Author Topic: Scottish Tiffany /Glasgow  (Read 11898 times)


3 review(s) for xxScottish Tiffanyxx (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative) [Indexed by Goldfinch]

Offline Vanhobonk

Had the privilege of meeting Scottish Tiffany last month .

 https://www.adultwork.com/3843306.

I say privilege as she is not an easy girl to get a hold off .I remembered she was on my hotlist a few years ago and i think i removed her for that reason .
I seen she had a new profile and decided to try again so added to hotlist and noticed her green light was on one night ,tried calling a few times but answer phone each time even though her light had just turned green ,left message ,sent text but no reply so gave up that night .
About a week later light was on again so called and the same scenario so gave up again ,walking up to my car i just thought fuck it and half heartily hit her number, she answered and i was almost caught of guard as was not expecting it .
She was free then so drove over to a flat in Rutherglen ,parking was not a problem, gave her a ring and answer machine so text and no reply, FFS i thought ,sat for 5mins rang again and she answered and gave me flat number .
I walked in and by fuck she is a hottie ,she was not dressed in anything traditionaly sexy ,in fact she looked like she was just in from work but still looked sexy as fuck .
She asked if there was anything i would like her to put on ,she seemed a bit rushed again i thought shes just arrived ,i said it doesnt matter but she said she would rather so asked me to get undressed while she went to get changed and she left room with £70 i gave her (half hour booking)and came back couple mins later with like little black gym shorts and a sports type bra on ,wow just my thing she looked great.
She danced so fuckin sexy lightly rubbing up and down teasing me ,i was hard as a rock and couldnt wait to pump her ,i was on the bed and she was standing turning round and bending over ,her arse in those gym shorts was a sight to behold ,a striptease like this then on to some coverd oral which was ok but just a nice wee warm up nothing great .
I then had her sitting on my face with her rocking back and forward in such a sexy way ,her pussy is lovely, some 69 then on to fucking .
This is where Tiffany excells she is one fantastic fuck ,she is so energetic with great rythm its like shes dancing with your cock in her .
Last position was doggy and i could feel me about to come so with me standing over the bed ,Tiffany lying on it wriggling around playing with her pussy she says she wants me to cum on her so i shot my load over her lovely tits and stomach.
Although she doesnt do owo/cim which i would normally go for she is such a great fuck and so bloody sexy i will definitely return if i can get a hold of her again .
Her organisation and coms could be alot better and was not offered drink or shower but still left smiling.
Looks wise she is the sort you would see in a babysitter/schoolgirl type porno ,i think she looks younger than her stated age.





3 review(s) found for xxScottish Tiffanyxx linked to in above post (3 positive, 0 neutral, 0 negative)


Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Nice review... :thumbsup:

She does look hot...The only thing that's stopped me trying to book her is the OW...On that basis, I don't think I would...But never say never... :unknown:

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,781
  • Likes: 39
  •  
  • Reviews: 123
Good review...personally I'm put off by her fannying around with the comms...that kind of shit does my nut in.

Offline Vanhobonk

Quote
   
Posts: 1,053Reviews: 39

« Reply #3 on: Today at 08:42:59 am »

Quote

Good review...personally I'm put off by her fannying around with the comms...that kind of shit does my nut in.

Yes shes not one for a pre planned punt but if you have £70 stached away and see her green light she is well worth it .

Offline Uncle Buck

Decent review. I’ve only ever heard good things about this SP but there are a couple of things that put me off. (1) total lack of pictures on her AW profile. Absolutely nothing to entice the punter IMO. (2) OW - although not a deal breaker, My preference is definitely OWO.

The same day appointment things suits me fine as that’s how I book anyway.

Shitty comms is a fucking irratation I could do without. Needs to be easy.... SPs need to learn this fundamental business requirement. Customers, consumers, businesses, punters and SPs all benefit from easy, prompt, accurate comms. The whole experience is less stressful for all concerned.

UB




Offline Vanhobonk

Quote
  Decent review. I’ve only ever heard good things about this SP but there are a couple of things that put me off. (1) total lack of pictures on her AW profile. Absolutely nothing to entice the punter IMO. (2) OW - although not a deal breaker, My preference is definitely OWO.

The same day appointment things suits me fine as that’s how I book anyway. 

Shitty comms is a fucking irratation I could do without. Needs to be easy.... SPs need to learn this fundamental business requirement. Customers, consumers, businesses, punters and SPs all benefit from easy, prompt, accurate comms. The whole experience is less stressful for all concerned.
 
I think she sees it as more of a hobby for her rather than a business.I assume she knows she is popular enough for her phone to ring a few times when she switches her green light on ,its not on often so prob when she just needs an extra bit of cash and gets to enjoy a good pumping as she certainly seemed to.
Turn phone on ,
Get pumped ,
Get money.
Its a pain in the arse for us punters but from her point of view a i can see why she does it this way .

