New rules

[westeros]

Been punting for a while and I enjoy reading the posts made by the usual suspects in the north west section.

Since, starting to use this site,  I came to the realisation that certain  regular punters like NigelF, Blackpoolrock, sinz etc, really know what they're talking about. So their comments on girls is incredibly helpful for me and other new punters. If they review positive, then the WG is definitely going to be worth it.

However the problem now is that those people who don't usually or never post are having to post to stay involved. I just wondered, how good would their input be? Are they genuinely taking part or just doing it so they don't get frozen out?

While it's great that more people are posting, I fear even I may come acropper of the new rules. I always thought if I don't have anything useful to say, I should keep my mouth shut.

Anyone else got any thoughts on this?

[frankc]

Been punting for a while and I enjoy reading the posts made by the usual suspects in the north west section.

Since, starting to use this site,  I came to the realisation that certain  regular punters like NigelF, Blackpoolrock, sinz etc, really know what they're talking about. So their comments on girls is incredibly helpful for me and other new punters. If they review positive, then the WG is definitely going to be worth it.

However the problem now is that those people who don't usually or never post are having to post to stay involved. I just wondered, how good would their input be? Are they genuinely taking part or just doing it so they don't get frozen out?

While it's great that more people are posting, I fear even I may come acropper of the new rules. I always thought if I don't have anything useful to say, I should keep my mouth shut.

Anyone else got any thoughts on this?

Not really sure of the exact rules Pal but I think you have to be reported by someone before you have your account frozen, think you'll be OK with your history

[Moby Dick]

Read other thread where admin warns lurkers posting pointless posts should be reported and have their accounts frozen.

[Cesarlo]

I'm guilty of being a bad contributer, although to be fair that's more down to the fact that I've ever been on one punt, about a year ago, and while I'm always looking (I'm quite picky!), I'm nowhere near as active as most people here.

I was quite surprised at first to receive the message about not being able to see links etc., but having thought about it, it does make sense. I've got a lot of useful information, especially in terms of warnings, what to look out for, etc., from this site, yet I've never really given anything back. Makes sense to try and make it more of a two way street.

I'm hoping to see xmanchesterfun next week, when I do I'll be sure to post a review.

[NigelF]

Since, starting to use this site,  I came to the realisation that certain  regular punters like NigelF, Blackpoolrock, sinz etc, really know what they're talking about. So their comments on girls is incredibly helpful for me and other new punters. If they review positive, then the WG is definitely going to be worth it.

A minor point, but I wouldn't say "definitely going to be worth it" as there's no guarantees in this game. We have proven ourselves to be reliably honest and usually accurate but it's just someone's opinion and of course the WG may change in the meantime. Also note that sometimes reviewers give differing reviews, e.g. I'm sure me and BR have reviewed some of the same girls but have had different views, tastes and experiences as well as given different ratings etc. Anyway, I definitely agree with your general comment and cheers for the compliment.

However the problem now is that those people who don't usually or never post are having to post to stay involved. I just wondered, how good would their input be? Are they genuinely taking part or just doing it so they don't get frozen out?

I think it's mostly the latter but it would probably take more effort to make something up than report on your own experiences so I wouldn't worry about many of them not being genuine (although I'm sure a minority aren't). Those who are just posting any old rubbish to get round the new rules are quickly finding their accounts frozen (as instructed by admin here: https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=207024.0).

While it's great that more people are posting, I fear even I may come acropper of the new rules. I always thought if I don't have anything useful to say, I should keep my mouth shut.

Anyone else got any thoughts on this?

As frankc has suggested, no one will be freezing your account as you have a track record of contributions (particularly a number of reviews), unlike all of the people who are getting frozen. Also note that you may well not be subject to the new rules anyway (or at least eventually):

I will tweak the criteria, so members who've been around a while and have hundreds of posts and good amount of reviews don't need to post to keep access to view links and images. Someone with for example 10 reviews has done their bit to the site and helped their fellow punters so shouldn't be affected.

[NigelF]

I'm guilty of being a bad contributer, although to be fair that's more down to the fact that I've ever been on one punt, about a year ago

Who was the girl you saw?

[Moby Dick]

Read other thread where admin warns lurkers posting pointless posts should be reported and have their accounts frozen.

https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=207587.0

[Cesarlo]

Who was the girl you saw?

amyloulou

She'd been reviewed a number of times here already and I didn't feel like I had much else to add, especially as it was deemed quite a marmite service in that she didn't actually offer sex. I believe she no longer escorts anymore due to having a baby. Really nice girl though.

