English Busty Rachel - Maidenhead

[Powell]

£100- 30 mins  External Link/Members Only

Communication: Made a call, quick conversation, described requirements, easy.

Venue: Pleasant block of flats, easy to access, easy to find parking.

Girl/ action: On arrival, I was greeted enthusiastically by a full porn star milf, which was exactly what I wanted.  She was very well groomed,  had plenty of make up, ridiculously short skirt, heels and a blouse struggling to contain her.  As someone else commented, she looks, and sounds like a much taller, porn version of Danielle Westbrook.  Almost immediately we started deep FK which got me started.  Pretty soon she was on top of me grinding her self against my cock and unleashing her fantastic tits in my face. It was one of those punts where everything is happening in the moment,  I could easily have lost control and shot way too early, but probably wouldn't have minded. Next, oral on her which was received with still more enthusiasm.  Her pussy was really tasty and I had to move onto sex in missionary, with her long legs around my neck, amazing tits to look at. She was giving a lot of vocal support - which of course helped me finish in total abandon. 

Conclusion: Great girl, it was a pretty overwhelming experience after a few so-so ones recently.  I would definitely go back, looking at her list of services I think I might slow down and think a bit too!

[silk51]

Powell, Thanks for the review been on my HL for a while now just a bit concerned the rest of the body is not great.

How would you describe the rest of her body these days?

[DaveHorse]

Hi Silk, Rachel is definitely my number 1 girl so perhaps I am bias but she is in fantastic shape.  Huge boob no real belly and small bum.  I definitely recommend her.

[contentguy]

She messed me around something rotten the time I tried to see her.

Guy

[Steely Dan]

What was her porn name ... any links?  Her listed age is 46 - so she might be 51 or so , is it? 

[contentguy]

Not sure of her porn name buy she also goes by Busty Evie
External Link/Members Only

Guy

[Powell]

The rest of her body is in great shape, on the lean, worked out side but not excessively so. I think she has had kids, but her stomach is pretty flat, didn't get all her kit off, but she was very kissable all over. Nice bum, not big. As for age, I agree that adding 5 to a given age is a reasonable approach, and seems to nearly always apply. 

[DrConners]

The rest of her body is in great shape, on the lean, worked out side but not excessively so. I think she has had kids, but her stomach is pretty flat, didn't get all her kit off, but she was very kissable all over. Nice bum, not big. As for age, I agree that adding 5 to a given age is a reasonable approach, and seems to nearly always apply.

Hi Powell, do you mind clarifying the high-lighted part of your post please ? I mean I've had a WG's skirt up & no knickers ect but for the most part I like to get them naked - What did she keep on & what was she trying to hide (if anything) do you think ? 

 

[contentguy]

Just to add, a link to my experience with her.  Which wasn’t posted as a review as I thought money needed to change hands at that point in my experience here.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=95633.msg1152504#msg1152504
It would have been a neg.

She was more interested in a 3 some than seeing me alone, kept suggesting when I called.
Suggested I park for an hour booking in a place with 30 minute restriction.
Dicked me around something awful.

Just wish I was aware at the time that I could review not having paid.
She sounded nice enough.

Also, her pics have been around for about a decade.
Pleased the OP had a good time and that Powell likes seeing her although she doesn’t get her kit off any more (is it the corset covering the fat tum thing?).
And those tits being natural!  I suspect she had them done so long ago she’s forgotten about the op.

So she’s advertising as 46, add 5 years as suggested and she’s 51 but the pics suggest mid 30s.

Deffo on my avoid list.

Guy

[DrConners]

Just to add, a link to my experience with her.  Which wasn’t posted as a review as I thought money needed to change hands at that point in my experience here.
https://www.ukpunting.com/index.php?topic=95633.msg1152504#msg1152504
It would have been a neg.

She was more interested in a 3 some than seeing me alone, kept suggesting when I called.
Suggested I park for an hour booking in a place with 30 minute restriction.
Dicked me around something awful.

Just wish I was aware at the time that I could review not having paid.
She sounded nice enough.

Also, her pics have been around for about a decade.
Pleased the OP had a good time and that Powell likes seeing her although she doesn’t get her kit off any more (is it the corset covering the fat tum thing?).
And those tits being natural!  I suspect she had them done so long ago she’s forgotten about the op.

So she’s advertising as 46, add 5 years as suggested and she’s 51 but the pics suggest mid 30s.

Deffo on my avoid list.

Guy

Cheers Guy - Everything I needed to know. I acknowledge that your meeting with her didn't take place but your reasoning that I highlighted makes perfect sense.

Powell signed out 2 minutes after I posted my question, maybe he saw it maybe he didn't. Probably read it and then logged out. 

