Riley Lee - Mansfield (incall)

[SaneOnes]

A pre-booking gone astray.

External Link/Members Only

Was arranged about 2 weeks from Christmas 2017. Booking was meant to take place on the 27th of December.  The only reason I tried to pre-book was to avoid the awkward rush/timing during the Christmas period.

A week before the meet, I sent her a text asking whether or not it was okay to text her with outfit requests. That's all I said in that one text. Radio silence. Alarm bell ringing already but I still waited till the day of the booking. I heard nothing from her which was gutting as the so called "trio of Mansfield's must-see belles" had been some of the most well reviewed WGs up to that point. Saw another well reviewed girl a couple of days later who is practically another regular now.

A few weeks into the new year, I heard that Riley had apparently "retired". According to others, "she is taking an extended break". I even sent Lucie Bee a text asking whatever had happened to Riley to which she replied "she doesn't work anymore".  I don't know what to take from any of that.

Flash-forward late May/early June of this year, news of Riley's return is in the air. She even posted a pic on UKE. Sent her a text only saying, "hi". Nothing came back. Sent her another one today, this time with more of a push, asking for an explanation and a possible re-arrangement. Still nothing.

I just think it's highly disrespectful to be ignored like this. I travel all around in the UK and have had  success making short notice bookings on the day on multiple occasions and on rare occasions that I've had to book well in advance, even those had been hassle free. But with Riley's status as an "efficient" WG in Nottingham, i expected much better, not an ounce of professionalism shown barring on the day of initial contact when she was seemingly putting me "down on her diary" for the 27th. She was also totally fine with me not putting a booking request through. Perhaps if I'd mentioned that I was a member of this site or of UKE... ...

[vw]

Thanks for the review, well out of order of her not to cancel any preexisting apppointments

I'm sure her fan club will be along.   

[SaneOnes]

Well, communication and overall attitude are basic requirements in this hobby/profession. One of the Manchester girls, who I'd seen a couple of times, had pulled something similar then swore at the punter to make it worse. There's no way I'm going back to see that one regardless of how positive my visits were.They are acting after all, some happen to be better at it than others.

[HailWood]

Sorry to hear that you have been messed around in Sherwood. Basic comms are important and I know how frustrating this sort of thing can be and especially when there is no explanation or apology.

[threechilliman]

According to others, "she is taking an extended break".

Who shouted loudest??

[SaneOnes]

Who shouted loudest??

Please tell me that was a rhetorical question.

[vw]

Who shouted loudest??

Do you mean who revved the loudest.   

[HailWood]

Who shouted loudest??

I really don’t get the big deal with this. Questions were asked at the time and I shared limited info to which I was privy due to being a reg of these girls.

Was this info of no use to you at the time, OP? 

Riley needs to ‘own’ this negative, learn from it and avoid any repeat. You will get no WKing from me.

[SaneOnes]

She doesn't appear to give a damn. One negative will hardly have any impact on someone so neglectful.

[Miketheknight22]

What I don’t get is how Riley quite rightly gets a neg for some shoddy timekeeping and communication issues but then you get Chelsea who appears to suffer from similar kind of problems and It doesn’t seem to affect her reviews in any way..

[Bangers and Gash]

She doesn't appear to give a damn. One negative will hardly have any impact on someone so neglectful.

One of our resident WK's will quickly take her some flowers and do a glowing multi-orgasmic review. And all will be forgotten.... 

[vw]

What I don’t get is how Riley quite rightly gets a neg for some shoddy timekeeping and communication issues but then you get Chelsea who appears to suffer from similar kind of problems and It doesn’t seem to affect her reviews in any way..

Who says this will affect Riley, are you one of her fanboys? 

Your post Seems very white knighty with your deflecting, just what Sherwood needs a parody mike

[Miketheknight22]

Who says this will affect Riley, are you one of her fanboys? 

Your post Seems very white knighty with your deflecting, just what Sherwood needs a parody mike

Haha keep your wig on mate! I’ve never been with either of them, I don’t know them and I’m not from sherwood.. Was just an observation on two posts where the behaviour is the same but the reviews aren’t..

[vw]

Haha keep your wig on mate! I’ve never been with either of them, I don’t know them and I’m not from sherwood.. Was just an observation on two posts where the behaviour is the same but the reviews aren’t..

