Author Topic: JJxox / Jade Glasgow. Any advice?  (Read 3138 times)

Offline The Man With No Name

Can't find a trace of anything about this one on here. Odd for a Scottish girl with great pics and decent-looking AW feedback, who seems to have been working for a good few months now.

Can anyone shed any light?

Cheers. :hi:

External Link/Members Only

Offline mrwhite

Maybe the profile was dormant for a while, it has only had 14000 views in 6 months.  A similarly aged profile for another girl has 70000+ views in about the same period of time.

It might also be because she has set her county as United Kingdom, and the town as Glasgow.  On AW Glasgow is listed in the county dropdown box.

Anyone searching 'region Scotland, county Glasgow' won't see her.

Offline The Man With No Name

Maybe the profile was dormant for a while, it has only had 14000 views in 6 months.  A similarly aged profile for another girl has 70000+ views in about the same period of time.

It might also be because she has set her county as United Kingdom, and the town as Glasgow.  On AW Glasgow is listed in the county dropdown box.

Anyone searching 'region Scotland, county Glasgow' won't see her.

Quite the in-depth analysis there, my man.

All good points, but surely the vast majority search by postcode proximity or "town"? Especially given we don't even have "counties" up here.

I recognise her pics from viewing her profile before, but can't quite remember why I'd never considered her till now.

Offline mrwhite

I don't know about the vast majority, just what I always do which is select the following from the menu:
Female
Escort
Incall
dislikes bareback
Scotland
Glasgow

And then check out the results.
When you put that lot in her profile doesn't show up.

Offline The Man With No Name

I don't know about the vast majority, just what I always do which is select the following from the menu:
Female
Escort
Incall
dislikes bareback
Scotland
Glasgow

Not meaning to be a smart arse, but you're probably missing a few girls by searching like that. After I add in my own preferences of age and recent login, it brings up 26 fewer than doing so by postcode.

The other advantage of searching by postcode is that you get their distance from you listed in the results. And once you get to know them, it's easy to tell from this what area they're in.

Offline mrwhite

Not meaning to be a smart arse, but you're probably missing a few girls by searching like that. After I add in my own preferences of age and recent login, it brings up 26 fewer than doing so by postcode.

The other advantage of searching by postcode is that you get their distance from you listed in the results. And once you get to know them, it's easy to tell from this what area they're in.
I have searched by postcode, and also by proximity search as well.  The problem I find though is all the WGs who take the shortcut of registering their location as G1 or G2, and once you have made the booking they give you an address in G77 or somewhere equally remote.

Offline The Man With No Name

I have searched by postcode, and also by proximity search as well.

The postcode proximity is the one I mean. You get to be able to tell which area it is by the distances from where you are.

The problem I find though is all the WGs who take the shortcut of registering their location as G1 or G2, and once you have made the booking they give you an address in G77 or somewhere equally remote.

Though I doubt you'll find many hookers working from Whitecraigs or Newton Mearns, this is true to an extent. Though I've found the vast majority of these cases are typically conning Roms who are more towards the east-end than the city centre as they claim. And even then, by "east-end" I mean Dennistoun, not Baillieston.

It's extremely rare that I've come across a girl worth booking who's put in a drastically different postcode from where they actually are. And when they have it's usually the case of a tourer who happens to have booked a G2 hotel as opposed to their usual G1.

I simply find searching by postcode proximity covers the most bases within the distance I'm willing to travel, so that's what my default's set to.



Meanwhile, back at the ranch....any info on this JJxox? I'm tempted to TOFTT as she's possibly quite handy for me, but would like some insight. Anyone?
« Last Edit: June 06, 2018, 11:19:19 pm by The Man With No Name »

Offline TommyMoundfrigger

Extensive feedback. Including a couple from Fluff1.  :dancegirl:

Offline randydandy2013

Find it a bit strange that she hasn’t sorted out a phone number yet, how long does it take to buy a PAYG mobile? Decent looking profile apart from that. 

Offline Dakota

Hi Cowboy,

Let me fill you in on JJxox…

When I met this girl it was actually in Newton Mearns, (but some of the older council type houses) before you build up your hopes of a nice pad.  When I visited her she obviously had her address as G1 or G2 and was actually in G77 which is miles away but suited me, I did suggest she made it a little more relevant.  The house was clean and basic but only a bath and no shower which I don't like.

The girl in question has a nice body that's true - but personally I didn't find her face as attractive but each to their own.

Im sure this is her first profile and that she is new to the industry and pretty inexperienced as her services are quite limited in terms of the different ways she delivers them, she was a good kisser but lacks that sensual style/manner that I prefer to receive as foreplay develops.   JJ is keen to get on with it and its more of a wham/bam and a wee bit rough for my liking....

At the price for 1 hour I would expect much more of a refined offering and even if she dropped her price I wouldn't visit her again.