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Any kissing or fingering in your booking?...I see FK is on her LL, right enough...

Offline Vanhobonk

There was plenty FK throughout the booking,was really good ,i dont think i could leave a positive review for any SP that didnt FK ,FK and a good fuck go hand in hand in my book .
As for fingering ,i normally do this but i cant recall if i did with Tiffany ,she certainly didnt say no to it ,i was def playing with her clit and she was very responsive to RO but im not sure if i did insert a finger for some reason.

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96

Offline The Man With No Name

Any kissing or fingering in your booking?...I see FK is on her LL, right enough...

Pretty sure I've fingered her in the past, before she happily took my fingers in her mouth to suck her own cum off them.

DFK doesn't nearly cover the tongue-tonsil tennis we've played the last couple of times, while "full-on" doesn't nearly cover the intensity of the groping and fucking. Think our bodies would've disappeared inside each other, if somehow possible.

This girl is unreal in her passion and simply gets better every time. Her service is like a genuinely-horny, faithful girlfriend with only eyes for you, when you haven't fucked for a week. Truly sensational.

Offline Hitboy

Don't see the fuss over this one. Looks like an ex crackhead. No shape at all to her. Skinny frame and crooked face. I walked

Offline muffherwell91

Decent review. I’ve only ever heard good things about this SP but there are a couple of things that put me off. (1) total lack of pictures on her AW profile.
At one point she used to have quite a few images on her AW page as I remember perving them.  I think she may even have had blonde hair in a few of them, although, perhaps it was a wig?

Offline JJ72

At one point she used to have quite a few images on her AW page as I remember perving them.  I think she may even have had blonde hair in a few of them, although, perhaps it was a wig?

If it's the ones I'm thinking about, then it was a blond wig indeed. Also some school girl outfits. Very slim. Easy to throw around if you're into that :)

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
If it's the ones I'm thinking about, then it was a blond wig indeed. Also some school girl outfits. Very slim. Easy to throw around if you're into that :)
Are yous not getting mixed up with Sexy Emma, who before her boob job had dark hair, but supposedly wore a blonde wig in some of her profile pics...

External Link/Members Only

As far as I remember Tiffany always had darker hair in her pics... :unknown:
« Last Edit: July 20, 2018, 03:07:56 pm by Clattypats »

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Pretty sure I've fingered her in the past, before she happily took my fingers in her mouth to suck her own cum off them.

DFK doesn't nearly cover the tongue-tonsil tennis we've played the last couple of times, while "full-on" doesn't nearly cover the intensity of the groping and fucking. Think our bodies would've disappeared inside each other, if somehow possible.

This girl is unreal in her passion and simply gets better every time. Her service is like a genuinely-horny, faithful girlfriend with only eyes for you, when you haven't fucked for a week. Truly sensational.
How did you find her lookswise?... :hi:

I'm just wondering, due to one of the other posts made on this thread... :thumbsup:
« Last Edit: July 20, 2018, 03:21:06 pm by Clattypats »

Offline DaVINCI

Are yous not getting mixed up with Sexy Emma, who before her boob job had dark hair, but supposedly wore a blonde wig in some of her profile pics...

External Link/Members Only

As far as I remember Tiffany always had darker hair in her pics... :unknown:
Definately had blonde hair at some point as l can remember some of the photos she had up previously. I am also sure she was a dancer which piqued my interest.

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Definately had blonde hair at some point as l can remember some of the photos she had up previously. I am also sure she was a dancer which piqued my interest.
I'll stand corrected... :D :hi:

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,174
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Don't see the fuss over this one. Looks like an ex crackhead. No shape at all to her. Skinny frame and crooked face. I walked

...maybe you could tell everyone what happened. She had face pictures up a while ago .....didn’t look that crooked to me ..if I remember. :unknown:

moosehead69

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Decent review. I’ve only ever heard good things about this SP but there are a couple of things that put me off. (1) total lack of pictures on her AW profile. Absolutely nothing to entice the punter IMO. (2) OW - although not a deal breaker, My preference is definitely OWO.

The same day appointment things suits me fine as that’s how I book anyway.

Shitty comms is a fucking irratation I could do without. Needs to be easy.... SPs need to learn this fundamental business requirement. Customers, consumers, businesses, punters and SPs all benefit from easy, prompt, accurate comms. The whole experience is less stressful for all concerned.

UB

You’re a lucky man if that’s the sort of same day coms you’re used to. Busy SPs tend to prioritise their existing bookings from what I observe.

Prompt replies from one that’s in demand in my experience is rare. On the flip side, means you have their full attention when you’re there. I’d be raging If they were texting or calling people back when I had pre-arranged their time. I’m generally happy if they have at least the decency to text back if I miss them. That acknowledgement encourages me To try again. If they blank me because they’re  busy I’m put off and less likely to try again.

