Erika Glasgow

[Gdest]

Visited Erika for the first time 2 weeks ago. Pretty girl, a little bit heavier than she is in her pictures but still curvy in the right places. Great person too. A half hour gfe.

External Link/Members Only

[andymars19]

Thanks for the details.... 

[Name Not Found]

Review of the year 

[Astarter]

Ffs this is the best of the worst I've seen yet lol!!!

[spenser]

Erika has been on my hot list for some time.

[Name Not Found]

Erika has been on my hot list for some time.

FFS, you've been member since 2010; that must be a he'll of a hotlist by now. Any chance you could actually meet someone that's on it and post a review?

[Jay_glasgow87]

She's been on my hit list for a while. Will be giving her a call soon!

[Name Not Found]

She's been on my hit list for a while. Will be giving her a call soon!

Nah, you're just another lurking fucker posting to keep your account access. You're not fooling anybody mate.

[DaVINCI]

Nah, you're just another lurking fucker posting to keep your account access. You're not fooling anybody mate.

+1

[djng6]

Did she do good DFK?

[Gdest]

To those who are complaining about the review. It’s my review, I’ll write what I feel is necessary. If you don’t like it bugger off to another review of her.

It was pretty standard, nothing out of the ordinary. Kissing but not dfk, massage, cowgirl, doggy and that’s it.

[David1970]

To those who are complaining about the review. It’s my review, I’ll write what I feel is necessary. If you don’t like it bugger off to another review of her.

It was pretty standard, nothing out of the ordinary. Kissing but not dfk, massage, cowgirl, doggy and that’s it.

If it was a review it would be in the review section.

[andymars19]

I’ll write what I feel is necessary

Which in this case helped the sum total of no one...

Look at it as a potential punter - would you book based on what you read there?!

[Astarter]

If it was a review it would be in the review section.

It was in the review section originally but was appropriately moved away from it hence the lack of context from previous posts on it.

[Gdest]

Which in this case helped the sum total of no one...

Look at it as a potential punter - would you book based on what you read there?!

I would yes, there was nothing more to add. I certainly wouldn’t be greeting over someone’s post being too small.

[Clattypats]

I would yes, there was nothing more to add. I certainly wouldn’t be greeting over someone’s post being too small.

It wasn't a review...That's why I requested it be moved! ... 

[Happyjose]

I would yes, there was nothing more to add. I certainly wouldn’t be greeting over someone’s post being too small.

It's a matter of respect for the forum

There are rules, and minimum standards for reviews

You should read the site rules, and the guidance available in the wiki.

[nervous1]

In my experience Erika was one of the best WGs for DFK.  Not seen her in ages but always got me going with her foreplay.  She remains my number one recommendation for first timers.

[Gdest]

It's a matter of respect for the forum

There are rules, and minimum standards for reviews

You should read the site rules, and the guidance available in the wiki.

I take what you say on board, I wasn’t aware of that. My positive reviews have been short in the past and people never said anything. My negatives and neutral have been well detailed to help people so I do have respect for others on this forum. It was just way the first two guys commented on the post. Anyways I’ll add more detail onto all my reviews from now on.

[Gdest]

It wasn't a review...That's why I requested it be moved! ... 

Noted mate, cheers!