Kelly may London royal oak

[OutForJustice80]

It's funny your having a pop, maybe your a bit hurt after I asked you to stop pming me about Sam 

Well that’s an interesting development.

[vw]

The reviewer colours what people think of the review regardless of who it is. Well, it does for me anyway.

I know what you mean some reviewers would have to pm me a link with no comment and i know i will enjoy, others not ever.  Most in between.

[SamLP]

The poem is flirting. To say otherwise is ridiculous. Can’t have it both ways.

Complete rubbish. When you look at the context, a joke was made, several others punters wrote humorous poems, and I joined in. To twist it to suit an argument is clutching at straws, especially when the subject is the OP’s behaviour prior to this booking. You want to call it personal. No, there’s a credibility issue and I don’t believe bookings which have had such a lead up can be credible and are normally biased. That’s not to say he didn’t receive a good service, but when she kept saying she favours some members over others, that adds to the lack of credibility.

[SamLP]

You are the only person I've ever had to tell to literally stop pming me to cunt of others as I don't want no part in it
And if Sam wants his welcome to the info as I find your individual duplicity astounding

At least my opinion of someone however appreciated is honest and consistent

Which makes yours and Sam's Waldorf and Statler double act here more laughable. As it's daggers behind the scenes

I know exactly why I am getting stick off both of you but there is literally no point

As for the reviews, no I'm not doing this back and forth every time

Unless a booking showed clear and imment danger to anyone else , no more reviews from me

I'm not doing this dance every time

There is no double act. Just a credibility issue which you’ve tried to turn personal with your stinking atttude. You cleverly try to refer to someone PM’ing you, when you on several occasions made personal remarks and references designed as digs towards me and cleverly disguised in humour. It’s obvious two wg’s have had loose lips and have been indulging in pillow talk. I would be careful how you respond here because if you want to blow this casket open, I’m prepared to expose the wg’s and go to admin with this. Don’t even bother denying it. You are real scum.

[Cuntminion]

There is no double act. Just a credibility issue which you’ve tried to turn personal with your stinking atttude. You cleverly try to refer to someone PM’ing you, when you on several occasions made personal remarks and references designed as digs towards me and cleverly disguised in humour. It’s obvious two wg’s have had loose lips and have been indulging in pillow talk. I would be careful how you respond here because if you want to blow this casket open, I’m prepared to expose the wg’s and go to admin with this. Don’t even bother denying it. You are real scum.

 

Sam your ego makes you believe your that important

Your not

[Cuntminion]

There is no double act. Just a credibility issue which you’ve tried to turn personal with your stinking atttude. You cleverly try to refer to someone PM’ing you, when you on several occasions made personal remarks and references designed as digs towards me and cleverly disguised in humour. It’s obvious two wg’s have had loose lips and have been indulging in pillow talk. I would be careful how you respond here because if you want to blow this casket open, I’m prepared to expose the wg’s and go to admin with this. Don’t even bother denying it. You are real scum.

And if you think I care about sams world on or off the forum your delusional this was my response four weeks ago


And just for future reference mate I usually respond with indifference in pm about other members when asked about them to cease continued discussion but going forward it's not something I wish to talk about at with anyone

Nothing personal, same applies to all

[SamLP]

Yes we all know about your “indifference” 
Anyway thanks for making my decision easier.

[dubhcarr]

thanks for the review OP glad you two met and Im a little surprised at your list of firsts but that is what experiencing is for......this lady is a bit high priced for my budget and based on services delivered as described in your review but Im sure your review is helpful to punters..thanks..

[Cuntminion]

Yes we all know about your “indifference” 
Anyway thanks for making my decision easier.

Easier? If as you describe shouldn't be difficult

Sam if you think you have something that is "horrendous" and makes me scum , just post it already, surely you wouldn't sit on something so awful and use it to threaten me if was genuine

You work yourself up to the point of self implosion, throwing out cute words

Yes we don't Like one another , do you have any relevance or worthy of discussion absolutely not

Please see prior response given out when Statler wanted to cunt you off 

[Cuntminion]

thanks for the review OP glad you two met and Im a little surprised at your list of firsts but that is what experiencing is for......this lady is a bit high priced for my budget and based on services delivered as described in your review but Im sure your review is helpful to punters..thanks..

Is above my p/h of £150 but the service list is very comprehensive

[NightKid]

I can't take this review seriously nor find it credible.