I don’t think prompt replies is something they ‘need to learn’. I think that’s a given that people prefer that.

I’m finding increasingly that booking through aw, whilst initially taking longer than a text or call, yields faster results. More and more SPs seem to be developing a preference for that.

I don’t blame them. Having a choice between taking a handful of punters who’ve taken the time to put a booking through, have good feedback and are less likely to be TW, or sifting through screeds of texts and call backs. It’s a bit of a no brainer. I’d do the same for a smoother day.

I used to flat out refuse to use Aw and stick with profiles with numbers up, but frustration at getting no response changed that. If you can’t beat Them, join them. Now the end justifies the means for me, but people will do what suits their own punting preferences.

Offline The Man With No Name

You’re a lucky man if that’s the sort of same day coms you’re used to. Busy SPs tend to prioritise their existing bookings from what I observe.

Prompt replies from one that’s in demand in my experience is rare. On the flip side, means you have their full attention when you’re there. I’d be raging If they were texting or calling people back when I had pre-arranged their time. I’m generally happy if they have at least the decency to text back if I miss them. That acknowledgement encourages me To try again. If they blank me because they’re  busy I’m put off and less likely to try again.

I don’t think prompt replies is something they ‘need to learn’. I think that’s a given that people prefer that.

I’m finding increasingly that booking through aw, whilst initially taking longer than a text or call, yields faster results. More and more SPs seem to be developing a preference for that.

I don’t blame them. Having a choice between taking a handful of punters who’ve taken the time to put a booking through, have good feedback and are less likely to be TW, or sifting through screeds of texts and call backs. It’s a bit of a no brainer. I’d do the same for a smoother day.

I used to flat out refuse to use Aw and stick with profiles with numbers up, but frustration at getting no response changed that. If you can’t beat Them, join them. Now the end justifies the means for me, but people will do what suits their own punting preferences.

I'd agree with much of this.

Discovered the night before, I'd be out and about with spare time on my hands one afternoon earlier this week, so decided I'd try to arrange a short-notice punt, if I was still in the mood for it. Tiffany'd had her the green light on that previous day and though I'd tried to arrange a booking, she let me know her circumstances had changed and was no longer available, so I was keen to make up for it. The short-notice of knowing my own availability meant I'd had little chance to arrange anything in advance via AW, but still fired off a couple of tentative messages. The thought of it though, combined with general difficulty in getting to sleep, required a wank to dose off that night. It therefore left me seriously wondering if I'd still have the urge, come the time and push to shove, given it was only a few hours later.

To my satisfaction (I guess, because I had the horn), I did still fancy giving something tidy a right, good rattling. And was reasonably optimistic when I saw plenty of green lights on. Made fuck-all difference, though - must've spent nearly 90 min in the car trying to arrange something. But between lack of availability, suitability, quality and location, (even though I was pretty central) it yielded fuck-all, so simply came home for a wank (or two). :D This was even despite me willing to extend the search, stay and pay to a half-hour, after initially only wanting a good value 15-min meet, given the extreme likelihood it would only be cum-once affair.

Point of my shitty non-story though, is that far the biggest issue in failing to secure a punt that day was simply a lack of response to my calls. Compounded by the fact that one of the very few hooker conversations I actually had that day was with one provider who doesn't even display her number, but had swiftly gotten back to me with it via AW. The other girl I'd messaged through AW also got back to me later that day, despite the numerous green lights and phone numbers who never bothered their arses.

This, combined with my other recent experiences of getting far more clear, concise and swift replies through AW of late, leads me to believe that there probably has been a shift in how popular, reliable, quality-service providers like to arrange bookings. 3-5 years ago, any number of top-pick Glasgow or Edinburgh girls would have their number up and get back to you promptly, if they didn't pick up first time. Now you're lucky to get one or two that fall into that category. It's a real pity for the impulsive quickie-lover like me, who often takes the urge when already out and about. However, given my recent experiences, and the knowledge of how increasingly unlikely I am to land a decent punt this way, that urge is definitely dwindling.

But it's also an inevitable symptom of a sellers' market - a complete dearth of reliable, quality girls wanted by too many experienced punters like us, who simply won't settle for the Romanian scam shite that have their green lights and numbers up 24/7. Simply put, as Moose says, why would a dwindling number of always in-demand hot, quality hookers bother with a barrage of texts and calls, when they can filter more than enough serious punters through AW at their own convenience?

Offline The Man With No Name

Don't see the fuss over this one. Looks like an ex crackhead. No shape at all to her. Skinny frame and crooked face. I walked

Then you've clearly never seen a crackhead. Also, coming from the fool who coughed up a ton for an utterly ordinary half-hour with that smug "doesn't consent to being discussed on this forum" twat, Chloe Candy, then proclaimed it was an awesome VFM experience, I think we'll all reserve the right to ignore your judgement.

