Longer Booking = Better Service?

[Joe Tortolano]

Reading a few of the reviews and it got me thinking. Are you more likely (but obviously not guaranteed) to get a better service with a longer booking than a shorter booking?  Particularly with the likes of the Roms?

Would a provider, particularly those that focus on volumes, be likely to put more effort in an hour and a half booking than they would for 3 separate half hour bookings? Or does it just come down to those that put the effort in v those that try to get away with the bare minimum?

[Name Not Found]

Ther's no definitive answer to that one. I've been with plenty SPs who put their life and soul into a half hour booking, and ones who waste as much time as possible on a longer booking to avoid getting on with the job in hand. I believe it all comes down to the girl's attitude. Some want to do their best; some just want to screw you out of as much money as possible for as little effort as they can get away with.

That's why I always start with a half hour meet with a new girl; that way you haven't wasted to much cash if she's a lazy fucker. and if she puts some effort in you know she might be worth a longer session.

Personally, I don't do Roms, but by all accounts, they're shit however long you book them for.

[crunch456]

Personally, I don't do Roms, but by all accounts, they're shit however long you book them for.

Theres a few that arent bad but yeah pretty much.

[mills_and_bhuna]

Mostly book for an hour but the one time I booked a half hour I left wishing I'd booked an hour .
I think it just depends on the attitude of the WG and whether she wants your return business .

[Matrix]

Reading a few of the reviews and it got me thinking. Are you more likely (but obviously not guaranteed) to get a better service with a longer booking than a shorter booking?  Particularly with the likes of the Roms?

Would a provider, particularly those that focus on volumes, be likely to put more effort in an hour and a half booking than they would for 3 separate half hour bookings? Or does it just come down to those that put the effort in v those that try to get away with the bare minimum?

some do, some don't. You may find yourself wishing you'd only booked 30 mins with some of them.

[Clattypats]

If it's a first meet, I will usually only do 30 min duration, although if she's well reviewed and I feel 45 mins is  GVFM then I may take a chance on that length of booking...

If I'm seeing Regs I will mainly do 45 mins (my preferred duration) with maybe an odd hour thrown in every now and then, as I know what I'm getting and it's going to ,more than likely be a great booking  ...Therefore, I don't feel 30 mins is long enough to "cover all the bases"...

I don't ultimately think duration reflects on service received though...

[km1903]

I’ve only done a few bookings but have always done 1 hour and so far find it works well- girls give a good service that doesn’t feel rushed

[Clattypats]

I’ve only done a few bookings but have always done 1 hour and so far find it works well- girls give a good service that doesn’t feel rushed

What girls would these be?

[pipes]

In my brief and few experiences, I’ve booked for an hour. Don’t want to be going up against a ticking clock.