Author Topic: Warning re Sharlette of Derby  (Read 10700 times)


1 review(s) for jimdinger (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by ]

Offline munterhunter

I booked this girl by phone after seeing her proile on Adultwork, I e-mailed and she sent me a txt. I arranged a 2 hr appointment for £150 at 1.30 on  Friday afternoon. She confirmed to say she had organised "childcare" and gave me directions.

When I arrived we went into the bedroom and I paid the £150 and asked to use the bathroom, there was a 2 year old in a buggy asleep and she said the childcare had let her down. I wasn't happy with this but went ahead she said someone else was comming to take care of the baby.

Her "Boyfriend" turned up and got aggressive because I was there and looked like he was going to throw me out. I'd been there 20 minutes. I asked for a refund she offered me £30 because she charges £120 for an hour. I argued and ended up with £80 of my money back so at £70 for 20 minutes it was an expensive punt!

It wasn't until I said I'd leave the house but wait outside and complain to the police and social services about the baby being in the house whilst she sold sex on AW that she gave me my money back.

In addition she offered bareback for an extra £50 which I declined (I don't play russian roulette) and despite looking ok in her pics on AW has a mouthful of rotten teeth!

She has varied feedback some good wome warning of her doing a runner with client's money.

Her Profile is on AW at External Link/Members Only.

Make  your own mind up! I couldn't leave this feed back on AW because I didn't book through the site!

Fatpro$$ie

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
A quick glance at this post and I felt for you but after reading it properly I dont. As soon as you saw the young child you should have got a refund and walked. What would you have done if no one had come for the child. Happily shagged its mother whilst it was shut in the bathroom for two hours? As it was you continued for 20mins whilst the child was in there.
Yes you got ripped off but your lack of decency towards a vunerable child makes me feel you deserved it. 
What she did was despicable and she deserves reporting (to social services as well) but you were just as bad I am afraid

Offline Jimmyredcab

If this is true, and I have no reason to disbelieve it then this woman should be reported to social services immediately, she is not fit to be a mother.   :mad:

I notice the link does not work.   ??

Mancspunter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
External Link/Members Only

Her?

I have to agree with Fatprossie in a way, no fucking way I would have hung around with a kid there, its just not right at all.
Not right for you to be ripped off though either but you could have saved yourself instantly by walking away. Get her reported she is obviously not fit to be a mother as Jimmy says.

Online Strawberry

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 1,831
  • Likes: 124
  •  
C-Cup!!!Can't you see they aren't a C?More like AA.

Offline Cactus

The whole experience just sounds terrible and I tend to agree with the other posters that as soon as you saw the child there you should have demanded a refund and left.  When she said that someone was coming to look after the child you should have still left and told her that you would be willing to come back as soon as the childcare had arrived.  You were lucky to get any cash back after the boyfriend had turned up, you already said he was agressive when he saw you and she could have just screamed when you started to get pushy and you left with your teeth in your pocket and a face covered in hooker scratches. I'm not even going to mention the bareback, that's just so wrong in this day and age!

The fact she was willing to still see you with her kid in the house is just plain wrong on her part, childcare en-route or not! She should be ashamed, is £150 really that important?

I think you actually did well to get out of there with £80 in your pocket.  You live and learn I suppose!

SteveNova

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest

When I arrived we went into the bedroom and I paid the £150 and asked to use the bathroom, there was a 2 year old in a buggy asleep and she said the childcare had let her down.

I may not have read this correctly but it sounded like this mother let you go to the bathroom alone, knowing her child was in there.  What was she thinking of  :scare: 

Offline munterhunter

To clarify the position regarding Sharlette:

Yes she did allow me to use the bathroom but wheeled her child out whilst I used the bathroom and then left her in the hall outside. The child was asleep. She said she had been let down but had called a neighbour who was "on the way"

We went into the bedroom I handed over the money and she left me alone for a few minutes to undress. I did NOT undress when she returned I asked about the child and she said that her neighbour had collected her child! We then got undressed together.

I would have expected her to contact me and let me know about her child care problems, had I not asked to use the bathroom I guess she wouldn't have said anything?

I don't believe I deserved to be ripped off any more than I believe it's right for a client to rip off a working girl. I reported this incident as a warning to others (not because I expected sympathy or anything else). 

I think there was a deliberate intention to take advantage and think that many clients in this situation would have simply left to avoid a scene.