That doesn't stop Sherwoodians defending ever.

[Miketheknight22]

That doesn't stop Sherwoodians defending ever.

Fair enough you know them better then I do.. I wasn’t defending her it was like I say just a comment

[vw]

I really don’t get the big deal with this. Questions were asked at the time and I shared limited info to which I was privy due to being a reg of these girls.

Was this info of no use to you at the time, OP? 

Riley needs to ‘own’ this negative, learn from it and avoid any repeat. You will get no WKing from me.

Why have you stopped calling them the trinity, is it after we busted you touting?   

[HailWood]

Why have you stopped calling them the trinity, is it after we busted you touting?   

Haha - you busted my ‘touting’? It’s all in your head VW. 

As for ‘trinity’, I wasn’t the first to deploy that collective noun. And I think you will find you have used it more than me

[SaneOnes]

What I don’t get is how Riley quite rightly gets a neg for some shoddy timekeeping and communication issues but then you get Chelsea who appears to suffer from similar kind of problems and It doesn’t seem to affect her reviews in any way..

Why have you brought up this Chelsea out of the blue? Is this Chelsea Hart you're referring to?

[vw]

Haha - you busted my ‘touting’? It’s all in your head VW. 

As for ‘trinity’, I wasn’t the first to deploy that collective noun. And I think you will find you have used it more than me

You are busted, most people can see your low level touting, thanks for highlighting a another one you speak for .   


How many times do you visit to become a reg MTB, must be lots of visits to get her to post this about you? 

Hidden Image/Members Only

[Newtothisstuff]

What I don’t get is how Riley quite rightly gets a neg for some shoddy timekeeping and communication issues but then you get Chelsea who appears to suffer from similar kind of problems and It doesn’t seem to affect her reviews in any way..

I'd assume you mean Chelsea Hart.
I'd have thought that her timekeeping issue was almost legendary by now. She doesn't get away with it on here though as plenty of people have commented on it many times. Myself included.
I think that if she does get a slightly easier time of it than some other girls, it's probably because she does give a good service and she was usually cheaper than many of the other girls.
Personally, I'd rather be kept waiting for 15 minutes and then see Chelsea than pay more to start on time with one of the coffin dodgers on the road out to Chesterfield. That's just my preference though. In an ideal world, Chelsea would be running on time. I think hell is more likely to freeze over first though.
Riley made a mistake. She didn't act professionally and she is being picked up on it. Fair enough. Hopefully she'll see this and not repeat the mistake.

[HailWood]

You are busted, most people can see your low level touting, thanks for highlighting a another one you speak for .   


How many times do you visit to become a reg MTB, must be lots of visits to get her to post this about you? 

Hidden Image/Members Only

That was only my second visit to Riley. She just appreciates a good shag 

[vw]

That was only my second visit to Riley. She just appreciates a good shag 

I though you had asked her to write it as part of the review deal?   

So if that was 2nd visit you are hardly a regular as sh didn't finish long after that post?      Or is the regualr tag an ego thing?   

[threechilliman]

I really don’t get the big deal with this.

You wouldn't

I half expect one of your gang to turn up on Mastermind, specialist subject 'The comings and goings of the WG's of Sherwood'.......

[Miketheknight22]

Why have you brought up this Chelsea out of the blue? Is this Chelsea Hart you're referring to?

It was hardly out the blue as there was a post about her and this issue just days ago.. This wasn’t a name and shame post either, I don’t know either of them and going off the regs on here they are both good punts, if anything it was highlighting the double standards the reviewers have, as in what one can be seen to get away with another can’t..

[HailWood]

I though you had asked her to write it as part of the review deal?   

So if that was 2nd visit you are hardly a regular as sh didn't finish long after that post?      Or is the regualr tag an ego thing?   

You are peculiar; why would you think that? 
Riley  is her own person and writes what she wants. I have no interest in influencing what she writes.
Your “stalking” on here seems to be driven by envy (or at least that how it looks IMO and has been noticed by others). If you want to book time with me, then I’m sorry but I don’t go for guys 

[HailWood]

You wouldn't

I half expect one of your gang to turn up on Mastermind, specialist subject 'The comings and goings of the WG's of Sherwood'.......

