Author Topic: Jennyblack4u - Fawdon, Newcastle  (Read 2146 times)

PunterPeteA

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
I saw this lady after seeing her advert on VS.

External Link/Members Only

The comms were fine, I had phoned mid-morning and she had to come out to join me at the location, but I was only waiting a few minutes. Parking and the neighbourhood were equally no problem. Her flat is small, but clean.

Jenny is a pretty black lady in her late 30s, originally from the Seychelles, with lovely black skin and a happy smile. She was good company and did not rush me at any stage. I like corporal punishment, and she had a small but useful collection of canes and whips. Although she needed a bit of prompting to really wield the cane, she eventually did so in a way that marked me for a good couple of weeks - as I had asked for. After I had come once she whipped me some more to get me hard again, before we had sex on the bed. I realised I was not going to come a second time until I had more punishment and she gave me a really hard set of lashes whilst I masturbated to a strong orgasam.

We sat (well she did) and talked for a while after, and I never felt rushed. All in all a good way to spend an hour, and a good way to spend £80.

Pete

Offline DevilD

Bloody hell, here we go again - member for a year, and first post.....admin clampdown ....what a good move! And what a general review...

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Bloody hell, here we go again - member for a year, and first post.....admin clampdown ....what a good move! And what a general review...

You need to stop criticising every new review. It’s good that they are reviewing which is what the site is all about.

Admin wants people to contribute and this is what the site is all about.

Thanks OP just continue now you’ve started
« Last Edit: July 07, 2018, 07:17:54 pm by Kev40ish »

Offline DevilD

Get real, he's been a member since 2105, and hasn't bothered to write a review since  yesterday and the clampdown...

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Get real, he's been a member since 2105, and hasn't bothered to write a review since  yesterday and the clampdown...

Yes I know but that was the idea to get people to start to review. You criticising everyone isn’t going to help.

Calm down

Offline waynekerr600

Thanks OP. What would you say her age was and are her photos accurate?

Offline Moresomes

I recognise this one .
She's using the same pics that she had on her now defunct A/W profile when I saw and reviewed her as "Charleenbrown for you" and before that she advertised as "Nikkiwill."
If those pics are indeed of her, they must have been taken well before man walked on the moon, because when I saw her she was a short haired plump little woman with sagging tits, and if she's in her thirties I'll show my arse in the Bigg Market. Nearer fifties I'd say
I did mention in my review that she had a few weapons of arse destruction on a chest of drawers in the bedrooms so anyone who's into being flogged and pegged might enjoy a visit, but it's never again in a thousand years for me.  :scare:

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,326
  • Likes: 804
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Get real, he's been a member since 2105, and hasn't bothered to write a review since  yesterday and the clampdown...

You need to take this up with Admin if you're not happy, this is the way he wants it. It's not your place to slag other members off.

As he's already deleted 10 of the snide remarks that you've posted all over the forum I know what the outcome would be. 
« Last Edit: July 07, 2018, 08:06:11 pm by daviemac »

Offline shaft10

You need to take this up with Admin if you're not happy, this is the way he wants it. It's not your place to slag other members off.

As he's already deleted 10 of the snide remarks that you've posted all over the forum I know what the outcome would be.

Agreed, it is quite frustrating though. Theres another member who has been on since 2012 without a single review and all of sudden posted 3 in a day. Appreciate that is whole point of the 'restricted access' rules to bring them out, but it does wind you up a bit. Well it does me anyway. The bigger picture should be more reviews, better for us to make educated decision on where and with whom to punt  :hi:

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,326
  • Likes: 804
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
Agreed, it is quite frustrating though. Theres another member who has been on since 2012 without a single review and all of sudden posted 3 in a day. Appreciate that is whole point of the 'restricted access' rules to bring them out, but it does wind you up a bit. Well it does me anyway. The bigger picture should be more reviews, better for us to make educated decision on where and with whom to punt  :hi:

Admin's posted that the whole purpose is to get the lurkers to either stop wasting sever resources with searches and page views or contribute constructively. Fair enough voice concern on a thread about the reason for the post but don't do what  DevilD has done and go all over the forum slagging new reviewers off, that just defeats the object.


Offline waynekerr600

I recognise this one .
She's using the same pics that she had on her now defunct A/W profile when I saw and reviewed her as "Charleenbrown for you" and before that she advertised as "Nikkiwill."
If those pics are indeed of her, they must have been taken well before man walked on the moon, because when I saw her she was a short haired plump little woman with sagging tits, and if she's in her thirties I'll show my arse in the Bigg Market. Nearer fifties I'd say
I did mention in my review that she had a few weapons of arse destruction on a chest of drawers in the bedrooms so anyone who's into being flogged and pegged might enjoy a visit, but it's never again in a thousand years for me.  :scare:

Cheers more somes. I did think those pictures were rather old. Shame as I do fancy seeing a black girl now and again n

Offline Moresomes

Cheers more somes. I did think those pictures were rather old. Shame as I do fancy seeing a black girl now and again n

It's definitely the previous Charleenbrown4U Wayne, and if those pictures are of her they are a million miles from what she was like at about this time last year.
In my view the use of those pics almost constitutes a scam, but once she opens the door it's bite the bullet or walk. (and I should have walked)  :unknown:

Offline Shearer1955

Bloody hell, here we go again - member for a year, and first post.....admin clampdown ....what a good move! And what a general review...