I'm not in a relationship and doing something behind a partner's back, I have nothing to hide and am not easily intimidated. Yes I suppose I could have ended up injured but I made it clear that I wasn't going to accept the situation and leave having paid £150 for a 20 minute visit!
Once they realised this I got my money back!

When I visit a working girl I try to be on time turn up clean or ask to shower and show some respect, I expect the same in return.

I know I wasn't a danger to Sharlette or her child but I accept that she didn't.  I did report the matter to derbyshire social services by phone and in writing a few days later. I've been punting for a long time and I'm happy to say that I've had far more positive experiences than negative. 

Offline Cactus

To clarify the position regarding Sharlette:

Yes she did allow me to use the bathroom but wheeled her child out whilst I used the bathroom and then left her in the hall outside. The child was asleep. She said she had been let down but had called a neighbour who was "on the way"

We went into the bedroom I handed over the money and she left me alone for a few minutes to undress. I did NOT undress when she returned I asked about the child and she said that her neighbour had collected her child! We then got undressed together.

I would have expected her to contact me and let me know about her child care problems, had I not asked to use the bathroom I guess she wouldn't have said anything?

I don't believe I deserved to be ripped off any more than I believe it's right for a client to rip off a working girl. I reported this incident as a warning to others (not because I expected sympathy or anything else). 

I think there was a deliberate intention to take advantage and think that many clients in this situation would have simply left to avoid a scene.

I'm not in a relationship and doing something behind a partner's back, I have nothing to hide and am not easily intimidated. Yes I suppose I could have ended up injured but I made it clear that I wasn't going to accept the situation and leave having paid £150 for a 20 minute visit!
Once they realised this I got my money back!

When I visit a working girl I try to be on time turn up clean or ask to shower and show some respect, I expect the same in return.

I know I wasn't a danger to Sharlette or her child but I accept that she didn't.  I did report the matter to derbyshire social services by phone and in writing a few days later. I've been punting for a long time and I'm happy to say that I've had far more positive experiences than negative.

Fair play to you mate, that post answers alot of the criticism that was aimed in your direction over the course of this thread, I was guilty of it too so for that I apologise.
It seems that she led you a merry dance in terms of the childcare situation and that you not getting naked when she told you was the right thing to do.  It seems that as soon as you found the child in the premisis the booking was effectively over in your eyes.  The only mistake I think you made was handing over any cash after you saw the kid, but I guess you have to take the WG at face value and believe her claim that the Neighbour was en route to take the child.  Things went downhill after that with the boyfriend turning up etc.

Reporting the matter to Social Service was also the right thing to do, as if you hadn't gone to the toilet you would never have known or worse found out when the kid wakes up screaming while you are at it with the mother.  She was clearly happy enough to carry out a booking with her kid there, lords knows if she had done it before! 

I had a girl who wanted me to go see her and I phoned when I was nearly there to get the address.  I could hear alot of noise in the background as we were on the phone and asked if everything was ok.  She said that it was her kids messing around with each other and I said that I wasn't keen on coming round to see her when the kids were there.  She said it was fine because her Mum was going to look after them, so I responded that she should phone me back once her Mum had picked the girls up and I would go round then......She then informed me that her Mum was already there and that they all lived together and that they would all be in the Living Room while we would be in her Bedroom.  I hung up!
« Last Edit: March 20, 2011, 01:01:52 am by Cactus »

Keen Punter

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
A quick glance at this post and I felt for you but after reading it properly I dont. As soon as you saw the young child you should have got a refund and walked. What would you have done if no one had come for the child. Happily shagged its mother whilst it was shut in the bathroom for two hours? As it was you continued for 20mins whilst the child was in there.
Yes you got ripped off but your lack of decency towards a vunerable child makes me feel you deserved it. 
What she did was despicable and she deserves reporting (to social services as well) but you were just as bad I am afraid
This is a typical PN view.

He was ripped off yet in some way it was his fault.

Hmmmm.......

Warwick

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
This is a typical PN view.

He was ripped off yet in some way it was his fault.

Hmmmm.......

I met Sharlette a couple of times in 2011 and I thought she was really good. No kids around, but there were obvious signs she had one. The house was a bit untidy, but nothing extraordinary. The fee was much lower than mentioned in this thread. On the second visit she offered bareback at no extra charge, saying she'd rather do bb than not and I didn't see her again.


Ravanelli

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
C-Cup!!!Can't you see they aren't a C?More like AA.