What did you actually find the matter with Tiffany? Were her tits not as wonky, misshaped and uneven enough as Chloe's for you? https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=171550.msg1855460#msg1855460

How did you find her lookswise?... :hi:

I'm just wondering, due to one of the other posts made on this thread... :thumbsup:

In short, she's fucking awesome. Less of the conventional take-home-to-meet-mother classically beautiful look, in favour of the naughty, promiscuous, smoking-hot sexy, "I want to pin you against the wall and nail you right now" look, which is exactly what you want in WG.

The only vague truth in what Hitboy was saying is that she is quite slim and doesn't have the biggest curves, so probably isn't what you're looking for if you like chunky girls. However, there's still a great quality to her tight, slim body that most girls five years younger would kill for and this only accentuates her utterly phenomenal tits. They're extremely soft and extremely natural, but beautifully sized and perfectly pert. All-in they're definitely the best natural set I've handled on a WG, possibly including civvy girls too.

She also has a perfectly nice, small-but-firm ass, and lovely tight legs.

Stated age of fun-loving, young-looking mid-twenties party girl also seems bang-on to me.

So all in, compared to the absolute worst I've seen trying to sell sex, her face is a solid 8/10, while her body can't be less than a 9.

At £70/hh this, Hitboy, is what actual value for money looks like...


Offline Uncle Buck

I'd agree with much of this.

Discovered the night before, I'd be out and about with spare time on my hands one afternoon earlier this week, so decided I'd try to arrange a short-notice punt, if I was still in the mood for it. Tiffany'd had her the green light on that previous day and though I'd tried to arrange a booking, she let me know her circumstances had changed and was no longer available, so I was keen to make up for it. The short-notice of knowing my own availability meant I'd had little chance to arrange anything in advance via AW, but still fired off a couple of tentative messages. The thought of it though, combined with general difficulty in getting to sleep, required a wank to dose off that night. It therefore left me seriously wondering if I'd still have the urge, come the time and push to shove, given it was only a few hours later.

To my satisfaction (I guess, because I had the horn), I did still fancy giving something tidy a right, good rattling. And was reasonably optimistic when I saw plenty of green lights on. Made fuck-all difference, though - must've spent nearly 90 min in the car trying to arrange something. But between lack of availability, suitability, quality and location, (even though I was pretty central) it yielded fuck-all, so simply came home for a wank (or two). :D This was even despite me willing to extend the search, stay and pay to a half-hour, after initially only wanting a good value 15-min meet, given the extreme likelihood it would only be cum-once affair.

Point of my shitty non-story though, is that far the biggest issue in failing to secure a punt that day was simply a lack of response to my calls. Compounded by the fact that one of the very few hooker conversations I actually had that day was with one provider who doesn't even display her number, but had swiftly gotten back to me with it via AW. The other girl I'd messaged through AW also got back to me later that day, despite the numerous green lights and phone numbers who never bothered their arses.

This, combined with my other recent experiences of getting far more clear, concise and swift replies through AW of late, leads me to believe that there probably has been a shift in how popular, reliable, quality-service providers like to arrange bookings. 3-5 years ago, any number of top-pick Glasgow or Edinburgh girls would have their number up and get back to you promptly, if they didn't pick up first time. Now you're lucky to get one or two that fall into that category. It's a real pity for the impulsive quickie-lover like me, who often takes the urge when already out and about. However, given my recent experiences, and the knowledge of how increasingly unlikely I am to land a decent punt this way, that urge is definitely dwindling.

But it's also an inevitable symptom of a sellers' market - a complete dearth of reliable, quality girls wanted by too many experienced punters like us, who simply won't settle for the Romanian scam shite that have their green lights and numbers up 24/7. Simply put, as Moose says, why would a dwindling number of always in-demand hot, quality hookers bother with a barrage of texts and calls, when they can filter more than enough serious punters through AW at their own convenience?

You must have been bored tonight. That was a hard read....

UB

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,174
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
You must have been bored tonight. That was a hard read....

UB

+1

In short, she's fucking awesome.

I think the The Man With No Shame is getting a tad carried away.  :wacko: :blush:

Offline The Man With No Name

You must have been bored tonight. That was a hard read....

UB

Nah, I was bored this afternoon. Only took a few minutes though. But you can tell the World Cup's finished and there's no way I'm watching fucking golf.

But, fuck you, hard read. :P :drinks: Why did you bother then? And at least I bother to make my drivel flow with a bit of eloquence. Thought a man like you of similar qualities would at least appreciate that. Much of what's on here is barely intelligible.

+1

I think the The Man With No Shame is getting a tad carried away.  :wacko: :blush:

Well, given your inference that you're a man of such modesty and admirable restraint, how would you describe an extremely attractive, well-priced, accommodating girl who gives her absolute-all in bookings with the service you desire, but struggle to find anywhere else?

