Author Topic: J u l I e in Whitechapel - more neutral than Switzerland  (Read 1101 times)


40 review(s) for J U L I E  (29 positive, 8 neutral, 3 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline Alitis

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

Thanks to all who reviewed Julie before.

Premises.  Flat within a short walk from Whitechapel station.  Clean, bathroom with working shower.  There was someone else in the flat, I believe another female.

Comms.  Excellent.  Arranged through message in AW, quick turn around.  Julie gave me her phone number for confirmation on the day of the event.

The girl.  That's where it gets tricky.  Based on previous reviews, I was expecting a slightly older and less attractive girl than the one I met.  I would describe Julie as tall-ish (5'8?), slim size 10 and I cannot imagine that she is over late 30s. If I am not mistaken someone reported her to be in her late 40 but this cannot be the case.
If she is is indeed in her early 40s, she is probably the youngest looking 40 year old I have met.
Body is slim, with flat stomach and nice long legs.  Breasts have lost their bounce as all reviews attest; average ass but in any case much better than the picture painted in some reviews.  Nice, tidy, clean shaven pussy.  In my personal view she is relatively good looking with clear skin, nice mouth and pretty eyes.
In right attire, for example a body hugging dress and heels she would certainly turn heads.

The performance.  Again, the other part of where it gets tricky.  I was expecting a worse looking girl and a much better performance. I treated myself to OWO,  sex, rimming (on me) CIM in round 1, in the bag in round 2.  Good OWO but not exceptional, no eye contact. Rather passive sex, mechanical rimming/ass play.  Overall a rather dull, uninspiring experience.

The problem with Julie is not that she cannot do better.  It is just that she is lazy.  She counts down dicks to the last mortgage repayment in Poland and that's it.  Hence the same photos in the profile for the last 100 years.  With a bit more effort she could be a star provider with much higher rates and people queuing to see her.  I don't think she has any extracurricular interests, no kids to raise, no interest to study, no interest to go the gym or anything else.  At least that's what she told me.

Was it a waste of money?  Well, I would not say that.  Fucked a nice girl twice
Got my money's worth? Well, I could have gotten more from someone else.,
Would I recommend her to my best mate?  Certainly not.  Plenty of better providers at the same rate

The meeting in a single word. Yawn.

Offline Sparta Prada

Good review which mirrors when I saw her but this was about 8 years ago when she was working in Romford. For me, the problem with Julie is she doesn't show any real sparkle or charisma. While she does what is on her profile the whole experience just feels a bit sterile, which is ridiculous when you have an attractive lady who is delivering the works!

Offline throwaway18223

Sorry to hear that OP. I saw her just in December and she was incredibly enthusiastic and sucked my dick great. Kept thrusting me into her with her leg which got me more riled up so its quite surprising to read this.

jake345

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Last poster is related to her.

OP. I concur. She's crap! How much did u pay?

mrhappypants

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Alitis, thanks for your review.  Hands up, I reported as a lot older than her stated age and I would stand by it.  Twenty years ago she must have been a corker but I’ve slept with women in their 40’s with (much) better tone and condition.  She isn’t overweight or unattractive, but the word “saggy” - front and back - is my lingering impression.

jake345

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Guest
Alitis, thanks for your review.  Hands up, I reported as a lot older than her stated age and I would stand by it.  Twenty years ago she must have been a corker but I’ve slept with women in their 40’s with (much) better tone and condition.  She isn’t overweight or unattractive, but the word “saggy” - front and back - is my lingering impression.

The age isn't important to me.

Her attitude was terrible.

It's possible it was just me though :(

Offline Azucar D Artagnan

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Forum Helper
  • ****
  • Posts: 2,126
  • Likes: 56
  •  
  • Reviews: 163
External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only+

The problem with Julie is not that she cannot do better.  It is just that she is lazy.  She counts down dicks to the last mortgage repayment in Poland and that's it.  Hence the same photos in the profile for the last 100 years.  With a bit more effort she could be a star provider with much higher rates and people queuing to see her.  I don't think she has any extracurricular interests, no kids to raise, no interest to study, no interest to go the gym or anything else.  At least that's what she told me.


Sad to hear the service lvel has dropped off by this whore . Previously had a great suck and fuck from her . Must be reaching that infamous 5km of cock sucked & fucked by now and few whores can survive on the game past that milestone  :lol:

Offline MrLakers101

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Posts: 37
  • Likes: 0
  •  
  • Reviews: 7
Punts with her have 'extra' services (I.e. OWO, CIM) but doesn't have any 'extra' flare to it. I agree with OP. I visited her once and didn't really enjoy myself much. I was told the same story by her as OP was. Seems to be a running correlation. Moreveover, people on here have mentioned she's good with her mouth, I don't see it from personal experience. I've had better i.e. SexyPolishSophia (who's actually excited to suck your cock).
Banned reason: Needs to review
Banned by: Iloveoral

Offline Heph

Thank you for the warning and the lucidly written review. Appreciated.