[NigelF]

amyloulou

She'd been reviewed a number of times here already and I didn't feel like I had much else to add, especially as it was deemed quite a marmite service in that she didn't actually offer sex. I believe she no longer escorts anymore due to having a baby. Really nice girl though.

3 reviews isn't many at all (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=8712). She does escort but according to her profile, she doesn't seem to do full service anymore (only blowjobs): External Link/Members Only

Anyway, new reviews aren't actually about adding new info to her current reviews (although it's great if they do), they're more about confirming further that she's a good punt (looks, service etc), especially since many of those things can be subjective (so it's good to here from a lot of punters). Even if your experience is very similar to others, it's still helpful to know that she's consistently good with a large number and wide variety (presumably) of punters. This applies even more so when a girl's reviews are mixed. Obviously reviews from a recent punt are very helpful too (to confirm she's still performing well, since many girls aren't consistent) but even though your punt was a while ago, a review would still be helpful (just make it clearly roughly/very roughly when you saw her so people don't think it was very recent).

Of course, if you can't really remember much about the blowjob then it's probably not worth doing a review anymore. However you definitely should have done one before. Anyway, hopefully you'll have something to review soon (if it's xmanchesterfun, try to be as harsh (but fair) as possible).

[goldwing1]

Shouldn`t be frozen out due a  lack of contribution - some people can`t contribute because they may be in a position where they can`t punt or just do minimal punts.

[NigelF]

Shouldn`t be frozen out due a  lack of contribution - some people can`t contribute because they may be in a position where they can`t punt or just do minimal punts.

If you have a problem with it then take it up with admin. I personally (like many others) very much agree with admin's stance.

If they do minimal punts then there's no reason they can't contribute based on those. If they can't/don't punt then they should have no interest in a punting site.

[westeros]

If they do minimal punts then there's no reason they can't contribute based on those. If they can't/don't punt then they should have no interest in a punting site.

I'll have to second that. With out being a prick, I'll have to say this place is mostly for punters who punt. If you don't punt, why lurk here?

I generally assume most people on here enjoy punting but it can be an expensive hobby. That's why the advice and feedback is inn valuable. No one wants a Shiite punt but if you do and you pass on the knowledge you're saving someone else from losing out.

I've said it before, if anyone take from here then the proper thing to do is to give something back. If you just get your kicks from other people's posts and reviews, then the internet is a vast and deviant place, I'm sure there's a site that caters for that. This site however is not for that.

[Al Reet]

I very much agree with admin’s stance on this even though due to my current punting habits and choices I’ve made regarding reviewing I’ll likely fall foul of the new rules at some point.

That’s my choice and my problem if it happens, there’s always the sister site which I tend to be more active on anyway.

Those who are all take and no give have a choice - contribute or get lost!

[frankc]

Shouldn`t be frozen out due a  lack of contribution - some people can`t contribute because they may be in a position where they can`t punt or just do minimal punts.

Maybe people should also be frozen for doing useless, overly fluffy, pointless reviews......just saying..

[goldwing1]

Maybe people should also be frozen for doing useless, overly fluffy, pointless reviews......just saying..

Totally agree with you there

[Blackpool Rock]

However the problem now is that those people who don't usually or never post are having to post to stay involved. I just wondered, how good would their input be? Are they genuinely taking part or just doing it so they don't get frozen out?

While it's great that more people are posting, I fear even I may come acropper of the new rules. I always thought if I don't have anything useful to say, I should keep my mouth shut.

Anyone else got any thoughts on this?

The new policy which I think is great appears to be targeted at long time "active lurkers" who contribute fuck all for years on end but leech off others.
Those who suddenly come on and post so they can get the links etc stand out like a cock on a rapist and are being picked up and dealt with accordingly as Admin has requested.
I don't think you will fall foul of the new rules as while you have a fairly low post count of 122 in just over 2 years you have also made a positive contribution with 9 reviews, in many respects your an ideal member with a high review / post ratio.
I'm happy to report and freeze the 1 post wonders but even if you didn't post for a few months and then came back on I don't think anyone would be reporting your account, it certainly wouldn't even register on my lurker radar

[lewisjones23]

I very much agree with admin’s stance on this even though due to my current punting habits and choices I’ve made regarding reviewing I’ll likely fall foul of the new rules at some point.

That’s my choice and my problem if it happens, there’s always the sister site which I tend to be more active on anyway.

Those who are all take and no give have a choice - contribute or get lost!

Can I ask why you are more active on UKE? what do you get out of it that you don’t on here?