I simply gave an honest answer to a question I was asked. When I haven't even posted one positive review of a girl I've seen several times, but has always delivered and is, all-round, probably the best currently on the Glasgow scene, there's no way you can accuse me of getting carried away.

Offline Hitboy

Then you've clearly never seen a crackhead. Also, coming from the fool who coughed up a ton for an utterly ordinary half-hour with that smug "doesn't consent to being discussed on this forum" twat, Chloe Candy, then proclaimed it was an awesome VFM experience, I think we'll all reserve the right to ignore your judgement.

What did you actually find the matter with Tiffany? Were her tits not as wonky, misshaped and uneven enough as Chloe's for you? https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=171550.msg1855460#msg1855460

In short, she's fucking awesome. Less of the conventional take-home-to-meet-mother classically beautiful look, in favour of the naughty, promiscuous, smoking-hot sexy, "I want to pin you against the wall and nail you right now" look, which is exactly what you want in WG.

The only vague truth in what Hitboy was saying is that she is quite slim and doesn't have the biggest curves, so probably isn't what you're looking for if you like chunky girls. However, there's still a great quality to her tight, slim body that most girls five years younger would kill for and this only accentuates her utterly phenomenal tits. They're extremely soft and extremely natural, but beautifully sized and perfectly pert. All-in they're definitely the best natural set I've handled on a WG, possibly including civvy girls too.

She also has a perfectly nice, small-but-firm ass, and lovely tight legs.

Stated age of fun-loving, young-looking mid-twenties party girl also seems bang-on to me.

So all in, compared to the absolute worst I've seen trying to sell sex, her face is a solid 8/10, while her body can't be less than a 9.

At £70/hh this, Hitboy, is what actual value for money looks like...

I was genuinely surprised with her appearance after reading reviews on here. Her teeth were wonky for start. You wouldn't believe the amount of crack being smoked in Glasgow recently and she looked fucked lads. Speech was slurred. Maybe she has got good tits but that frame was shit. You need to get out and shag something decent if you think she's fucking awesome  :D Comparing her to civvies shows the standard of woman in your existence. No wonder you think she's fucking awesome.  You sound a bit in love with her so hope I've not offended you. The way you describe her sounds like something I'd like to shag so if you ever come across something worthy of your beautiful description be sure to let me know
« Last Edit: July 23, 2018, 02:02:09 am by Hitboy »

Zidane18

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Met this one 3-4 years ago.

Puntwise everything was fine but there was a creep who had his head out the window knoeing what was going on.

This made me avoid going back.

Her flat was just off cathcart/hampden way

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,174
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Much of what's on here is barely intelligible.

If you don’t like it ...go somewhere else. :bomb:

You sound a bit in love with her so hope I've not offended you.

...maybe he’s that weird Bill Sykes guy that keeps leaving her that OTT gushing AW FB. :wacko: :crazy:
« Last Edit: July 23, 2018, 10:07:41 am by Courtney »

moosehead69

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Never met her, but going from the pics alone, i'm getting more of a vibe that it's alignment with those who describer her as a skinny crack head.  These coming words may sound harsh, but she looks emaciated and malnourished to me, and that's coming from someone who appreciates a size 6 or 8.  As I've never seen her, I'll keep an open mind.

As for classically beautiful or they want to pin you against the wall type.  I prefer a woman who is both. 

Looks and preferences are very subjective, and there's no two ways about it.  But there are a fair few SPs on her at the minute getting decent reviews for their looks who I've met, but I'd rate them as below average looking facially, all of them.  So that alone just shows me that standards and preferences are vastly different.

I think ive mentioned before, but IMO the below average and average looking SPs do best review wise in terms fo their looks, providing they have good banter and provide a decent service.  The above average and very attractive SPs iv'e met, I find people are constantly looking to knock down a peg or two. This is just my own findings.

Nothing anyone has said her would sway me either way from booking this SP, but her profile and pictures put me off.  She just seems a bit too 'budget' for my tastes. My tastes have changed and I expect far more nowadays from a meet.

 

Offline The Man With No Name

If you don’t like it ...go somewhere else. :bomb:

...maybe he’s that weird Bill Sykes guy that keeps leaving her that OTT gushing AW FB. :wacko: :crazy:

Never been a Dickens fan, prefer Westerns. But if you fuck off to Disneyland, we'll leave it at that.

I was genuinely surprised with her appearance after reading reviews on here. Her teeth were wonky for start. You wouldn't believe the amount of crack being smoked in Glasgow recently and she looked fucked lads. Speech was slurred. Maybe she has got good tits but that frame was shit. You need to get out and shag something decent if you think she's fucking awesome  :D Comparing her to civvies shows the standard of woman in your existence. No wonder you think she's fucking awesome. You sound a bit in love with her so hope I've not offended you. The way you describe her sounds like something I'd like to shag so if you ever come across something worthy of your beautiful description be sure to let me know

1. I considered her voice slightly strange the first time I saw her, but it's just her lazy diction combined with her accent, resulting in that kind of accent you do commonly find in Glasgow. Just like the fact Alex Ferguson sounds pished every time he's interviewed - believe it or not, he actually isn't.

