Not so lucky with meHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyHidden Image/Members OnlyExternal Link/Members Only or
External Link/Members Only+447459938440
07459938440
Many thanks to Xeron for his TOFTT review and the other reviewers who have published and shared. This is a negative based on qualification in the room. I did not fuck her and you should weigh my negative accordingly.
She has a good telephone manner and fluent English with qualification by text and phone, explicitly declining some listed services (anal play)
by phone. She begins fielding calls about 11.00am. I am going to omit some of the detail - suffice to say her handling of the booking process forewarned of a more than passing possibility of sharp practice and that I would need to qualify carefully in the room. In addition to my own observation if you check back through her reviews she has a very mixed press and her price has dropped over the last two years from what looks like £110ph at May 2017 down to £80ph as it stands currently on her profile. Her reviews include a warning from trusted friends. However, she is reasonably close by, reasonably good looking and reasonably priced, so I wanted to be sure. She sends postcode and road name in advance and asked to call from outside for the final detail of the address. Do not try to book in advance.
The location is a ground floor flat with an anonymous entry in a Victorian conversion, residential side road off the Turnpike Lane. Find you way to the large Ladbrooks and you are near. Once through the front door there are three unmarked doors on the ground floor; it is the far one. The flat is shabby both outside and in, but I have punted in worse. I did not see signs of anyone else.
In the room, at the start of our meeting and prior to transaction she failed the 60 second, 4S test.
Sexy?
Services?
Smells good (room/ bed/ girl)?
Smiles?
She did not get an unequivocal pass on any of the four items. Specifically for me, it was her response on Services which tipped the balance.
Compared to her photos I was disappointed in her looks. The photos are her but she was under presented, scruffy uncombed hair, unappealing civilian clothing and the general air of “I do not need to make an effort.” Despite this, it is the girl in the photos and she is pretty. The older, sluttier, scruffier images in the middle of the set are more representative than those currently on her profile. I would guess a size 8 rather than a six.
During the final confirmation of services I suggested I pay for an extra in advance (CIM) and that, if I then did use it, she return the extra (£20 for CIM). At this point she told me if I had paid for the extra she would not return the £20 even if I did not use the service. I was surprised and when I gently challenged this she became insistent. I thought she was overreaching and trying to scam me. You will have an idea of where we were in the proceedings that I physically took the money back out of her hands before I walked.