Now that would actually make Mastermind more interesting 

I note you still fail to explain why a punter knowing when a lass is taking a break is an issue for you.

[vw]

You are peculiar; why would you think that? 
Riley  is her own person and writes what she wants. I have no interest in influencing what she writes.
Your “stalking” on here seems to be driven by envy (or at least that how it looks IMO and has been noticed by others). If you want to book time with me, then I’m sorry but I don’t go for guys 

Well it wont be the first time you have a collaboration deal to promote brand mike, doubt it will be the last.  I believe 100% she was influenced by you to post that, bet you get her to come here and deny it such is your influence.   

The use of the stalking word seems like a collaboration suggested by a female, who is writing your posts today?     

You are the last person i would meet if i was that way inclined and you paid. 

[vw]

Now that would actually make Mastermind more interesting 

I note you still fail to explain why a punter knowing when a lass is taking a break is an issue for you.

As we pointed out earlier it is the sum of all the parts of you posts.

You seem rattled today, will Riley be along to save you?   

[HailWood]

Well it wont be the first time you have a collaboration deal to promote brand mike, doubt it will be the last.  I believe 100% she was influenced by you to post that, bet you get her to come here and deny it such is your influence.   

The use of the stalking word seems like a collaboration suggested by a female, who is writing your posts today?     

You are the last person i would meet if i was that way inclined and you paid.

I don’t have time for this today. Have a good one VW and thanks for the laughs.
We can play another day.

[SaneOnes]

It was hardly out the blue as there was a post about her and this issue just days ago.. This wasn’t a name and shame post either, I don’t know either of them and going off the regs on here they are both good punts, if anything it was highlighting the double standards the reviewers have, as in what one can be seen to get away with another can’t..

Well, no one is really getting away with anything. We are all aware. I understand what you're trying to say but that warrants  a different thread. You're talking about Chelsea Hart's unreliable time keeping skills in general whereas Riley had totally fucked off in this instance, could well have been her first time, I doubt it. So, it's a different scenario and there's really no need to bring in Chelsea into this.

[vw]

Well, no one is really getting away with anything. We are all aware. I understand what you're trying to say but that warrants  a different thread. You're talking about Chelsea Hart's unreliable time keeping skills in general whereas Riley had totally fucked off in this instance, could well have been her first time, I doubt it. So, it's a different scenario and there's really no need to bring in Chelsea into this.

It just needs someone to grow a pair and drop her a neg or 2.   

[SaneOnes]

Yep, they also need to stop deflecting (even if by default) the issue by mentioning others with "similar" attributes when they aren't similar at all.

[Miketheknight22]

Well, no one is really getting away with anything. We are all aware. I understand what you're trying to say but that warrants  a different thread. You're talking about Chelsea Hart's unreliable time keeping skills in general whereas Riley had totally fucked off in this instance, could well have been her first time, I doubt it. So, it's a different scenario and there's really no need to bring in Chelsea into this.

How is it a different scenario? In the end both punters received no action at all due to piss poor timekeeping and communication! The excuse may be different but the end result was the same.. And again I’m not shaming anybody here, that’s not my intention just the way people interpret things differently that’s all..

[threechilliman]

I note you still fail to explain why a punter knowing when a lass is taking a break is an issue for you.

That's because I were busy.

It's not the knowing or indeed the letting us know. It's how it's said in Sherwood. That underlying tone that comes across as 'I'm special because I know this about her'. Your mate golfie were exactly the same.

[SaneOnes]

How is it a different scenario? In the end both punters received no action at all due to piss poor timekeeping and communication! The excuse may be different but the end result was the same.. And again I’m not shaming anybody here, that’s not my intention just the way people interpret things differently that’s all..

Because this is deflection by default. Now Riley can easily be thinking, "If someone as unreliable as Chelsea can get away with it, what's all the fuss about if I was disrespectful to only one (that's been reported) who I didn't bother to formally cancel?" Create your own thread.

[Belgarion]

That's because I were busy.

It's not the knowing or indeed the letting us know. It's how it's said in Sherwood. That underlying tone that comes across as 'I'm special because I know this about her'. Your mate golfie were exactly the same.