For someone to court someone publicly for weeks and weeks, taking over so many topics and going pages and pages with their own flirting, right until it became an annoyance for many. Was there gonna be any other outcome?

It's even evident with some of the comments on here. OMG you finally say her etc etc.. It's punting, not dating. It's not courting. i'm sure Kelly May is a good service provider, so this isn't an attack on her, but after all that went down, there's no way this is a non-biased review and as a result can't be taken seriously IMO.

Without getting into the ins and outs of any underlying issues between OP and SamLP, I concur with the above quote. Yes the review could be somewhat validated by OP mainly reviewing the services that the SP was providing, but having witnessed the nauseating levels of PDA between the OP & SP on UKE, I'd argue that there's too much of an element of personal bias at stake with this to be considered a credible enough review.

Has anyone reported the original review post with the appropriate notes to Admin yet? Cause I was thinking of doing that myself but if someone's already beat me to the punch then there's no point for me to spam the moderation log.

[OutForJustice80]

Without getting into the ins and outs of any underlying issues between OP and SamLP, I concur with the above quote. Yes the review could be somewhat validated by OP mainly reviewing the services that the SP was providing, but having witnessed the nauseating levels of PDA between the OP & SP on UKE, I'd argue that there's too much of an element of personal bias at stake with this to be considered a credible enough review.

Has anyone reported the original review post with the appropriate notes to Admin yet? Cause I was thinking of doing that myself but if someone's already beat me to the punch then there's no point for me to spam the moderation log.

I don’t really understand the logic there. All reviews are based on personal experience. Our experiences are coloured by any number of things and what floats everyone’s boat won’t be the same. The op obviously really likes the escort in question so use that as a basis for considering the review. If this review was in stark contrast to other experiences posted where you might think the reviewer is making shit up to promote a WG then definitely worth reporting but I don’t personally get that sense.

[OutForJustice80]

Complete rubbish. When you look at the context, a joke was made, several others punters wrote humorous poems, and I joined in. To twist it to suit an argument is clutching at straws, especially when the subject is the OP’s behaviour prior to this booking. You want to call it personal. No, there’s a credibility issue and I don’t believe bookings which have had such a lead up can be credible and are normally biased. That’s not to say he didn’t receive a good service, but when she kept saying she favours some members over others, that adds to the lack of credibility.

Most of the Kelly and Coma saga has been based on insults and jokes. Flirting takes many forms.

Are you really trying to say this isn’t personal?

[Cuntminion]

Without getting into the ins and outs of any underlying issues between OP and SamLP, I concur with the above quote. Yes the review could be somewhat validated by OP mainly reviewing the services that the SP was providing, but having witnessed the nauseating levels of PDA between the OP & SP on UKE, I'd argue that there's too much of an element of personal bias at stake with this to be considered a credible enough review.

Has anyone reported the original review post with the appropriate notes to Admin yet? Cause I was thinking of doing that myself but if someone's already beat me to the punch then there's no point for me to spam the moderation log.

I don't really understand

I have good rapport with people on the other site male and female, it's not covert, hidden or stealth, it's just fun and what someone says has never swayed me into a booking although online attitude is is important for me to gauge whether I will enjoy someone's company

If interaction elsewhere is the new barometer or criteria then you could dispute a lot of positive, neutral or negatives

That is not something I would do or advocate as a review being helpful to myself is services offered/delivered, comms, profile accuracy when I research for my bookings
I don't buy into the bespoke side of anyone else's review as our Taste's may completely differ

If anyone wishes to attach doubt to a review by myself there's not much I can do about that nor would I argue against it as I am not defending it, I don't see the need

It is what it is

[smiths]

Without getting into the ins and outs of any underlying issues between OP and SamLP, I concur with the above quote. Yes the review could be somewhat validated by OP mainly reviewing the services that the SP was providing, but having witnessed the nauseating levels of PDA between the OP & SP on UKE, I'd argue that there's too much of an element of personal bias at stake with this to be considered a credible enough review.

Has anyone reported the original review post with the appropriate notes to Admin yet? Cause I was thinking of doing that myself but if someone's already beat me to the punch then there's no point for me to spam the moderation log.

This scenario applies to countless reviews on here as loads of punters on here and UKE punt with UKE or UKP WGs. Which isn't against the rules on here, in fact its a main reason UKE exists, so WGs and punters can flirt, tout and arse lick as much as they like. IMO its for other punters to make up their own minds on the usefulness or not of a review, it helps to have the UKE or UKP background though on a review thread though.