Vulnerable child at risk but hey, let's haggle over the cup size. There are times in life when I am disgusted by human nature. Not just the unfit mother but the punter who considers it acceptable to shag that mother while a kid is shut in the bathroom. Where's your common fucking decency!

Offline munterhunter

I WAS the punter who posted the original warning about this lady. I certainly didn't consider it acceptable to shag the mother whie her child was in the bathroom. Should I have walked away possibly but hindsight is a wonderful thing but then so is honesty. Would I have booked her if she had bb on her profile NO. Had I not asked to use the bathroom I would not have known about the child and I'm sure she wouldn't have told me. When I found out about the child I questioned her and she assured me a nieghbour was on her way over to care for the child. Before getting undressed I asked again about the child and she said the neighbour had picked her up. I had no reason to doubt her and went ahead with the booking. I made the repirt to warn others about the childcare situation about the bb and about the boyfriend. She's still on AW see External Link/Members Only she's now Sharletteb it's the same woman. She now advertises bb. There are no rates shown she has 0 feedback but there's something she doesn't want seen because she's got the contents hidden. I hope she's ditched the aggressive boyfriend, got her childcare issues sorted out and is offering services that punters can enjoy but from how she's advertising I have my doubts. I have NO doubt that on the day in question her and her boyfriends intention was to rip me off! On the question of childcare when I visit a WG which I don't do all that often I don't expect to find children on the premises and on this, the only occasion I ever have, I asked for confirmation from the lady that her neighbour had icked the little one up before continuing. Fro anyone wondering about my profile name I set Munterhunter99 up in 2011 to match my own aw profile. I spent 15 months working abroad came back and AW had deactivetated me so I set up a new profile Munterhunter and the corresponding profile on here to match.

Ravanelli

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I WAS the punter who posted the original warning about this lady. I certainly didn't consider it acceptable to shag the mother whie her child was in the bathroom. Should I have walked away possibly but hindsight is a wonderful thing but then so is honesty.

You didn't think it acceptable and yet your original post infers that you did or if not what were you doing for twenty minutes before the aggressive boyfriend turned up? To balance your own hindsight against this woman's honesty as an excuse for for fucking a prossie whilst there is a vulnerable child in the house displays a warped sense of morality and values. I couldn't give a fuck that it was her intention to rip you off or that you asked up front about child care because none of this mitigates for the fact that you did the deed in full knowledge of the fact that there was a child in the bathroom. Nice to hear that you almost recovered some sense of morality by threatening to call Social Services until you got your money back. As I said... where's your fucking common decency!

Offline EnglishRebecca121

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 3,924
  • Likes: 0
  •  
 where's your fucking common decency!

calm down you have used that phrase twice now

the guy wrote a negative review as a warning and did walk in the end :unknown:
Banned reason: Ex sex worker with zero useful contribution to make
Banned by: Head1

Ravanelli

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
where's your fucking common decency!

calm down you have used that phrase twice now

the guy wrote a negative review as a warning and did walk in the end :unknown:

I've used it twice for good reason. Have you missed the point? (Don't answer, it was a rhetorical question)... Vulnerable child left in the bathroom whilst dear old mum fucks punters and your acceptable solution to that is that, 'the guy wrote a negative review.' Briliant, I'll write to Social Services and tell them theres no need to bother investigating vulnerable kids belonging to prossies because you and Munterhunter have come up with a cunning plan to end child abuse in that particular area by getting punters to write negative reviews on UKP. Well done Rebecca for supporting such a worthy cause! :dash:

Offline Dani

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Service Provider
  • Posts: 2,603
  • Likes: 2
  •  
I've used it twice for good reason. Have you missed the point? (Don't answer, it was a rhetorical question)... Vulnerable child left in the bathroom whilst dear old mum fucks punters and your acceptable solution to that is that, 'the guy wrote a negative review.' Briliant, I'll write to Social Services and tell them theres no need to bother investigating vulnerable kids belonging to prossies because you and Munterhunter have come up with a cunning plan to end child abuse in that particular area by getting punters to write negative reviews on UKP. Well done Rebecca for supporting such a worthy cause! :dash:

I tried saying this before under my old username (everyone now knows it is me so no point trying to hide it) and I just got told this was more of a punternet type answer
Basically I blamed him for happily staying after he knew the child was there and not checking himself that the child had actually gone (considering he never mentioned hearing the neighbour collect the child just that the prossie said she had).
I would have walked the moment I saw the kid as she should not have let a punter in with the kid there and on seeing it the punter should have just walked and not sat around waiting and hoping someone did really pick the kid up.  Yes he did walk in the end but only because of the loud boyfriend turning up and not because of the vulnerable child stuck hidden in the bloody bathroom
Where it would have probably stayed for the whole TWO hour booking as I doubt a neighbour managed to get in and out without being heard. Plus anyone who had a babysitter would have ensured the child was gone before allowing the client in the property.

