SHOLA-ALONE

[goldwing1]

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

£180 outcall to my house 1 hour

I`ve had a bad run with Adultwork in the last three weeks.
3 Failed / cancelled
3 Emergency punts having to be arranged

This is the 3rd emergency one

I saw their profile, only just over a week old, liked what I saw so got in touch, from phone call to them turning up was just over 2 hours, communications were spot on.
Her photo`s are spot on, none of this  fancy airbrushing rubbish, what you see is what you get

When they turned up, I just got that sixth sense that this was going to be good, Shona has that sultry look about her and Lee is well chilled out.
 

Had the usual chat then Shona and me had a snog, ( full on DFK, none of these pecks on the lips nonsense ) good feel of her tits then stuck my head between her legs while she sucked Lee off, then Lee was quite happy to watch while she sucked me off.

Then off to the bedroom.

Started off where left off, Shona and me having a bit of fun, oral on each other, lying face to face DFK`ing our faces off, seriously horny.

Then  on with the hat, her on top while Lee was more than happy just to sit and watch and get the occasional blow job, missionary next, then spit roast, we took it in turns at both ends.

Next up was a DP which Shona was enjoying, in fact we were all enjoying it, a proper full on filthy threesome, no holds barred, no stopping for a breather.

Both her mouth and minge either had a cock or a tongue in them.

Finally finished off with the condom off,  Shona lying down sucking me and looking me in the eye off until I couldn`t hold back any longer and shot a weeks worth off in her mouth.

I think it`s a massive turn on when a  bloke is getting turned on and enjoying watching someone else shagging his missus.

Overall, a top quality meet with a good looking couple who like a laugh, relaxed, good to get on with and top notch sex.
No clock watching so to speak, 10 min chat - 1 hour of fun - 10 min chat after.


Couple of notes about their profile.
Their profile is both a couples and her singles page all in one.
The other one is emails, i`ve sent emails and it comes back as deleted, but  they said they didn`t even receive them, we both logged onto our Adultwork accounts on my PC and couldn`t figure it out, but at least their phone number is on their profile.

[scutty brown]

So did they know you are a member here ? Did you tell them you were going to do a review?
Sorry, but in view of your comments elsewhere, there has to be concern.

[goldwing1]

So did they know you are a member here ? Did you tell them you were going to do a review?
Sorry, but in view of your comments elsewhere, there has to be concern.

There was no concern about this meeting, actually turned out to be better than I expected.

[scutty brown]

There was no concern about this meeting, actually turned out to be better than I expected.

Maybe, but that doesn't answer my question. Did you tell them in advance that you are a member here?

[goldwing1]

Maybe, but that doesn't answer my question. Did you tell them in advance that you are a member here?

The answer is no.
I`ve met with people before and during the chat afterwards, the merits of various sexual service websites have been discussed including ukpunting and ukescorting, both are a good source of information both for punters and WG`s alike.

[manfox]

This has all got a bit odd or am I missing something obvious...

[scutty brown]

read this thread
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204579

[goldwing1]

This has all got a bit odd or am I missing something obvious...

He`s on about this thread regarding mentioning being a member of this site.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204579.msg2104308#msg2104308

It`s distracting when people discuss other issues that have nothing to do with the punt or the people involved.

[scutty brown]

He`s on about this thread regarding mentioning being a member of this site.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=204579.msg2104308#msg2104308

It`s distracting when people discuss other issues that have nothing to do with the punt or the people involved.

It has everything to do with how much we can trust this review, or any of the others you've done.
As stated on that other thread, you've effectively opened yourself to suspicion of blackmailing the girls into overproviding in exchange for good reviews here. Until you clear that suspicion, there's  big question mark over all your reviews.
Your habit of disseminating rather than answering the question simply increases the suspicion

[goldwing1]

It has everything to do with how much we can trust this review, or any of the others you've done.
As stated on that other thread, you've effectively opened yourself to suspicion of blackmailing the girls into overproviding in exchange for good reviews here. Until you clear that suspicion, there's  big question mark over all your reviews.
Your habit of disseminating rather than answering the question simply increases the suspicion

I`ve not blackmailed anyone or colluded with anyone to give positive feedbacks - quite the opposite in fact.
Many times i`ve left feedback but have had none in return.