There is much better value for money and quality out there than this lady

D

Offline The Man With No Name

Cheers for the info.  :drinks:

When I met this girl it was actually in Newton Mearns, (but some of the older council type houses) before you build up your hopes of a nice pad.

Seems a similar setup in another leafy suburb slightly nearer town, from what I can tell.

The girl in question has a nice body that's true - but personally I didn't find her face as attractive but each to their own.

Would you say she's verging on ugly, or simply not to your taste? Does she resemble anyone famous, for example? How would you rate both, out of 10?

pretty inexperienced as her services are quite limited in terms of the different ways she delivers them, she was a good kisser but lacks that sensual style/manner that I prefer to receive as foreplay develops. JJ is keen to get on with it and its more of a wham/bam and a wee bit rough for my liking....

By "rough" d'you mean just lacking in finesse in delivery of services, but plenty of enthusiasm? Or actually a bit neddy in her demeanour? I really like full-on passion from the start as opposed to a sensual build-up, and she's also happy to be submissive as I dominate her, as I've requested. So from your experience would you say, she's likely to deliver on both these counts?


Sorry for the extra questions on top of your advice against. But she seems happy to provide what I'm looking for and her location is extremely handy for me. :hi:


Offline mrwhite

When I met this girl it was actually in Newton Mearns, (but some of the older council type houses) before you build up your hopes of a nice pad.  When I visited her she obviously had her address as G1 or G2 and was actually in G77
Weird coincidence... I picked that postcode at random when I was critical about WGs using the wrong postcode to improve booking chances

Offline Dakota

Hi Cowboy,

I wouldn't describe her as ugly at all .. so have no fear about that bit for me face is only a 6/10.

I guess if you are looking for her to be submissive, then might be less of a problem for you … but when I was communicating with her, everything in the garden seemed rosy and possible … might be she talks a good game and cant deliver.

When I referred to her services being limited in terms of how she delivers them, I was probably using OWO as the example, which I don't recollect her being very good at, but with other girls giving oral if one style of type of OWO doesn't work, they will change their style of attack so to speak.   With JJxox there was no variation..

Hope that helps

D

Offline The Man With No Name

Cheers for the extra info. I'll keep her on the back burner for now and see if she pops up again in the same area.

Ended up managing the impossible and got a booking with the always incredible Tiffany (External Link/Members Only). Utterly smoking-hot girl with a tremendous attitude and every booking I've had with her, including this one, has been top class and terrific value. So when I saw her green light on and her phone actually ringing, given the rarity of both occurrences there was no chance I was going anywhere else.

Been meaning to get a glowing review up, though she works so seldom these days with several regulars and already a great rep, there's little point. Probably just as well though. If she had a regular schedule, or hookers who did were anything like her, I'd likely be broke.


Offline youngatheart

  • Age Check : 18+
  • Banned
  • Banned
  • *
  • Posts: 612
  • Likes: 1
  •  
  • Reviews: 9
What I do not get is £60 for half an hour and £130 for an hour.

Now 2x£60 = (carry the 1, divide by 4 and multiply by the negative integer)  and you get  - - - oh yes, £130!!!


Simple ! ! ! !
Banned reason: Fuck you cunt
Banned by: Head1

Offline solway

Cheers for the extra info. I'll keep her on the back burner for now and see if she pops up again in the same area.

Ended up managing the impossible and got a booking with the always incredible Tiffany (External Link/Members Only). Utterly smoking-hot girl with a tremendous attitude and every booking I've had with her, including this one, has been top class and terrific value. So when I saw her green light on and her phone actually ringing, given the rarity of both occurrences there was no chance I was going anywhere else.

Been meaning to get a glowing review up, though she works so seldom these days with several regulars and already a great rep, there's little point. Probably just as well though. If she had a regular schedule, or hookers who did were anything like her, I'd likely be broke.
you Jammy  B. I've been trying for ages to catch up with  Tiffany.Absolute little honey even although it's OW.

Offline The Man With No Name

you Jammy  B. I've been trying for ages to catch up with  Tiffany.Absolute little honey even although it's OW.

Yeah a real rarity now, sadly. Still, makes you appreciate it all the more when you do get a booking, while keeping your bank balance in check.

Just need to keep an eye on her profile - perhaps stick her in a hotlist to make that easier. Not sure if the adjoining newsfeed bumps them up whenever they put the green light on, but might be another way to keep track of when she's available - External Link/Members Only. Dunno if there's any other notifications you can get from AW regarding girls' availability, but none that I've come across.

Other option, of course, is to save her number and simply try your luck when you're out and about. As she can be slightly scatterbrained with regard to her schedule. But given she works so rarely and randomly, and nearly always has both the green light and number showing when she does anyway, it's an extreme long shot. Especially when her phone's always off when she isn't. I guess you could always ask her to drop you a text whenever she's available, but given my previous comment, there's little danger she'd ever remember.