Ravanelli, You are wasting your breath on this one.  I am just grateful that I am not the only one who was horrified by this as I was beginning to feel maybe I had over reacted but the more I think about it the more I know I didnt as if I had walked in on that I would have walked and called social services immediately to ensure the child was safe, sod the money and sod the punt the childs welfare would have worried me more than losing cash or not getting laid
« Last Edit: April 23, 2013, 04:27:55 pm by Dani »

Ravanelli

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I am just grateful that I am not the only one who was horrified by this as I was beginning to feel maybe I had over reacted but the more I think about it the more I know I didnt as if I had walked in on that I would have walked and called social services immediately to ensure the child was safe, sod the money and sod the punt the childs welfare would have worried me more than losing cash or not getting laid

Cassie, you certainly didn't over react, you had a perfectly normal response and what shocks me even more is that even now individuals are talking about circumstances relating to the punt and the guys review, like any of that matters or contextualises the issue. Did he really walk or was he thrown out. IMHO he didn't walk, he was twenty minutes into his punt and had it cut short by the boyfriend. I had cause a while ago to report a particular wrongdoing to the Police, I won't go into detail but the decision meant I also had to tell the police that I payed for sex. I wasn't particularly embarrassed and even if I had been I like to think that the issue transcended my own personal discomfort and I did the right thing. It's worth every punter sparing a thought to the fact that occasionally when punting you see things that you ought not to. Easier for me to make the decision because I'm not married but for those who are married or attached then there are ways of doing these things anonymously.  :hi:

Offline munterhunter

I note your comments. Everyone is entitled to their opinion but lets look at the facts. My original report is fairly clear I didn't make any inferences. I reported an attempt to rip me off to warn other punters. I made a booking in good faith. I discovered the child by accident when I asked to use the bathroom. I questioned the lady and had no reason to doubt her when she said her neighbour was on the way. She left me in the bedroom told me to undresa and I didn't till she returned and confirmedthe baby had been collected. I then went ahead with the bookingand spent the 20 minutes before the boyfriend arrived having sex with the WG. I doubt the baby would have slept through what the boyfriend did which included kicking the bathroom door almost off its hinges and punching a couple of holes in stud walls. I threatened them with police and social services which got him to calm down and me half my money back. I perhaps could have handled it differently but I reacted to a situation that was starting to get out of hand and did report them to social services. I have no problem with you questioning my actions or my common decency any more thsn I have with defending them. That's your opinion but lets notlose sight of the fact that this couple set up a situation to put me in a situation where I would just walk and forget the money. You might want to think about directing some questions about decency at them as well as me.

Offline munterhunter

In answer to Ravanelli did I walk or was I asked to leave IN FACT  not IMHO  because I was there and you were not it was 6 of one and half a dozen of the other. I'm hardly likely to say to the boyfriend sorry mate I've paid for 2 hrs I'm staying for 2 hrs. Any more than I am going to have sex with the mother while the baby was in the house which is the conclusion you seem to have reached despite the fact that the post makes no such inference. It's the only really bad experience I've had in 30 years of punting and worthy I think of warning others about. You say you've reported matters to the police like you I am unmarried and did report the matter to social services. I also admitted paying for sex I didn't call the police because I got some money back. Elsewhere you've written negative reviews where girls have given poor service. I wrote this one because it felt like a set up the boyfriend was aggressive and it was a rip off attempt. IMHO girls sometimes have off days or perhaps our expectations may be unrealistic in which case I'd chose not to see her again. Where there's a rip off involved where punters are likely to lose out I decided to rsise a warning on here. If that brings me some flak I'll live with it. My feedback on AW was there to view I've seen a number of ladies without a problem and see a couple of ladies I've known for years. It's clear we handle situations differently  isn't that the diversity of the human psyche? I've nothing to hide here I posted to warn people about my experience. I re posted after you ang also to point out that Sharlette is back on AW hiding her feedback and not advertising her rates. When I first posted I got a bit of flack the opinion changed but I'll repest here what I said before. I didn't post the warning looking for sympathy I did it to warn people. I have tried to clarify some misunderstandings. I haven't lied or misled if people want to criticise what I did 2 years ago thats ok. Thw kady in question is still on AW with a profile that gives cause for concern whether you accept the veracity of my posts or not!