Genuine question btw - not loaded or setting you up in any way

[Brexshitter]

As a punting “novice” with very few actual meets,i.e., a very limited budget, I find the site very useful, that said many people have a diffent opinion on what constitutes a good punt. One of my favourites at the moment is Indonesian Ann in Manchester. Seen her a couple of times now, good location, very clean apartment, happy smiley face and, for me an excellent service. Nice slow gentle HE. In my limited experience I’ve always found if your clean respectful and not pushy most, but not all, ladies give a better service.

[lewisjones23]

As a punting “novice” with very few actual meets,i.e., a very limited budget, I find the site very useful, that said many people have a diffent opinion on what constitutes a good punt. One of my favourites at the moment is Indonesian Ann in Manchester. Seen her a couple of times now, good location, very clean apartment, happy smiley face and, for me an excellent service. Nice slow gentle HE. In my limited experience I’ve always found if your clean respectful and not pushy most, but not all, ladies give a better service.

put a review up

a HE meeting is classes as a punt

[PLeisure]

As a punting “novice” with very few actual meets,i.e., a very limited budget, I find the site very useful, that said many people have a diffent opinion on what constitutes a good punt. One of my favourites at the moment is Indonesian Ann in Manchester. Seen her a couple of times now, good location, very clean apartment, happy smiley face and, for me an excellent service. Nice slow gentle HE. In my limited experience I’ve always found if your clean respectful and not pushy most, but not all, ladies give a better service.

Feel free to review, then 

[Blackpool Rock]

Feel free to review, then 

I almost posted the same and while I think this is a 30 day poster to get the links etc in fairness I see he has only been a member for about 6 weeks so the proof of the pudding etc

[Moby Dick]

If you have a problem with it then take it up with admin. I personally (like many others) very much agree with admin's stance.

If they do minimal punts then there's no reason they can't contribute based on those. If they can't/don't punt then they should have no interest in a punting site.

+1
Its a punting forum for punters.

[cueball]

Maybe people should also be frozen for doing useless, overly fluffy, pointless reviews......just saying..

Totally agree with you there

 

Sharp as a spoon that lad, sharp as a spoon 

[westeros]

Sharp as a spoon that lad, sharp as a spoon 
[/quote]

Not heard that in ages. Takes me back to when teachers would tell you off in class . Welcome back cueball. Missed your remarks. NOT your caged animals though

[Al Reet]

Can I ask why you are more active on UKE? what do you get out of it that you don’t on here?

Genuine question btw - not loaded or setting you up in any way

No particular reason - I see both sites as completely different entities - which of course they are. I enjoy the mix of banter between wg’s & punters over there. The kind of thing that’s best kept off here IMO.

I see UKP as the ‘serious’ punting site and at the moment I’m not really doing that much, hence not posting a lot on here.

[Richthescouser]

As a punting “novice” with very few actual meets,i.e., a very limited budget, I find the site very useful, that said many people have a diffent opinion on what constitutes a good punt. One of my favourites at the moment is Indonesian Ann in Manchester. Seen her a couple of times now, good location, very clean apartment, happy smiley face and, for me an excellent service. Nice slow gentle HE. In my limited experience I’ve always found if your clean respectful and not pushy most, but not all, ladies give a better service.

Get a review done, that shows you’re a useful contributor and helps make others pick the best girl for them. Particularly if you’ve had any bad experiences, get them reviewed. I’m not punting much at the moment (lack of funds and Im not built further heat) and the girl I do meet with is a refg, I’ve reviewed her positively and don’t want to come across as a tout, so I won’t re-review her or post her name in public. When I go exploring again I’ll be adding to my reviews.

[frankc]

 

Sharp as a spoon that lad, sharp as a spoon 

 .....went right over his head......

[Kirkjones123]

I find myself caught in this situation

[blackburnian]

I find myself caught in this situation

Not hard to fix - start contributing , very possible to do this without actively punting or reviewing .

Bb

[ricardo123456]

It's a fair rule...I think!!  I regularly punted up to around 2004, when I realised that the good bits (punting) were outweighed by the bad bits (my mental health).  It's not just punting, but recreational drugs were similar.  I started punting again around 2.5 years ago, but have now not done so for a year (yes, I accept I should have reviewed).  I stay on here as i know I will punt again, just don't know when - could be next week, could be a year, I have no idea which.

