Sugar Baby?
Masaj
Shemales

Author Topic: Rachel Local Wellingborough  (Read 849 times)


1 review(s) for Rachel Local (0 positive, 0 neutral, 1 negative) [Indexed by Sinz]

Offline H_p_5

Thieving drugged up lady.
Took my money and disappeared
Her boyfriend pimp or whoever will politely escort you out after she’s taken your money.

Lesson learnt

External Link/Members Only or External Link/Members Only

Would no return or recommend


Online jc1971

Have you tipped off the local boys in blue? If they are scamming punters they will be up to other things too. The address will 'be of interest'....

Online Foxtail17

Thanks for the info. I am planning a few days in the area next month and she was on my HL as a possible, no longer. Cheers.

Offline one eyed panda

Interestingly, this lady currently has an AW rating of 4. Two of these are positive from regular punters - it takes time and effort to get ratings of more than 30 so these are not invented profiles for getting feedback. Then one for an unexplained no show. But no negative feedback from the OP.
Banned reason: Posting his email address to bypass PM restrictions
Banned by: daviemac

Offline Sinz

Interestingly, this lady currently has an AW rating of 4. Two of these are positive from regular punters - it takes time and effort to get ratings of more than 30 so these are not invented profiles for getting feedback. Then one for an unexplained no show. But no negative feedback from the OP.

Interestingly, you have not bothered to contribute anything to the forum or review any of your punts.

What exactly is your point ? Why does the OP have to rate negative on AW. AW ratings are shit and means bull crap, hence punters use UKP to make an informed decision.

You are either the WG herself or the pimp concerned about this negative review.

« Last Edit: June 26, 2018, 01:27:48 pm by Sinz »

Offline HailWood

Interestingly, you have not bothered to contribute anything to the forum or review any of your punts.

What exactly is your point ? Why does the OP have to rate negative on AW. AW ratings are shit and means bull crap, hence punters use UKP to make an informed decision.

You are either the WG herself or the pimp concerned about this negative review.
+1
The OP is credible due to his review history IMO.
One Eyed Panda joined hear shortly after this lass started on AW. This is his first post. Smells of a rescue job to me whether pimp or WK, I could not say.
« Last Edit: June 26, 2018, 02:15:52 pm by MikeTheBike »

Offline one eyed panda

As a matter of interest I 'joined' on February 18. I lurked a lot before then. I dont post reviews generally because as I havent got a prostate any longer after surgery, while I still punt what I get out of it wouldnt be very helpful to anyone as a basis for their own.

I'm very amused to be accused of being a pimp though.

I have a reasonable rating on AW where I registered in 2005

I had over 100 field reports on %%% live at one time; in both cases listed under the same handle as here

Occasional poster on the auto-censored since 2008

It is my long term punting experience that leads me to question what others take at face value. Read the OP's text again and understand why I question what is written. I wasnt judgemental at all having noted the 15 reports.
Banned reason: Posting his email address to bypass PM restrictions
Banned by: daviemac

Online Foxtail17

As a matter of interest I 'joined' on February 18. I lurked a lot before then. I dont post reviews generally because as I havent got a prostate any longer after surgery, while I still punt what I get out of it wouldnt be very helpful to anyone as a basis for their own.

I'm very amused to be accused of being a pimp though.

I have a reasonable rating on AW where I registered in 2005

I had over 100 field reports on auto-censored live at one time; in both cases listed under the same handle as here

Occasional poster on the auto-censored since 2008

It is my long term punting experience that leads me to question what others take at face value. Read the OP's text again and understand why I question what is written. I wasnt judgemental at all having noted the 15 reports.

There may be other punters in the same boat as you and any reviews of any services are always welcome. Not every punter wants/gets/is able to have full sex so anything you can contribute may be of help.