2. How would you know anything about her frame, when you supposedly walked? Did you wait for her to strip, then fuck off without your money?

3. I only compared her tits to those of civvy birds, because they're on the level that justifies a crossover comparison. But again, that's something else you never actually saw in your 2 seconds of in-depth physical analysis.

4. The fact you've bothered to raise the subject about the "standard of women in my existence" clearly indicates you're thoroughly insecure about your own record of fatties and munters and would therefore clearly no nothing about "getting out and shagging something decent." I've done a reasonable number of attractive women in my time and I'm still young, decent-looking and charming enough to go out and do more. I choose to bang the odd well-established hooker purely because of the convenience, assurance of a good fuck and possible kinks you don't get on civvy street. If Tiffany was bad looking, I wouldn't repeatedly pay to shag her, would I?

5. You, like Mickey Mouse, have tried to somehow claim I'm infatuated with this girl, merely because I speak highly of her looks and service. But that's simply because she's a thoroughly great two-pop shag for 70 quid. As I said before, I've not even posted a positive review. You, on the other hand, couldn't find enough flashing lights when preaching the gospel of the great Chloe "Courtesan" Candy. And that despite being utterly ordinary looking, by all accounts including your own, but also with the tits and self-adoration of Jackie Bird, she was somehow the deal of the century at 100 quid for a full 30 min of her precious time. Hypocritical twat.
(Courtesan def. A hooker who thinks she looks far better than she does and charges way over the odds for a minimalist, shite service because she's a smug cow who thinks she's above prostitution, despite this being her chosen profession.)

6. Your last sentence is simply a moronic, contradictory mess which makes a mockery of the earlier points you've tried, and failed, to make.

7. You're clearly just a bit of a useless, fucking arsehole. Not even a whole useless, fucking arsehole. Just a bit of one.

Offline Jock D

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,781
  • Likes: 39
  •  
  • Reviews: 123
I simply gave an honest answer to a question I was asked. When I haven't even posted one positive review of a girl I've seen several times, but has always delivered and is, all-round, probably the best currently on the Glasgow scene, there's no way you can accuse me of getting carried away.

A review would have been handy then :cool:

Offline Vanhobonk

Quote

Quote

Never met her, but going from the pics alone, i'm getting more of a vibe that it's alignment with those who describer her as a skinny crack head.  These coming words may sound harsh, but she looks emaciated and malnourished to me, and that's coming from someone who appreciates a size 6 or 8.  As I've never seen her, I'll keep an open mind. 

I can assure you she does not look malnourished ,she is petite yes but has a cracking wee body,nice we pert arse and nice tits .She is fit and healthy looking .

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,174
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Mickey Mouse, have tried to somehow claim I'm infatuated with this girl

I was getting that impression Clint ...but I’ll let you off.

moosehead69

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I can assure you she does not look malnourished ,she is petite yes but has a cracking wee body,nice we pert arse and nice tits .She is fit and healthy looking .

Thanks for that.  And like I said, I was keeping an 'open-mind', due to the vast discrepancies in her feedback.  So whats the script with her teeth?  They've been mentioned.

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Met this one 3-4 years ago.

Puntwise everything was fine but there was a creep who had his head out the window knoeing what was going on.

This made me avoid going back.

Her flat was just off cathcart/hampden way
How did you find her lookswise?...Did she have a crooked face, or wonky teeth?... :unknown:

moosehead69

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
How did you find her lookswise?...Did she have a crooked face, or wonky teeth?... :unknown:

 :lol: :lol: :lol: :lol:

Has she been skelped about wae the ugly stick!


Offline Hitboy

Never been a Dickens fan, prefer Westerns. But if you fuck off to Disneyland, we'll leave it at that.

1. I considered her voice slightly strange the first time I saw her, but it's just her lazy diction combined with her accent, resulting in that kind of accent you do commonly find in Glasgow. Just like the fact Alex Ferguson sounds pished every time he's interviewed - believe it or not, he actually isn't.

2. How would you know anything about her frame, when you supposedly walked? Did you wait for her to strip, then fuck off without your money?

3. I only compared her tits to those of civvy birds, because they're on the level that justifies a crossover comparison. But again, that's something else you never actually saw in your 2 seconds of in-depth physical analysis.

4. The fact you've bothered to raise the subject about the "standard of women in my existence" clearly indicates you're thoroughly insecure about your own record of fatties and munters and would therefore clearly no nothing about "getting out and shagging something decent." I've done a reasonable number of attractive women in my time and I'm still young, decent-looking and charming enough to go out and do more. I choose to bang the odd well-established hooker purely because of the convenience, assurance of a good fuck and possible kinks you don't get on civvy street. If Tiffany was bad looking, I wouldn't repeatedly pay to shag her, would I?