Ravanelli

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
lets notlose sight of the fact that this couple set up a situation to put me in a situation where I would just walk and forget the money. You might want to think about directing some questions about decency at them as well as me.

I really find your whole approach to this and your logic quite bizarre. No one is accusing you of being the bad guy and you were obviously in a difficult situation but you don't seem able to contextualise what you see as your issues with the substantially more serious issue regarding the child at risk. You saw the child in the bathroom and were prepared to go ahead with the punt anyway, do I really need to explain how wrong this is? You say you were assured that the carer had picked up the child but this sounds like complete bollocks to me because  I'm sure you would have heard something beyond the mother telling you this had happened. Irrespective of what you say you were told, it was obvious you had made your decision to stay with this skank. Cassie is spot on, the money and the sex all become immaterial and you should have hotfooted it out of there as soon as you saw the child and either called Social Services or written them an anonymous letter. The theme running throughout your posts is one almost of self pity because you got the raw deal. Actually the kid got the raw deal and what happened to you is just incidental and hardly worthy of mention by comparison.

Offline CoolTiger

Update....

This is her new profile, although it was removed a short while ago.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Relevant thread:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=134463.0

Offline smithy_132

Update....

This is her new profile, although it was removed a short while ago.

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only


Relevant thread:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=134463.0

Thanks for the update CT. I had seen a profile for someone called Blake recently, not sure if it was/is the same one, but thought she looked OK. Can't recall checking the likes list, certainly wouldn't have took it any further if BB was on it, but even if not, good to know and avoid.

Offline snapontool

This is the first time I've read any comments about Sharlette, I did see her over in Derby many years ago before she disappeared for a while, she did warn me her boyfriend may well turn up anytime so I was always quick to shoot & go.

I did always wonder why such a pretty girl was working tbh, but by the 2nd or 3rd trip it was obvious she on something & reading the comment about her rotten teeth that pretty much confirms she's a junky.

Re the first comment, you had some balls my man, to threaten her, I would have just gone as if it's the same guy I saw one day after I left, you must have some 'big bollocks' to front them out, fair play to you.
 :thumbsup:

Online Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,206
  • Likes: 538
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
Wow, the op seem to feel taking a lot of shit here, his story sounds fair to me and he gave a post as a punter on a punting forum about a punt warning other punters of an issue of a kid being left in the house alone.

Your banging on about a kid like it's his fault, for all he knew the kid was with a neighbour when the wg returned, he isn't social services and his job wasn't to inspect the house to make sure the kid was with someone though yes at that point I would have left, in hindsight I'm sure that's what the op wished he'd done too but he didn't, ranting at him really isn't the one judging moral values, I wasn't aware that's what this site was about, I think there's not allowed or something to discuss that?

Is there a reason it doesn't say anything under Ravamelli's nick (like post/reviews/ service provider) ? Just st wondering who you are in relation to the site?

Online Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,206
  • Likes: 538
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
Oops old post, sorry to bump it, just seems offensive the way the op was verbally attacked.

Offline CoolTiger


Is there a reason it doesn't say anything under Ravamelli's nick (like post/reviews/ service provider) ? Just st wondering who you are in relation to the site?

AFAIR, Rav had issues with WGs trying to out him so Admin closed off his account, and he's long gone.

Like a certain recent retired member, whose posts are similar, i.e. you can't click him  ;)

Online Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,206
  • Likes: 538
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
AFAIR, Rav had issues with WGs trying to out him so Admin closed off his account, and he's long gone.

Like a certain recent retired member, whose posts are similar, i.e. you can't click him  ;)

Arrr with you, thanks matey

I just didn't like the way he judged the op, didn't realise the post was very old haha


Online Iloveoral

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 20,206
  • Likes: 538
  •  
  • Reviews: 501
Well spotted, I see bb is on offer too, nice girl  :dash:

Offline SCOOBYDOO1

External Link/Members Only

This is her in action .......................................

Offline kingkong69

Supposed all went downhill from there.. Shame really