[unus669]

This scenario applies to countless reviews on here as loads of punters on here and UKE punt with UKE or UKP WGs. Which isn't against the rules on here, in fact its a main reason UKE exists, so WGs and punters can flirt, tout and arse lick as much as they like. IMO its for other punters to make up their own minds on the usefulness or not of a review, it helps to have the UKE or UKP background though on a review thread though.

+1

[SamLP]

Easier? If as you describe shouldn't be difficult

Sam if you think you have something that is "horrendous" and makes me scum , just post it already, surely you wouldn't sit on something so awful and use it to threaten me if was genuine

You work yourself up to the point of self implosion, throwing out cute words

Yes we don't Like one another , do you have any relevance or worthy of discussion absolutely not

Please see prior response given out when Statler wanted to cunt you off 

Why would I post something personal on the forums. It's an issue for admin, and I'll be forwarding all the relevant info.
Self implosion? 
You're the one who couldn't take a bit of genuine criticism, and decided to turn it into an attack on me.
It's a pathetic ploy, one which got you banned last time you decided to white knight a favourite wg of yours that i had given a negative.
Another one of your recent favourites received a negative from me, and you been slyly making snide digs, like the pathetic creature you are
However, you went a step further and decided to reveal personal info about me disguised in innuendo and humour so that only I would be able to understand. A stupid decision on your part, and it will be up to admin to decide whether it holds up or not as you've cleverly disguised it. I disagree with many people, such is life, but i absolutely dislike those who try to make things personal, claim indifference, and then make snide and sly personal remarks. It's a cowards game, and then claims not to know anything, and refers to egos.

As for whoever sent you whatever pm. If it's so bad, then I hope you did the right thing by reporting it. No use trying to drive a wedge on here for dramatic purposes as it doesn't interest me.

[NightKid]

All reviews are based on personal experience.

Yes, but by virtue of it being a review there has to be a certain level of objectivity involved. For example, there's a girl I'm seeing at the moment who I have really good relations with ... but if she were to get into the whoring business and I tell you that you ought to go see her, do you think you should take my word for it?

If anyone wishes to attach doubt to a review by myself there's not much I can do about that nor would I argue against it as I am not defending it, I don't see the need

If you genuinely believe that then you should probably stop commenting in your own thread by now.

This scenario applies to countless reviews on here as loads of punters on here and UKE punt with UKE or UKP WGs. Which isn't against the rules on here, in fact its a main reason UKE exists, so WGs and punters can flirt, tout and arse lick as much as they like. IMO its for other punters to make up their own minds on the usefulness or not of a review, it helps to have the UKE or UKP background though on a review thread though.

Indeed ... which was why I commented, in order to put my viewpoints across.

[vw]

If you genuinely believe that then you should probably stop commenting in your own thread by now.

Just cut and paste zen IMO.

[Cuntminion]

Why would I post something personal on the forums. It's an issue for admin, and I'll be forwarding all the relevant info.
Self implosion? 
You're the one who couldn't take a bit of genuine criticism, and decided to turn it into an attack on me.
It's a pathetic ploy, one which got you banned last time you decided to white knight a favourite wg of yours that i had given a negative.
Another one of your recent favourites received a negative from me, and you been slyly making snide digs, like the pathetic creature you are
However, you went a step further and decided to reveal personal info about me disguised in innuendo and humour so that only I would be able to understand. A stupid decision on your part, and it will be up to admin to decide whether it holds up or not as you've cleverly disguised it. I disagree with many people, such is life, but i absolutely dislike those who try to make things personal, claim indifference, and then make snide and sly personal remarks. It's a cowards game, and then claims not to know anything, and refers to egos.

As for whoever sent you whatever pm. If it's so bad, then I hope you did the right thing by reporting it. No use trying to drive a wedge on here for dramatic purposes as it doesn't interest me.

