a word that he (or she) has written.

[daviemac]

He won't answer DM  because he can't, he will be vague as usual. He is treating Viva Street as an agency,  then mentions Elite again that everyone already knows are full of b,&s

He's mentioned NE agencies using fake photos twice, surely it can't be that hard to answer, like you say though he can't. It's only the newer dodgy agencies that do that and Elite is one of them.

There was a couple got caught out on UKE some having the same girl advertised in different areas, and I mean miles apart like NE and NW and it turned out she'd left the agency weeks before.

[waynekerr600]

He's really not done the girl any favours.

I wouldn't use elite anyway but she started off with a bad review from a trusted member. She now has a bad review from a trusted member and a suspect review from a suspect member. If she had been with a different agency I might have missed that she was the girl anthg reviewed with a name change but the OP has quite helpfully made the link.

He's either got bad EAS or is the girl or agency but I think the whole thing has backfired rather like the fan boy/pimp/employer review of dirtydionne a while ago.

[toon972]

There’s certainly no rules about reviews having to be objective. The very nature of this industry is subjective - what I find to be attractive may not be someone else’s cup of tea.  I don’t think all elements of a booking can be judged objectively. Some can, were the agency quick at responding, was the location clean and tidy, was the lady on time, how accurate was their profile etc. When it comes down to enjoyment and attraction then it is all subjective.

Also, this was always a review of the lady not the agency.  Trust me I do not like the way this particular agency use fake photos (this was true in my experience twice - once where it worked out and once where it didn’t) and I have been clear of that throughout. Also, to answer an earlier point about North East punting and examples of bait and switch/ fake photos I have found sites like vivastreet where a lot of independents operate are almost always fake - I’ve booked and sent home at least three or four girls that way. I’ve also called a lot more and asked them if they are actually the girl in the photo only to have the phone put down on me. Of course, independents may be seen differently as opposed to an agency who you would hope were more trustworthy. Also, Elite (the agency in question here) have done it to me twice even after I asked them to confirm genuine photos.

If you find my review fluffy and over the top then please just disregard it. If I had believed what the other review said then I’d have not even entertained a booking but the fact is I’d have missed out on what was, to me, and in the end a great evening with a lovely lady. I am sure that my review may lead others to book and I hope they have a great time too.

I can 100% promise though that this is not a sponsored or bullshit review in that it’s fake or anyone else other than the actual punter involved commenting.  You may not agree or chose to ignore it completely but that’s totally fine. Like other businesses and services that I use in my life, if I can help them by leaving a good review when I have truly had a good time then I’m happy to do so. This helps other people looking to use that business or service becuase they can see all the reviews and make up their own mind.  Now Kacey has one very negative review and one very positive review.  More will follow and overall a true overview will form and it all helps us and the service provider in the end.

A lot of rambling on here and this makes no sense.
" I am sure my review may lead others to book " 

[Kev3773]

He/she is online but doesn't attempt to defend against the accusations. The main reason imo is that there is no defence. # Rumbled 

[Kev3773]

A lot of rambling on here and this makes no sense.
" I am sure my review may lead others to book " 

I think quite the opposite will happen, her bookings will take a downward spiral 

[ajcam8]

To be fair, you’re all right. When I mention agencies using fake photos, that is based on my experience from all over the UK and yes, vivastreet, bumpix, uescort and similar. Appreciate that vivastreet and others are not an agencies and that really the only agency in the North East that I can comment on using fake photos is Elite (as they’re the only ones that I’ve used). I’ve only been to the NE once and booked a lady - for those that have read my other comments I’m not the most experienced punter.

I swear that I am not Kacey or a rep of the agency. Please believe me that I am genuine on this. Why the overly fluffy review? Well, despite a potentially poor start it turned out to be a fantastic evening. Kacey was incredible. Enjoyed the sex and the chat. I was motivated to leave a subjective review as I had read the other one and personally felt it was written in a really derogatory tone with no respect and wanted people to not be put off booking her because she’s really sexy and knows how to treat a man, in my opinion. Ignore it if you don’t believe it that’s fine.