5. You, like Mickey Mouse, have tried to somehow claim I'm infatuated with this girl, merely because I speak highly of her looks and service. But that's simply because she's a thoroughly great two-pop shag for 70 quid. As I said before, I've not even posted a positive review. You, on the other hand, couldn't find enough flashing lights when preaching the gospel of the great Chloe "Courtesan" Candy. And that despite being utterly ordinary looking, by all accounts including your own, but also with the tits and self-adoration of Jackie Bird, she was somehow the deal of the century at 100 quid for a full 30 min of her precious time. Hypocritical twat.
(Courtesan def. A hooker who thinks she looks far better than she does and charges way over the odds for a minimalist, shite service because she's a smug cow who thinks she's above prostitution, despite this being her chosen profession.)

6. Your last sentence is simply a moronic, contradictory mess which makes a mockery of the earlier points you've tried, and failed, to make.

7. You're clearly just a bit of a useless, fucking arsehole. Not even a whole useless, fucking arsehole. Just a bit of one.

Could tell plenty from her frame. She's a whore who was dressed as one. Also doesn't take long to spot someone who's of their tits.

You don't shag anything decent m8. Anyone listening to your fluffy shit can tell. You repeatedly shag this skank whilst never having reviewed her. You are the phrase 'white knight' personified, come rushing to her defence as soon as she gets a bit of criticism. Calm down a bit and don't be so protective. This is a forum for rating hookers. Not to proclaim your love for them.
Did she tell you were "young, decent looking and charming" you fucking idiot? :D  Take more than that from any woman to show the loyalty you're showing you fluffy wanker. She's a hooker my fellow punter. Don't be blinded. You keep bringing up Chloe as if I'm going to compare hookers with you. Sorry but not stooping to such fluffiness. I stand by the review on Chloe. I even found fault with her on said review.
Something your not capable of.

Offline Hitboy

I was getting that impression Clint ...but I’ll let you off.

Grow a set of balls Mickey and stand by what you said. Don't be so spineless. This is only a forum, he can't get you on here :dash:

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,174
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Grow a set of balls Mickey and stand by what you said. Don't be so spineless. This is only a forum, he can't get you on here :dash:

...there is not enough for me to go further. I’ll deal with things my way thank you very much. :cool: :music:


Offline The Man With No Name

Could tell plenty from her frame. She's a whore who was dressed as one. Also doesn't take long to spot someone who's of their tits.

You don't shag anything decent m8. Anyone listening to your fluffy shit can tell. You repeatedly shag this skank whilst never having reviewed her. You are the phrase 'white knight' personified, come rushing to her defence as soon as she gets a bit of criticism. Calm down a bit and don't be so protective. This is a forum for rating hookers. Not to proclaim your love for them.
Did she tell you were "young, decent looking and charming" you fucking idiot? :D  Take more than that from any woman to show the loyalty you're showing you fluffy wanker. She's a hooker my fellow punter. Don't be blinded. You keep bringing up Chloe as if I'm going to compare hookers with you. Sorry but not stooping to such fluffiness. I stand by the review on Chloe. I even found fault with her on said review.
Something your not capable of.

Fuck knows why you bothered to quote me, as instead of responding to any of my points you've simply resorted to more childish, personal insults. Presumably because you have no real answer to any of them, effectively acknowledging them as true - as per most of your forum contributions and lack of reviews. Reminds me of a certain....RANDY! Is it you?! I call CUNT!

You haven't the slightest idea of the women I shag outwith punting. But trying again to claim with no evidence that they're all awful, merely adds to your irrelevant raising of the issue, greatly implying that you suffer from extreme insecurity over your own heffer-form, down the Savoy Disco.

But wake up sunshine, you couldn't possibly compare Chloe to Tiffany as you never actually went through with the fucking booking. You've also only posted one other review, so she's pretty much the only marker of your poor taste I have to go by. But going by her prices, limited likes, proven form for being a smug cunt, and another dreadful review from a far more reliable punter than yourself, I at least have it on reasonable authority that, for 30 quid more, Chloe's most likely rather shite in comparison for what she charges. All you claim to have against Tiffany is that you shat yourself when she opened the door as you probably realised she'd be too much you. You then claim you "found fault" with Chloe on your review, but where is this? Stating there's "not much population in the tit region" is a compliment when speaking of her horror-show of a rack. I am, however, starting to think all this is you simply trying and failing to get some sort of revenge for me proving you wrong on your review thread, when you foolishly described Chloe as "something special" and "VFM". Fuck knows why, when the quickest glance at her profile would tell you she couldn't possibly be.