 

Sam please do forward everything you think you know, I'm sure your ego and theories would make a scintillating read

I know nothing of you other than what you post on forums

Vindictive needy whinger, who trip's over himself time and time again by preaching straight cut rhetoric  yet constantly contradictory

-moaned to an sp about likes, got called out for it
-loves a little flirt and poem as long as you feel suitably attended to
-bit of an idiot
-stomps his feet

As for being prior banned absolutely and I learnt, reviewed my own conduct and have not repeated

I have never since mentioned ANY of your reviews or added commentary   regardless of who it is, it is of no interest to me

YOU attach agenda not me

Your "genuine critiscm" is nothing more than you wanting to have a pop

As for driving a wedge, no right thing to do there, I'm not cunting you off behind the scenes, nor is it a crime to do so
That's what it is

[SamLP]

Sam please do forward everything you think you know, I'm sure your ego and theories would make a scintillating read

I know nothing of you other than what you post on forums

Vindictive needy whinger, who trip's over himself time and time again by preaching straight cut rhetoric  yet constantly contradictory

-moaned to an sp about likes, got called out for it
-loves a little flirt and poem as long as you feel suitably attended to
-bit of an idiot
-stomps his feet

As for being prior banned absolutely and I learnt, reviewed my own conduct and have not repeated

I have never since mentioned ANY of your reviews or added commentary   regardless of who it is, it is of no interest to me

YOU attach agenda not me

Your "genuine critiscm" is nothing more than you wanting to have a pop

As for driving a wedge, no right thing to do there, I'm not cunting you off behind the scenes, nor is it a crime to do so
That's what it is

Keep talking cunt.
As always taking comments out of context and adding your own theories.
I bet you feel like a big man hiding behind words, but I see through your facade.

[Cuntminion]

Keep talking cunt.
As always taking comments out of context and adding your own theories.
I bet you feel like a big man hiding behind words, but I see through your facade.

Prepare your paranoia dossier and file it off lad

As mentioned no point reviewing at all as you'll always come charging in with something but it is funny you add so much weight to yours you think I'd give a fuck too

Good luck with your "wedge" too, it's always useful to know where you stand, going forward you might not feel such a plum with tag teaming partner

I can't imagine it takes a lot to get a samlp in a train of thought and doing bidding, most could probably timeshare you if they fluffed you up a little and agreed

But honestly I don't have the heart to even humor your stupidity even once

Finally This back and forth could be infinite, so I'm out

[SamLP]

Prepare your paranoia dossier and file it off lad

As mentioned no point reviewing at all as you'll always come charging in with something but it is funny you add so much weight to yours you think I'd give a fuck too

Good luck with your "wedge" too, it's always useful to know where you stand, going forward you might not feel such a plum with tag teaming partner

I can't imagine it takes a lot to get a samlp in a train of thought and doing bidding, most could probably timeshare you if they fluffed you up a little and agreed

But honestly I don't have the heart to even humor your stupidity even once

Finally This back and forth could be infinite, so I'm out

You can review as you like.
However, if prior to your reviews, you engage in endless levels of needy behaviour and flirting, then I will call out the credibility of the review. The only stupid person here is yourself, who rather than actually understand the point being made, decided to take the personal insults rule and show your pathetic behaviour.

[STAR-LORD]

Nevermind the blooming 99's teabags...get the 69ers in. They are blooming awesome. 

Shocked me you didn't try with Holly Jameson. 

Hang on, can I just back up a bit? When you said 99's was you regarding to 99's teabags or ice creams? 🤔 Sorry! 

[STAR-LORD]

Oh just one more thing Sam for all the flirting, needy, "it's not dating" digs

Aren't you the same fella that let his poetic skills get the pre punt juices flowing

There was once a hooker called Andrea
Just another "disaster" from Romania
She stole all the men's hearts
Using her vagina and mouth parts
And when they were done
Jizzing all over her bum
She told them to fuck off and depart
©®Samlp

There was once called a hooker called Andrea Meddan
She loved coming to London to top up her tan
That's actually a lie, but she did pack some cream
Lots of lube, condoms and wore those straight perfect seams
She sucked and fucked, and moaned and groaned
Leaving our wallets empty and our members unboned
©®samlp

And had a little moan about not getting closure when some sp fucked you off?

SamLP credit is given where credit is due. Good poem skills I must say. 

[STAR-LORD]

This scenario applies to countless reviews on here as loads of punters on here and UKE punt with UKE or UKP WGs. Which isn't against the rules on here, in fact its a main reason UKE exists, so WGs and punters can flirt, tout and arse lick as much as they like. IMO its for other punters to make up their own minds on the usefulness or not of a review, it helps to have the UKE or UKP background though on a review thread though.

+2

[HighlyMotivated]

Just post all the info in this thread Sam, this pop corn isn’t going to eat itself