I'm not UKP Police and I know your 100% legit - Sounds like a postive review backed up by some fluffy fan boys in an attempt to drum up some business for her.

I'm not interested in meeting her but this does look like another review manipulation. 

[Powell]

Powell signed out 2 minutes after I posted my question, maybe he saw it maybe he didn't. Probably read it and then logged out. 

I'm not UKP Police and I know your 100% legit - Sounds like a postive review backed up by some fluffy fan boys in an attempt to drum up some business for her.

I'm not interested in meeting her but this does look like another review manipulation. 

You are reading a lot into this.

I had a good time, I was looking for an older MILF type, that was what she was, not too arsed if she was 46 or 51 - exactly the same level of age tweaking that they all do.

On the other hand, you are right about the pictures, they show a smoother younger version. Fair cop, I could have mentioned that somewhere.

In answer to your question, I think the only kit left on was stockings.  Maybe they were hiding something dreadful?  Gout ? Terrible varicose veins ?   

I know you say that you are not the UKP police, but I think you show all the signs of a very promising detective!  Keep up the good work.   

[contentguy]

You are reading a lot into this.
.
.
.

I know you say that you are not the UKP police, but I think you show all the signs of a very promising detective!  Keep up the good work.

Not sure if that’s sarcasm or not.  But for me, this site is about uncovering honesty that enables us to make informed decisions about who we see.

This lady’s pics are yonks old, that’s dishonest.
Your failure to point that out in your review adds to her deception, but thanks for acknowledging.
You had a great time with her, I genuinely thank you for sharing that experience.

I had my time wasted, probably because she was prioritising threesomes / conveyer belting punters.

The parking advice was terrible and suggests she’s running a turnstyle operation.

Your suggestion that you can’t remember what she didn’t take off is odd. You mentioned she didn”t get nekkid, but couldn’t remember why.  Then said stockings could have been offending objects.  Did you ask her to take them off.  My worst experience of such behaviour was failure to remove trackie bottoms, I remembered that!

But thanks for the review.

Guy

[Powell]

Yes, I did drift into sarcasm.  Yes, its a bad habit.  Yes, I do get punched in the face more often than most.

The kit not coming off thing was just a passing comment, but yes definitely stockings were still.  I wasn't refused, I just was keen to get to the main event that day, as I tried to convey in the review.

Anyway, thanks for taking a balanced view. Interestingly she did mention a 3-some to me too.

[DrConners]

Not sure if that’s sarcasm or not.  But for me, this site is about uncovering honesty that enables us to make informed decisions about who we see.

This lady’s pics are yonks old, that’s dishonest.
Your failure to point that out in your review adds to her deception, but thanks for acknowledging.
You had a great time with her, I genuinely thank you for sharing that experience.

I had my time wasted, probably because she was prioritising threesomes / conveyer belting punters.

The parking advice was terrible and suggests she’s running a turnstyle operation.

Your suggestion that you can’t remember what she didn’t take off is odd. You mentioned she didn”t get nekkid, but couldn’t remember why.  Then said stockings could have been offending objects.  Did you ask her to take them off.  My worst experience of such behaviour was failure to remove trackie bottoms, I remembered that!

But thanks for the review.

Guy

+1 +2 +3

Nothing I need to add, Guy has summed up perfectly but out of respect to a fellow punter I'd just like to say I'm not trying to 'have a go' at you Powell & thanks for acknowledging & responding to questions/concerned raised here.

So much bullshit on so many of these AW profiles, out of date & photoshopped/altered pictures are a pet hate of mine.

You saw her & had a good time - Your money, your punt ect.

I had a good time, I was looking for an older MILF type, that was what she was, not too arsed if she was 46 or 51 - exactly the same level of age tweaking that they all do.

On the other hand, you are right about the pictures, they show a smoother younger version. Fair cop, I could have mentioned that somewhere.

In answer to your question, I think the only kit left on was stockings.  Maybe they were hiding something dreadful?  Gout ? Terrible varicose veins ?   

But the fact of the matter is she's older than her profile & her pictures are well out of date & a misrepresentation of her appearance.

Not for me but thanks for taking the time to post the review. 

[Ed R]

Your failure to point that out in your review adds to her deception, but thanks for acknowledging.

*narrows eyes*

Your co-operation has been noted. It is possible that your  . . . punishment may be mitigated.

*lights cigarette, blows smoke in face*

and now, to continue . . .

[DrConners]

*narrows eyes*

Your co-operation has been noted. It is possible that your  . . . punishment may be mitigated.

*lights cigarette, blows smoke in face*

and now, to continue . . .

What ? Is this humour ?  Are you a Policeman ?