[NigelF]

It has everything to do with how much we can trust this review, or any of the others you've done.
As stated on that other thread, you've effectively opened yourself to suspicion of blackmailing the girls into overproviding in exchange for good reviews here. Until you clear that suspicion, there's  big question mark over all your reviews.
Your habit of disseminating rather than answering the question simply increases the suspicion

+1

I`ve not blackmailed anyone or colluded with anyone to give positive feedbacks - quite the opposite in fact.
Many times i`ve left feedback but have had none in return.

That's actually quite funny but surely you don't care about receiving AW feedback anyway.

It's not about feedback, it's more about getting either an undisclosed discount (which would influence your review) or an "artificially" improved service (i.e. one that most punters wouldn't get) because you warned them about being on UKP beforehand (although it could easily be argued that you already do that to some extent by virtue of having a pretty much identical username on AW - where it's also clear you review pretty much everyone you see).

Or, almost just as bad, you reviewing them in order to just do them a favour/be nice/help them out (not necessarily to get anything in return although you might hope you do) because they genuinely did give you a good service and had accurate pics etc. That might sound fine but it's not because your primary motivation is not to help punters, it's to help the WG. If helping punters isn't your primary motivation then that's a big problem.

[goldwing1]

+1

That's actually quite funny but surely you don't care about receiving AW feedback anyway.

It's not about feedback, it's more about getting either an undisclosed discount (which would influence your review) or an "artificially" improved service (i.e. one that most punters wouldn't get) because you warned them about being on UKP beforehand (although it could easily be argued that you already do that to some extent by virtue of having a pretty much identical username on AW - where it's also clear you review pretty much everyone you see).

Or, almost just as bad, you reviewing them in order to just do them a favour/be nice/help them out (not necessarily to get anything in return although you might hope you do) because they genuinely did give you a good service and had accurate pics etc. That might sound fine but it's not because your primary motivation is not to help punters, it's to help the WG. If helping punters isn't your primary motivation then that's a big problem.

Nothing wrong in giving feedback, I don`t do it in the hope of getting any back, it`s to help other punters, but according to a lot of people on here, Adultwork feedback is  not worth reading anyway.

I only asked the question to open a bit of a debate, many times on here, i`ve seen the phrase " aware of my uk punting membership " and wondering if it`s a good or bad thing.

My report above is a true and accurate description of what went on.
Quite like threesomes, got two women booked next week and a married couple the week after and the reports will follow providing I don`t get let down like on the last three occasions.

[frankc]

So did they know you are a member here ? Did you tell them you were going to do a review?
Sorry, but in view of your comments elsewhere, there has to be concern.

+1

[scutty brown]

Nothing wrong in giving feedback, I don`t do it in the hope of getting any back, it`s to help other punters, but according to a lot of people on here, Adultwork feedback is  not worth reading anyway.

I only asked the question to open a bit of a debate, many times on here, i`ve seen the phrase " aware of my uk punting membership " and wondering if it`s a good or bad thing.

My report above is a true and accurate description of what went on.
Quite like threesomes, got two women booked next week and a married couple the week after and the reports will follow providing I don`t get let down like on the last three occasions.

Still evading the question aren't you?
Before you had sex, did you, or did you not, tell this girl and her partner/pimp that you were going to review her here?

[blackburnian]

I only asked the question to open a bit of a debate, many times on here, i`ve seen the phrase " aware of my uk punting membership " and wondering if it`s a good or bad thing.

If that's all you were asking for then fair enough - but you've got to realise what many others would infer from your question and why they would question your credibility .