Accuse me of white-knighting all you want, I couldn't give a fuck, coming from you. But I never claimed Tiffany was perfect in any case, having already stated she'd be too slim for some, has rather a small ass and hasn't the most classically beautiful face. I'm quite happy to say that my perfect woman would be prettier, with more curves and a rounder ass. (This, by the way, is called "finding fault".) But you ain't getting a better service from anything nearly as hot for 70 quid in Glasgow at the moment. That is something I'm willing to go all-out on. To me that isn't fluffiness, but a fair assessment of proper VFM. But you give it your own derogatory, little childish label if you want. Just like the rest of your fucking nonsense, I couldn't give a shite.

Lastly, stop using SMS-speak, and calling people by motorway numbers when you have a proper keyboard to use. It's no longer 1998 and cool to show-off what you can do with your new Nokia. It's 2018 and just sad.

Offline The Man With No Name

...there is not enough for me to go further. I’ll deal with things my way thank you very much. :cool: :music:

Good to hear, you'd be best just to ignore the cunt. I've said my last piece on the matter, as I've no more time for his resorting to childish insults, which he now even seems to be directing at you, despite sharing a similar stance.

Hope you and Goofy are enjoying the Magic Kingdom. :D

Offline myothernameis


As far as I remember Tiffany always had darker hair in her pics... :unknown:

I have photos from her private gallery from around 2006, so must check them out, and see if any blonde hair

Offline Courtney

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,174
  • Likes: 15
  •  
  • Reviews: 18
Reminds me of a certain....RANDY! Is it you?! I call CUNT!

You could be on to something here...

The similarity of the way the links are posted at the top of the page.

Hitboy reviews:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=178937

Randy F reviews:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showreviews;u=8991


Zidane18

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
How did you find her lookswise?...Did she have a crooked face, or wonky teeth?... :unknown:

She was not a crackhead or close to one. A little sleepy but had just showered prior to my arrival. Was an early punt 12pm or 1pm 1 hour booking. ~120-130 maybe even 110 back then.

Seems she had a late night the night before as she had been at the shed nc with her friends

Performance: she was up for round 2. Kissing:  fine
 Gfe type vanilla booking and had a clean bedroom.

Didnt use bathroom

Face was fine. Cute gnd.

Scottish accent.

Cant recall teeth.

Fresh breath

She wore black

Cant recall if owo or ow but provided enthisiastically

A keen student who does this part time to raise funds would be how i described her

Back then she had the picture of her looking or standing outside a hotel window.

This is atleast a three year old review.

It was the pervy neighbour that fucked me right off.

If i could catch her online and available: i would DEFINATELY not hesitate to book her.

Glasgow had several good sps back then and I would rank her up there with the best
« Last Edit: July 24, 2018, 03:52:32 am by Zidane18 »

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
She was not a crackhead or close to one. A little sleepy but had just showered prior to my arrival. Was an early punt 12pm or 1pm 1 hour booking. ~120-130 maybe even 110 back then.

Seems she had a late night the night before as she had been at the shed nc with her friends

Performance: she was up for round 2. Kissing:  fine
 Gfe type vanilla booking and had a clean bedroom.

Didnt use bathroom

Face was fine. Cute gnd.

Scottish accent.

Cant recall teeth.

Fresh breath

She wore black

Cant recall if owo or ow but provided enthisiastically

A keen student who does this part time to raise funds would be how i described her

Back then she had the picture of her looking or standing outside a hotel window.

This is atleast a three year old review.

It was the pervy neighbour that fucked me right off.

If i could catch her online and available: i would DEFINATELY not hesitate to book her.

Glasgow had several good sps back then and I would rank her up there with the best
Thanks for that... :thumbsup:

Offline Clattypats

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 7,165
  • Likes: 11
  •  
  • Reviews: 96
Well Hitboy...I know looks are subjective n all that, but that's 3 other punters (2 I've asked)that's description of Tiffany is a vast contrast to yours...Have you even set eyes on her in person?... :wacko:

It's starting to look like you have maybe had bookings turned down, and there is a bit of mischief making going on  :unknown:...I've already hinted at it before


https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=192424.msg1999653#msg1999653

Something doesn't add up with you! ... :bomb:
« Last Edit: July 24, 2018, 09:07:52 am by Clattypats »

Offline mr small

Don't see the fuss over this one. Looks like an ex crackhead. No shape at all to her. Skinny frame and crooked face. I walked

When was this ?

She was an attractive, slim, well toned dancer when I seen her.

 :hi:

Offline myothernameis

I have photos from her private gallery from around 2006, so must check them out, and see if any blonde hair

Is this the same girl were talking about





Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only


Offline myothernameis

Don't see the fuss over this one. Looks like an ex crackhead. No shape at all to her. Skinny frame and crooked face. I walked

...maybe you could tell everyone what happened. She had face pictures up a while ago .....didn’t look that crooked to me ..if I remember. :unknown:

She looks ok, no crooked teeth, she a babe, so dont know why hitboy walked, like to see him get out of this one





Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only

Hidden Image/Members Only