I made a mistake commenting on the old review and I’m man enough to admit that.

Anyway, I won’t be commenting on this anymore. I’ve said my piece and you can all make up your own mind. The fact is, I met with Kacey, she’s a genuinely beautiful, sexy, charming, professional lady who deserves respect. I had a great time and hope to see her again. I’d highly recommend her to anyone, even if that means booking through Elite.

[Highlander]

I find it incredible that he/she even posted the fake pictures in the "review" 

Haha, I just read this and was going to post the same as you!

[johnny34]

To be fair, you’re all right. When I mention agencies using fake photos, that is based on my experience from all over the UK and yes, vivastreet, bumpix, uescort and similar. Appreciate that vivastreet and others are not an agencies and that really the only agency in the North East that I can comment on using fake photos is Elite (as they’re the only ones that I’ve used). I’ve only been to the NE once and booked a lady - for those that have read my other comments I’m not the most experienced punter.

On one hand you say "that is based on my experience from all over the uk" & on the other hand you say "I'm not the most experienced punter"    more bollocks 

[Kev3773]

To be fair, you’re all right. When I mention agencies using fake photos,
Appreciate that vivastreet are not an agencie and that really the only agency in the North East that I can comment on using fake photos is Elite (as they’re the only ones that I’ve used). I’ve only been to the NE once and booked a lady

I made a mistake commenting on the old review

 
The fact is you lied about north east agencieS faking photos 
I think this is enough for members to make an opinion of your credibility

[ajcam8]

On one hand you say "that is based on my experience from all over the uk" & on the other hand you say "I'm not the most experienced punter"    more bollocks 

Yes that’s right. I’ve used agencies in London, Nottingham, Birmingham and Newcastle. That’s a fair selection of the UK. I’ve probably only seen about a dozen escorts since the beginning of this year when I saw my first escort. I am fairly confident that isn’t many judging by all of the professsiknal punters on here.

Experience can be limited yet wide reaching.

[ajcam8]

 
The fact is you lied about north east agencieS faking photos 
I think this is enough for members to make an opinion of your credibility

I never lied! Not once.

I said many agencies do and that’s still true. As I explained before, I’ve come across agencies all over the UK who do this and I never specifically said these agencies where all in the North East. I just happen to post this statement in reply to a comment about fake images in the North East forum because that’s where the lady I was reviewing is based.  Seems stupid to put the review anywhere else and I didn’t realise that you had such pride in the agencies of the North East that you’d come rushing to their rescue like some sort of ‘White Knight’. Perhaps you represent one of the agencies? 

[daviemac]

I never lied! Not once.

I said many agencies do and that’s still true. As I explained before, I’ve come across agencies all over the UK who do this and I never specifically said these agencies where all in the North East. I just happen to post this statement in reply to a comment about fake images in the North East forum because that’s where the lady I was reviewing is based.  Seems stupid to put the review anywhere else and I didn’t realise that you had such pride in the agencies of the North East that you’d come rushing to their rescue like some sort of ‘White Knight’. Perhaps you represent one of the agencies? 

Nobody's white knighting anybody, you're getting called out for talking a load of shite and making things up as you go along. The subject of the shite you're talking is largely irrelevant. The issue is what you are saying, not who you are saying it about. You included North East agencies in your list that use fake photos and were asked to name them, a very reasonable request as nobody wants to use an agency that does that. 

You joined here to white knight a prossie you've seen, your first post, on an old negative review, was to state  "It sounded unfair based on what I experienced so thought I’d take a peak on here to try and find it. I think this is it". This was done under the instructions / on behalf of the prossie concerned.  Whatever you claim to have experienced with this prossie has no relevance to the fact that AnthG had a crap time and posted  fair and justified negative that you tried to discredit.