TCM often puts this in his reviews  AFAIK does so to inform punters reading them that the birds knew there may well be a review on here - we can therefore draw our own conclusions as to if they were "performing for the camera" - this way he's not doing it to get extras or tout them etc etc
Also some of his punts are fairly "memorable" for the girls involved and would be hard to truthfully review in detail anonymously - others are arranged on UKE so hard to do anon with the same username.

Bb

[frankc]

I only asked the question to open a bit of a debate

Well, you asked the question but never contributed further to the debate, whats the point in starting a thread and then ignore all the subsequent posts?  IMO your an attention seeking fantasist who's reviews now have no credibility

[NigelF]

Nothing wrong in giving feedback, I don`t do it in the hope of getting any back, it`s to help other punters, but according to a lot of people on here, Adultwork feedback is  not worth reading anyway.

Still banging that drum eh? That's exactly why people don't trust your reviews. To be clear, I do actually think your reviews are pretty much honest but I also think you either wilfully neglect to mention stuff, sugarcoat it or perhaps just have poor eyesight. Moreover, you're definitely not very discerning and are too easily pleased, as such, your reviews are probably a bit more useless rather than untrustworthy.

Having said that, I've seen a noticeable improvement in your more recent posts and reviews. For example, comments like these:

Her photo`s are spot on, none of this  fancy airbrushing rubbish, what you see is what you get

( full on DFK, none of these pecks on the lips nonsense )

However, while such comments are very helpful, they also suggest you've experienced some issues multiple times in the past (e.g. regarding inaccurate/airbrushed pics and lack of proper DFK), however your reviews don't reflect that at all. Neither do your previous comments, e.g. where you claimed that you've never had a bad punt (despite having had hundreds of punts).

I only asked the question to open a bit of a debate, many times on here, i`ve seen the phrase " aware of my uk punting membership " and wondering if it`s a good or bad thing.

It is actually a fair enough question to ask and is interesting but you can also see how it would raise suspicions. I thought I'd already posted in your thread but it seems I haven't (or it didn't work for some reason). I'll post tomorrow but for now, IMO and indeed my experience, the WG being being aware of my UKP membership is either a neutral or a negative thing. I'm mainly referring to them realising after I've put up a review though. In terms of them knowing beforehand, that's only happened to me once (to my knowledge) and it basically had no discernible effect/was neutral (despite her verbally slightly suggesting otherwise but nothing major). Nonetheless I haven't reviewed her. She's based in the West Midlands and she has numerous reviews on here anyway.

My report above is a true and accurate description of what went on.
Quite like threesomes, got two women booked next week and a married couple the week after and the reports will follow providing I don`t get let down like on the last three occasions.

I presume those were all cancellations and not "no shows" or sudden radio silences?

[goldwing1]

Still banging that drum eh? That's exactly why people don't trust your reviews. To be clear, I do actually think your reviews are pretty much honest but I also think you either wilfully neglect to mention stuff, sugarcoat it or perhaps just have poor eyesight. Moreover, you're definitely not very discerning and are too easily pleased, as such, your reviews are probably a bit more useless rather than untrustworthy.

Having said that, I've seen a noticeable improvement in your more recent posts and reviews. For example, comments like these:However, while such comments are very helpful, they also suggest you've experienced some issues multiple times in the past (e.g. regarding inaccurate/airbrushed pics and lack of proper DFK), however your reviews don't reflect that at all. Neither do your previous comments, e.g. where you claimed that you've never had a bad punt (despite having had hundreds of punts).

It is actually a fair enough question to ask and is interesting but you can also see how it would raise suspicions. I thought I'd already posted in your thread but it seems I haven't (or it didn't work for some reason). I'll post tomorrow but for now, IMO and indeed my experience, the WG being being aware of my UKP membership is either a neutral or a negative thing. I'm mainly referring to them realising after I've put up a review though. In terms of them knowing beforehand, that's only happened to me once (to my knowledge) and it basically had no discernible effect/was neutral (despite her verbally slightly suggesting otherwise but nothing major). Nonetheless I haven't reviewed her. She's based in the West Midlands and she has numerous reviews on here anyway.