I agree with this
So many (supposedly) first reviews but all they offer is generalisations and extract bits from other reviews to offer a suggestion they have seen the girl
Sorry but its bollocks..

Offline Mansell

I agree with this
So many (supposedly) first reviews but all they offer is generalisations and extract bits from other reviews to offer a suggestion they have seen the girl
Sorry but its bollocks..
It's great to bring them out but I'm also worried they are just posting bollocks. Guess we will just have to weed them out when they do  ;)

Online Kev40ish

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 5,063
  • Likes: 24
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I agree with this
So many (supposedly) first reviews but all they offer is generalisations and extract bits from other reviews to offer a suggestion they have seen the girl
Sorry but its bollocks..

Yes I do agree, but they will end up being caught out in the end or go back to lurking.


If they have logged on again and not answered reasonable questions about their review. I will definitely be reporting them.

Offline Shearer1955

What I find offensive is posting about girls who for the most part offer a good service but  I consider these to be what are in effect malicious reviews even when positive....they can actually destroy the credibility of a good girl who provides a decent service because its a personal exercise to prevent exclusion
I do fully acknowledge it is almost impossible at times for Admin to be able to prevent this completely
Should it be a requirement that new contributors reply fully to a minimum of at least 20 posts before they are permitted to post a review
I appreciate its an admin nightmare & whether it can be done is beyond my knowledge
Sadly so many first reviews over the past few days...I don't believe almost any of them  :(
« Last Edit: July 07, 2018, 10:07:32 pm by Shearer1955 »

Online daviemac

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Moderator
  • Moderator
  • *****
  • Posts: 32,326
  • Likes: 804
  •  
  • Reviews: 24
I agree with this
So many (supposedly) first reviews but all they offer is generalisations and extract bits from other reviews to offer a suggestion they have seen the girl
Sorry but its bollocks..

It's great to bring them out but I'm also worried they are just posting bollocks. Guess we will just have to weed them out when they do  ;)

Admin doesn't agree he posted about  DevilD here pointing out he's another one who's 'lost it' - 

Here's another one who's lost it:
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=profile;area=showposts;u=27067

He's attacking members even one for posting proper negative review.

Admin has removed the 'freeze account' option due to misuse by some.    :hi: 

PunterPeteA

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Thanks OP. What would you say her age was and are her photos accurate?

The pics are her, but yes, they are a few years old. If you look at the third picture she has a scar on her right buttock, and I saw that same scar when I was with her.

Offline waynekerr600

Cheers Pete think I'll give her a miss. Just seen Tia this week whose photos are also will past their sell by date so sounds like disappointment waiting to happen.

Offline waynelovejuice

I’ve seen her (and reviewed her!) and she must be in her fifties.

That said, I like mature ladies and she is friendly and good fun to be with.

I despair of the comments that come on here about time wasters, lurkers, leeches or whatever. For some guys, going to see a WG for the first time may be quite a big step and, by reading the posts on here, this site might give them the confidence to do so.

Does nobody have the wherewithal to think that this frequent criticism of first time reviewers is the probable reason so few do post?

When you look at the list of people who do review, the numbers aren’t actually that big. I wonder why.....?

Offline Shearer1955

I’ve seen her (and reviewed her!) and she must be in her fifties.

That said, I like mature ladies and she is friendly and good fun to be with.

I despair of the comments that come on here about time wasters, lurkers, leeches or whatever. For some guys, going to see a WG for the first time may be quite a big step and, by reading the posts on here, this site might give them the confidence to do so.

Does nobody have the wherewithal to think that this frequent criticism of first time reviewers is the probable reason so few do post?

When you look at the list of people who do review, the numbers aren’t actually that big. I wonder why.....?

Im not disputing it can be intimidating the first time you meet a prossie because it is a strange environment and equally it is daunting when posting an initial review on here; my criticism is of those who have been members for some time who suddenly post a review when the alternative is to lose viewing rights
Some will be real and of course the ethos of the site is to encourage members to post reiews when they have seen someone because it build a picture of the escort; her services and her deameanour  to those she meets
That said some reviews are very basic and can easily be manufactured by reading others and even looking at the A/w profile to extract details; the real information is sparce and lends itself to perception of a false review
I hold up my hands to criticising some because of their motives
Lets hope the actions by Admin weed out the wronguns and we can move forward positively
It is a great site and we want to keep it that way  :hi:
« Last Edit: July 10, 2018, 01:05:19 pm by Shearer1955 »