Yup. Won't be surprised if Miketheknight is golfie.

MTB and MTK reviews are worthless IMHO

[HailWood]

Yup. Won't be surprised if Miketheknight is golfie.

MTB and MTK reviews are worthless IMHO

Don’t read them then.
You are going to hate my next one 

[vw]

Don’t read them then.
You are going to hate my next one 

I'm sure the girl will be pleased with your collaboration.   

Is it in for editor approval?   

[HailWood]

That's because I were busy.

It's not the knowing or indeed the letting us know. It's how it's said in Sherwood. That underlying tone that comes across as 'I'm special because I know this about her'. Your mate golfie were exactly the same.

How could I have said it any more simply than I did?

[HailWood]

I'm sure the girl will be pleased with your collaboration.   

Is it in for editor approval?

No, I’m going to announce I’m MTB at the end of the meet and see if I get the same reaction as when you announced to Andrea M as per your review.
Talk about “hey, it’s me the celebrity forum troll” 

[vw]

No, I’m going to announce I’m MTB at the end of the meet and see if I get the same reaction as when you announced to Andrea M as per your review.
Talk about “hey, it’s me the celebrity forum troll” 

Nope you will have applied  to review before long beforehand.   

Yep you sure are a troll, shocked you have lasted here this long with your collaboration efforts.   

Well it wont be the first time you have a collaboration deal to promote brand mike, doubt it will be the last.  I believe 100% she was influenced by you to post that, bet you get her to come here and deny it such is your influence.   

The use of the stalking word seems like a collaboration suggested by a female, who is writing your posts today?     

You are the last person i would meet if i was that way inclined and you paid.

Mike now you have time lets get back to this. 

[HailWood]

Nope you will have applied  to review before long beforehand.   

Yep you sure are a troll, shocked you have lasted here this long with your collaboration efforts.   

Mike now you have time lets get back to this. 

You think?

[Miketheknight22]

Because this is deflection by default. Now Riley can easily be thinking, "If someone as unreliable as Chelsea can get away with it, what's all the fuss about if I was disrespectful to only one (that's been reported) who I didn't bother to formally cancel?" Create your own thread.

I have no desire to argue with you honestly, I can see your point of view and I think you can see mine.. My thought was if everybody got negs for pissing punters off about times and stuff and they were aware of it then they might make more of an effort to not do it.. Thus better service for punters..

[Miketheknight22]

Yup. Won't be surprised if Miketheknight is golfie.

MTB and MTK reviews are worthless IMHO

It’s a free country so take it how you please.. And I have no idea who golfie is??

[vw]

I have no desire to argue with you honestly, I can see your point of view and I think you can see mine.. My thought was if everybody got negs for pissing punters off about times and stuff and they were aware of it then they might make more of an effort to not do it.. Thus better service for punters..

Well would be better for the reviews to exist, but some like to use cancels/no shows/unreliability as leverage.  External Link/Members Only


It seems to me unreliability reviews are more common with out of region punters, not just Sherwood.

[HailWood]

Not on here I didn’t but I had the balls to leave a neg on AW which is more than most have done.
As it turns out her issue was serious and believable IMO. My punt, my money, my prerogative.

[vw]

Not on here I didn’t but I had the balls to leave a neg on AW which is more than most have done.
As it turns out her issue was serious and believable IMO. My punt, my money, my prerogative.

Did you retract the AW neg when you believed her?   

So the make up sex was not discounted then?   

[RedKettle]

Doing my head in with MTB and MTK in separate discussions on the same thread - going for a rest.

[HailWood]

Did you retract the AW neg when you believed her?   

So the make up sex was not discounted then?   

Nope retraction was not made because it happened.
Make up included additional time to compensate me for my time wasted.
Feedback was given indicating that we had put the incident behind us (like adults would)

Now I know you are going to have a problem with this. So c’mon don’t start being reasonable now 

[SaneOnes]

I have no desire to argue with you honestly, I can see your point of view and I think you can see mine.. My thought was if everybody got negs for pissing punters off about times and stuff and they were aware of it then they might make more of an effort to not do it.. Thus better service for punters..

And you think that POINT hasn't been made a million times over??? Create your own bloody thread!