[Woodcutter]

I'm probably one of the long time lurkers implied.
I've only been punting just over a year & my original name was the same as my AW id.
I didn't feel comfortable posting for those 2 reasons,
My first punt wasnt reviewed here & was pretty disappointing but I used this forum for a couple of years to check for reviews of aw girls (wish I'd picked a reviewed girl 1st time round)
 I'm very grateful that these reviews exist, I can take a lacklustre punt on the chin but I'm very wary of being outed or robbed/attacked by a pimp.
So thanks to the regular posters & sorry if I've 'taken the piss' using the site.
being a newbie & not a prolific punter I don't really feel I have much of value to contribute, but I'll try to do so in the future as I'm sure a horde of anon silent users can be irritating to say the least

[Cesarlo]

3 reviews isn't many at all (https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?action=serviceprovider;id=8712). She does escort but according to her profile, she doesn't seem to do full service anymore (only blowjobs): External Link/Members Only

Anyway, new reviews aren't actually about adding new info to her current reviews (although it's great if they do), they're more about confirming further that she's a good punt (looks, service etc), especially since many of those things can be subjective (so it's good to here from a lot of punters). Even if your experience is very similar to others, it's still helpful to know that she's consistently good with a large number and wide variety (presumably) of punters. This applies even more so when a girl's reviews are mixed. Obviously reviews from a recent punt are very helpful too (to confirm she's still performing well, since many girls aren't consistent) but even though your punt was a while ago, a review would still be helpful (just make it clearly roughly/very roughly when you saw her so people don't think it was very recent).

Of course, if you can't really remember much about the blowjob then it's probably not worth doing a review anymore. However you definitely should have done one before. Anyway, hopefully you'll have something to review soon (if it's xmanchesterfun, try to be as harsh (but fair) as possible).

Many thanks for taking the time to give a good, helpful response, Nigel. I'll definitely keep that in mind for when I review xmanchesterfun.

I'd post a review on amyloulou, but it was quite a while ago now, it may not be accurate at all given the time that's passed, plus she hasn't logged onto AW since January. I doubt she'll be back now that she has a baby.

Cheers again, though.

[NigelF]

I'd post a review on amyloulou, but it was quite a while ago now, it may not be accurate at all given the time that's passed, plus she hasn't logged onto AW since January. I doubt she'll be back now that she has a baby.

Ah, fair enough, I didn't notice that. Given what you've said, this is one of the very rare occasions where I agree that there's little point in posting a review.

[cueball]

I quite like the new rule.... It's bringing posters out onto the boards. Yes, there's some plonkers but not all....

Some good members will come from this.

[mrfishyfoo]

I quite like the new rule.... It's bringing posters out onto the boards. Yes, there's some plonkers but not all....

Some good members will come from this.

You'd hope so. 

[wilky24]

Were are the new rules not really been on for a few weeks first I've heard of it after reading this article

[neil1978]

It's quite funny seeing all the new posters now all saying they will put up reviews.....let's see if they do.
I can't say much as I was guilty of it myself, but in my defence i forgot I was even a member.
In just over a year I'm up to 30 reviews which isn't bad I don't think and I'm sure they've helped at least a couple of people out.

[frankc]

I'm up to 30 reviews which isn't bad I don't think and I'm sure they've helped at least a couple of people out.

For me its the content of the review rather than how many reviews you post.....

[neil1978]

For me its the content of the review rather than how many reviews you post.....

I agree

[threechilliman]

For me its the content of the review rather than how many reviews you post.....

+1.

[blackburnian]

For me its the content of the review rather than how many reviews you post.....

Absoultely - always nice to see reviews when they are previously unreported too.

Bb

[cueball]

For me its the content of the review rather than how many reviews you post.....

That's a good summary frankly me old mukker 

Some have reviews in double figures but not one worth reading.

[piz111]

i got frozen out i have written over 5 reviews! i just have been mad busy at work and havent punted for a couple of months!

[catweazle]

i got frozen out i have written over 5 reviews! i just have been mad busy at work and havent punted for a couple of months!

What part of "30 days" didn't you understand?

[mrfishyfoo]

That's a good summary frankly me old mukker 

Some have reviews in double figures but not one worth reading.

....and there's some with even more than that and even they aren't worth reading. 

FWIW there is no right or wrong way to write a review as long as it contains the relevant info.

Cost
Duration
Quality of comms
Were the services received what had been requested
Was the SP enthusiastic
Was the incall fit for purpose.

Would our punter return

 

[mrfishyfoo]

What part of "30 days" didn't you understand?

Think you find that The Boss  changed it to 90 days and then suspended it.   

[cueball]

....and there's some with even more than that and even they aren't worth reading. 

Don't be too hard on yourself fishmonger  yours aren't that bad 

[catweazle]

Think you find that The Boss  changed it to 90 days and then suspended it.   

Thanks ff