I presume those were all cancellations and not "no shows" or sudden radio silences?

One was radio silence when I arrived at the postcode - now profile gone.
The other 2 - it was a case of me texting an hour beforehand to confirm if it was still on and the reply " somethings come up " type of rubbish.
I won`t be rebooking- no second chances with me, I mean, I book in advance, work all week, looking forward to some Saturday night fun and they can`t be arsed to contact me and then got to rush around to salvage something.
Mind you, luckily for me, the emergency punts turned out to be excellent.

[NigelF]

One was radio silence when I arrived at the postcode - now profile gone.
The other 2 - it was a case of me texting an hour beforehand to confirm if it was still on and the reply " somethings come up " type of rubbish.
I won`t be rebooking- no second chances with me, I mean, I book in advance, work all week, looking forward to some Saturday night fun and they can`t be arsed to contact me and then got to rush around to salvage something.
Mind you, luckily for me, the emergency punts turned out to be excellent.

I'm actually getting serious deja vu with this (and I think I said that last time too). Anyway, the cancellations probably aren't worth reviewing (I never do) but the radio silence definitely is as long as you still have a link - the profile doesn't need to be active. Sometimes they come back under the same profile but even if they get a new one that can be indexed to your review. Also, the indexed pictures mean people will get to know what she looks like and even though the profile is now gone - the indexed pictures will almost certainly still work/appear.

Anyway, cheers for the info, now answer these questions:

Still evading the question aren't you?
Before you had sex, did you, or did you not, tell this girl and her partner/pimp that you were going to review her here?

Well, you asked the question but never contributed further to the debate, whats the point in starting a thread and then ignore all the subsequent posts?  IMO your an attention seeking fantasist who's reviews now have no credibility

[Carpy]

Well, you asked the question but never contributed further to the debate, whats the point in starting a thread and then ignore all the subsequent posts?  IMO your an attention seeking fantasist who's reviews now have no credibility

+1

I don’t recognise them as reviews, one thing I have learnt on here is how to sniff out which reviewers are worth taking note of and which are suspicious.

[goldwing1]

I'm actually getting serious deja vu with this (and I think I said that last time too). Anyway, the cancellations probably aren't worth reviewing (I never do) but the radio silence definitely is as long as you still have a link - the profile doesn't need to be active. Sometimes they come back under the same profile but even if they get a new one that can be indexed to your review. Also, the indexed pictures mean people will get to know what she looks like and even though the profile is now gone - the indexed pictures will almost certainly still work/appear.

Anyway, cheers for the info, now answer these questions:

The radio silence one was called    Ellie-mays back - based in the Newton Heath area of Manchester, so I jumped back on the tram and went to cherrys for a threesome

I didn`t tell the couple before we had sex that i`d leave a review on here.

Mentioning ukpunting, I just wanted to see what sort of comments it would raise to see if it`s worth mentioning it or not when I go on a punt.
Some people have suggested that I mention it to get an above average service in exchange for a good review - well, that`s a load of bollocks.

[scutty brown]

............Some people have suggested that I mention it to get an above average service in exchange for a good review - well, that`s a load of bollocks.

It would be a very good idea if you named those "some people"

[bigthickdick]

It would be a very good idea if you named those "some people"

Really??? Isn't it obvious to you what he means?? Some people here on the forum during this debate suggested  that he's mentioning UKP for that reason.

[scutty brown]

Really??? Isn't it obvious to you what he means?? Some people here on the forum during this debate suggested  that he's mentioning UKP for that reason.

The way he phrased it I thought he meant other people had told him to do it.........

[bigthickdick]

The way he phrased it I thought he meant other people had told him to do it.........

No he didn't. BUT... it was actually he himself suggesting it with his original post to that thread when saying

", so to me, it`s in their best interests to give you a good time in the hope that you will leave favourable comments on here ."